{"as_of":"2026-08-23T14:59:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:023b5c5ac657410cfb6defc0708ee823b42cfe634f01e1c44c275db299b28c2f","coverage":[{"denominator":41,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":41,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":41,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":41,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.10152/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.10152/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.10152/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System.Communi- cations of the ACM21(7):558–565, 1978","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1978},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f33f3d9aa31dc7532c24b6096b7737de3c2e6cec17532354ba555ba83efb2743","observation_id":"57461842-22e2-43e4-a4c9-25812a806dc5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"The Part-Time Parliament.ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 16(2):133–169, 1998","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1998},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e7a9e3d70ab865f4737c7f4444c8a9aad3e1bda90d42aaf7f77b182814d53e47","observation_id":"2b56bcdd-9484-4440-a175-b462f995e266","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Paxos Made Simple.ACM SIGACT News32(4):51–58, 2001","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2001},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b79faf5ee9a8e6cfc04f3230962a4c73cdc7fd62f369033dcfe02724dc7100b3","observation_id":"4eb2c67a-4341-4225-99af-724a2edc21fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:25f04e993f2048e17e058a093d2f5aef78c11b8342418e2ef16eb6c76bdf4351","observation_id":"21779913-e591-4006-9023-8022ebc7d987","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Fischer, Nancy A","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1985},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f96715da06eb65b6dbc1163654f2aaf53d54e81be468d632a385dd460cf15a08","observation_id":"660c4252-704d-4fe8-825b-ee2e10b1ca65","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"3385.93428","doi":"10.1145/93385.93428","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Agreement is harder than consensus: Set consensus problems in totally asynchronous systems","venue":null,"work_id":"d0e4054b-0fd9-4363-9cd6-ab999cad9784","year":1990},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e1a418fe97a3062f0e62828b9ae43e4f7f94b9ad1f319d473bf8b71408d19bfd","observation_id":"c3d28cc6-23fd-4937-969a-bdd6e5d4637d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.589751Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:17.322935+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:17.322935+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"7088.167119","doi":"10.1145/167088.167119","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Generalized FLP impossibility result for t-resilient asyn- chronous computations","venue":null,"work_id":"a1da9b4a-4096-4c4d-835b-2361c9dc30c9","year":1993},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0be9cc37bba61b8c1583608141dd8d7648c1bba8245725c7fc016fa934b75030","observation_id":"3934ea99-02d6-4a4f-a928-247c75d9afc9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.579113Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:17.690569+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:17.690569+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"The topological structure of asynchronous computabil- ity.Journal of the ACM46(6):858–923, 1999","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a3b1a2613d72890da077afa91273747104922de3a0a85a52cefa5e8191d3127b","observation_id":"1363fa8e-96de-4728-b0da-c66a854886e1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"7088.167122","doi":"10.1145/167088.167122","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Wait-free k-set agreement is impossible: The topol- ogy of public knowledge","venue":null,"work_id":"98d91c6b-38db-4f96-b5c7-4fea8aadddef","year":1993},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:39958383d16eae5538424569c28dcb4d9c08f00bfd386514eb61d9cddda74ab3","observation_id":"b920fbab-0b43-46e1-a64c-0beeb7212cd2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.578030Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:18.439944+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:18.439944+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"The Byzantine Generals Problem.ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems4(3):382–401, 1982","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1982},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:35742990f463c580436f6c57e8db828ae3d231c21d6dc8f6f94e3fb2e5a69c26","observation_id":"b06a2066-b960-4d46-8b72-8ac96ce225e9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Consensus in the presence of par- tial synchrony.Journal of the ACM35(2):288–323, 1988","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1988},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3109237e28939a8397b5b732e9f7caa88b30d6dc5c9f364e0fe6ee0f87ed42f1","observation_id":"e2eab4ea-29ed-4535-9512-3cdbc1d85948","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1145/226643","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.478042Z","title":"Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems.Journal of the ACM43(2):225–267, 1996","venue":null,"work_id":"7d8b03b1-9a0e-4d12-aeba-644b3eb55e85","year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:afa1f18ef087807b4df544b78552d59cdfa35c660b8ce00afb29705c5a40d30d","observation_id":"ac87afba-8197-46b0-8987-a4cedb260662","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.486073Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:18.818119+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:18.818119+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"0221.806707","doi":"10.1145/800221.806707","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":"Another Advantage of Free Choice: Completely Asynchronous Agreement Protocols","venue":null,"work_id":"00b34d28-58f5-4050-853b-cf2218578168","year":1983},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9ce2031cfebb6a37e43e089a820d7198af556b71b77e14d24e027449504d89e3","observation_id":"cd98592c-1da6-49da-943c-eee6de9ec9b7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.550313Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:19.195091+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:19.195091+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1109/sfcs.1983.48","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"241f426f-31d2-4fcb-bcf4-119f5ae1fbc7","year":1983},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9902c42d1491877f03e2776a5ca3fc5556005d453ded6da9f7f63a2d6281105b","observation_id":"482eedeb-9e25-4923-91a8-02ea4f1f9f98","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.554662Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:19.58995+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:19.58995+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"FastAsynchronousByzantineAgreement with OptimalResilience","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:62d73795bc69373268b9b40d84cbd98e519d12202546908839b3ebbb3f392ac0","observation_id":"d608c617-24fe-4680-975a-2223bab5fa4f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"7088.167105","doi":"10.1145/167088.167105","metadata_source":"arxiv_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:28:24.338817Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"5f60e7f9-6216-4cbf-9113-a0539e81e87b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:30840a52ceb1010eafccd1b5b7eeffca49a0c733ff10d6a1d241b1fe61ecda77","observation_id":"d7dc87aa-e1c8-4ff5-8e1a-3162cc113645","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.472588Z","resolver_source":"arxiv_id","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:19.948721+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:19.948721+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"The Honey Badger of BFT Protocols","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:756ec87183c392fa271be2b6ae80316f3a5a7576d955ad0a1c4932ea8fa9882c","observation_id":"80353946-26cb-4833-a4fd-82b3095ad436","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d675e8171ad709c5e8706232092693fffb33103a62b95ca2f69fbc9b19550481","observation_id":"0c33aaf9-8cc2-426f-b3f3-47f17907741f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"The Stellar Consensus Protocol: A Federated Model for Internet-level Consensus","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7f30a22ce6e54b88a3ac6fe18e999957226043220a65d77ca960ca69ef4e805f","observation_id":"37c75213-956b-4b64-a8c3-9abd1d53b79a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1803.05069","last_updated":"2019-07-23T05:19:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T12:47:45.584037Z","submitted_at":"2018-03-13T23:01:05Z","title":"HotStuff: BFT Consensus in the Lens of Blockchain","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1803.05069","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Reiter, Guy Golan Gueta, and Ittai Abraham","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1803.05069","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bfb6a855481d384183254eb914a974ee85581778989c399a03868209a26c9697","observation_id":"53718117-afe6-402a-9478-143427800f74","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Tendermint: Consensus without Mining","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b634470efd223ee5aa8cb51a6812e3722df7971f056f45d2db06f5baf71bd699","observation_id":"c7331e9e-c853-4738-b9a9-037ef9b15b90","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Chan and Elaine Shi","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:967a333cca2ff419e9f8a5250fd4acc0c5c13beb57b7a8ee667fa0fe21b51400","observation_id":"5da0eb36-be11-4f06-a9e8-3ca742ab3825","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Algorand: Scaling Byzantine Agreements for Cryptocurrencies","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:01a0cdbf4d69983f02685530b735bff92fdfa8d7fdf637fcc3ac081a6b17d3e5","observation_id":"ea6eba17-956b-46e8-9290-3297188e120d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2106.10362","last_updated":"2024-07-09T18:10:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:15:59.863774Z","submitted_at":"2021-06-18T21:34:17Z","title":"Jolteon and Ditto: Network-Adaptive Efficient Consensus with Asynchronous Fallback","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2106.10362","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2106.10362","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.475672Z","title":"Jolteon and Ditto: Network-Adaptive Efficient Consensus with Asynchronous Fallback","venue":"cs.DC","work_id":"3520a038-5533-4bfe-af5f-376f72fab6a1","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2106.10362","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1052d6206333b5550cc1fbcf6d56fa8c8b3fba7fec42449156a49bd263e843e2","observation_id":"6d5708a7-f413-4218-bf13-ed556a9453fb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.478295Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"HotStuff-2: Optimal Two-Phase Responsive BFT","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2390936ceff0116c71f8c7964737b2ca8913b782a1645d28be79dab6a649de40","observation_id":"dcea6ac9-4583-48d4-890d-a2d6a0635209","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Ouroboros: A Provably Secure Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocol","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bf4e6fcf65885d0ddb1123089cefafc8e159c4f9a7f2923041f4b4dfd0fed679","observation_id":"2fc9b2be-13a9-4458-ae8d-17faeafafb13","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Ouroboros Praos: An Adaptively-Secure, Semi-synchronous Proof-of-Stake Blockchain","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5b10a717ba80a26ce2947be0b3a1ffda5a2e2a2a90294ac52de92b97f212ea74","observation_id":"b3fa2101-38b4-4325-8bc5-5e7d7f6f95c9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2007.01560","last_updated":"2020-07-03T09:05:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T22:04:59.176758Z","submitted_at":"2020-07-03T09:05:40Z","title":"GRANDPA: a Byzantine Finality Gadget","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2007.01560","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2007.01560","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2007.01560","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:49:54.815029Z","title":"GRANDPA: a Byzantine Finality Gadget","venue":"cs.DC","work_id":"e1a2d844-23e4-49ef-8b83-235db7179cf2","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2007.01560","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:10cb01eee3dc581ff0b9e587c7ec6299f86319a68ab6b5b30e0fe1f034d835b3","observation_id":"b8798715-b80a-4f0a-b8f4-fd5e6ec6e31c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.532760Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:22.864004+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:22.864004+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1710.09437","last_updated":"2019-01-22T09:31:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T18:40:30.305251Z","submitted_at":"2017-10-25T19:54:52Z","title":"Casper the Friendly Finality Gadget","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1710.09437","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Casper the Friendly Finality Gadget","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1710.09437","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1ab0c9d0d7d26ae976f0438d88fea5d1f2fd4841c44e836d6390ab73083e25fb","observation_id":"d03695c8-d849-4782-96bc-cdd32bad4e08","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1710.09437","last_updated":"2019-01-22T09:31:32Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T18:40:30.305251Z","submitted_at":"2017-10-25T19:54:52Z","title":"Casper the Friendly Finality Gadget","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1710.09437","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"URL:https://arxiv.org/ abs/1710.09437","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1710.09437","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:26167912f9ad89bbc20bf83f2bf0382408a4287d04d3dcea945a6a28b18601a9","observation_id":"0837cdc3-3331-4b59-a8ba-d8c27ddadd48","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1906.08936","last_updated":"2020-08-24T14:54:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T03:34:27.713672Z","submitted_at":"2019-06-21T03:55:19Z","title":"Scalable and Probabilistic Leaderless BFT Consensus through Metastability","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1906.08936","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Scal- able and Probabilistic Leaderless BFT Consensus through Metastability","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1906},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1906.08936","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1e3656f26191876c98eb89554043bfcbdeed9af5e43734ffd590e223260071e6","observation_id":"3188a86a-dcd1-447d-978d-653ee8db9cfe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1906.08936","last_updated":"2020-08-24T14:54:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-21T03:34:27.713672Z","submitted_at":"2019-06-21T03:55:19Z","title":"Scalable and Probabilistic Leaderless BFT Consensus through Metastability","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1906.08936","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"URL:https://arxiv.org/ abs/1906.08936","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1906},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1906.08936","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e3ccca79c4499ebd9ea471a76d10517f1ec2fc4eb27fd11fc0abd7ce6f152c5a","observation_id":"97d71aba-d3e2-46cd-8f9c-3ee2a7f7e6b9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Casper the Friendly Ghost: A Correct-by-Construction Blockchain Consensus Protocol","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bd4d5a78579756b8615b9d75c1de148e3d001d9ec6761cedfbc82fa58e88d1d2","observation_id":"961a882a-11da-46b5-89a2-58b790e623e8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2102.08325","last_updated":"2021-06-04T05:07:56Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:45:09.355523Z","submitted_at":"2021-02-16T18:12:59Z","title":"All You Need is DAG","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2102.08325","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"All You Need is DAG","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2102.08325","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3c18293d52b39f60e358f457dde482e2210ce8fbdab9c18f5696e3a27d1f0ba5","observation_id":"b4664436-679c-4ce0-a841-d9efeb0455d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"The Swirlds Hashgraph Consensus Algorithm: Fair, Fast, Byzantine Fault Tol- erance","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:603c26b761a3b238420a3a8cdf49e1a6d773412ddbc4ae7fef700d224cd2a683","observation_id":"5dfb3ddb-e992-4931-8edb-d36d21146128","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Aleph: Efficient Atomic Broadcast in Asynchronous Networks with Byzantine Nodes","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:272a8b4977efef15f378ca54e21d5aa001a079f60115f9a399514b9a9d627d03","observation_id":"ae2dc36b-dd0f-418a-aa88-886f5e484c49","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2105.11827","last_updated":"2022-03-16T09:55:20Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T13:22:53.981233Z","submitted_at":"2021-05-25T10:53:41Z","title":"Narwhal and Tusk: A DAG-based Mempool and Efficient BFT Consensus","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2105.11827","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2105.11827","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.518425Z","title":"Narwhal and Tusk: A DAG-based Mempool and Efficient BFT Consensus","venue":"cs.CR","work_id":"82525197-07ae-4728-b998-7a7d67fb9e9c","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2105.11827","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f46ca15848fedfeae5e49a09b19efb575a94cba43eb93a85d5af94e52e7b93f6","observation_id":"72270a37-17ee-48f1-abe2-c1a3ee671b68","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.520580Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2201.05677","last_updated":"2022-09-07T05:36:35Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T21:38:16.507100Z","submitted_at":"2022-01-14T21:16:07Z","title":"Bullshark: DAG BFT Protocols Made Practical","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2201.05677","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Bull- shark: DAG BFT Protocols Made Practical","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2201.05677","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f86812496dbc33a9fe083ed41a3e159299959a78edaa57c3de8c8ccc7beef1b6","observation_id":"2facf02f-3e50-4a2c-b8ce-1807b56ea4bf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"Mysticeti: Reaching the Limits of Latency with Uncertified DAGs","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:34f94b029ddc414e4732974d092ca93c8aeee542c3f78feb5fc4c9046ba39aaa","observation_id":"3d32f3a0-c816-44eb-ba3f-3afded812fc9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2205.09174","last_updated":"2023-09-22T20:40:09Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T01:23:03.091976Z","submitted_at":"2022-05-18T18:45:20Z","title":"Cordial Miners: Fast and Efficient Consensus for Every Eventuality","version":6},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2205.09174","doi":"10.4230/lipics.disc.2023.26","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2205.09174","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T02:49:54.815029Z","title":"Cordial Miners: Fast and Efficient Consensus for Every Eventuality","venue":"cs.DC","work_id":"c24cbae7-d833-49b3-af47-098782ff39b7","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2205.09174","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d4e504126ae3c6d7dfe241d40f0207902604f545ca2ca3780265295696686ddc","observation_id":"48b0dbb3-869b-459b-b3f0-a8561402107f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T14:00:32.510256Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:25.353807+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-07-16T18:51:25.353807+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2402.08068","last_updated":"2025-01-22T09:44:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-20T01:20:18.684263Z","submitted_at":"2024-02-12T21:27:32Z","title":"The Blocklace: A Byzantine-repelling and Universal Conflict-free Replicated Data Type","version":4},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2402.08068","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","title":"The Blocklace: A Byzantine-repelling and Universal Conflict-free Replicated Data Type","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2402.08068","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.10152"},"observation_digest":"sha256:465be427319b6dd79d6c1b01ed4372e1596971aa845b18658d002ce36ddf3964","observation_id":"6b6cf970-7713-42da-865f-2f642cd9ef23","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-14T13:54:31.204150Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.10152","last_updated":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.DC","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T16:02:22.105984Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T06:22:25Z","title":"Consensus as Collapse Policy: Communication Evidence, Horizons, and Prefix Decisions"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":41,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":2,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":28,"verified_exact":11,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":41},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-23T06:30:53.778098+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 23 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 41 of 41 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.10152."}