{"as_of":"2026-08-15T17:58:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:127ff3854dff157621f464e5d00de22c742b57060262e2c800ce0c21669b9156","coverage":[{"denominator":50,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":50,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":50,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":50,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.01850/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.01850/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.01850/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.868283Z","title":"An empirical study of software developers’ management of dependencies and changes,","venue":null,"work_id":"130d71da-0679-4c85-afbf-cae75165ca99","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5e6469027a34ad97822a0fda139d1729c962fc5066f613d947447407f4c3498","observation_id":"1b15523f-e5cf-4fee-91ae-27800f955c8b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.869648Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.929382Z","title":"A field study of refactoring challenges and benefits,","venue":null,"work_id":"a58ed99c-4112-4de1-9710-3df64fe99955","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f347332344fb48620c5d2fd0fd6b3068ab1761bec60d917c09e780871de66856","observation_id":"e4de29ff-a442-4adf-a571-07060cf06f4c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.931062Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T14:27:07.749339Z","title":"Use of relative code churn measures to predict system defect density,","venue":null,"work_id":"56d495f6-4246-41fb-970b-bd40a3ab2bc6","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7a43f200be412e34b591835d829b9b47b87a86f2486c1f40200a568bca3a6935","observation_id":"072f7df5-0558-4fbc-a261-938476e029a3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.859254Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.908683Z","title":"Mining version histories to guide software changes,","venue":null,"work_id":"39b9d55f-8175-4b85-88d4-c9ce3c498ae4","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0b1f1c2097f4649e4420180f7e212c6d7443e721d7021db97386c2c6056fbd3b","observation_id":"ec60cc97-9bc0-4550-86dc-efc312a761cd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.910001Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.900610Z","title":"Don’t touch my code! examining the effects of ownership on software quality,","venue":null,"work_id":"3623c7fb-f66a-4d25-8fb6-07941a3903e4","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f28b012c6c105a2f08609f8104d4306e19f8fc1c00b4aaa6bc8552f5fabbb319","observation_id":"9a99dec2-551a-4f89-b1b8-f1a26dd31359","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.901868Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.859924Z","title":"Combining insights from multiple tools to manage technical debt in industrial c# projects,","venue":null,"work_id":"0845a385-c9ee-40ca-a24b-6b8236a80623","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:73958f4f610f5c03160aa90fa7199a70fdd179a6650a05ac6675bb5bdd67aa20","observation_id":"aa7e6bf4-1ec8-4b0b-aeeb-7db96962acc3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.861268Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.896259Z","title":"Socio-technical con- gruence: a framework for assessing the impact of technical and work dependencies on software development productivity,","venue":null,"work_id":"a1e6d95c-8046-4961-847a-969f03f3e4f8","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0df323278d8ff23eb8cf79ca4879e2d5eb8f5ba5836f85e8edc9f21423f7d2f3","observation_id":"7297f20d-0882-42e8-89e8-38bc7fb86c53","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.897764Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.892364Z","title":"Technical debt — codescene documentation,","venue":null,"work_id":"a264ffde-885f-46d4-b2f4-0cdf46708528","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6d74f58cacc8905e736be568af373c030148c26bb53db50b75966c3d5cb6f22b","observation_id":"b8572c57-f7f7-4020-8a62-5fc5209e1a61","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.893885Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.864006Z","title":"Reducing friction in software development,","venue":null,"work_id":"a6eadaec-6518-46fa-b510-36fe0128bf17","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:818114671f8a9c6091406f8bfee8c17672e9b881f898dd16783820ea6f7ba34a","observation_id":"2b5dcd4b-fb18-41b3-be25-ac70279ddcfd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.865553Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.887732Z","title":"Detecting technical debt in source code changes using large language models,","venue":null,"work_id":"cf138d32-4b91-438a-a0c4-1eaba525b9c1","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fe4b0e5f081c0f0f545be4bf444ad986b6481ae0d72031e2b285852348e3254a","observation_id":"50e64217-04dc-43ce-8a40-4a6a3c8fe8b4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.889160Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.909868Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"90684603-9c6c-475b-be4b-160aff605e49","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3c54eabcea9be16a11b56250f9fb158ccad30128853d7afc4ef08df9a832cf42","observation_id":"de2eff81-b305-49c7-adf8-c3d5d46831c7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.911026Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.931128Z","title":"Code Red: The Business Impact of Code Quality - A Quantitative Study of 39 Proprietary Production Codebases,","venue":null,"work_id":"15b343ea-49e2-41eb-8776-6aa12a438b85","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1f5c97f8e6b46fcae4cebbd0ac5dc16e4840c3203b023d03a5234194250d69db","observation_id":"df12b87a-989c-482e-bdb0-5ab999ccce1c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.932378Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.912642Z","title":"Increasing, Not Diminishing: Investigating the Returns of Highly Maintainable Code,","venue":null,"work_id":"503abc86-a71e-4941-a8ca-0747cf4b0dfc","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ea79066c1ca8964f3c45cc0f31a4ab24cffc17b36b68f4a96a84384961939fa3","observation_id":"76a30af1-793d-411c-8d31-129f2eb7742c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.913884Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.892154Z","title":"Ghost echoes revealed: Benchmarking maintainability metrics and machine learning predictions against human assessments,","venue":null,"work_id":"f6e91153-4f97-4c8c-8be2-f30ae780dd94","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d68e4dcf36da6cc585c53394e77783cf922e8ab4c0d2d6eed2e55479d17e5056","observation_id":"3964cf66-422f-4e80-be61-b2afe2b200d3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.893701Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1620.369550","doi":"10.1145/3691620.3695501","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"ismell: Assembling llms with expert toolsets for code smell detection and refactoring","venue":null,"work_id":"3ef07eb7-c589-4e15-ba3e-55245bd3d4ee","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:42b26a51f6e7b0bc94a8e806a47372d0046b9f3b7a16fd72ceac3fb5e00631c7","observation_id":"a4e157b1-b6de-4b19-bf75-1176bcb0524d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:17:47.926687Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-11T20:20:13.927706+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-11T20:20:13.927706+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.878819Z","title":"Case study research: design and methods (ver. ed.),","venue":null,"work_id":"96b210df-553c-4887-806d-cf79281d2408","year":1989},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:36b605a3132a8658a00eea0eb41768ac955ba8cb1d06152c12fef4ad74aebd95","observation_id":"d59d716f-8f4a-400b-b509-10347eca9e08","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.880253Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T04:41:59.630541Z","title":"Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering,","venue":null,"work_id":"eb2813e0-320b-441f-8290-8b83227e6737","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5c14ed2f3f6dda96ca6c87bd14134b27bcb91f7ff95c37a594b44d8538bbb7e0","observation_id":"b5bacfcb-9fd5-47a6-afca-542134a469ba","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.912882Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.918263Z","title":"Smells in software test code: A survey of knowledge in industry and academia,","venue":null,"work_id":"3fe05dda-0678-41c9-956f-32fd71fdfe8e","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:eae5895bc578e886d667df83d00be65d10744e8349f54e45f234fa3756b6b51d","observation_id":"5e892995-6115-453a-a5a6-6a34c0b1d534","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.922483Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.907911Z","title":"Technical debt: From metaphor to theory and practice,","venue":null,"work_id":"e40cae3b-7923-4b01-8b4e-57b7bf93456a","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5dc7f82fb38dcff7f5c7d3b514214dba01af68f6948f5bcd7d701b3f0d066f76","observation_id":"ef565933-8733-41d2-99d5-d3ab41fee19f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.909203Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.899179Z","title":"A systematic mapping study on technical debt and its management,","venue":null,"work_id":"c82e2cef-b0ce-45df-b72d-85929c324341","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:918120e4f9508f11e54968db510322519a81a23bd195bf28f8df2d4b6ce31bc0","observation_id":"4182e670-2a05-4526-b7b2-43e3cb071c60","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.900766Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.876487Z","title":"Managing technical debt,","venue":null,"work_id":"157e1b8c-4a84-43a5-ba85-b31063b1167d","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1b550b4df0ae55b87ec0b1b0b304cf6d14c83b2687c2e26e4554844501836557","observation_id":"b62ea9a1-00af-483b-9ae2-79e4fe72bea1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.878176Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.863823Z","title":"Software maintenance and evolution: a roadmap,","venue":null,"work_id":"94a233b9-d863-442d-8a85-4c0fa43cdd42","year":2000},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6a19a0c59552d3eb9ddbbec6591e7a6343e1d916d74a0f75aacff1cc8d68a8a4","observation_id":"784e5d49-5448-44e9-8f71-ad32f2e915d5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.865359Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.903304Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"1a482e34-27b8-4ca7-9d59-73dee15ca288","year":1980},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6e994ba4bbc6139a579129d48a9848c887820e5fc345777b786fcf656a19ea76","observation_id":"f6ccb75e-9795-40d9-8a54-ceb3e01ecfc1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.904667Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.927426Z","title":"A survey of software refactoring,","venue":null,"work_id":"24d93eb3-c1c4-4929-9657-831cd0f083a4","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:09b246690448bb0b8f45e557967007c134af362e2057dad8c42755a718ca8781","observation_id":"eb93540e-3d86-4f8d-bb8e-4eb1bb8ce279","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.928585Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.879856Z","title":"Automatic software refactoring: a systematic literature review,","venue":null,"work_id":"862b307b-022c-41c3-b5f3-743b2ee5ad14","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:33e9300338f7b5cb6cec2b58383fa44c8a2789292a5f4f83a493840de16f4560","observation_id":"c9a316bd-fdef-47e6-b75f-addc74d589ef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.881084Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.885575Z","title":"An ecosystemic and socio-technical view on software main- tenance and evolution,","venue":null,"work_id":"2e6bd865-2089-4d4d-a8c5-2b5ee03e9ea1","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:077a54695dc36d7757bec6b455253a0ad00ef46fea4135e2fbac1263b53a61a9","observation_id":"1188a05e-5ee4-4b4f-8133-f383a274af20","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.887028Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.925272Z","title":"Socio-technical grounded theory for software engineering,","venue":null,"work_id":"db7719ae-729a-417e-8fd7-b7a023728ad1","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f2d81d872d18b23e41824bcf4fd1c4a61c3954073d779e32b9f8b5b3c081103f","observation_id":"03fab086-a1b8-4753-93aa-10da5b617b08","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.926782Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.933469Z","title":"Technical debt prioritization: a developer’s perspective,","venue":null,"work_id":"90a1d2eb-206a-48d5-b441-dc01f0932518","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:11818d4bc218629ff721cb91a8a72366c2fa6b144925268c9b48ffaaf71648b4","observation_id":"1ecc6112-6e91-479b-8e02-e920c0ecdf44","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.934711Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.914423Z","title":"Technical debt mon- itoring decision making with skin in the game,","venue":null,"work_id":"0f7776b9-d757-4a84-9f55-05d65ad31ee2","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2fa24eef7b0810a8e52d2ca690ab130cbd3a1afc3547475ceccd2c202372bc2f","observation_id":"1be66e8f-5a1d-4f05-85ae-ef65c27082a0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.915705Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.902480Z","title":"A sys- tematic literature review of technical debt prioritization,","venue":null,"work_id":"83a694c2-b45f-4648-a1d5-14fbab17ee71","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:266663fe166af2c9a354e6968323e7be91225a2beb5866e1c61c7bcc6f4172ad","observation_id":"b7a4e7bc-4d15-4ca1-b6cf-ebc53a43c9dd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.903782Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.861800Z","title":"A systematic literature review on technical debt prioritization: Strategies, processes, factors, and tools,","venue":null,"work_id":"d869a9c4-24e8-4cf1-8b26-6ef8d36542f2","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ef7cad8e7f9b0bf19b7c0808f0c07dc637ec8b3161f17bcba2f63488587f13d7","observation_id":"aa9838e3-2437-46b4-bdb3-77469f292648","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.863261Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.951012Z","title":"Technical debt prioritization: Taxonomy, methods results, and practical characteristics,","venue":null,"work_id":"9ac3fae9-dee8-461f-95df-fdf4d34ca0c3","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b0a67589dae2b54f62819c6549b0120eb7b8e676b57d558dce775093c94eb1e5","observation_id":"5ca04dc2-405d-417d-969f-64ed7a3e088a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.953646Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.938260Z","title":"Tracy: A business-driven technical debt prioritization framework,","venue":null,"work_id":"b637963e-df97-43ce-9f60-f6913bec0418","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:20327cddfd19bfb61ebd11dd35293ee83ca2995fb80228a5c4d55210b50f4f03","observation_id":"45ee4a67-c40e-4bee-b561-eeb802da1e5c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.939629Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.867830Z","title":"On the value of a prioritization scheme for resolving self-admitted technical debt,","venue":null,"work_id":"7f57a263-3dde-4144-96cd-d66ebe941398","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3250b8d466d8eb10817a77878645fc59f4ec0db869e95b1f231a80d7a2fce2f2","observation_id":"f6a3a29e-4907-45ad-a41c-89fcd047b2e8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.869102Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.935621Z","title":"An empirical study on release-wise refactoring patterns,","venue":null,"work_id":"c6990ce0-e68d-4e99-996c-c847c25d1b87","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:baab75c85986a240c2fa1acc1a8f771c5acc008e7fdbb72c202a08ee8fdb456e","observation_id":"0303fd58-208d-4a44-90ec-e2bca67bd35b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.937680Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.954584Z","title":"An empirical study on maintainable method size in java,","venue":null,"work_id":"129385e6-9818-42b2-a9d9-e8ef2eb477af","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ce39f73d76676f7fa0fce1c51c619fced461da80976c8f95ab62a46dba792fb8","observation_id":"4c81ec4f-e997-42aa-8af7-103630bab671","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.959655Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.905225Z","title":"The good, the bad, and the monstrous: Predicting highly change-prone source code methods at their inception,","venue":null,"work_id":"61c19dd0-492d-4739-bee1-945f5189b9b3","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:621e3989ca21bd2b5b6c33904c9a9391d6d9b0d7bd314f9e95d0151210dcb3a7","observation_id":"cd060756-0742-4187-8c2f-3c95eb35e987","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.906688Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.883714Z","title":"Exploring the architectural impact of possible dependencies in python software,","venue":null,"work_id":"9f299035-46d6-4d70-8fce-b306d14fc484","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fdbbfc71559521efc421b85c8e0145088d6ed3839f2a763b03bd2fa1e8ac558e","observation_id":"db965285-8f84-4ef6-98d5-d3c3cb340724","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.885042Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.933127Z","title":"Monitoring code quality and development activity by software maps,","venue":null,"work_id":"ccc1c9e3-9971-41fd-90d7-27f972365ece","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:72ababdf5fb69954c29348fbb6293fea783a124c7bebd2524caf3d627fc256c9","observation_id":"75f6489a-fb4d-4540-bb2e-d42b2b91de3f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.935010Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.931655Z","title":"Refactoring tools: Fitness for purpose,","venue":null,"work_id":"659461a7-7bcf-445f-8279-b092b4b085ec","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2703996c58d0a47ee64e82953a35732e33de1f60e7c5c68053e52fd975d41c5f","observation_id":"f85ea2c6-3eab-412c-a027-4657defd8191","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.932927Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.849005Z","title":"Industry’s cry for tools that support large-scale refactor- ing,","venue":null,"work_id":"967578f4-c719-4525-bdc8-c9cded17465b","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:126b05b905ec985c9f96d9710919aae99199758eebac39892309a653282ffcaf","observation_id":"23e1de5b-7faf-4487-8822-2d17e381f57e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.850856Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.894486Z","title":"A metrics-based approach for selecting among various refactor- ing candidates,","venue":null,"work_id":"d82b0966-b1a5-4ac3-830a-dd02eb175d1b","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ce28c2d39c8059d475ecac49a8f77de83843420dcc32e155b23d4ca919f25228","observation_id":"014f4dff-df24-44a1-aa4e-cb61439d798f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.896460Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.904377Z","title":"How we refactor, and how we know it,","venue":null,"work_id":"3c029841-4fea-435b-901d-e6e910bf9ae4","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e9ec69c6642658ade85b8e10616b28d375a68113cae7816cb4937ffe34ee1deb","observation_id":"81fd407f-0488-4aba-a2a7-5db98dbc0b31","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.905573Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.947219Z","title":"One thousand and one stories: a large-scale survey of software refactoring,","venue":null,"work_id":"779b4dbf-2d42-4f4a-9576-58fce69cce57","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b6bda84eee7aa7a85e6c7211c0e13083715b35ec5c7c6f0d5614a75dcd9d7e11","observation_id":"ee62726b-7038-4c71-9e66-9bbb36aacc7f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.950150Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.929106Z","title":"Barriers to refactoring,","venue":null,"work_id":"909e77ea-60da-49e3-88e5-fac01f238661","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:87cefdac641d8877f8a5bdd742a46e5de648b758cdbcd8af5720cd6ca54555e9","observation_id":"9307adf9-92d1-42fa-9497-17a09424ad70","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.930369Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.917866Z","title":"Priortd: a method for prioritization technical debt,","venue":null,"work_id":"a4726b6c-625a-4570-a67d-f3afce82624e","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b1113976dc431263f481dd1a6df4810577bad0de3145de7d841fbe42140e6bb7","observation_id":"879fd402-48b4-47c6-bc16-0a775a046230","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.919152Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.944584Z","title":"Technical debt management automation: State of the art and future perspectives,","venue":null,"work_id":"7a24ad6e-e8f0-4ac6-bb98-331fd6ec1a2e","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1bba341e579e553c32ac1fda03fce652d95527f467505c08c53c0074a3c4575a","observation_id":"a034b36c-fca5-403f-bc33-faea81a39d5c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.946477Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.923151Z","title":"A practical approach for technical debt prioritization based on class-level forecasting,","venue":null,"work_id":"aea23de7-0cc7-41b3-96aa-9bab5e057fec","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0a6d3aff1ad95f8cd6e6723ba1f933e3804b60e79abcab305ea5e240a71f991e","observation_id":"d96729f2-f3d6-4ccc-929f-fe852279e5d0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.924493Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.942605Z","title":"Maintenance operations on cloud, edge, and iot environments: Taxonomy, survey, and research challenges,","venue":null,"work_id":"6e05e110-6bf2-4bb8-bdc4-8a4780a87b3c","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:83ac38ea8ba6402c31ebeab01301a8d925761067f7584bae8851cfc2b37f1e8e","observation_id":"08b493b4-6407-475b-b5e9-e224da1bc10a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.943981Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.940197Z","title":"Cultural and socio-technical aspects in software de- velopment,","venue":null,"work_id":"a75ffdca-673c-4ee0-81cd-326afd5fbccf","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-03T09:15:57.395639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.01850"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8b5163de087066962f5284bf6ed64b98a5931144f24696297b347d6a3f8c1eda","observation_id":"c8507c47-96ba-4cbe-a893-29ee9267a150","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:53.941853Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.01850","last_updated":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T22:57:10.395598Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T08:11:12Z","title":"Technical Debt Friction for Maintenance Prioritization: An Industrial Multi-Case Study"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":50,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":1,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":2,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":47},"total_outbound_references":50},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 15 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 50 of 50 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.01850."}