{"as_of":"2026-08-18T09:32:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:a3e7c70aeda8b211af26d0ce7942cdaa48ffd5636a6e6a955be8fc8eeb1ca801","coverage":[{"denominator":39,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":39,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":39,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":39,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.02808/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.02808/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.02808/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Pilkington and L","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3e14c45029ba1696dcafb3a416a1984bdd2f369aab2adbf817774b3067194935","observation_id":"cf2fde28-3079-484a-af7d-bbfbcca31e8d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2c18015c1ae72276a11a5c34664589776990e76b216d563393b7666a0a56ac06","observation_id":"7eb67172-2710-4402-a104-7d1760211ccf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0745ca47507fcf2447dfbf30374b9bcae6a8ab4ec1ef77cb8ad0307481d9cf5d","observation_id":"38743495-46c0-466c-a894-4b47534ccf81","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Brooks and H","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1987},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8de891784dd849cfa038a935a68263868337d051a8b49decc32cc9878486750e","observation_id":"89f577ee-59b9-4476-bcdc-05bf2f707f86","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Optimizing preventive service of software products,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1984},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:187fe6f84619b63ec9f5f5eb9db78ac268e061ac8953d3284f54c14c0332fc4b","observation_id":"c96a15f7-f3e3-493b-b2b6-dca06f6a1368","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f2d30b9150c24819538b6eb8b4695c05e3705ea849406a15209aff7c3222111b","observation_id":"a55a262e-109e-49f1-98e0-1c7d66118fe6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"N-version programming: A fault-tolerance approach to reliability of software operation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1978},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ac016f0a3828dce728b84d77e0f8987355b00db39d19c9f238bf54223141ac63","observation_id":"03af390f-4299-498c-bc69-1d8bcacbfadd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Dependable computing and fault-tolerance,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1985},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:baaf341e101cf62f1149f19af24826b41eba4405db5072f5431ffe20c531d870","observation_id":"dac90c5f-9a04-4586-b5a6-a76393352fc1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"An experimental evaluation of the assumption of independence in multiversion programming,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1986},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d94e278a858681fdaa0b5ee648dbe4ec000ae28578a705faafcbb1cd99b1194e","observation_id":"e22bd42f-d9d2-4c17-a988-d90ac9eda0dc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"N-version programming for railway interlocking systems: Synchronization and voting strategy,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f2d652a4513b8348b3c80fef372493e151e43540b9955d18c8fd003fb66538d3","observation_id":"579bf841-7f82-4deb-9918-5f00a13611b4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Highly available blockchain nodes with n-version design,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c10c557dd841b3ae61d63a443439fa45f35ffcba5fa8ab92313288e4e88e2c19","observation_id":"4e774bfb-800c-4063-8d4c-18bcfc4bf14d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2107.03374","last_updated":"2021-07-14T17:16:02Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T11:58:24.516369Z","submitted_at":"2021-07-07T17:41:24Z","title":"Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2107.03374","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Evaluating large language models trained on code,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2107.03374","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:df28b994b3a6d75d0f87148a8cf11e4f3bbd1796f5cc207e6b904383841b183d","observation_id":"79860fed-8c5b-4af8-a154-0b2e10597199","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2303.08774","last_updated":"2024-03-04T06:01:33Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T09:58:46.058102Z","submitted_at":"2023-03-15T17:15:04Z","title":"GPT-4 Technical Report","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2303.08774","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Gpt-4 technical report,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2303.08774","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:80cc4510a1d45008e86c54d2c5fbfe200c15d1231a75c58f921ac2bc0c416a5a","observation_id":"b514e18a-a0ed-41b1-a102-7df52ed8119a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Deepseek-r1 incentivizes reasoning in llms through reinforcement learning,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7bfd0e2a3e1e34c536d21bed69ebd3d467f4aeaeb8fbe352c925bbf428812f59","observation_id":"095b4c4d-abe1-488c-8285-1c70cdccfc8f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Beyond functional correctness: An empirical evaluation of large language models for text- to-code generation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:29fec701c51c1fa04db678ab6961b44c8a1c1610d300188c218df379473ddc1f","observation_id":"2da5c560-2336-41d4-9d70-4df82a148347","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2206.07682","last_updated":"2022-10-26T05:06:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T00:14:01.413100Z","submitted_at":"2022-06-15T17:32:01Z","title":"Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2206.07682","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Emergent abilities of large language models,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2206.07682","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c9e4769e7c2f093dd1720853f35860ae95d9bcff89a60c00f82481464df4dd5b","observation_id":"c435fb00-5c02-450f-9c1e-4b04e4a45364","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2001.08361","last_updated":"2020-01-23T03:59:20Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T17:41:53.092611Z","submitted_at":"2020-01-23T03:59:20Z","title":"Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2001.08361","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Scaling laws for neural language models,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2001.08361","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e5399f55c30b0a7a8923ecf8dabe1ffb87e295a8c91447e0bb109d4d9f819568","observation_id":"9a5c9f6c-9f6d-4437-9107-96fa614b1db5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Competition- level code generation with alphacode,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6150fb1532e3e70f4e7c5976cabe146de42d8dc775ffb50714f295e988c12e6c","observation_id":"3762a575-ef9a-47eb-988d-927d69ca265a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2108.07732","last_updated":"2021-08-16T03:57:30Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T17:40:38.050939Z","submitted_at":"2021-08-16T03:57:30Z","title":"Program Synthesis with Large Language Models","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2108.07732","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Program synthesis with large language models,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2108.07732","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9ed49ae78b56001d75f065e6a29792eac8778ebd2fa295563e36b93435872898","observation_id":"8c17c839-6b5b-4459-bf57-e9592861b9ef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Galapagos: Automated n-version programming with llms,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ca99742e49c4026d2c57c27c208b1bee9191e6485bee0ec922a7ac0854f0b8c3","observation_id":"6b832986-19bf-47ae-b96a-55e1ce9c5cf3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Evaluating the diversity and quality of llm generated content,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e5c83364267de0e74219972637d5b50248ce8a378291567d1a45ead6a22c9688","observation_id":"125a097e-a280-48f3-9b3b-681c7db85325","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Human-written vs. ai- generated code: A large-scale study of defects, vulnerabilities, and complexity,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c24bb9ec6e75f6a3d74ca9e4bfcc7721d8619ed3c5d61cb9ad258fe9879c2ef2","observation_id":"cab6189c-d3aa-4b06-b43e-a3abc673ba84","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"0016.808467","doi":"10.1145/390016.808467","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"System structure for software fault tolerance,","venue":"ACM SIGPLAN Notices","work_id":"324563b8-c0ec-4afe-b24d-20596a27542b","year":1975},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:db53a0f2daf0ccb7c02f9555dc8ab7c631bf18b2546239434dce2f73dc46960c","observation_id":"0a12ae51-f18b-4849-84d4-40e9ac3c4ae7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:58:34.310322Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"8522.568525","doi":"10.1145/568522.568525","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"A survey of rollback-recovery protocols in message-passing systems,","venue":"ACM Computing Surveys","work_id":"b25c9fe3-1f20-4685-bc05-04e654bdf602","year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:57c34c6f829f64311376fef057c6b6950955e69bb343ae697c20d8c6f56be91e","observation_id":"01faa8e4-534c-48e9-a66b-e8cb6b06933b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:58:34.303819Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Exception handling and tolerance of software faults,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1995},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:26f5dac1e59326195261f6c54d9c4cc091806bf7ade33cbbd8f999ac05731dfa","observation_id":"234a8745-eff4-45bc-b0cd-85a8fe4a38cb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Analysis of faults in an n- version software experiment,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1990},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ccfa0c4952578d9130eb832e101593f072747a288dd4793660171e6f2aa057a3","observation_id":"121bf915-025a-4b1b-a012-1fe4a4ced1a9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2503.00691","last_updated":"2025-03-07T05:38:47Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T18:41:04.518152Z","submitted_at":"2025-03-02T02:04:58Z","title":"How Diversely Can Language Models Solve Problems? Exploring the Algorithmic Diversity of Model-Generated Code","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2503.00691","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"How diversely can language models solve problems? exploring the algorithmic diversity of model-generated code,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2503.00691","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3d14a5b5ec48603ce7a34e39217a853b3d3cdea8132039156c25dc2779959bdc","observation_id":"bf2f77b5-8159-47d9-9e4e-4d8b5169d248","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2409.04114","last_updated":"2024-09-06T08:31:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T22:31:05.209355Z","submitted_at":"2024-09-06T08:31:18Z","title":"Multi-Programming Language Ensemble for Code Generation in Large Language Model","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2409.04114","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Multi-programming language ensemble for code generation in large language model,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2409.04114","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a2875c5e8b98dc20d6c87ce506cf996c5101b3bc590b0ff3871c97a5779cefcb","observation_id":"0bcaf08a-9fd2-4cd7-a8b8-940576bb0e5b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Can generative ai enhance the effectiveness of n-version programming?","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d3e4f6aec2330d646b72df8d69e8af06dac21fdf573aeb71647febd06520e856","observation_id":"8aee76d5-5876-4588-8b5e-2bb949d3209d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Language models are few-shot learners,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1684dbc2a5d87022d3c2240d16c94d5821c1d611fbc22b230948c137340f5b31","observation_id":"75198b5e-9a36-46da-bf1b-9b567dc7d2fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2005.14165","last_updated":"2020-07-22T19:47:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2020-05-28T17:29:03Z","title":"Language Models are Few-Shot Learners","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2005.14165","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2005.14165","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0d919230f44cc105646a0666f135560947547210f96ced9126ceebbbee35d0e2","observation_id":"4fec23fe-8487-40a1-a310-b70027a001cf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2009.10297","last_updated":"2020-09-27T04:07:11Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T14:26:33.940158Z","submitted_at":"2020-09-22T03:10:49Z","title":"CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesis","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2009.10297","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Codebleu: a method for automatic evaluation of code synthesis,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2009.10297","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a209c92f5275b74b98c071a990d96215c04ea8b21cf2668c7ea64c2eae18f0c9","observation_id":"e5c44a5b-b5da-42d8-9a2e-764379709d4e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d488c65b780e29409b811ec9cd5de68ed676aaa84cc92d8ff5ba689d4a5e5b16","observation_id":"eef87272-7ef1-4c9c-ae26-f050cab6cb27","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Codenet: A large-scale ai for code dataset for learning a diversity of coding tasks,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6cb0ec38a939730741ad2af374cb3d98a11d8ac87d44a0570b3490093b7a13b3","observation_id":"0d7fdd4a-ac0b-4f7e-9639-62d6ab3f29b2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2105.12655","last_updated":"2021-08-29T19:43:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:22:32.184164Z","submitted_at":"2021-05-25T00:13:29Z","title":"CodeNet: A Large-Scale AI for Code Dataset for Learning a Diversity of Coding Tasks","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2105.12655","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12655","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2105.12655","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b60a00c2e28760b126f379173ec32f10c1a3081bcb7057443a327688a5c92b44","observation_id":"361d19de-d24a-45c0-b053-c1297e100eef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"AFL++ : Combining incremental steps of fuzzing research,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3e502ad2168f16328e209dfbf67de534060d76b06491525c844e9013b1db0b95","observation_id":"9b480f00-e774-49bd-ac76-45f1713ef76a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"CodeContests+: High-quality test case generation for competitive programming,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fceb0294cee24bba77cb325dd5677abc01f36198999552d57e0709ef04f5566d","observation_id":"def425d3-0b78-4446-b94c-bfd8a01e067b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Cosmic ray: Mutation testing tool for python,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1471ba3018a31630b91c2ef3b6ac52390c34b4e5b4ebb1e13bd14ec78bbf44e2","observation_id":"b0d3771f-4d2b-4f1b-ada7-0520f73c92cf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","title":"Python documentation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.02808"},"observation_digest":"sha256:58bc95129f448104a873453970da79ddef1fadb31e837c79406f5d1b38e6c7aa","observation_id":"852c875c-ec07-420c-9c0b-7212bf67169e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T06:57:16.033336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.02808","last_updated":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T18:13:31.839750Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-02T22:49:05Z","title":"A Systematic Methodology for Evaluating Failure Independence in LLM-Generated Code"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":39,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":37,"verified_exact":2,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":39},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-18T06:34:34.496301+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 18 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 39 of 39 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.02808."}