{"as_of":"2026-08-07T09:22:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:0295db83213a847de3ac96559337d325d603e85cf76088f3e8a705f048481dbd","coverage":[{"denominator":31,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":31,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":31,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":31,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.07065/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.07065/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.07065/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.764406Z","title":"How effective are machine learning and doubly robust estimators in incorporating high-dimensional proxies to reduce residual confounding? Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","venue":null,"work_id":"7a58a81d-0edd-4b39-bced-5cf28f930096","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:98a3f16067f8367d69cb3b6bbf73473b8fbc67db56234cb6d36489db8f9e7b97","observation_id":"d5459d1c-9c74-4bc1-99d7-dec14492188f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.765909Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.762260Z","title":"Can we train machine learning methods to outperform the high- dimensional propensity score algorithm? Epidemiology","venue":null,"work_id":"03dd9de8-c329-4df5-83d5-d04853840cd8","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:733506282965c02b337b447faf506b59e4a2197d8ca40c6c1ca59bc74090fa9b","observation_id":"35ac8440-c40d-4ec9-a0f4-b572d4c04ba2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.763805Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.717710Z","title":"High-dimensional propensity score and its machine learning extensions in residual con- founding control","venue":null,"work_id":"048e1791-298e-44ee-94ef-8c48978cb3ad","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:deaf023044de03f316cc1f6b60a0cb792879134832e96fe3fa877d1b8f248deb","observation_id":"ee89245e-d0ee-437f-87a0-4e482bf9832f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.719123Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.719791Z","title":"National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data, 2013–2018","venue":null,"work_id":"9d2b77e4-16e5-4b1c-aa7f-c042ff65b1e9","year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f1102d6e0e978d1a8a3706cb5c2f7dd995076df9e70ed637add70d5fb62ab594","observation_id":"aaa19cc4-8090-4e6f-9406-1f6fd9f7cb3a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.721125Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.723899Z","title":"Machine learning for improving high-dimensional proxy con- founder adjustment in healthcare database studies: An overview of the current literature","venue":null,"work_id":"97950e9b-59ac-4594-bb99-c8009ad54566","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8e11e12c9d2f8733041a79f5507577195627c1719be297331c9a7ad591c0b5a5","observation_id":"c29a22d6-7ade-4734-b924-61e357a362df","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.725206Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.729680Z","title":"Collaborative-controlled LASSO for constructing propensity score-based estimators in high-dimensional data","venue":null,"work_id":"02676ebe-9e81-4a2a-847b-7b222851adf8","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:097134a80c15668d014704f294a4bda5da9810b5a29e5ca817ba37708b1f1e45","observation_id":"a7b9f353-4529-4200-93f8-e2a0f0e9c698","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.730942Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.731663Z","title":"Targeted learning with an undersmoothed LASSO propen- sity score model for large-scale covariate adjustment in health-care database studies","venue":null,"work_id":"dabc8859-58f9-4ad0-b9de-9981d95f01c9","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e484b6f58fc79f9f274fb272ce0fa92deb76ae734f4db05385694cd35852ec18","observation_id":"b32f26e7-f7fe-4711-a473-bf16764e4952","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.732922Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.745323Z","title":"Outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference","venue":null,"work_id":"965f04bc-569d-48be-9cc5-0416a5a153e1","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:87550556045f663dc5312c57420eec92420110a8446d97d382e1c17a521b00fb","observation_id":"2defd4b3-6e43-48d6-b351-002b3ee43cfa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.748324Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.758302Z","title":"Covariate selection with group lasso and doubly robust estimation of causal effects","venue":null,"work_id":"ee951807-764b-4785-b28e-b302e65068f3","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:451be3ecd4f1cb1eb424981c4a42c79961abe03256874dfd02022149c8ec03e0","observation_id":"eba8258c-b376-470d-9af2-970ab6807678","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.759740Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.766562Z","title":"The highly adaptive lasso estimator","venue":null,"work_id":"1734b9e4-ac44-459d-84b1-c0a3174f116b","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bc8012f12d36b776d53b04bd56a6506d10a3a870c078b763cab1248a86703588","observation_id":"593f6b53-365e-43ba-bb26-b45fbd84056a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.767727Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.751310Z","title":"Highly adaptive LASSO: Machine learning that provides valid nonparametric inference in realistic models","venue":null,"work_id":"04df334a-5793-4500-9968-3c9612114c48","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:82e08a094e128b9bd8f48a46e2ed832c0f22123309f7a494eefcfe37b409a12b","observation_id":"f05a6a0a-3dfe-42ce-a2ac-0b7f10bd0c61","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.752923Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1111/biom.13681","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"reader reaction to ‘outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference’ by shortreed and ertefaie (2017)","venue":"Biometrics","work_id":"9e894c9d-4541-41cf-9cf3-54d465db4652","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9d0b94183732f634af0899e60c247f37bfe17485ec98d14eaa4e236ae5022c45","observation_id":"e830c066-75f2-420a-85f8-feb7a01003d7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:33.613234Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.756045Z","title":"Flexible collaborative estimation of the average causal effect of a treatment using the outcome-highly-adaptive lasso","venue":null,"work_id":"6eca023a-446a-490b-8a99-6504af0ee991","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a81bf6abcaff1a60e73dc35a45c979813ea4fb75386f852b1dea522464f5f776","observation_id":"2d84d159-4aa4-4595-b295-8f35acf2b639","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.757461Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.753585Z","title":"Robust inference on the average treatment effect using the outcome highly adaptive lasso","venue":null,"work_id":"c70db0c6-fcca-4910-8b28-0e86525e34e2","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6c5af6fc71107a2055559472a5dfe284994bc24ada014963d2cb48ff03a1e927","observation_id":"65dacb3c-6e62-420c-a4f7-d1cb5ec3c3a7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.755271Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.744351Z","title":"Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models","venue":null,"work_id":"83e61952-53f6-4e8f-b285-5264aa1406a3","year":2008},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5c89fed992c9c178f285aaed7077388503a7c07b100ef794a8c482c8ad2d198e","observation_id":"dd49766b-a5c4-42e4-94bc-7e7026790594","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.745935Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.736043Z","title":"Dealing with limited overlap in estimation of average treatment effects","venue":null,"work_id":"5acdbac1-55ae-4b26-a34f-f88be8129f25","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9f7f9c9580da99ce2f9a110fe4a2418e001883eb0d8652e108da8ecf1f9495f1","observation_id":"97deb67a-9b4d-436a-adb6-a45bc9a699d7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.737497Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.738986Z","title":"Diagnosing and responding to violations in the positivity assumption","venue":null,"work_id":"1df39911-9041-454c-8f61-adc43c4063de","year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1394b5c9a121225e83e6951af7d7f0185a95b0c27037cc117d7c5c76cd609e6e","observation_id":"16195d8d-202a-4c94-ab60-3c03e14b9dc4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.741273Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.755099Z","title":"Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models","venue":null,"work_id":"880f8833-0da4-4fe4-9ce2-3ad995b790ac","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:da53566acd2650f2af6201fd7538b9fe6bd8cc85168a927d42e450ac982ae828","observation_id":"404d1c96-5ece-468a-ab27-f1efc11bf926","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.756401Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.760298Z","title":"Targeted maximum likelihood learning","venue":null,"work_id":"1e056251-ca9f-4c24-9f5b-d4b4da75972b","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:aab0e1bfab74fd86a6444edd96a46ecf9b5dd5f38fe7d567cdf75d8b1deb4ffb","observation_id":"2691be4b-1e55-4f97-b5c8-bc8ad253c831","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.761686Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.735269Z","title":"Targeted Learning: Causal Inference for Observational and Experimental Data","venue":null,"work_id":"a32fdb51-a7ae-4d60-acd0-5981124eeb4e","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a54f20ed3ecc9e24771ae956b1e8553768428b558b9d64f74ad2f63e1010b127","observation_id":"450c32cc-0756-45bf-ada1-6f3ac9fee86c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.736521Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1093/aje/kwac087","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Data-Adaptive Selection of the Propensity Score Truncation Level for Inverse- Probability–Weighted and Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimators of Marginal Point Treatment Effects","venue":"American Journal of Epidemiology","work_id":"1b12f1c8-f3bb-41ff-be30-2ad1fdb35e57","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:08302e4eb726e37ae538b0f4832d98a9dc4f301a80a06c07ad92f0a62f001db8","observation_id":"1b345478-b391-4453-a349-32174412c256","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:33.623298Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T18:49:33.022481+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-12T18:49:33.022481+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.742067Z","title":"Why does obesity cause diabetes? Cell metabolism","venue":null,"work_id":"ff06006b-febe-4fe7-af1c-dfec66016a5b","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:56a3cf4130180969b54ea8bf96902bd80752de48c0880d5814ad24b633953da3","observation_id":"bf3fdab4-dbec-4ea8-ba5c-be28af36d30b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.744531Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.749035Z","title":"Plasmode simulation for the evaluation of pharmacoepidemiologic methods in complex healthcare databases","venue":null,"work_id":"2174dc9a-7f0c-4f9a-883d-5daa1d592edb","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:498e925eb4633683260df1967c8039f192191ca0a49923714fdd746f64ab4f60","observation_id":"f55bdaf4-2dc5-4e35-9ce7-fe7644a0dc47","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.750657Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1093/aje/kwv108","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Regularized regression versus the high- dimensional propensity score for confounding adjustment in secondary database analyses","venue":"American Journal of Epidemiology","work_id":"670fcb1a-6579-4db1-bc75-6bba0b3c212f","year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f64003f1d9f2e361c85dfa460b8f8ac2d3f763f8843c9d3907774dee1aef1654","observation_id":"1098b1e3-a69a-44bf-b830-a2a36eb5ac0a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:33.613452Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.721844Z","title":"Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods","venue":null,"work_id":"a94808d8-da45-4cbb-b801-16dbe2249f59","year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:76884dbe1175e6606444cae6279901c36fcf6d67a60ef0c4d107f20243e26e63","observation_id":"e54be667-15fa-4dd0-96e3-b146350f2c17","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.723374Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.11740","last_updated":"2025-04-16T03:36:27Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T21:10:09.129714Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-16T03:36:27Z","title":"A cautionary note for plasmode simulation studies in the setting of causal inference","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2504.11740","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2504.11740","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.329522Z","title":"A cautionary note for plasmode simulation studies in the setting of causal inference","venue":"stat.ME","work_id":"9643f50c-ee7b-47cb-800f-02d213372391","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2504.11740","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:921e1e627a2f53d630a71dc40bc4e6c60f391f9eabaeb65cff69a806bfb46662","observation_id":"e756decb-ad4a-41e6-9a30-82fe120e5a96","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.330795Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.727815Z","title":"Rsimsum: Summarise results from monte carlo simulation studies","venue":null,"work_id":"11173347-475c-459d-bf05-c7eb82b0d043","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5669501cc4d809df039c74d2b729326ab82558fd3f18c126a21d18de4b7c856b","observation_id":"fe242822-86a2-42d7-b2f4-152a36a08ccf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.729158Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1097/ede.0b013e3181a663cc","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"High-dimensional propen- sity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data","venue":"Epidemiology","work_id":"a2e2bb13-b285-4fcc-928d-2af26273240c","year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:50f19ea976bfef48fd2dcf4e1f0052b0e04bd9b5f0a047d3fe54be884cd0bb2c","observation_id":"fac13cce-36bb-40ad-b27b-9a451a03526f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:33.617396Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1093/aje/kwr001","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Covariate selection in high-dimensional propen- sity score analyses of treatment effects in small samples","venue":"American Journal of Epidemiology","work_id":"930e264f-23aa-41f2-992a-8dc879d363e5","year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2c30a575a88116dcdc8d7adfcfb293ceb06c1a4961448e3cc86455829efd5f85","observation_id":"88f06adf-9c3d-41ae-8eb1-3203cfa3757e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:33.626306Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1002/sim.7250","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Comparing the performance of propensity score methods in healthcare database studies with rare outcomes","venue":"PubMed","work_id":"6c2139b3-6f4a-46af-a227-a0dae7503ac1","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f3e04b0e50dd9c409d9cc2615860e8fa0b874d6688ced5131bd61d05f0dd2712","observation_id":"a84122f0-56dc-41b1-a838-02309f02bbfd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:33.620422Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.715691Z","title":"outcome-adaptive lasso: Variable selection for causal inference","venue":null,"work_id":"6e5de565-a371-4014-b34d-6bbd7ef2d06d","year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:53:49.178153Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.07065"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e6ea18a0751a34a577cb6debfe2cf13cd05a8cdf6da3a106a0c8a2145cde6e3e","observation_id":"023e7d6b-2999-4109-87da-8cf29aee254d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-09T20:56:34.717083Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.07065","last_updated":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"stat.AP","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T14:16:31.728236Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-08T06:48:07Z","title":"Which Regularized Propensity-Score and Doubly Robust Methods Are Best Calibrated When Exposures or Outcomes Are Rare? A Plasmode Study of Proxy-Based Confounding Adjustment"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":31,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":0,"verified_exact":7,"verified_fuzzy":24},"total_outbound_references":31},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 31 of 31 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.07065."}