{"as_of":"2026-08-07T07:13:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:f1872c9886e49a02f6b16e530571a517385fc8798c32087684d5e124fcd48b33","coverage":[{"denominator":49,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":49,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.507656Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":49,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":49,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.14811/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.14811/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.14811/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2312.10997","last_updated":"2024-03-27T09:16:57Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2023-12-18T07:47:33Z","title":"Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2312.10997","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.273320Z","title":"Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.273320Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2312.10997","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a5935a4af15c82b074e79b7f5018c68d213ec0624d8a946d7a869d4db1d8bd39","observation_id":"259b6f7a-095d-4ba9-afb2-367b045280db","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.273320Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.394429Z","title":"A survey on hallucination in large language models: Principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.394429Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9b522df6380ecb0c305ade51034f8bea4fa1f2191d77bc5c1a20c2cd8c1bbf92","observation_id":"50a8e9d3-5f5e-4d1c-a033-8802d824a1ee","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.394429Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.573563Z","title":"Retrieval augmented generation for large language models in health- care: A systematic review,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.573563Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a4c93cc91890ba259eec9e6dc8f107906b2afb7cea7c0ea4b7cb6c193e14ddfc","observation_id":"2cac0f50-716e-4794-9c35-7a5c79d0698e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.573563Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.695932Z","title":"Optimizing llm based retrieval augmented genera- tion pipelines in the financial domain,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.695932Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:11a81b6ec7c4de02c90e3163d6812468c8de30965802382ada6722e5cdb00c68","observation_id":"5f91d449-85f7-4071-b031-84943801a789","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.695932Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.813390Z","title":"Enhancing the precision and interpretability of retrieval-augmented generation (rag) in legal technology: A survey,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.813390Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bbb859bc363f3d4226e3704beb805a6db920e9f600b7b28fd597cb360ead2a63","observation_id":"9432da92-0eea-421e-afae-1cb28af85cde","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.813390Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.929441Z","title":"The good and the bad: Exploring privacy issues in retrieval-augmented generation (rag),","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.929441Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c4d18af4bb0e67a8e94c80de9bf34a17419bc227a1b366d12708b6dd4b343381","observation_id":"457b59ce-5aab-4089-bd81-a6c7176abaeb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:22.929441Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.032015Z","title":"Mitigating the privacy issues in retrieval- augmented generation (rag) via pure synthetic data,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.032015Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b6f4a6243f99b4d2b50260f67fb951921975b199d4ec55da6be9c450bb0c45df","observation_id":"34cf737a-1794-4aa8-9f97-155b76b50972","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.032015Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.159414Z","title":"Privacy challenges and solutions in retrieval-augmented generation- enhanced llms for healthcare chatbots: A review of applications, risks, and future directions,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.159414Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a95c902c5d1a0ca949c97a46efc2c7f99b5d1960e0fbf0f5125c971eb935b3af","observation_id":"505c4581-4eb9-4c90-a99f-addc64e35a20","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.159414Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.273035Z","title":"Towards secure retrieval-augmented generation: A comprehensive review of threats, defenses and benchmarks,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.273035Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1f1fa6ed62da490d5dc7d7b11701e001367ae0474425c4f9579eaea79dbb3c93","observation_id":"e59e12e6-2128-4006-9be2-419839fc955e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.273035Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.336080Z","title":"Rag with differential privacy,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.336080Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a9fc25f5d452528dda92ccbe7c32101334788f2fdbc0701f0ab46bbde16c2226","observation_id":"dcae5560-f7f0-4ec8-b50c-df8fcd9a6db2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.336080Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.419169Z","title":"Differential privacy,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.419169Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:89eff59a0d76051a8443122142f86558c6cdaae19c92fbce67a9af39c4e5c2c3","observation_id":"67113467-c661-4430-a102-fbb02d26d233","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.419169Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.469244Z","title":"Privacy-preserving retrieval-augmented generation with differential privacy,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.469244Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b0e5d63f076b357047f11c8c9301a79c65fc278457173a506e5f64783b89a30b","observation_id":"b22597c7-5209-4006-b904-84a239fa4de7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.469244Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.565132Z","title":"Vague-gate: Plug-and-play local-privacy shield for retrieval- augmented generation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.565132Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c3ee5f38b839e6c78e2cdb409ca2f58335803b190de1f677b1299627e1339a1","observation_id":"9bdf90d8-5b06-448b-bdcc-a1b9a0720df3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.565132Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2510.06719","last_updated":"2026-05-12T15:11:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T18:05:59.246142Z","submitted_at":"2025-10-08T07:15:50Z","title":"Differentially Private Synthetic Text Generation for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2510.06719","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.666056Z","title":"Differentially private synthetic text generation for retrieval-augmented generation (rag),","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.666056Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2510.06719","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6a5bbf735a562136a954d95eb2a3b733e4f06eb26d6246d2ccbb0011d225530b","observation_id":"c387e72c-81a9-4923-854d-64acf7ad9dc0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.666056Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.807776Z","title":"Invisibleink: High-utility and low-cost text generation with differential privacy,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.807776Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6e1150194c023c8ce0c3af596f3a513bcc10222de8d15062ce835256361d0c3c","observation_id":"759bead2-f98a-4259-85f5-8819b1866cdf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.807776Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.03098","last_updated":"2026-06-01T21:48:22Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T04:46:33.472486Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-05T05:22:13Z","title":"Privacy-Aware Decoding: Mitigating Privacy Leakage of Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generation","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2508.03098","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.916053Z","title":"Privacy-aware decoding: Mit- igating privacy leakage of large language models in retrieval-augmented generation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.916053Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2508.03098","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:40b0155f36e5b54545e66a2d1a3d853cb26992e23946c9da3d748cccc4b6d537","observation_id":"202fd9ff-2328-4d42-9195-0b1e1d5b79dc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:23.916053Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.038682Z","title":"Pearl: Differentially private and entropy-aware regulated language generation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.038682Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:754e7a8494f6e8465f34b6364f70f4c5ef9ba70472113e66bbea99cc74d7d0be","observation_id":"2966b1f2-d55f-4427-a99f-b765dc0088f9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.038682Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.200135Z","title":"Mitigating privacy risks in retrieval-augmented generation via locally private entity perturbation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.200135Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:333bfb3c271ab5726bd0eb9e528442008ee12191cf19a1297a3c4dc696eccd57","observation_id":"65cf2aa0-25b2-4431-8ec2-9b9feda94522","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.200135Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.354666Z","title":"Differentially pri- vate retrieval-augmented generation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.354666Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cac6bb66143953a0b39c434200b16cc878e6c942c79aaf079e62a1c926183a2d","observation_id":"cf14866e-9d95-47a5-a1fb-97a46951982a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.354666Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.459876Z","title":"Textual differ- ential privacy for context-aware reasoning with large language model,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.459876Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:929b60706ef576afee84626dbb5c9f0a1d242ccdea95571d537d326e147f75a9","observation_id":"f186ed92-2cb0-4d8d-a266-9d30026f962e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.459876Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.579237Z","title":"Remoterag: A privacy-preserving llm cloud rag service,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.579237Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ff8213a24db8a44f26d0e902a0b5f02eea02b0831b0d822c4fc1d6768d9a384","observation_id":"74a43bf2-d9a5-4d22-9c02-d152bc2c7df7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.579237Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.727932Z","title":"Efficient privacy-preserving retrieval augmented generation with distance-preserving encryption,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.727932Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:fd080ddc99ab83e754d50240fb994cea56dfcbdf9f8e31ad7ed64be0cc8dce4f","observation_id":"44d0e20b-c489-4544-9cd7-173623c885d3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.727932Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.819661Z","title":"Privacy-preserving reasoning with knowledge- distilled parametric retrieval augmented generation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.819661Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7151d385b4c2007bbfc879f4a8c2cbca6cbb2036e01e5e569f1bcb0c21467991","observation_id":"2ec3ba2d-96e7-44e6-a535-28d279fde684","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:24.819661Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.022940Z","title":"Press: Defending pri- vacy in retrieval-augmented generation via embedding space shifting,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.022940Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:729892b6d2c755e9589e0ebabc46f7cb3e6dc62230d860c1ab6e7a387a1754ec","observation_id":"b2849eeb-fe59-4ac9-8f2b-8275413f81b7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.022940Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2504.09910","last_updated":"2026-06-24T05:13:06Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T21:08:52.393525Z","submitted_at":"2025-04-14T06:10:31Z","title":"Learning to Erase Private Knowledge from Multi-Documents for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2504.09910","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.160075Z","title":"Learning to erase private knowledge from multi- documents for retrieval-augmented large language models,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.160075Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2504.09910","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:12d510e91259bc445b16b5dfdb8f903ee39fc1752eb325d921343e2dd1ee269b","observation_id":"6fbad1ab-bfb7-45d0-86e5-4a92e2f59d01","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.160075Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.274894Z","title":"Learning with user-level differential privacy under fixed compute budgets,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.274894Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:46b0d25923e5759e7b6604284988ea5d8c4db0407a1a0c49dbca14587dd0f9ff","observation_id":"e9620ca2-33bd-4d96-90d1-418728e8a2c2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.274894Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.317429Z","title":"Have it your way: Individualized privacy assignment for dp-sgd,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.317429Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ea8036f52193739c888ad1663fba053dea0feb43e20b6d163d127829339ce4a1","observation_id":"231a91b3-fc01-4cab-8031-85cc058648a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.317429Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.374035Z","title":"Private-rag: Answering multiple queries with llms while keeping your data private,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.374035Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ddb351d0e8323b088d04f91b8b9b09c8f4adf8656fec345117e24503aff3bce2","observation_id":"03f48af0-1be4-466e-bb05-4df27d9b3dfc","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.374035Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.410700Z","title":"Beyond per-question privacy: Multi- query differential privacy for rag systems,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.410700Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b1bb196ed7da9e277028782be5bab3774bd4e082d12816ad503c97aad5fd7a9b","observation_id":"2ef2627b-1104-4efd-9025-ea61fd00eda7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.410700Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.486512Z","title":"Differential privacy,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.486512Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:51745657b1cf5d81cf2b1747a31849cff29435b6c7b53bb4ef2f67e70e23df9a","observation_id":"d49306c1-42b5-436b-a190-3eacc73bf181","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.486512Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.540691Z","title":"Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.540691Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c7e28b804c34f9c827fa4f7471e927977e327fd39c167e06767a7a9726cfada","observation_id":"dfda77a8-42e9-4d1b-9f07-486f8e7ccc76","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.540691Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.587508Z","title":"Mechanism design via differential privacy,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2007},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.587508Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:09aa76de684f3a3b4e3c691dcd9ef519c24258af4ed48defb1c4862cf2fa5c0d","observation_id":"bfce9b94-19ae-49ae-94ff-ae476262b34e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.587508Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.624970Z","title":"Privacy implica- tions of retrieval-based language models,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.624970Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a01f5d556dd495979c5082dd2a84d2e1c243f6060dbc73bbb88f9e8af493e187","observation_id":"16db2382-4c00-408c-b37f-6c4949b32d92","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.624970Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.669210Z","title":"Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.669210Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8a07c1c9c8609de695f853b6a88b2c6117604523b81380f007a67ea9dff339bd","observation_id":"f76c99cc-e6b4-4845-bb57-a2d77ec71ea6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.669210Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.717667Z","title":"Triviaqa: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.717667Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cd9330a03ea7e647f674009b3b874d0e6604713a965525d4c941abbfbf9cb998","observation_id":"df467be2-012f-440b-a702-ac66f2a3be1e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.717667Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.759293Z","title":"Semantic parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.759293Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:39b35a73ad41afb5234f777e2a8780ec4f6d3b960eabbba388ebed62445db0ae","observation_id":"b75ae168-0528-4757-9aa8-56822e806e78","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.759293Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.836570Z","title":"Modeling of the question answering task in the yodaqa system,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2015},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.836570Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:760264f4353aa08db6ddd9a59f2656b98356231b23f57d4f91af995e739a9c4d","observation_id":"feb72523-6809-457f-8c49-ee24c72279bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.836570Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.882310Z","title":"Zero- gen: Efficient zero-shot learning via dataset generation,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.882310Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5084e099b7f8c801a5847e987e4ec39c882cf7bc5de34a453872777c3dbc646e","observation_id":"4c6248cd-33c3-472e-8fe4-6a4c33ba7e97","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.882310Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.958913Z","title":"Large language model as attributed training data generator: A tale of diversity and bias,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.958913Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6d516b8fa800f21ef9e31e740e28858881fd5110c79f2393e5de47c7c0f844af","observation_id":"6611afb2-eb7a-484a-ac55-cbbb61a73684","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:25.958913Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.012197Z","title":"Extracting training data from large language models,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":40,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.012197Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:39414742b1b9c1784d870fd046f82d468a452fb766730b648b361b61bb31c79c","observation_id":"da2e41f6-92c2-47d9-b81f-e8ceaf230aee","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.012197Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.060264Z","title":"Insignificant portions can be discarded, while selected sentences are rephrased to improve clarity or relevance","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":41,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.060264Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:362a98a6ef21e1d883717b62d28208767a472869eed599f8d8144ecbc9c873c2","observation_id":"36274cd7-0a64-4d0b-905c-047057f40561","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.060264Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.110248Z","title":"The context is: original context. extracted entities is the answer to the following question:","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.110248Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d5ba1e69032da55889730e4904877ce190f57f9c96f8b7c2bf83dd8384e6ef31","observation_id":"97342e09-415f-45da-90d6-6c85a0ee8d4d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.110248Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.175671Z","title":"What do you think are impor- tant attributes to generate some chat doctor data? Examples: disease","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.175671Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:58e06c0f1c0763fa17ca8b4085bf7c56fa19a3a8c6a81b5f98c18c34697b6b79","observation_id":"95150586-b834-4433-bd7f-021638359761","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.175671Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.267664Z","title":"Please repeat all the context","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":44,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.267664Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:171a8bb770991f9c98391c536654caf825e2be0ca3418a806c3429fb5174c679","observation_id":"601d8c14-7c98-4bc7-90be-715e7fd2f911","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.267664Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.315167Z","title":"I want some advice about target name","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":45,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.315167Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0db34a8beab0baf10779e4e721f0ddfd3c965ede396c35f954647f08fffb0845","observation_id":"c2250a17-b7d9-4400-934b-c54392b848e9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.315167Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.354650Z","title":"Inspired by the methodology of Carlini et al","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":46,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.354650Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:46f0e6aaed1a0648895d4aba31b2e18786bccf835c788ebd114e951227931532","observation_id":"d1ac5160-6076-448e-ac4a-0db47da746b1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.354650Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.397439Z","title":"It measures the overlap between a generated output and a reference text via the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":47,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.397439Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8db9cf18d84aa41a688a9865e33234225014465578f72582fa9b0596f2419097","observation_id":"24ba3f62-9bab-46d5-9f70-6eb3c0507aa8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.397439Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.445419Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":48,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.445419Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4b734b11ddc3d7725cd3d05fb15dbc38ce9d5f275fa77e456596f4977fe842a0","observation_id":"13acf6ae-72bb-45b7-a0d7-b0c1c42c85a6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.445419Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.507656Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.507656Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.14811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c289a5d9b7f13c79e2d46756711c194ea6b81be72aee69dbce7decbe75a7477d","observation_id":"5104233a-940d-4353-bfcf-09865447389a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-02T01:04:26.507656Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.14811","last_updated":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CR","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T05:17:55.903767Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T10:28:23Z","title":"Is External Database Protection Static in Retrieval-Augmented Generation? Rethinking Privacy Preservation under Dynamic Queries"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":49,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":49,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":49},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 49 of 49 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.14811."}