{"as_of":"2026-08-16T08:16:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:6a8be5f441be7a4a284dabd18f98136c6b34a3f545c297d1496a5763cb7e973d","coverage":[{"denominator":17,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":17,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":17,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":17,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2606.22720/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2606.22720/integrity","json":"/paper/2606.22720/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"The existence of such an equilib- rium follows from the proof of Corollary 3.1","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:624a8991c32e0c7f4cff0ff07254c1aca3f850c18624c8f3717948676ef98371","observation_id":"4c2555b5-d9fd-4cbf-b6b4-827cc65bc035","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"We can conclude that (q ′ 1, t′","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:81ab19638a5e2c39dcf3beae7fe979f6de44c18dec96cc236eecc5a4c0858c60","observation_id":"e0d4d0d4-7361-462c-988e-0c60d297cf50","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"As for allθ∈Θ ′ A \\Θ A, they stick to the original contract (q 1, t1)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8faf7ab3d0d698cd2d9bf03d13de22b01cf4e1ec79a2c4ad1faace628e614123","observation_id":"04d98341-4547-4215-9f9a-f76dd032cde3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"Firm 1 can be strictly better off by deviating toM ′, which completes the proof thatMis not an equilibrium","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c08cba3ea75ddbfc0970a719869c0d7906c82e761e258934e92c0ca6e5d9b7c2","observation_id":"1c3e3cf8-7737-4c0c-847d-7d886b776481","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"Thus, p= ˆ∆(1−q k) +t k 1 +t k 2.(7) Since ∆k = ∆>0,q k <1, andt k 2 ≥0, we have ∆k(1−q k) +t k 2 >0","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:447839f32f6d1a8e2c086b621f00bf4998c57973a09c001b0b8a99e2f3dd7e99","observation_id":"948c1f53-137e-4ea0-898b-ae496d69174f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2e11540b9da43e027d3b11f6c56105a607be3b40169c89aef33c5eab6771e34f","observation_id":"8bec8311-6e98-43db-bac9-8d96a4a03261","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"parse_uncertain"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"Hence, all types ∆> ˆ∆ strictly prefer (1, p), while all types ∆< ˆ∆ in the top interval do not prefer the new contract","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:851b2549f8924cd160121967feb9317b87d9b452a0855629e050e194fa382008","observation_id":"72ce49aa-4f2c-41cb-b7ed-8a8d229ac71a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"The utility gain from (1, p) over (q j, tj 1) paired with (1−q j, tj","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3afa3702c34286fddf791a97b722d31cffab295b488bec8e5b702140497281c0","observation_id":"e296db40-a24b-4152-88de-ff6c88e1d316","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"This expression is increasing in ∆, since 1−q j ≥0","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0d23bf21e24ab83576e5aa50ef2ac6180bcbc3fe365fb7e778bbaae5c3029682","observation_id":"88ff77ef-ff40-4dbe-af4b-17511e9848eb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"Summing these differences froml=jtok−1 yields ∆jqj −t j 1 −t j 2 = ∆jqk −t k 1 −t k 2 − k−1X l=j (∆j −∆ l)(ql+1 −q l)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b2bdbea257ce7314ca71df8d7efeadea25451df0d385319f371d5dbfcb2576d2","observation_id":"1abde818-cea0-44b6-a693-a80b5821b3f1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"The change in firm 1’s expected revenue is ∆Π1 = (p−t k 1) H(∆ k)−H( ˆ∆)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bf16effbfb4d21c6b536d71bd45a6305df27602870da4089308f7e0b51840285","observation_id":"a2b8218e-ade8-489c-9206-c9432a055aa8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"•Types with ∆>∆ K−1 buy exclusively from firm 1, choosing (1, p 1) from firm 1 and (0,0) from firm 2","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:168ce496538c21dabd6da3ffdb8a72d75cc5f5c755a6f74d2d845b70c4817897","observation_id":"734edbbe-4665-4a46-971f-6afbb201746f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":", K−1, the agent is indifferent between adjacent contractskandk+ 1: ∆k qk −s k = ∆k qk+1 −s k+1","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b0a54dddc6da241bf56bed0cd51f69eae7f0f690ab5f25d4b1b6cc9d76206de5","observation_id":"1c87137c-0501-47d0-8566-4a273a731536","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:256876adec221d9d227a57a85a5e0fe85247c81e6c29258e810a84a3fa49b176","observation_id":"a6d91e45-31d7-42dc-8e0e-8f45d9c0cb71","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":"By the same calculation, with ∂∆k−1 ∂tk 2 = 1 αk and ∂∆k ∂tk 2 = −1 αk+1 , setting ∂Π2 ∂tk 2 = 0 yields: H(∆ k)−H(∆ k−1) + h(∆k−1) αk (tk−1 2 −t k","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bc81863acfb2702522df41b3186968a411b25bcc385058e19dae8600ba57f8c7","observation_id":"d6bc9d52-f8b9-4471-a45a-85a706071490","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c0ae44ad94eb6be2eb9af645241b50e71d340af3e27522ff30df5b5a678979b3","observation_id":"9ceb6c02-0181-40bf-b5f8-a85f4ea28b47","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2606.22720"},"observation_digest":"sha256:25f1fad2177ee4504970dcd368c15136f512e528b79435dc8c5dcbcfc120f6c4","observation_id":"44f290f1-6af2-4f21-9422-9453bb5c6951","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.22720","last_updated":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"econ.TH","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T13:57:41.588588Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-21T23:37:56Z","title":"Screening Under Competition"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":17,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":1,"unresolved":16,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":17},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 17 of 17 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2606.22720."}