{"as_of":"2026-08-11T14:44:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:dd17f491004cdafc6b506d022ac4bae8a58ef55e264d0bd0e49d6d2fd478e7ba","coverage":[{"denominator":16,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":16,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:29.135533Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":16,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":16,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.13071/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.13071/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.13071/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.26185","last_updated":"2026-06-24T13:24:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T09:50:01.846501Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-24T13:24:40Z","title":"Necessary but Not Sufficient: Temperature Control and Reproducibility in LLM-as-Judge Safety Evaluations","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2606.26185","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:27.844913Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:27.844913Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2606.26185","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:df7368ffd7a8a70a732f73853d7aa2c729748d4adb9197015f8a1d6deb41b8e4","observation_id":"992e5398-d529-4625-a9f2-499d87be3443","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:27.844913Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:27.927771Z","title":"ClaudeCode: Anagenticcodingtool.https://docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/ claude-code, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:27.927771Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ccacddf8521b84449178d33f122afb10429248dc3d824b0c6a7ec297ee8563c9","observation_id":"1d227edd-ba51-4e86-a008-aa20569df6b2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:27.927771Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.000027Z","title":"ChatGPT Codex.https://openai.com/index/introducing-codex/, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.000027Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:01d8aec34d251ac271433970669901122199291ca2d5830ba826935cc6b54cba","observation_id":"b81d87a3-3fec-4e70-b691-94386e05ef2c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.000027Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.096803Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1981},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.096803Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:92827b825b2b0d37356485cadca3ad88d9e75b6972b5f5870e3e9fc3460dd6a4","observation_id":"9dbfa972-e7ca-4aa3-b00c-dbcbdf182491","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.096803Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.166261Z","title":"Zheng, W.-L","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.166261Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:800f50fa881d897531b06ed3d501ad5db547e0fa205ee6d1e154c369f23912a8","observation_id":"42664787-00de-4370-82db-1568033edb10","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.166261Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2606.19544","last_updated":"2026-06-17T19:37:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T21:36:12.342843Z","submitted_at":"2026-06-17T19:37:13Z","title":"Reliability without Validity: A Systematic, Large-Scale Evaluation of LLM-as-a-Judge Models Across Agreement, Consistency, and Bias","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2606.19544","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.241184Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.241184Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2606.19544","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:67f49b7e1dedd2056bb2734e35c45f8b6679e6919b3b9625c4018874872ddf84","observation_id":"7372c3e8-b551-4f79-a773-8cd860d755a8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.241184Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.313674Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.313674Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0cfa70699ca4345c8ea20a485d8a01705ee0d8589baf3898aa7dda59a5c69f52","observation_id":"d7ed4084-4ac7-41b5-93fa-b9082dfdd99f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.313674Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.408676Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.408676Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:afd69b515798c4435094b602e0884fc1ae1db3a6bf5de372a17eb45adb0962bd","observation_id":"52e2a281-3132-4099-9a94-b0559c9ad7cc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.408676Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.496515Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.496515Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:33cb80c964b70dfff0ccc8606abf203b3cb1f8355304ee297fd671e71dd9cbe4","observation_id":"a3fdaee9-939c-4382-ace5-dfb94a162d27","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.496515Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.596832Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.596832Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:690bdddf18b2d8b9345f8364ca8be9fb7c63ca5a4efd605a0d3c6036cbbf2fb0","observation_id":"be6e39fb-887a-4c42-bdd7-c17ac61345a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.596832Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2311.05232","last_updated":"2024-11-19T12:42:45Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T16:45:07.733095Z","submitted_at":"2023-11-09T09:25:37Z","title":"A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2311.05232","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.673120Z","title":"Huang, W","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.673120Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2311.05232","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f4323d9c74275a0f9db64e67dcd9cc2e7b390b95af7257d8751e1530d24146ac","observation_id":"de3be781-2572-49e1-8bd0-af238c6673e1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.673120Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.763257Z","title":"Shinn, F","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.763257Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f3b23a8535e8ab16d3eaf452fed86d7592fb82c03c8c9d742c8c301007fad528","observation_id":"f957a89a-c605-4250-88ad-a3a0d150914e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.763257Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.871188Z","title":"Hitzig, M","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.871188Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5d612e3be68b95844a82f0fd215f8006b4d226e9422dadc29d72ca1de8c27895","observation_id":"31c6070a-8aa3-498b-9a0b-584984eaba94","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.871188Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.963934Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.963934Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8e79bccd0e0c5398e96f2b9d9f564782dc91ee12ef89b0608047d193b6dfee5e","observation_id":"c52138b1-4bf5-4116-acf0-353c7df9b3bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:28.963934Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2404.13501","last_updated":"2024-04-21T01:49:46Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2024-04-21T01:49:46Z","title":"A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agents","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2404.13501","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:29.076513Z","title":"Zhang, X","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:29.076513Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2404.13501","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:606e7bc1f4e55220b4fa8b7f4e574e43bdce1e0b1db5949f03a8fd8f87513f17","observation_id":"3b5f5894-9d9f-4f79-b581-7c7c66a4851d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:29.076513Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:29.135533Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:29.135533Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.13071"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8989a692c3ce1938ecd4b22f4e7ac9b5130b2ac1c9a55e83e6467ceed13af63e","observation_id":"140ba1c3-c01f-4671-8a26-0bcd6be492d8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T07:23:29.135533Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.13071","last_updated":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.SE","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-09T07:54:19.157537Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-11T07:45:13Z","title":"Compaction as Epistemic Failure: How Agentic LLM Tools Fabricate Confirmed Results from Killed Processes"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":16,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":16,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":16},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:44.6726+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-11T06:34:36.301508+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 11 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 16 of 16 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.13071."}