{"as_of":"2026-08-07T10:28:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:946491e85d07419ffd4cc9df5248a224daf10db1b8ba2c5068799fb2436013e3","coverage":[{"denominator":15,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":15,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":15,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":15,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2606.01120/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2606.01120/integrity","json":"/paper/2606.01120/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2309.13788","last_updated":"2024-04-23T22:59:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T16:23:02.443154Z","submitted_at":"2023-09-25T00:45:07Z","title":"Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2309.13788","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2309.13788","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2309.13788","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Can llm-generated misinformation be detected?","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","work_id":"2127e826-feed-4481-a236-04e0209eb0f6","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2309.13788","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3d9a6d0ea8f249aa82d5878d0db995a0d7577333a44fcc9bb6fcadb414d6a948","observation_id":"3feb16be-6b61-45b7-b4bd-557b2de77ed4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T20:46:14.224063Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":"InProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Process- ing, pages 7052–7063, Online and Punta Cana, Do- minican Republic","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9ec9c482ebe8ce1b957ae13f982640d70de64f84026fe7003decb4145b1e6ceb","observation_id":"1a17329e-ba15-493b-885d-3de96330ef47","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.13415","last_updated":"2024-06-19T10:11:37Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T00:28:33.852091Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-19T10:11:37Z","title":"Factual Confidence of LLMs: on Reliability and Robustness of Current Estimators","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2406.13415","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2406.13415","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-01T20:46:14.225158Z","title":"the moon is made of marshmallows","venue":null,"work_id":"0e295925-92a8-4ee8-b763-38077f866386","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.13415","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:13805a6202da61e80455be21d92ee4ec9b0f0a910fc6881e0c9a9ea43b65a915","observation_id":"0e0f1ea6-5ecb-4aba-a35e-6f97724b7fe9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T20:46:14.226530Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":"InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8420–8436, Bangkok, Thailand","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8b5c2f7e0eb94da0ee1a0e1faf247aad64536237a6e2c6fde589a1318dbccf3a","observation_id":"23933543-86f2-40e0-a08e-2636298b9b1e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2408.12076","last_updated":"2024-08-22T02:33:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T19:04:22.495890Z","submitted_at":"2024-08-22T02:33:13Z","title":"ConflictBank: A Benchmark for Evaluating the Influence of Knowledge Conflicts in LLM","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2408.12076","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2408.12076","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-01T20:46:14.222899Z","title":"Yuxi Sun, Aoqi Zuo, Wei Gao, and Jing Ma","venue":null,"work_id":"b9a3b8ce-7087-4417-8180-a64750bbe694","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2408.12076","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:852879152f5e19b9a42e0f4782f106c285017fe2e293bc2fdfcadd9cfaa6c459","observation_id":"e84f25f2-a6ef-4f85-bee3-84b3cb4a5ee7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T20:46:14.224252Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2306.09296","last_updated":"2024-07-01T03:38:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:43:03.878575Z","submitted_at":"2023-06-15T17:20:46Z","title":"KoLA: Carefully Benchmarking World Knowledge of Large Language Models","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2306.09296","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2306.09296","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-01T20:46:14.227640Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09296 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":"f6effc22-1206-4c38-bfe1-aeba20856196","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2306.09296","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9b7dbcded75802f37fd2669f8c998333764b98c4cd144af70053c29a890f3f42","observation_id":"fdc28b91-c1d9-4ac0-abe0-f791d7f4c0f2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T20:46:14.229166Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:da2a1502435e3d44ed5174775152207f92f4f3f49747657d53d771d9e0accc67","observation_id":"35c98c93-6262-4a4c-be9b-84f0681ec2df","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:865d8cf48d31363500b8d588338c376e80b6523f77f7470034037551b3d5243f","observation_id":"1a2daea0-b809-4a5f-a201-82289a50f61b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:81cc26062cfb48ce46f6a6020f6f58a09938fc8c8140d8657d21d0d4b14f15d2","observation_id":"33c0dd26-9493-416f-aaa9-317c14392616","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":"Appendix A.5 presents hallucination cases where models over-confidently extrapolate be- yond their verified knowledge boundaries, fur- ther motivating prior-aware arbitration","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b145f34e2996bd24b9c4157712274061829c1fe036875ca2e331020ef1475828","observation_id":"9f5cc02c-892f-481f-866c-ff3af684f815","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":"Sup- port","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e49d46407db99458e9e84ea07fb082d8cfb7db095988f5e2f22a54fda81d60ce","observation_id":"42fcfeaf-718a-4991-9a11-22bfbff520ef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":"complete college","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:24edc290a9ddf2e3415638c89029946cb8491fe517bd843ca4b277d6838a8ed2","observation_id":"804f55fc-f2c7-4273-8cb9-f73cf97c0fe8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":"Break down your reasoning process and assess the confidence level of your original answer, explaining why you believe your answer is correct","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c0b0f235ed7a371d1246d8136bd6853a178395256e06ab41e7eaff972afb76d","observation_id":"e0510a8c-8d48-478d-8f0b-ce900d10acf9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":"Determine whether the evidence contains deceptive or unreliable information, considering possible contradictions or inconsistencies","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4ef12fd22ffc6a0a4d9e9bd065426cd9d7872acd0a07fd231631cf680b20b52","observation_id":"59c3aad9-87fd-4950-a536-957fafa686fc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","title":"True\" if the model’s answer is correct, and","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking","version":2},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01120"},"observation_digest":"sha256:52a7d8d7de8a8f72fdf08ef1afbc04304acc7dd0e9b74c9e844636681e7c0953","observation_id":"50ab4032-4a4b-4955-9989-a752bf5b83c0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T17:39:56.659403Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01120","last_updated":"2026-06-05T05:09:52Z","latest_version":2,"primary_category":"cs.AI","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T08:05:45.173300Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-31T09:37:56Z","title":"Diagnosing LLM Arbitration Behavior over Pre-evidence Epistemic States in RAG-based Fact-Checking"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":15,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":1,"metadata_mismatch":2,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":10,"verified_exact":2,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":15},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 15 of 15 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2606.01120."}