{"as_of":"2026-08-17T04:47:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:866b0a8c0e3e5d135ca5a1652eb436aa08a50239d7e9f47b80e589ba8ea83b9a","coverage":[{"denominator":20,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":20,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":20,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":20,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.08046/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.08046/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.08046/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1610.01644","last_updated":"2018-11-22T23:40:00Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T22:50:03.459615Z","submitted_at":"2016-10-05T20:59:01Z","title":"Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"1610.01644","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1610.01644","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"1610.01644","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Understanding intermediate layers using linear classifier probes","venue":"stat.ML","work_id":"bdc944db-4be2-44f7-950b-eaef12fab00e","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1610.01644","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3092a025ae66cee19f2b5d185e2c103154f080382e7e6e41ee380dfb42433fcf","observation_id":"143c7272-25c5-46e9-af0c-569334f0e823","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.378979Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T03:08:13.648934+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T03:08:13.648934+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2102.12452","last_updated":"2021-09-22T07:50:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T18:19:01.601115Z","submitted_at":"2021-02-24T18:36:14Z","title":"Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advances","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2102.12452","doi":"10.1162/coli_a_00422","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":"2102.12452","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-11T11:50:26.030339Z","title":"Probing classifiers: Promises, shortcomings, and advances.Computational Linguistics, 48(1):207–219","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"3eabab74-ac71-4292-86ce-b0469cd4e6cf","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2102.12452","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4c8f1122d6c96f5e2b465300ca2fb01cd19bfe012d66ab4ef3f7a085d1f32374","observation_id":"2a7a1a1f-1b9d-4428-a9a0-368112909fad","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.367762Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T10:20:22.427185+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T10:20:22.427185+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.05488","last_updated":"2026-05-28T15:25:50Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T03:54:05.056674Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-05T18:55:16Z","title":"Reasoning Theater: Disentangling Model Beliefs from Chain-of-Thought","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2603.05488","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2603.05488","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2603.05488","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"URLhttps://openreview","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"3cfa8124-6872-4486-9147-958a1865068e","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2603.05488","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c9f40be6392fb8d7415004666421822975b791d6fb61a400e5ef00de2f7c323a","observation_id":"9b84128e-f349-4870-acd8-9ba961f81d4d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.376385Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2512.25070","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2512.25070","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.25070 , year =","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","work_id":"97e67943-9fc4-454f-ac29-39f6373cb64c","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:671a0e353df0dd6ed7690ce59741b79e8f98cf57338982cff9a0e0151adcb1f0","observation_id":"c5b067d3-60d0-4d19-b79d-af339a284728","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.376309Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2507.16806","last_updated":"2026-05-15T00:00:51Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:17:41.140558Z","submitted_at":"2025-07-22T17:56:01Z","title":"Beyond Binary Rewards: Training LMs to Reason About Their Uncertainty","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2507.16806","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2507.16806","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.377531Z","title":"InProceedings of the 2022 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2292–2307, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"f782e200-f772-4bab-b33a-02ad5e0437b7","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2507.16806","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:84a69fdd81fbb32ab8be5e248c9a3d5e909b0a0dcc124163936ab94c772af657","observation_id":"e13225bf-52b7-4951-86b6-efb0cd9277f5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.379275Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.052990Z","title":"GLM Team and Zhipu AI","venue":null,"work_id":"9fffd841-646b-4805-b182-f4853844e411","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:478414e98aa96d390eb96d2073aa57875a0e274c99b103fc657e551d13d6d4c9","observation_id":"5a3c86a3-1461-44b2-94eb-ab31af16f2cd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.054198Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.15188","last_updated":"2026-05-14T17:59:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T03:40:42.079660Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T17:59:28Z","title":"FutureSim: Replaying World Events to Evaluate Adaptive Agents","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2605.15188","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.15188","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2605.15188","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:49:54.815029Z","title":"FutureSim: Replaying World Events to Evaluate Adaptive Agents","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"b2690141-822c-41ef-b53c-fd7789ebc170","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.15188","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:85bb682304a1c67030925d31f1d9015989f27e0374f68f1929702c8d11ecd125","observation_id":"4cca3f23-51ea-48fd-a970-c86c7f6b0152","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.387127Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:20:08.727764+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:20:08.727764+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.15188","last_updated":"2026-05-14T17:59:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T03:40:42.079660Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T17:59:28Z","title":"FutureSim: Replaying World Events to Evaluate Adaptive Agents","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2605.15188","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.15188","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2605.15188","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:49:54.815029Z","title":"FutureSim: Replaying World Events to Evaluate Adaptive Agents","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"b2690141-822c-41ef-b53c-fd7789ebc170","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.15188","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4181d9d368ed4faf5f7e17da1cd503386624b6321dcf4592d7461631ca2141f","observation_id":"af63ff8f-3371-476f-a5dc-d1364c579a8c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:40.475691Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:20:08.727764+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:20:08.727764+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2411.15594","last_updated":"2025-10-19T10:32:43Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T06:43:22.011336Z","submitted_at":"2024-11-23T16:03:35Z","title":"A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2411.15594","doi":"10.1016/j.xinn.2025.101253","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2411.15594","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"2676656a-67bd-4ad5-bad6-cb6f5fcdbfbe","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2411.15594","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ec5ca599e8a403d6afc35bf801e988ad1ab33cbb7ff002c37ef382de70d69f41","observation_id":"b81a63c5-82ce-436a-b1d5-444bd4af4357","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.389783Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T18:20:01.818871+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T18:20:01.818871+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.25052","last_updated":"2026-05-24T12:57:01Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:05:55.119852Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-24T12:57:01Z","title":"Faithfulness Metrics Don't Measure Faithfulness: A Meta-Evaluation with Ground Truth","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2605.25052","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2605.25052","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.383300Z","title":"Faithfulness Metrics Don't Measure Faithfulness: A Meta-Evaluation with Ground Truth","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"eb1591d8-acc8-4b46-8576-0bf4d699cd9d","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.25052","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:44d6879e6714a22deec79386cb86bf9133024e21359a26fc056b88fc556c0ea1","observation_id":"c7767332-5b37-456c-8dae-ea9c97ab7d1f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.384847Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.054912Z","title":"Toni J.B","venue":null,"work_id":"dd1189e4-61bd-4655-a5e4-1f49d6e9334b","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c59b622d4431d11eed1ebd101e6ff8c19c939644559302b17c84c0242b2b24f5","observation_id":"c021c0d0-14f8-453c-a211-74667a28abda","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.056018Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.056584Z","title":"URLhttps://aclanthology.org/2024.emnlp-main.842/","venue":null,"work_id":"6abd12ae-5f6d-4876-ab2e-c06aefd51ad8","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bbbbda5080093937f2d09e1ca775a693d51784e1eb93bc460c9f9dcec9fb35c8","observation_id":"c803a02a-88fb-4a55-b227-0ddb9ac60c19","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.057843Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.09117","last_updated":"2026-05-27T02:49:05Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T21:08:12.093049Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-10T02:47:59Z","title":"Decoupling Reasoning and Confidence: Resurrecting Calibration in Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2603.09117","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2603.09117","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.380452Z","title":"Decoupling Reasoning and Confidence: Resurrecting Calibration in Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"8ce2624c-609a-462d-9085-c3a55b82fe1a","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2603.09117","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53aabd62ad60f4994ddacc8360e652b1adbc1ad0e35c9fbad204fdc443b3ae54","observation_id":"9970aff0-bf3a-46fb-9b38-86896c95b3e6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.381696Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.64898/2026.04.10.717844","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"T., Dooms, T., Yamamoto, R., Meehl, J., Molnar, C., Bissell, M., Hazra, D., Fang, C., Nguyen, N., Anderson, M., Osborne, C., Duffy, P., Toomey, B., Klee, E., Myasoedova, E., Ryu, A","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","work_id":"378f30b2-9f6c-4aad-9e71-8e483e26a8e0","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ce361006af250efa32b7ec1ce9947f4bd350869af82b9f44e686301cf7aa27a3","observation_id":"08f1d861-37fc-41fd-ab95-59282066a9cd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:40.477545Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:20:09.172942+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:20:09.172942+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1126/sciadv.adp1528","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Park, Rafael Valdece Sousa Bastos, and Philip E","venue":"Science Advances","work_id":"a987b881-4c87-45eb-ab56-e02e7849eaf5","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ddd41ce04b120077c4937fef55bc55b3f94b0777df0a25516a3e042312e9dda4","observation_id":"9883e102-f572-4e45-85f1-4152eef1c7cf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:40.479446Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:20:09.670753+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:20:09.670753+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2505.09388","last_updated":"2025-05-14T13:41:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2025-05-14T13:41:34Z","title":"Qwen3 Technical Report","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2505.09388","doi":"10.1016/j.aiopen.2022.12","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2505.09388","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-11T11:50:26.030339Z","title":"Qwen3 Technical Report","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"25a4e30c-1232-48e7-9925-02fa12ba7c9e","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2505.09388","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:13d83cedf06948fafbedfd5069b180eaf709c187170753cca7366839b7cf4dc4","observation_id":"2831b9f5-d52f-4ceb-b674-7a9bc165cc5f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:16:41.390276Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.049662Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"72fb0c9b-80d3-4977-a556-39b6fe2828be","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dac61bb12ffb02aee3d738b1b2d1640e4c6ae522c6e7c8581e64a36b9c9383ac","observation_id":"bb2c40c2-4d18-459a-8723-399a25e6e666","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.050693Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.051191Z","title":"Your answer will be evaluated using the BRIER SCORING RULE which is basically (- (1 - p)^2) if your answer is correct and (- 1 - p^2) if your answer is incorrect","venue":null,"work_id":"d8db8657-fe7d-44e5-aaee-eb02ce1c8a0d","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6a08e1d981d41c77d629928d9f42422e4663175ba7d266e1c282532228f7e2be","observation_id":"d887d1d6-bf7d-40fc-94d0-f146967437b3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.052413Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.046163Z","title":"Then the value of log2(x4y3z2) is m n wheremandnare relatively prime positive integers","venue":null,"work_id":"7dcf63d0-355f-4705-9554-723ea0d235c1","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ca51130e69ddbe626be413d650d36126e484bd2075d99444bcd2166cfd579c61","observation_id":"982e7cc8-b74b-4788-9658-813018049119","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.047382Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.047942Z","title":"Models and decode.We compare the untrained Qwen3-8B base model with ourQwen3-8B model trained according to the DCPO recipe of Ma et al","venue":null,"work_id":"d62078ce-c678-496d-85bf-7fac9a32c154","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:09:53.133146Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.08046"},"observation_digest":"sha256:492e278e8a1717ad37e059d6ac7eb560f0aab10f6af60829ae97da19228dd24b","observation_id":"455e6733-6fc8-4205-9d5d-62081035ba37","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-10T01:26:44.049097Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08046","last_updated":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T13:32:27.478556Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T01:52:09Z","title":"What LLM Forecasters Know but Don't Say: Probing Internal Representations for Calibration and Faithfulness"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":20,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":9,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":1,"verified_exact":4,"verified_fuzzy":6},"total_outbound_references":20},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 20 of 20 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.08046."}