Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 9 minor 42 references

Torsion parallel pure spinors on neutral manifolds

T0 review · 3 major / 9 minor · reviewed 2026-07-08 · glm-5.2

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pure spinors on neutral manifolds reduce to decomposable forms

desk verdict Clean algebraic characterization of pure spinor squares in neutral signature, with explicit NS-NS supergravity solutions read the letter →

arxiv 2607.06358 v1 pith:6WMLFSGN submitted 2026-07-07 math.DG

Alejandro Gil-García This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 53C2753C5015A66
keywords purespinorsneutralsignaturespinorialformstorsionparallelNS-NSsupergravityKähler-Atiyahalgebradecomposableself-dual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the square of an irreducible real pure spinor on a pseudo-Riemannian manifold of neutral signature (p,p) — meaning a manifold whose metric has p positive and p negative directions — is precisely a decomposable p-form (a wedge product of p one-forms) that is either self-dual or anti-self-dual, depending on the spinor's chirality. Conversely, every such form arises as the square of a pure spinor. This establishes a complete dictionary between pure spinors and decomposable (anti-)self-dual middle-degree forms in arbitrary neutral signature. The author then globalizes this correspondence to manifolds: a pure spinor parallel with respect to a metric connection with torsion is equivalently characterized by a first-order differential equation on its associated p-form, without requiring the manifold to be simply connected. As an application, the NS-NS supergravity Killing spinor equations in four-dimensional neutral signature are reformulated entirely in terms of exterior forms, and explicit left-invariant solutions are constructed on certain four-dimensional Lie groups, including the direct product of the real line with the three-dimensional Heisenberg algebra and the product of the affine line group with R^2.

What carries the argument

The signed spinor square map E^κ_γ: Σ → ΛV*, constructed by composing the Chevalley-Riesz isomorphism (identifying the Clifford algebra with the exterior algebra equipped with the geometric product) with the irreducible Clifford representation and an admissible bilinear pairing. The generalized products △_k of the Kähler-Atiyah algebra serve as the computational engine for translating Clifford multiplication into exterior-algebra operations.

What would settle it

A counterexample would be a decomposable (anti-)self-dual p-form in some neutral signature (p,p) that provably cannot be realized as the signed square of any pure spinor, which would surface if the quadratic identity α⋄β⋄α = 2^{d/2}(α⋄β)_{(0)}α fails for some β not of the conjugate-basis form used in the proof.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central object is the signed spinor square map, which sends a spinor to an exterior differential form via the Kähler-Atiyah realization of the Clifford algebra. The paper's main result (Theorem 3.13 and its global version Theorem 4.8) shows that this map, when restricted to pure spinors in signature (p,p), yields a bijection with decomposable (anti-)self-dual p-forms. The key mechanism is that purity — the condition that the annihilator of the spinor in the cotangent space has maximal dimension p — forces the square to be a single wedge product of p mutually orthogonal isotropic one-forms, with the chirality of the spinor encoded as a Hodge duality condition on that form. This reduces a问

Load-bearing premise

The proof that every decomposable (anti-)self-dual p-form is the square of a pure spinor relies on verifying a quadratic algebraic identity from the theory of real spinorial forms for a specific choice of conjugate basis element, and the argument that this single verification suffices depends on the completeness of that algebraic theory for all dimensions p.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In signature (4,4), non-pure (non-isotropic) chiral spinors correspond to Spin_0(4,3)-structures, giving an intrinsic characterization of these structures via four-forms satisfying explicit quadratic equations.
  • The NS-NS Killing spinor equations in neutral signature (2,2) reduce to a system of exterior-form equations: a decomposability condition, a duality condition, an algebraic constraint linking the one-form, three-form, and two-form, and a differential equation coupling the Levi-Civita connection to the torsion.
  • The reformulation of torsion-parallel spinor equations as differential equations on forms bypasses the need for simple connectedness of the underlying manifold, since the spinor equation reduces to an intrinsic equation on the base manifold's exterior algebra.
  • The Lie algebra of the stabilizer of a pure spinor in Spin_0(p,p) is computed as the semidirect product sl(p,R) ⋉ Λ^2 R^p, recovering a result of Kath by different methods.
  • Explicit supersymmetric solutions of the four-dimensional NS-NS supergravity system are classified on almost abelian Lie algebras: the unimodular case yields R ⊕ heis_3 and the non-unimodular case yields R^2 ⊕ aff(R).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bijection between pure spinors and decomposable (anti-)self-dual p-forms suggests that classification problems for manifolds with special holonomy admitting parallel pure spinors in neutral signature can be translated into classification problems for certain geometric structures defined by parallel decomposable forms, potentially making them more tractable.
  • The Spin_0(4,3)-instanton condition derived in signature (4,4) takes the same algebraic form as the Spin(7)-instanton condition in Riemannian signature (8,0), suggesting a systematic neutral-signature analogue of Riemannian exceptional holonomy geometry that could be developed further.
  • The exterior-form reformulation of the NS-NS system could serve as a starting point for constructing new supersymmetric solutions on non-simply-connected neutral manifolds, where the traditional spinor approach encounters topological obstructions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 9 minor

Summary. This paper studies irreducible real pure spinors on pseudo-Riemannian manifolds of neutral signature (p,p) using the framework of real spinorial forms developed in [15]. The main algebraic result (Theorem 3.13) proves that the signed square of an irreducible real pure spinor of chirality μ in signature (p,p) is a decomposable (anti-)self-dual p-form α = θ₁∧⋯∧θₚ satisfying ∗α = (−1)^{C(p+1,2)} μ α, and conversely every such form arises as the signed square of a pure spinor. The paper treats the cases p=1,2,3,4 explicitly before proving the general result, and in signature (4,4) shows that non-pure (non-isotropic) chiral spinors correspond to Spin₀(4,3)-structures. The global version (Theorem 4.8) and a characterization of torsion-parallel pure spinors via the differential system ∇^g_X α = A_X △₁ α (Theorem 4.11) are established without simple-connectedness assumptions. As an application, the author constructs left-invariant supersymmetric solutions of the NS-NS supergravity system on four-dimensional almost abelian Lie groups (Theorems 4.17–4.19).

Significance. The paper provides a complete and explicit algebraic characterization of the signed square of a real pure spinor in arbitrary neutral signature (p,p), answering a question raised in [15, Rmk. 3.39]. The derivation is parameter-free: it proceeds from the algebraic equations of [15] without introducing fitted parameters or ad hoc normalizations. The case-by-case analysis for p=1,2,3,4 is thorough, and the general Theorem 3.13 follows a clear strategy combining Plücker relations with explicit verification of the quadratic spinorial equation using a conjugate basis. The application to Spin₀(4,3)-structures (Proposition 3.6) and the Spin₀(4,3)-instanton condition (Corollary 3.8) are natural and useful. The differential system of Theorem 4.11 and the explicit NS-NS supergravity solutions on R⊕heis₃ and R²⊕aff(R) are concrete and falsifiable. The Lie algebra computation of the stabilizer (Proposition 3.17) complements Kath's earlier work [32] by different methods.

major comments (3)
  1. [Theorem 3.13, proof (p. 12–13)] The proof verifies the quadratic equation α⋄β⋄α = 2^p(α⋄β)_{(0)}α only for the single conjugate basis element β = ϑ₁∧⋯∧ϑₚ, relying on the sufficiency direction of Theorem 2.8(c)→(a) from [15, Thm. 3.20]. The reader's report and the stress-test note both flag this as the load-bearing step. The verification itself appears correct: the factorization α⋄β = (−1)^{C(p,2)}(2−ϑ₁⋄θ₁)⋄⋯⋄(2−ϑₚ⋄θₚ) and the annihilation relations θᵢ⋄α = 0 (from purity) and ϑᵢ⋄θⱼ + θⱼ⋄ϑᵢ = 2δᵢⱼ yield α⋄β⋄α = (−1)^{C(p,2)}2^p α, and (α⋄β)_{(0)} = (−1)^{C(p,2)}, so the equation holds. However, the argument that checking for this single β with (α⋄β)_{(0)} ≠ 0 suffices depends entirely on the completeness of the algebraic theory of [15]. The author should add a brief remark explicitly acknowledging this dependency and, if possible, sketching why the sufficiency direction of [15, Thm. 3.20] applies here without additional隐
  2. [Proposition 3.4 (p. 9)] The proposition gives necessary conditions for α to be the signed square of a chiral spinor in signature (4,4), with sufficiency only when B(ξ,ξ) ≠ 0. The isotropic case B(ξ,ξ) = 0 is then handled separately in Proposition 3.9. The logical structure is sound, but the statement of Proposition 3.4 says 'only if' for the general case and 'if in addition B(ξ,ξ) ≠ 0, then the above conditions are also sufficient.' This is correct but somewhat unusual phrasing; the author should clarify in the statement that the sufficiency requires the additional hypothesis explicitly, perhaps by splitting into two propositions or restating more carefully, to avoid confusion for readers who may cite only the necessary conditions.
  3. [Theorem 4.11 (p. 17–18)] The computation that a_X⋄α + α⋄τ(a_X) simplifies to A_X△₁α uses the decomposability of α. The intermediate step shows a_X⋄α = a_X∧α − a_X△₁α − a_X△₂α and α⋄τ(a_X) = −a_X∧α − a_X△₁α + a_X△₂α, which sum to −2a_X△₁α = A_X△₁α (since a_X = −½A_X). This is correct. However, the claim that 'the rank-p vector bundle U is preserved by ∇^{g,A}' is derived from the equation ∇^g_X θⱼ − A_X△₁θⱼ ∈ Γ(U). The argument that α∧(∇^g_X θⱼ − A_X△₁θⱼ) = 0 implies ∇^{g,A}_X θⱼ ∈ Γ(U) is valid locally (where α = θ₁∧⋯∧θₚ), but the author should clarify whether this local preservation suffices for the global statement, or whether additional topological conditions on U are needed.
minor comments (9)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'non-pure spinors correspond to Spin₀(4,3)-structures' could be more precise: it is specifically non-isotropic chiral spinors in signature (4,4) that give rise to Spin₀(4,3)-structures, as clarified in Proposition 3.6.
  2. [p. 2, line 5] The citation '15, Rmk. 3.39]' has a bracket typo; should be '[15, Rmk. 3.39]'.
  3. [p. 5, Definition 2.7] The diagram following the definition uses arrows E_κ and E^κ_γ but does not label the arrow from (ΛV*,⋄) to Cl(V*,h*) as Ψ. While the text explains this, adding the label would improve clarity.
  4. [p. 9, Proposition 3.4, Eq. (2)] The condition Φ△₂Φ + ½cΦ = 0 should perhaps be cross-referenced with the analogous equation in [37, Lemma 3.19] for signature (8,0), which is mentioned in Remark 3.5 but not directly compared.
  5. [p. 13, Remark 3.14] The degrees of freedom count C(p,2) + 1 is a nice observation. It would be helpful to explicitly state that this matches the dimension of the pure spinor cone (minus the projectivization), for the reader's benefit.
  6. [p. 14, Proposition 3.16] The case p=2 is treated separately from p≥3. The condition (ϕ+μ∗H)∧α = 0 for p=2 should be compared more explicitly with the p≥3 conditions H∧α = 0 and ϕ∧α = H△₁α to highlight the structural difference.
  7. [p. 20, Lemma 4.16] The computation of dH at the end of the proof states 'we computed H = 2d_{11}(2d_{11}+d_{22}+d_{32})e_{1234}', which appears to be dH rather than H itself. This should be clarified.
  8. [p. 22, Theorem 4.19] The change of basis defining f₁,...,f₄ should specify that it is an orthogonal change of basis preserving the metric g, or clarify that it is merely a Lie algebra isomorphism (which suffices for the conclusion g ≅ R²⊕aff(R)).
  9. [References] Reference [41] is a Ph.D. thesis; ensure that the institution and year are complete. Reference [24] and [25] are listed as 2026 arXiv preprints; verify these dates.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for a careful and constructive report. All three major comments are well-taken and will be addressed in the revised manuscript. Two require clarifying remarks; one requires a more substantive addition explaining the global argument.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Theorem 3.13 proof: dependency on [15, Thm. 3.20] sufficiency direction

    Authors: The referee is correct that the proof of Theorem 3.13 verifies the quadratic equation α⋄β⋄α = 2^p(α⋄β)_{(0)}α only for the single conjugate basis element β = ϑ₁∧⋯∧ϑₚ, and that the sufficiency of this check relies on the (c)→(a) direction of Theorem 2.8 (= [15, Thm. 3.20]). We will add a remark after the proof of Theorem 3.13 explicitly acknowledging this dependency. The key point is that [15, Thm. 3.20(c)] requires only the existence of a single β with (α⋄β)_{(0)} ≠ 0 for which the quadratic equation holds, together with the linear equations τ(α) = σα and ∗(π∘τ)(α) = μα. In our setting, the conjugate basis element β = ϑ₁∧⋯∧ϑₚ satisfies (α⋄β)_{(0)} = (−1)^{C(p,2)} ≠ 0, and the quadratic equation is verified by the factorization α⋄β = (−1)^{C(p,2)}(2−ϑ₁⋄θ₁)⋄⋯⋄(2−ϑₚ⋄θₚ) together with the annihilation relations θᵢ⋄α = 0 and ϑᵢ⋄θⱼ + θⱼ⋄ϑᵢ = 2δᵢⱼ. The linear equations are established earlier in the proof. Hence all hypotheses of [15, Thm. 3.20(c)] are met, and no additional conditions are required. We will include a brief sketch of this reasoning in the remark. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Proposition 3.4: clarify that sufficiency requires B(ξ,ξ) ≠ 0

    Authors: We agree that the current phrasing could cause confusion for readers who cite only the necessary conditions. We will revise the statement of Proposition 3.4 to make the logical structure more transparent. Specifically, we will split the proposition into two parts: (1) a necessary-conditions statement valid for all chiral spinors, and (2) a sufficiency statement under the additional hypothesis B(ξ,ξ) ≠ 0. This mirrors the structure already present in the text, where the isotropic case B(ξ,ξ) = 0 is handled separately in Proposition 3.9. The mathematical content is unchanged. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Theorem 4.11: local vs global preservation of U

    Authors: The referee raises a valid point about the passage from local to global. We will add a clarifying sentence explaining why local preservation suffices. The rank-p bundle U = {θ ∈ T*M | θ ∧ α = 0} is globally defined in terms of the globally defined form α. The equation ∇^g_X α = A_X △₁ α is also global. Locally, where α = θ₁∧⋯∧θₚ, this equation implies ∇^{g,A}_X θⱼ ∈ Γ(U) for each j = 1,...,p. Since the θⱼ locally span U and the connection ∇^{g,A} is a local operator, the condition that ∇^{g,A} preserves U can be verified in any local trivialization. Concretely, for any local section θ of U (not necessarily one of the θⱼ), we can write θ = Σ fⱼ θⱼ for local functions fⱼ, and then ∇^{g,A}_X θ = Σ (X(fⱼ)θⱼ + fⱼ ∇^{g,A}_X θⱼ) ∈ Γ(U), since each summand lies in U. No additional topological conditions on U are needed; in particular, U need not be globally trivial for this argument. We will incorporate this explanation into the proof. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity found

full rationale

The paper's central results (Theorem 3.13, Theorem 4.8, Theorem 4.11) are derived from the algebraic characterization of spinorial forms in Theorem 2.8 and Corollary 2.15, both cited from [15] (Cortés, Lazaroiu, Shahbazi). While [15] is co-authored by the present author's collaborator C.S. Shahbazi, the cited results are algebraic equations (the quadratic identity α⋄β⋄α = 2^{d/2}(α⋄β)_{(0)}α and the linear chirality condition) that serve as input constraints, not as the target output. The paper's actual contribution is to solve these equations in neutral signature (p,p) for pure spinors, showing the solution reduces to a decomposable (anti-)self-dual p-form. The verification of the quadratic equation for the candidate α = θ₁∧⋯∧θₚ uses explicit computations with conjugate bases (the factorization α⋄β = (-1)^{p(p-1)/2}(2-ϑ₁⋄θ₁)⋄⋯⋄(2-ϑₚ⋄θₚ) and the annihilation relations θᵢ⋄α = 0), which are independent algebraic manipulations, not restatements of the input equations. The differential system (Theorem 4.11) follows from Theorem 4.7 (also from [15]) by substituting the specific decomposable form and simplifying a_X⋄α + α⋄τ(a_X) to A_X△₁α using decomposability — again a genuine computation, not a tautology. The NS-NS applications (Theorems 4.17–4.19) solve explicit PDEs on Lie algebras with no fitted parameters. The self-citation to [15] provides the algebraic framework but does not pre-determine the paper's conclusions. No step reduces to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities, forces, particles, or dimensions. It works entirely within the standard framework of Clifford algebras, spin geometry, and NS-NS supergravity. No free parameters are fitted to data; the Lie algebra examples are obtained by solving equations with parameters determined by the PDE constraints.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The algebraic characterization of spinorial forms (Theorem 2.8 / [15, Thm. 3.20]): a form α is a signed spinor square iff α⋄β⋄α = 2^{d/2}(α⋄β)_{(0)}α and (π^{(1-s)/2}∘τ)(α) = σα.
    This is the foundational result from [15] on which all computations in the paper rest. It is cited, not re-proven.
  • standard math Existence and uniqueness (up to scaling) of admissible bilinear pairings on irreducible real Clifford modules in neutral signature (Proposition 2.2 / [15, Thm. 3.1]).
    Used to define the signed square maps. Cited from prior literature [2,3,15].
  • standard math The Chevalley-Riesz isomorphism Ψ: (ΛV*,⋄) → Cl(V*,h*) is an isomorphism of algebras.
    Classical result going back to Chevalley and Riesz [11,12,40], used to identify spinors with exterior forms.
  • standard math Classical Plücker relations: a form ω satisfies (ι_v ω)∧ω = 0 for all v iff ω is decomposable.
    Used in Propositions 3.3, 3.9, and Theorem 3.13 to conclude decomposability. Cited to [18].
  • domain assumption The stabilizer of a non-isotropic chiral spinor in Spin_0(4,4) is Spin_0(4,3), from [5,8,10].
    Used in Proposition 3.6 to identify the stabilizer of the four-form Φ with Spin_0(4,3). This is a result from the holonomy literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Torsion parallel pure spinors on neutral manifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6WMLFSGN

@misc{pith2026260706358,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Torsion parallel pure spinors on neutral manifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6WMLFSGN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.06358}
}
abstract

We study irreducible real pure spinors on pseudo-Riemannian manifolds of neutral signature using the theory of real spinorial forms. We prove that the square of such a spinor is a decomposable differential form of middle degree satisfying a natural duality condition. In signature $(4,4)$, we show that non-pure spinors correspond to $\mathrm{Spin}_0(4,3)$-structures, yielding an intrinsic algebraic characterization of these structures. In addition, we characterize real pure spinors parallel with respect to metric connections with torsion in terms of an equivalent differential system for their squares. As an application, we study left-invariant supersymmetric solutions of the NS-NS supergravity system on certain four-dimensional Lie groups.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    Cortés, C

    V. Cortés, C. Lazaroiu, and C. S. Shahbazi,Spinors of real type as polyforms and the generalized Killing equation, Math. Z.299(2021), no. 3-4, 1351–1419,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-021-02726-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s00209-021-02726-6 2021

  2. [32]

    I. Kath,Parallel pure spinors on pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, Geometry and topology of submanifolds X, World Scien- tific Publishing Co., 2000,https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812792051_0008, pp. 87–103

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812792051_0008

  3. [1]

    Agricola,The Srní lectures on non-integrable geometries with torsion, Arch

    I. Agricola,The Srní lectures on non-integrable geometries with torsion, Arch. Math.42(2006), no. 5, 5–84,https: //am-brno.math.muni.cz/06-S/agricola.pdf

    work page 2006

  4. [2]

    D. V. Alekseevsky and V. Cortés,Classification ofN-(super)-extended Poincaré algebras and bilinear invariants of the spinor representation ofSpin(p, q), Commun. Math. Phys.183(1997), no. 3, 477–510,https://doi.org/10.1007/ s002200050039

    work page 1997

  5. [3]

    D. V. Alekseevsky, V. Cortés, C. Devchand, and A. Van Proeyen,Polyvector super-Poincaré algebras, Commun. Math. Phys.253(2005), no. 2, 385–422,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-004-1155-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-004-1155-y 2005

  6. [4]

    Araneda,Parallel spinors, pp-waves, and gravitational perturbations, Class

    B. Araneda,Parallel spinors, pp-waves, and gravitational perturbations, Class. Quantum Grav.40(2023), no. 2, 025006 (21 pp),https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/acaa83

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/acaa83 2023

  7. [5]

    Parallel Spinors and Holonomy Groups on Pseudo- Riemannian Spin Manifolds

    H. Baum and I. Kath,Parallel spinors and holonomy groups on pseudo-Riemannian spin manifolds, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom.17(1999), no. 1, 1–17,https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006556630988

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1006556630988 1999

  8. [6]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker, and J. H. Schwarz,String theory and M-theory, Cambridge University Press, 2012,https://doi. org/10.1017/CBO9780511816086

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816086 2012

Show all 42 references
  1. [7]

    Berger,Sur les groupes d’holonomie homogènes de variétés à connexion affine et des variétés riemanniennes, Bull

    M. Berger,Sur les groupes d’holonomie homogènes de variétés à connexion affine et des variétés riemanniennes, Bull. Soc. Math. France83(1955), 279–330,https://doi.org/10.24033/bsmf.1464

    1955 doi

  2. [8]

    Bhoja and K

    N. Bhoja and K. Krasnov,Notes on spinors and polyforms II: quaternions and octonions,https://arxiv.org/abs/2205. 05447, 2022

    2022

  3. [9]

    R. L. Bryant,Metrics with exceptional holonomy, Ann. Math.126(1987), no. 3, 525–576,https://doi.org/10.2307/ 1971360

    1987

  4. [10]

    R. L. Bryant,Pseudo-Riemannian metrics with parallel spinor fields and vanishing Ricci tensor, Global analysis and harmonic analysis, Séminaires et Congrès, vol. 4, Société Mathématique de France, 2000, pp. 53–94

    2000

  5. [11]

    Chevalley,The algebraic theory of spinors, Columbia University Press, 1954,https://doi.org/10.7312/chev93056

    C. Chevalley,The algebraic theory of spinors, Columbia University Press, 1954,https://doi.org/10.7312/chev93056

    1954 doi

  6. [12]

    Chevalley,The construction and study of certain important algebras, The Mathematical Society of Japan, 1955

    C. Chevalley,The construction and study of certain important algebras, The Mathematical Society of Japan, 1955

    1955

  7. [13]

    Cortés and L

    V. Cortés and L. David,Generalized connections, spinors, and integrability of generalized structures on Courant algebroids, Mosc. Math. J.21(2021), no. 4, 695–736,https://doi.org/10.17323/1609-4514-2021-21-4-695-736

    2021 doi

  8. [14]

    Cortés, M

    V. Cortés, M. Freibert, and M. Galdeano,Generalised Einstein metrics on Lie groups,https://arxiv.org/abs/2407. 16562, 2024

    2024

  9. [16]

    Dunajski,Anti-self-dual four-manifolds with a parallel real spinor, Proc

    M. Dunajski,Anti-self-dual four-manifolds with a parallel real spinor, Proc. R. Soc. A458(2002), no. 2021, 1205–1222, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2001.0918

    2002 doi

  10. [17]

    Dunajski and M

    M. Dunajski and M. Przanowski,Null-Kähler structures, symmetries and integrability, Topics in mathematical physics, general relativity and cosmology in honor of Jerzy Plebanski, World Scientific Publishing Co., 2006,https://doi.org/10. 1142/9789812772732_0013, pp. 147–155

    2006

  11. [18]

    M. G. Eastwood and P. W. Michor,Some remarks on the Plücker relations, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo – Suppl.63(2000), 85–88,https://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~michor/plue-lon.pdf

    2000

  12. [19]

    D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen,Supergravity, Cambridge University Press, 2012,https://doi.org/10.1017/ CBO9781139026833

    2012

  13. [20]

    Friedrich and S

    T. Friedrich and S. Ivanov,Parallel spinors and connections with skew-symmetric torsion in string theory, Asian J. Math. 6(2002), no. 2, 303–336,https://doi.org/10.4310/AJM.2002.v6.n2.a5

    2002 doi

  14. [21]

    Garcia-Fernandez and J

    M. Garcia-Fernandez and J. Streets,Generalized Ricci flow, American Mathematical Society, 2021,https://doi.org/10. 1090/ulect/076

    2021

  15. [22]

    Gil-García and C

    A. Gil-García and C. S. Shahbazi,The algebraic square of an irreducible complex spinor,https://arxiv.org/abs/2510. 13801, 2025

    2025

  16. [23]

    Gil-García and C

    A. Gil-García and C. S. Shahbazi,Parallel spinors forG∗ 2 and isotropic structures, Ann. Glob. Anal. Geom.67(2025), no. 2, 9 (23 pp),https://doi.org/10.1007/s10455-025-09987-y

    2025 doi

  17. [24]

    Gil-García and C

    A. Gil-García and C. S. Shahbazi,Complex spinorial forms, Brinkmann four-manifolds, and self-dual bundle gerbes, https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22798, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Gil-García and C

    A. Gil-García and C. S. Shahbazi,Sasakian manifolds and spin-c Killing spinors,https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.11168, 2026. 24 ALEJANDRO GIL-GARCÍA

    2026 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Gualtieri,Generalized complex geometry, Ann

    M. Gualtieri,Generalized complex geometry, Ann. Math.174(2011), no. 1, 75–123,https://doi.org/10.4007/annals. 2011.174.1.3

    2011 doi

  20. [27]

    Gutowski and W

    J. Gutowski and W. A. Sabra,Real Killing spinors in neutral signature, J. High Energy Phys.2019(2019), no. 11, 173, https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2019)173

    2019 doi

  21. [28]

    Gutowski and W

    J. Gutowski and W. A. Sabra,Neutral signature gauged supergravity solutions, J. High Energy Phys.2021(2021), no. 2, 030,https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2021)030

    2021 doi

  22. [29]

    Reese Harvey,Spinors and calibrations, Academic Press, 1990

    F. Reese Harvey,Spinors and calibrations, Academic Press, 1990

    1990

  23. [30]

    Ikemakhen,Parallel pure spinors and holonomy, C

    A. Ikemakhen,Parallel pure spinors and holonomy, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris337(2003), no. 3, 179–184,https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1631-073X(03)00275-9

    2003 doi

  24. [31]

    Kath,Killing spinors on pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, Habilitationsschrift, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 1999

    I. Kath,Killing spinors on pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, Habilitationsschrift, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 1999

    1999

  25. [33]

    Klemm and M

    D. Klemm and M. Nozawa,Geometry of Killing spinors in neutral signature, Class. Quantum Grav.32(2015), no. 18, 185012 (36 pp),https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/18/185012

    2015 doi

  26. [34]

    C. I. Lazaroiu, E. M. Babalic, and I. A. Coman,The geometric algebra of Fierz identities in arbitrary dimensions and signatures, J. High Energy Phys.2013(2013), no. 9, 156,https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2013)156

    2013 doi

  27. [35]

    C. I. Lazaroiu, E. M. Babalic, and I. A. Coman,Geometric algebra techniques in flux compactifications, Adv. High Energy Phys.2016(2016), no. 1, 7292534 (42 pp),https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7292534

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    C. I. Lazaroiu and C. S. Shahbazi,Real pinor bundles and real Lipschitz structures, Asian J. Math.23(2019), no. 5, 749–836,https://doi.org/10.4310/AJM.2019.v23.n5.a3

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    C. I. Lazaroiu and C. S. Shahbazi,A functional forSpin(7)forms,https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.08274, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Meinrenken,Clifford algebras and Lie theory, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013,https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-642-36216-3

    E. Meinrenken,Clifford algebras and Lie theory, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013,https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-642-36216-3

    2013

  31. [39]

    Ortín,Gravity and strings, Cambridge University Press, 2015,https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139019750

    T. Ortín,Gravity and strings, Cambridge University Press, 2015,https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139019750

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    Riesz,Clifford numbers and spinors, Springer Dordrecht, 1993,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1047-3

    M. Riesz,Clifford numbers and spinors, Springer Dordrecht, 1993,https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1047-3

    1993 doi

  33. [41]

    C. S. Shahbazi,Torsion parallel spinors on Lorentzian four-manifolds and supersymmetric evolution flows on bundle gerbes, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Hamburg, 2025,https://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/handle/ediss/11620

    2025

  34. [42]

    Tomasiello,Geometry of string theory compactifications, Cambridge University Press, 2022,https://doi.org/10.1017/ 9781108635745

    A. Tomasiello,Geometry of string theory compactifications, Cambridge University Press, 2022,https://doi.org/10.1017/ 9781108635745. Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi A vanzati, Trieste, Italy Email address:agilgarc@sissa.it

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed July 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.