{"as_of":"2026-08-09T22:40:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:ac1838fd805c16407504b4ad042c44c729d633a102e0d32e1ae45b5f4a534638","coverage":[{"denominator":96,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":96,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":96,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":96,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2606.01789/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2606.01789/integrity","json":"/paper/2606.01789/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 50(2):157–194","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5b53bcb8aadacaa3da00f08e82d3fd0f14d63a14ce0f6b5d900aba338299831","observation_id":"437ad1c5-0b1a-4d27-88c0-5a823d2d91e2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, volume 2024, pages 57559–57610","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a1cba7e60698f283a4a7d7cbd965f494edda6a23a30649a7e308bee75f5b6a09","observation_id":"e79d280f-e7d9-4120-a339-866084d2bca1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2303.12703","last_updated":"2023-03-22T16:45:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T21:58:01.053654Z","submitted_at":"2023-03-22T16:45:54Z","title":"Causal Reasoning in the Presence of Latent Confounders via Neural ADMG Learning","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2303.12703","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2303.12703","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.018993Z","title":"Virginia Aglietti, Alan Malek, Ira Ktena, and Silvia Chiappa","venue":null,"work_id":"677fda44-52a2-4075-8045-d1fc21ac2f6a","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2303.12703","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:63211169544fb710e6c01743fa43ceec92a6b2a8fbe2620bdbb6db536c8f2b6e","observation_id":"4475e0c5-ba51-49e7-8017-84192b3a0d99","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.021068Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"Springer","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bd1639dcb76b7c486e777006276782a958ddcb423f2254fea2f67782c709d7cf","observation_id":"9f52175c-9751-46aa-817c-5441669e72e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2206.08448","last_updated":"2022-06-16T21:08:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T17:30:23.816188Z","submitted_at":"2022-06-16T21:08:49Z","title":"Empirical Bayesian Approaches for Robust Constraint-based Causal Discovery under Insufficient Data","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2206.08448","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2206.08448","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.033935Z","title":"InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol- ume 38, pages 11043–11051","venue":null,"work_id":"a712269e-2dbf-494b-bf28-fc31aadb8568","year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2206.08448","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5af2c12e30b29223dc9b84c032cbccd87a6f4999d9d7fefd8323d1d4fff8c66b","observation_id":"9261fa05-63b2-439f-9f7e-d23110d6d58b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.036149Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2512.11219","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.025415Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.11219 , year=","venue":null,"work_id":"111b6196-7dc9-49d1-b2d1-d7beafbaec52","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bdc448e1c44907b97a731c1adf0e2fba503b0f2be6cc504a8e45ead0730a60ac","observation_id":"6d33ad75-6e11-43a7-9220-d4270a0669b0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.027373Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2306.02931","last_updated":"2024-05-27T20:43:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:38:43.389873Z","submitted_at":"2023-06-05T14:51:05Z","title":"Bivariate Causal Discovery using Bayesian Model Selection","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2306.02931","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2306.02931","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.045830Z","title":"Bivariate causal discovery using Bayesian model selection.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02931","venue":null,"work_id":"46f4f23c-00c0-47e8-850d-ea84a2290796","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2306.02931","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a9dc6daae6ae6254e10719499a901e79b97132fea61537bbee6dd5f2a082c0cd","observation_id":"e1d40eda-df80-4619-b5b7-c5484345dde1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.048325Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2406.03234","last_updated":"2024-06-05T13:13:58Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:25:53.102819Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-05T13:13:58Z","title":"Fine-Grained Causal Dynamics Learning with Quantization for Improving Robustness in Reinforcement Learning","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2406.03234","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2406.03234","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-03T10:17:57.432776Z","title":"Hwang, Y","venue":null,"work_id":"2e749f20-f5d5-48b8-9ae1-ec2da8852332","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2406.03234","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f1ffd8874923d242fc643eaf8ca683d17985dfc0777e928277dd29115e41d886","observation_id":"8713b231-5936-4ee6-94d2-38aefcfec4f1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.024183Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2402.01207","last_updated":"2026-04-02T21:08:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2024-02-02T08:25:32Z","title":"Efficient Causal Graph Discovery Using Large Language Models","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2402.01207","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.01207","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2402.01207","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:49:54.815029Z","title":"Efficient Causal Graph Discovery Using Large Language Models","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"a0eb491b-3423-4d99-b222-8920e6c85797","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2402.01207","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:79966c3054515b1515aea083d282c50a41310d1ef6db4df94bcbb61563ca4997","observation_id":"37c54079-26be-494f-b933-4d9a5193cf2d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.031652Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"Peter JF Lucas, Linda C Van der Gaag, and Ameen Abu- Hanna","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:85b764e439a983b3c35838490426b4dfbad1f90d41c59d9cb166b4f503be4607","observation_id":"93005362-fd89-4a5c-8cc8-94ffb9be5db1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.24432/c5fs30","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, pages 8975–8982","venue":"UC Irvine","work_id":"3ac909f0-8c41-426e-8bd1-226e23b8ad13","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5c5d25fe9fb99efcb3e39dad76afc3d1387ebb8babb2eb5b9e2c16934611e53a","observation_id":"db7572f7-69e1-4743-a5ca-026541e89eba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:32:18.197003Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"Tim Van den Bulcke, Koenraad Van Leemput, Bart Naudts, Piet van Remortel, Hongwu Ma, Alain Ver- schoren, Bart De Moor, and Kathleen Marchal","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:48b97ca5c5fbc1a223eff6df37efef109b1c5c4956c3465ddcb033415f386ee2","observation_id":"4733009d-0411-4963-a7eb-e76ee89920fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"InInternational Conference on Ma- chine Learning, pages 50650–50668","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c0bcbcff587c48a86dd945d48e0a0734d7f678f4fea4ea1c429efb73e23ad6ec","observation_id":"445a97e4-571c-4e13-87d3-3e54d621528d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"InProceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelli- gence (IJCAI-21), pages 3566–3573","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fffeee2589b444e49bb2675b94d1fdaef7677b693b01141c16071a163888d930","observation_id":"0ca12995-b254-4c71-84c9-529e560e495d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 8584–8593","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d3a19d3a89fce5bb22b681600e9494a1be4e674b0a78184b67d2052606f3b939","observation_id":"c754aad9-e488-495d-a0cd-c76afb20659d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2510.12503","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.041372Z","title":"InProceedings of the AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 40, pages 36757–36765","venue":null,"work_id":"d3dfdaab-3646-4cd0-b0b6-cb0299932ae7","year":1994},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:319cd42dc7004a5030679a90f9d3a4d9e2ceab2a79fe95133555ad53d00f3261","observation_id":"5cf35cc1-9e4a-438e-87d9-e56a0c1aa6cb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.043933Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2303.03187","last_updated":"2023-03-06T14:49:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T20:45:37.940670Z","submitted_at":"2023-03-06T14:49:59Z","title":"Boosting Differentiable Causal Discovery via Adaptive Sample Reweighting","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2303.03187","doi":null,"metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2303.03187","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.037800Z","title":"original paper","venue":null,"work_id":"0c5f5279-a2e0-4d46-bb7d-5ca0fabc37d6","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2303.03187","citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cb1109d3ddbb12d5e84c10b9b8c6e442d2e9ca67ea3a7340772cc9926a59be87","observation_id":"9e0414c5-be6d-431c-9b57-62dec6405756","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-01T23:26:22.039795Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d725c38dbeb0e5f7908ceb4690138cd2084533f085ffb23192ab0c9505d055af","observation_id":"44e4a45c-02ee-407f-928a-3dcc9a41ee8e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1992},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cbcb11c241b312ad048c0d4cf6d99e8f2e7d6a2b3c6ffa64db771e57a3ec6596","observation_id":"ff95bcc4-b0bd-4aee-bde9-97a87b6996ab","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1989},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec040ddc416f442f3baa60c1244f440696191dee358c0eb17110866b6bdbf268","observation_id":"6af99f37-096a-44b3-b0a2-f7bbfaeef473","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1988},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f16affc1f0a32092a277d45da9b443826c3792830ea2e53bcc38576e51cba2d8","observation_id":"2d0a8ff2-63d0-4972-8cc6-38df3ee5dd36","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:06a74dfee035c2abf1e476f41b15874c0dd92cbc4ec6d19df7c7111522b21193","observation_id":"ee3f2a06-9d2f-46ba-9217-8a914897f575","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2f265ec542a9c5a6145c471fe3a124ba1d91fc50554d4e831e3bbd207ae8a9cf","observation_id":"34cfc6bd-fbd8-47ee-a911-406b78553890","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:022f8b154ae7e348823cfde1f2becf81034fdb945648ffeda01de2b47e76317f","observation_id":"bb16443b-1f87-4cd3-a151-463691d87be5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:41e58b4813738e3853ad47e3d25690622c4d416303f68b3c1481ee863db026f9","observation_id":"f9743624-6c0a-4e04-8f0b-2da9daa57e15","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0604afdaf903cf157984e30229a97912437f8cb956d53b77546ee0d75d7713d0","observation_id":"edc02c4e-ab69-4095-add4-40a5765d7cea","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bb03138f1ea0e103e68f9db773d81a5d1ed865998eb00b82573d6dbe33a0aec2","observation_id":"fb3ac212-3e2e-40e5-a73d-a8ff78082f3b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:846ac4e930836ca46208bb4d25e6b4f29bc834a3dde33d81c55faacb6fb4c2f4","observation_id":"941190a1-a9cc-4077-9bc5-c5668e68d6ea","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a1abfc127eb2c7bf58d7848176348e6124c65bfd80b169e60f8cf7262d9435f7","observation_id":"58b5e8e4-901c-45c2-83ec-ff9755a9a03e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3c0ca9cc8860d7a2418aa6251e5f4857bf087d4581816a51285d416f1a245aaa","observation_id":"9f8f558b-d8d3-43b4-aa02-7986896e3191","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9020001178a0602da315f593532726c10322125f0d225198fd08c1e732dd84e9","observation_id":"37d1edc9-9de7-4d1c-9f13-e8a2742a2214","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2003},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c25ca8053814f3031ff0b33795d6bc64026a0c869f9d9152496993c73f7804bd","observation_id":"e90b44aa-baa7-4d68-a05c-bae99f97dcf4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0a184355890570c35296d893b6456be881681ff4e0f70105bf424cdf0c23c936","observation_id":"3db8bbdb-14e4-4e66-90ab-9bdda605a065","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:775dd19a01f80b52a4231ba2c383103e7e1fef746fcff913d2175612c456a9c7","observation_id":"b1c62d0d-fb48-4780-8685-57d452811e92","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1997},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9e35baf20b55e709c15c4bc3e229aa42e0928bca34423cfdfeafba2a4471e529","observation_id":"6701a083-0300-4983-83af-a0d68cf60e81","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3e82a659d62fe45a2afc6cc83119fcfb167de9e70ad22846eea74c803d06682c","observation_id":"11f26930-3f7b-4545-86da-2d81a95babd2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1993},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b23adb91b676e77ae8a5661039e6c49021974a042f49dec696ff02a966e27ece","observation_id":"6a4bb070-951e-4009-9530-949dd4f80d36","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53c8a5d4a74ee4ae927a30d2987ee552ec6601be6314036efdf1683a0a86cfce","observation_id":"ccdec68f-dc4c-489d-a473-be5ff6000c1c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0f89d486cad6297a2d02df226f6fb3b907d35f5f3a8eaa80fb4cb0576c4fafdc","observation_id":"15da7661-6ab6-46a4-b465-3cda8efceea2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:958371c5b51766689841ae08b87d7038dd90494a4a9d9d62cf0d9b011b8080c5","observation_id":"7353d802-63a4-4d15-9990-5a88e3de8148","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3fbcaf75f8817fcda76d7fcbfb4b804028300c0093c7f9c7961c5e949b8c4ada","observation_id":"00b31ea2-7c07-4d3b-a272-06c8ae5425cc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b037c38c3c8dc8f98167cbc3af15e377631115a057e62e6ab6788481b000ad6a","observation_id":"d24873d1-b4d1-40ee-88f0-ebca03fd702c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a602974b6149414a679531d2aacbba041dd8799943a6d8eec66e6275edc64f7","observation_id":"5d4c3dfb-95f1-4bec-879b-fa57c56c54a0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4a3fec4cdad0aa0f0d128401c16d39172e0751088e2f3fcb5f3127c195e4c357","observation_id":"43874d71-a39b-4414-acd7-15a17a8bf177","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1995},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1a7d65ea4ad7f0755b25ae6d5df0f3d04fb2325eed87b3d6dd5d03bf345e955d","observation_id":"65f3c1a1-b0af-4642-b56d-1d8444c62499","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4424ac99b5331ca2994b6da9fd6dd93e3a10d131a427d1254126f5f606abf9a8","observation_id":"f639e7a8-6bbc-4b03-a37f-7e921dbd1330","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d114d2ad7ee8107ebd60fa358d115ce022144bdfd27e6c6f7dbfdc521b22fa70","observation_id":"f421180e-9322-4e8b-8dd2-b73eac9c734c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ab04fa5587811d95700f29a6d13cbfd0e1d0cfae5876d967964873ce440a3df0","observation_id":"ab9a692a-baa4-4f66-8b56-a02964144ffe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7b4f9b0baf66879a70b929f18e64cb33909db29bc238fc137a80b9a9cfd7bf6b","observation_id":"f4e7be55-1807-4369-9368-ebd93894c2a8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bf8bb3c11aac442040e570423b1308b88ad36dbdc74a3d73afcbc68f77e75986","observation_id":"81e41c49-c409-406e-b8fe-dc6730227a21","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:40e7b70d4c7f8c286f1080c0db1090cc517b00e61586a6163cc4b5d02e215a63","observation_id":"ff669395-6153-45c7-b579-363c6b14bb29","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c71c5f16a5e6837467b5911a3044a8c2e96ec7eb12bc045db0dbffda0ef222b6","observation_id":"33b98c15-2da7-41ad-bfcb-37526104d78c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1989},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:240c1f79cba5e90ea7b30747f71ed6feefdb1393e483d88eecdbfaf9f0bd7908","observation_id":"31aad8a5-cb0d-4e8f-9ec9-b950beb37e8a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fa53d1541728da388b2b3b5b7006a9664ba25258b69d277f9278aef71d24999e","observation_id":"bd29c1f1-e669-4607-a89d-fd31a119fafa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1994},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5796350d80c995f9950da33f62c89dfd4381b1ac75d8a251a60004c39a80b4b3","observation_id":"d930c424-80e3-453d-ad38-c998d0653274","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d874e0481f6cede4caf4db326dec23a283f0467961dd87164fa9cb68f20941db","observation_id":"dc76ed39-2aca-49b3-b904-f687fce0a95f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:38d4e82b3d7a2836c4d3fb34c295c09f501ab8e8f89e14ec6859aa4559ef1fb1","observation_id":"131e6575-4d88-4970-9621-2f584f3ea8a0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8e6f53e26e8e8c169b3e143eaff857f9d59ca7ea8495dc848b2d97eeb8f1b2bc","observation_id":"ab793965-c894-44d8-bb4a-5f5b032829b9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":59,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f64b42db8c967ad5c1cad7d9f0c6478c014d941a2de01df7067fee8eeb8d0947","observation_id":"2de537af-273a-4bd3-9d3c-ba9744802377","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ff45ebd076c0f6041953587655d910c7a7e7267143da196917a7e61ccba0953d","observation_id":"b0447a4e-a427-49ab-b63f-84d79a417bfa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":61,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8bca32ef040b6bc87c7129c83de26c27874a48712e6c4f9ee105fc798046370d","observation_id":"444963a8-f7ab-4fff-81a1-fd407ccedef9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":62,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e475c5545f2a3485ab0e3d414b4951ba4ff6b6168b5034ae55698216c0081f9d","observation_id":"51f3b86a-89d4-45c2-b0ed-d8e801c205e1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":63,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53528f3b5727f24ad86a69cab0fd70f8848aaaf3f8d89ef32c6d6100c47ea9c7","observation_id":"d949834b-7b0a-4aa6-b411-47050a8898dc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":64,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:473d70633fb9c4309aa1d8f009cb49ee1539b64ecca86996e2d6ee9a3751d1b9","observation_id":"9776dbbe-2e33-4b28-84b5-7d70141997f0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":65,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a42e1a9a6c0e4d4760c96e15283ed41d7ec7d3e6ce75a8028e2bc69441c83019","observation_id":"c5f4d4e5-d521-47a5-862f-d0710d626f42","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1987},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":66,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e3e969aafb5c6e3138632db3716515b45e9cf16fdc907ad69a40a4ea0e5a5a28","observation_id":"b13f9d75-2565-4448-8254-65889b270eac","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":67,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ac29560f122b93cb57541f8638019bb2918e71d0a1f1305336d638629b518122","observation_id":"4a97e1e9-32b9-4730-9b2f-e96767c56692","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":68,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dc41ef19db7c4537e63df57706e5130c52e9b463c113897c0447e402b9f2f5db","observation_id":"5dfe989f-e666-4e2c-a273-00813ad2d801","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":69,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a8f4b3e3ea92f3e112193f0d1c15effb2aa40e2630f72c7b14747a34f7378010","observation_id":"9a5d5ca4-e242-4d4b-b81c-f1d31a8299ba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":70,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4824bd38fc841cdec0949e1e10f3c2194bffb8d621ab65f753d348970579cc4","observation_id":"f890fb5b-c5ee-45c6-ad3b-cd4aa5c032b8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":71,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5849d10f2d5b608062d0fbce8a7cde141950bf5635b7608fe61e3bd474e20eb9","observation_id":"586fb625-bf71-422d-85f4-fb3361a386c2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":72,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f3353d3b36f1875e1c853c15e47f553469cb746ee0b1aacd1044720da9f49ff","observation_id":"59d2ce76-c81b-4236-908b-2ecf624bdcae","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":73,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1dce47d585d82a589390791ffc56a2f43723139f1b62e83016fdf8ee3d42c6b5","observation_id":"c59ac7c2-717d-4eb5-8e57-165d54c3a4a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":74,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b85e55f0f0371e0f30e8ad16d6726de8bc85e7e3567e63c9d401e2feacda488c","observation_id":"5a7e4de9-72db-4dfb-8b94-c98ef5aa343f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":75,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:723b49689f2095533789d436d143b69c2796354450dae837b65abc398432b0ac","observation_id":"32a73802-4f67-4f21-8bb7-242547fb2af4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1989},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":76,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:64dbb2d3194e134b7dbc409934bc51051fe870415d904943e98167050d2715fc","observation_id":"ce4019c8-35fa-4934-88ea-b132d80b5ae3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":77,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c3d55c36144710ade374155400bbb16b216e5b97c704629cfd9370f513552e1c","observation_id":"df195a89-cb4a-46e1-af7d-592a49412c02","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1992},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":78,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9641212b83df2e48e0832e8d5cfc0d6822013e26c81b71529e0bf2547ac8552a","observation_id":"ee5f2985-e5d1-4760-9b2e-2d82f0062171","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":79,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b3e6f6c8a07374f9c0db3042140543775ac391d49f38dd3acbc232d820c05750","observation_id":"8c29a426-768b-4ede-865f-84850fdc7a4a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":80,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f6efe8bc6b6b2d6faed3a9c0e632e83f1ef6aaa01cbaf466cf361ce2a5073506","observation_id":"3a11c028-c823-4d1a-8384-4b424876494d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":81,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2474cac6f11342c844e22877e468bb16d006d70a904000e18890a1922ccbeea5","observation_id":"2b2f288f-0252-40d2-a08d-2de6488f4d14","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":82,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c62af72705834ecfea49dee13a137eaa8c70c2421e18424971c89dec0cb19f6","observation_id":"83331ff6-ebc7-4f11-b00b-b38c75002b2f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":83,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cb37110ebfd9e4f98a72ee286ba5a2bfddc533fca07eb72d9e92f084e3d6dd91","observation_id":"af147fce-a3c9-4b33-9bd3-77d6b81c005e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":84,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f0a4ac547798defb1c10b592c20cfa2c5f2acf523c2481ec6cd30deaa7cdbc5a","observation_id":"efd6a56c-e72e-4963-a839-c12724807869","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":85,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7438c5a8263157fa00dbc602a99760a724b747d00ab943df9255870c632fa2f2","observation_id":"db25a22b-e941-4643-89ad-83c548030476","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":86,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:907abd5548972561993d9a9becbf121dd1f00da849e7dec93e9c80c29e0b83e6","observation_id":"8b6ab7a6-07b5-4cc8-9b87-140d46418e6b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1989},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":87,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:824e4a5111e43535f1dfd121222d3eb7530a8ee2a9f48aa51951ff7e1d012b5e","observation_id":"95e0f7ba-ebb4-46f1-a993-841292176003","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":88,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6544d10109c0bafe094631d4d85ea2cb9de8e4ee8f35fcb93f95d2cf0a455190","observation_id":"89b5c71c-1c78-4b21-9e71-978f6bf3ecfd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"Unknown”. This high rate of “Unknown","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":89,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fb9f4d15494c700a110abea25f3842043916d4baa9d0d38839d71bb85000f95e","observation_id":"c6af3326-4ded-49ed-8044-7776205a46e3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":90,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c130dc7499bce210c53351fa5e9fbba5a58b9af85627a02f612da2a7e048d44d","observation_id":"8c76b8a8-1ccc-4f17-85d8-a92078282f1a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":91,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e84e72da1f598b40f07332d26ab60451a1cb22f25c09ead9adccd4349aeadc4d","observation_id":"1e74d5a9-7197-4fb7-92d6-9ae39e4951c1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":92,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:78dd094378734795ff520d3f87c2817f6b9e0ef2466a08e65e296c477e099128","observation_id":"f65f1dbc-3945-4994-b04f-675b977af85f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"corresponding analysis on the dataset","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1995},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":93,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a443df1bc7b44412b3ef667dc9a9b3b21e9f0c88a88be8bd8c51197a2c8b1504","observation_id":"8be75e8d-724d-43e8-9f8a-6a73b4846320","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"This query is to ask the statistical correlational relationship between the factor pair conditioned on other factors","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":94,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:52a12689be6b99c616648d6a548a46e44d0a8c00333224a930b9c9f24771dfb3","observation_id":"8093c4ca-fcef-4e61-9cd9-07d395f1e0cd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":95,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6374e3a179f851af9c17a5bca090d93ec17345f870a0b3fbfb9f5ca3adc65229","observation_id":"e02103e1-f593-42d2-963d-c9f0af0766b3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","title":"Required information","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1970},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery","version":1},"reference_index":96,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.01789"},"observation_digest":"sha256:251232cab7accb13625aa2c8f23f9c1d281e817c7aec3698b2173969f3cabbf7","observation_id":"df6442c0-1ee3-48c5-aadc-f958d487de06","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-28T14:25:13.422578Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.01789","last_updated":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.AI","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:08:06.159592Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-01T07:09:06Z","title":"Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":96,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":3,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":87,"verified_exact":6,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":96},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 96 of 96 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2606.01789."}