{"as_of":"2026-08-22T19:32:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:ad11301ff0d0457e938453cf2c31b8b2a6f394dfb840020a0ef5bbf4fb7059f2","coverage":[{"denominator":61,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":61,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":61,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":61,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.03494/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.03494/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.03494/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Light fields and computational imaging,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8ae7d7af784eaff4b318cf7b75cd6ad5a5f6d43e9be4259bd4909096dd4e7826","observation_id":"9ff712d6-80b6-4f4a-97fc-08b3487a897f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"The Plenoptic Function and the Elements of Early Vision,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1991},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7db1d3100908745c602bff96556dd0b973e2319b84a5bc1614b93e7db9b9786b","observation_id":"42b7a9b8-7df4-45dd-b554-b62efe7b1963","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Light field rendering,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:57a0f7c58d966389f271ed69640ff145cd2b75b83ac6634435eba6476ecb11b2","observation_id":"ec9f47eb-4b7c-48c3-8252-f52f1bea4acc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Information technology — Plenoptic image coding system (JPEG Pleno) — Part 2: light field coding,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9510261688258fa2fbbd1d3abdfa7bbc1e4006e5a08bbfb173545b33b8f0cce4","observation_id":"9d468c12-ec14-45c1-9c48-d6e4fbbdac23","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Available: https://www.iso.org/standard/74532.html","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b0c2e6655df8df28a62f876ae03c8dfc9c2c60c422a103249b5a899f64685e59","observation_id":"dc07d9df-148f-433d-b891-e59823a8ca58","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Bench- marking subjective quality assessment methodologies for light field compression,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f443f5ebfe29245afa93978bdc7975db0a3588436c88025ba9dc96bdb463eab7","observation_id":"a027f4ab-ce77-4270-b61f-49a5e7879cab","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"A survey on visual quality assessment methods for light fields,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6bf855b8b3375471e08d6de586827b1541cb74bcb8cb3d1cd855094a96120ffe","observation_id":"faf705ff-f156-4375-b3e8-21c37a7675e7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"On the performance of objective quality metrics for lightfields,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:23726c893f845150e2f488f1426978b63da2c11fba55a0e3ecde2db36af6d520","observation_id":"5129b5a5-4503-47b6-a9f3-6c2552ed42a8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Quality assessment of compression solutions for ICIP 2017 grand challenge on light field image coding,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:68b85cfc9e76f9fed9128afbd2d76489645861a8def3e103e25cb9e88932cdfe","observation_id":"8fcc829f-438b-45fb-a3b7-350ed094b369","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Datasets for the quality assessment of light field imaging: Comparison and future directions,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ba2ed23e5baac3edb03093ae8d9368883eb5c691f2f495dc61029df53de4bedc","observation_id":"4de5559c-df1d-407a-bc20-d0a86d981606","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Methodologies for the subjective assessment of the quality of television images,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fb0b71b126bfd64ab0c7a5aa31404d0b76f21eb1e470551534a3b587bd65384c","observation_id":"28560392-5dd2-43fa-a707-27a89c8679e6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:72f15b6e50172ccabcea52d96e3bd9d7195b90dab30e16277d6a5abae44ddcae","observation_id":"96088dd2-adfa-468c-995c-a4475a22954a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Subjective quality assessment: a study on the grading scales: illustrations for stereoscopic and 2d video content,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ccf8dbac984be012ab19efbd89e19e47b9676aa9a679d715cb6af509ccfaf4e0","observation_id":"82cf5044-ac0e-40c6-af90-dfe79457b59b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Active sampling for pairwise comparisons via approximate message passing and information gain maximization,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c77fa98cdc717cbbd840c977b90c5a4f63abd6d6d3e9ff14cd4937f70dceb44a","observation_id":"fdd9cbe5-0bad-45f8-a167-3c275990f220","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Estimation from pairwise comparisons: Sharp minimax bounds with topology dependence,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:031222ca6e81be1790d0e7026e766509efa0d7426454f7a40d7b961c276b14b8","observation_id":"d145c1ad-5666-4812-92ee-a40863992b89","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Comparison of subjective methodologies for local perception of distortion in videos and impact on objective metrics resolving power,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2dbb2ffe642f614cc0629035baec87faad7ed5c3633e68f28bec0be78e0ad26f","observation_id":"b2020419-20ee-4cab-8362-d554dd49b502","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1963},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f801eba5d2bfc61ccca62075c21688da01b43c206299145e0eb7a1447afca909","observation_id":"83aad616-fe75-419e-bcf2-3b7d5c02cb47","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"From pairwise comparisons and rating to a unified quality scale,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bedb7f4fc0f237a387505739ee6838e9039dfdb51d9df21095d0d4c25a0252f1","observation_id":"59d9aaf1-5ef2-49d5-a15e-f52734d840c6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2309.06227","last_updated":"2023-09-12T13:46:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T04:43:02.932418Z","submitted_at":"2023-09-12T13:46:29Z","title":"On the Injunction of XAIxArt","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2309.06227","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"”discriminability- experimental cost","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2309.06227","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0d53452c5b381c64090736b0f10f4d9117e74e9961dfdc9075380a998bba7377","observation_id":"4dfe192e-b79f-4a02-afc8-70463017b952","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Measurement of visual impairment scales for digital video,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7188949982b0ccb3b3c03e3ca9f6508cc0d1366bb5f4c767124c2af061423db5","observation_id":"0d4a5204-4b07-4b35-8574-8e8ae9be2604","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Subjective image quality assessment with boosted triplet comparisons,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:79a65feebcf2217a80f8390cb7c42db3b8c1190b80af11bbff7f085911270bfc","observation_id":"d9ac7299-42aa-424b-8efd-e11b9d5ccc5d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2010.00370","last_updated":"2020-10-01T13:05:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T19:16:35.282494Z","submitted_at":"2020-10-01T13:05:09Z","title":"Strategy for Boosting Pair Comparison and Improving Quality Assessment Accuracy","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2010.00370","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Strategy for boosting pair comparison and improving quality assessment accu- racy,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2010.00370","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e46de22dd447f23509992c2490d7279f55d93d4390ea740b248401d585611d89","observation_id":"5460af41-bf40-4484-81b6-3ace65a48ad6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"A new framework for interactive quality assessment with application to light field coding,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1f09d3b1dc5e2471ec5734485540e793a7ae74e9bb75989c7274d16ee779e03b","observation_id":"7e5fa0cd-7925-4a09-b488-9b6064bc45e9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Subjective evaluation of low distortion coded light fields with view synthesis,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4d1cee3f804bcf14bbec74e7d7c6eacae867f8c4822720eb3428a82fece2e421","observation_id":"f52c4aab-1898-4fe1-9ecc-d45c8b2f834b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"A hybrid subjective quality assessment framework for light field coding,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:26b98adb4e82d75b9f890cd40d8e9af6a2c9409ed82d20faf3fd92a61d9657a6","observation_id":"215ca890-5808-4e2b-8e88-583e283a9051","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Perceptual video quality assessment: A survey,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:010e64359dabd6d80ca2e9f3a923bc2c8be21b35218c5abf19a899119cf2c8c1","observation_id":"3b5385c0-3bb4-4c2a-b356-fa9e80d54935","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"No- reference image and video quality assessment: a classification and review of recent approaches,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e30537d238bddc7aa12db0fdf56d94902ce78bf0cd98c4df6ed9b875a25f6473","observation_id":"d13cf5ae-3b54-40d3-b922-623380dae15c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.04508","last_updated":"2024-12-11T07:45:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T09:17:34.345151Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-04T05:25:17Z","title":"Video Quality Assessment: A Comprehensive Survey","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2412.04508","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Video quality assessment: A comprehensive survey,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.04508","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:de58fbd8927d8b9b1d9f185cb577a26beb67207bbaeed5098682f11c379c5575","observation_id":"97c3aba8-edbf-43c7-a1b6-935952a18dac","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Perceptual evaluation of light field image,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:22eddfc27e73e49eb99c3f64cdb2ec1b4daf0ae00788493a9eaf77954b9e9533","observation_id":"3db721b6-d3d9-4cda-b483-966868749a4b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Re- liability of the most common objective metrics for light field quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:10b219e0e04d21d5fbc4715f87bf593403d724724a423845d5b0834c6822a65c","observation_id":"a10f62d7-033e-4cd1-9aa6-edcf24ef5a70","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Towards a quality metric for dense light fields,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:52cb6d18fd1b12ecb889c558e6e78645569c9e1abf988dcccd41177a6b538562","observation_id":"a9c4ca54-87a5-4ff8-b5aa-4d1fb55f2699","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"A light field image quality assessment model based on symmetry and depth features,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:af34e0d2b40059aef4970c651b62c32f1d29aa7da83bbe7ebca59aea5f885791","observation_id":"8606b24a-f138-4b29-bf51-2ee0a0101fe2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Light field image quality assessment via the light field coherence,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e850a9d3c09932243b86f597f845b56697ecfc3813fb2fc61b050d54b78655c0","observation_id":"e56595f3-a32b-4ac6-b88d-921f991de3bf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Full reference light field image quality evaluation based on angular-spatial characteristic,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4849afc42ed9ec75902884c8f6c4a82d73533174fd21834141567c0324f1207a","observation_id":"31997f63-a647-4c06-99fd-022a87c305c9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Light field image quality as- sessment using contourlet transform,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fa6f95a4e5e7446086b9436954acd01475b42aa87aae2d42103b9e1b1072ef1e","observation_id":"732f3608-3230-46c2-8df1-5e3d2124ba11","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"A metric for light field reconstruction, compression, and display quality evaluation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f972c1c515833d4a93d2fc93cd444377239dd87af3f95bc208ed31990ec4cb96","observation_id":"82c6c746-4f6c-4f6c-b328-bea5eede8c38","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Light field image quality assessment using natural scene statistics and texture degradation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec92ca6a46352ed4070d7199326ed6dd7a924dcf34be8ae1a0c6c4e25ae39a59","observation_id":"a1a2e776-7409-4646-b7a0-bf2f11f43685","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Eddmf: An efficient deep discrepancy measuring framework for full-reference light field image quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e9d63850a71bd7ed14bd20ee946a7a203e62ff1b749c1f5ad43203ec6a0dffad","observation_id":"e8e33bd4-4b15-406b-8d07-3f6b1bc239e2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Multi-dimension attention network for full-reference light field image quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b5264ced252328e981b67ca143693d194829356466de6b9f3c5b226b2fb5a8c6","observation_id":"f4e742d9-f631-4e66-be09-13c40d2cb4f7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"3d gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field rendering","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6ce61f7ee2708d66f1be78fcce83ca63bc216a1d8298dcce0a98249457733a3a","observation_id":"9171e4ef-908b-4655-b8cb-85cec51de315","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"https://gitlab.com/wg1/ jpeg-pleno-refsw","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ba9ed9dd76eacf663250927eaa8fb265d692c1d7d834c93c28e01f48642b8653","observation_id":"497220a9-22da-4c86-b834-ed6cbc229dd3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"https://x265.org","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ddd73e52592f095ce3d1fc0026f4fbc743f8c1d372d14e9946fd94d70d448162","observation_id":"e07a4758-11f4-494c-b279-ce52147f5915","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"JPEG Pleno light field coding common test conditions v3.4,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9254375c5eb5ac89a55a60b45702502675a1438ce75b138de5348ec5f0af9c3a","observation_id":"a6eae4a3-56a6-440b-b880-d895af228c4a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Seidel, L","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:611d3d0e5600a55bb3c246d07a2bb8d4bf905e46619d10d93f9996c23bb00bd5","observation_id":"aee7fcd7-a9e3-44a7-844d-205933229c6a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Real-time intermediate flow estimation for video frame interpolation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b77859a798c565b23990d0cfa8b0d15af17a7c7bc016e32593b3e96c9bff34a3","observation_id":"73870c28-df5c-4c0a-afac-e2b642b5386a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Revisiting adaptive convolutions for video frame interpolation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bd724d522744c12604c48de70db3157b90f5cb6be5f7a6d4bc5e6ab9565d280c","observation_id":"f2ad0a86-1da5-4283-82d4-88e89a56eda6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1712.03686","last_updated":"2017-12-15T14:43:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T20:05:01.231439Z","submitted_at":"2017-12-11T09:21:36Z","title":"A practical guide and software for analysing pairwise comparison experiments","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1712.03686","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"A practical guide and soft- ware for analysing pairwise comparison experiments,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1712.03686","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:77df3769c1fa80c9552626010136c2e3a0987571c83cd4136337648ef21f25ee","observation_id":"f62c1777-3c10-4da2-a53f-42a1effb6431","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5f7cf977cb9fba50e48cae2fd0ee8e442a1f851a4478066e83d5b399485bf43","observation_id":"8bfdbefd-92cb-4696-b4be-3805e8f0c58d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2003},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e9af093ca9a346895ee3df75cfeac3ad9a194573e9e8c9d52071bcd2c0c00dbc","observation_id":"8c31819d-19f6-45d2-b5db-62ea33caf0ec","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Information content weighting for perceptual image quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":50,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c672e21d6caa46e1e168dc31e83dcaa3b451bac21e92f4ac5077f930ded907e3","observation_id":"311d90ff-6ece-4afe-bcd3-270898fad4cb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Image information and visual quality,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":51,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:95c848e42c19092ef712674a4a2ff0d03d8584434a41adbbb42838071eea186a","observation_id":"b19675ef-f38d-4e00-8db0-c709ff8daa2a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"FSIM: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":52,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a171ac8d317316cbbed9bab0114b278c2f97411a9890abe8354c3ef8a38e8742","observation_id":"3f2c9b2d-23a2-4ec9-8eaf-c50bd194740c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Gradient magnitude similarity deviation: A highly efficient perceptual image quality index,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":53,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:57b1e16f0c341b7631feadae0a7186535b00b88d81cfdc024453cf5342d3f24e","observation_id":"3f0a6685-3428-413e-98ce-f818caf986c7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Most apparent distortion: Full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":54,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2029c2c3c175ffa4314221f49fd426cda1988774d2e30326dc017481a87fe32d","observation_id":"30498309-cf9d-4be6-9b5f-c472cd1388d5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Perceptually optimized image rendering,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":55,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b995e0bd6b7be5a7d71590c8757de6c90dd6b4f55709f5495777277d9a4823d1","observation_id":"39202b24-5574-4e5d-b2c8-2a9fd9826551","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":56,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f11e038bea17877956033a7a596d4d5b2ba00d664da3c349fa8ebdef261b04f8","observation_id":"2bfcc4b7-227f-4904-b96b-9a4bb0476131","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Image quality assess- ment: Unifying structure and texture similarity,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":57,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:651b659ec7f3717b4b75564765f0cb845febe90d32b3b1cb3a3db2e733dcac74","observation_id":"6c847a37-73d3-4a0e-9ff6-3aa18584f3c8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Shift-tolerant perceptual similarity metric,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":58,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec68667f5fbc258afd04067afddab6ade0f1d3ae40218e52752fe7be9a9e581c","observation_id":"5c85ef26-aac1-4a53-8532-19af782d5736","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2211.04927","last_updated":"2023-11-24T12:59:12Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T10:48:12.721490Z","submitted_at":"2022-11-09T14:57:27Z","title":"DeepDC: Deep Distance Correlation as a Perceptual Image Quality Evaluator","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2211.04927","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Deepdc: Deep distance correlation as a perceptual image quality evaluator,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":59,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2211.04927","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:be5c4245347054ddbda5d91319311d1137d59eebeec14a9ed8465d2cf56ad020","observation_id":"f9dc8f8e-e9b8-464e-94e7-ac914991a0ad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"VMAF: The Video Multi-Method Assessment Fusion tool,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":60,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c17d2f9196804d13881fbd0f69e9647d8f059ac4531be39c4b47ffb878a756d0","observation_id":"2cc43c1f-eb0f-4ce2-a7cf-82fb29d06d02","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2401.11485","last_updated":"2024-07-02T21:16:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T19:24:07.076163Z","submitted_at":"2024-01-21T13:16:33Z","title":"ColorVideoVDP: A visual difference predictor for image, video and display distortions","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2401.11485","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","title":"Colorvideovdp: A visual difference predictor for image, video and display distortions,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation","version":1},"reference_index":61,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2401.11485","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.03494"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d953454efd697c81985f3a5c2931b490242b3d965276c96eae7d4130770feae2","observation_id":"477e18f4-f2bd-4524-93c0-0a354b67d94f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T02:06:24.212795Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.03494","last_updated":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CV","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T02:38:33.152607Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-03T17:03:45Z","title":"Towards Standardized Light Field Quality Assessment: Hybrid Subjective Benchmarking and Objective Metric Evaluation"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":61,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":61,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":61},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:14.747728+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-22T06:32:06.552537+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 22 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 61 of 61 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.03494."}