{"as_of":"2026-08-21T04:55:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:7816c1fb7049e0ecb314fcbccae818490e031f97afceab2205c27155a8b22338","coverage":[{"denominator":0,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":2,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-13T07:01:49.222325Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30777","last_updated":"2026-08-13T02:37:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T23:09:40.232830Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-29T03:09:37Z","title":"What Breaks When LLMs Code? Characterizing Operational Safety Failures of Agentic Code Assistants","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2605.30777","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-11T22:40:37.839133Z","title":"What breaks when llms code? characteriz- ing operational safety failures of agentic code assistants,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03968","last_updated":"2026-07-09T20:41:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T11:46:11.360588Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-04T17:57:05Z","title":"Refused in Chat, Written in Code: Workflow-Level Jailbreak Construction in IDE Coding Agents","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-11T22:40:37.839133Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.30777","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03968"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b5d6f9cc1ff1d8f9ff0587ab7335073edd6971c525a28b22ef14924e86f4f2f3","observation_id":"1a1c7308-2416-4b71-a574-4d8aa882d3e9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-11T22:40:37.839133Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30777","last_updated":"2026-08-13T02:37:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T23:09:40.232830Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-29T03:09:37Z","title":"What Breaks When LLMs Code? Characterizing Operational Safety Failures of Agentic Code Assistants","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2605.30777","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-13T07:01:49.222325Z","title":"What breaks when llms code? characteriz- ing operational safety failures of agentic code assistants,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03968","last_updated":"2026-07-09T20:41:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T11:46:11.360588Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-04T17:57:05Z","title":"Refused in Chat, Written in Code: Workflow-Level Jailbreak Construction in IDE Coding Agents","version":2},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-13T07:01:49.222325Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.30777","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03968"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bad4da254b775a7fb1faa2eb6923ef75ce6eb1a034b0ddcc255e4eb06b8e3c68","observation_id":"1098af1d-4af5-4470-8d30-6e25479fdf3c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-13T07:01:49.222325Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2605.30777/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2605.30777/integrity","json":"/paper/2605.30777/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2605.30777"},"outbound":[],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.30777","last_updated":"2026-08-13T02:37:51Z","latest_version":3,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T23:09:40.232830Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-29T03:09:37Z","title":"What Breaks When LLMs Code? Characterizing Operational Safety Failures of Agentic Code Assistants"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":0,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":0},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:59.587034+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-20T06:33:54.927442+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 21 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2605.30777."}