{"as_of":"2026-08-16T02:40:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:8c059f0e038ec9560d943cce6b8c917378967f6309d30dad75e2e6f74a7c6187","coverage":[{"denominator":22,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":22,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.577040Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":23,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":23,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":1,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T04:27:10.055590Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:16:15.895014Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2607.15253","metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2607.15253","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T06:16:15.895014Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","venue":"cs.IR","work_id":"85d73cfe-2de3-475c-bb7a-2df6025cb815","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08944","last_updated":"2026-08-09T22:43:27Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T07:57:13.449131Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-09T22:43:27Z","title":"What Would Fix This RAG Failure? Auditing Counterfactual Response with Paired Evidence Interventions","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T04:27:10.055590Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2607.15253","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08944"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d6b25e80db9795a3c8d465032f7f9efb91f1f9b38220d7b9f6563793e8b83679","observation_id":"082dd4fe-7964-4562-a26d-22bbc4a41234","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T04:27:10.451344Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.15253/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.15253/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.15253/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:44.923040Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:44.923040Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b20880d671ec4e1e4b68f1effe196bdf42a144078eb2d87a0087975017684f1d","observation_id":"a1db3ddb-006e-4484-be1f-4d16bdfb0d95","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:44.923040Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.014880Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.014880Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7840a959c77fadaa063fd9365cd5e4103802421c56ab36e73598c00a3b2024ee","observation_id":"47551fcd-4165-49e1-bcc8-d6e87a039741","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.014880Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.080798Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.080798Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a76141c0fca725fbd26adc4da6db9374d84a24938678d2e96d741b07dad17e16","observation_id":"92fbd107-ba72-4815-a18b-e5adfcd81b9a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.080798Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.174008Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.174008Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:751f29ea1780e9d48dd07f3ef866e83cb7da8e06ba1af190ab8fb64f23fab8a0","observation_id":"11328a40-07f8-4e02-b0f8-9b0ccf811d11","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.174008Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.258490Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.258490Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4392e9f1991bf4e8736813642cf9041c35ec35d0864a7be80d939629efc6cb30","observation_id":"82d00797-564c-4d23-9e1c-fad94a52e768","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.258490Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1901.04085","last_updated":"2020-04-14T14:57:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T23:25:05.204139Z","submitted_at":"2019-01-13T23:27:58Z","title":"Passage Re-ranking with BERT","version":5},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1901.04085","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.340908Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.340908Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1901.04085","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7f615963c393a5e57c3cfee85eaafb32dc54b4d3582ec5cc302e1bf0ef4b1508","observation_id":"86787ebe-b332-4958-8932-2830ea14bf6d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.340908Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.424972Z","title":"2009.Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference(2nd ed.)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.424972Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:392c08de8a0dd33ac6d86a9799f6e8b951127c714bef6d2ee4eae3d785a74481","observation_id":"6f82f529-19e7-4026-9f63-e9fe6985bb55","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.424972Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.514480Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.514480Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8eeae54cfad006a3a3e1450f815eb7d17f3a98cda6c0691dc7fc80edc2afef24","observation_id":"47b66216-4188-479f-a11a-e1818f05b40d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.514480Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.678489Z","title":"Smith, and Mike Lewis","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.678489Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ba8fbf2fd306f1d86f57e9a72854c3bed2007f5be461827269e072c2aafe8c2a","observation_id":"c789d4af-ee06-4629-b857-7ad257d79f0a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.678489Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.844441Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2009},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.844441Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e565addd859dcf5c5e6df1f6356df4e81ea27a2748890a64a55813e7a31c72af","observation_id":"4d02475b-e407-4860-8e0a-e0f1cab958fb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.844441Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.957196Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.957196Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:66612dd3b17f1350defbaa888b930ccfaacbacc890cddb168fa0c6bd482b9471","observation_id":"11a315cf-7628-4205-832b-13031208a73e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:45.957196Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2412.15115","last_updated":"2025-01-03T02:18:21Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2024-12-19T17:56:09Z","title":"Qwen2.5 Technical Report","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2412.15115","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.167355Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.167355Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2412.15115","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e9cadadb2e0af41d85504f862db8dfa73919bb418779012d3dc6aeea5885b359","observation_id":"c709afc5-d23d-4536-a263-2c698e556175","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.167355Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.282151Z","title":"Cohen, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Christopher D","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.282151Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5b59cac09178ff0e740ca45d4ff780bc55b866ef3c4780b654d740651c1439b1","observation_id":"1ecfb542-35cd-4a3c-8ead-3936b211cfbe","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.282151Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.428985Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.428985Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d0298fb936c1643db861bc8e591f3cb335e609528965301f694aad6e7125408f","observation_id":"deb9bbab-8e3f-4f11-8276-58f857471452","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.428985Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.633487Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.633487Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c5ce38cf9db4669bb8d695db1dbb5130ecc1b77a7b736518e1a48737c404b4f8","observation_id":"06d802cb-951f-4a38-90c6-839b37b02e5e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.633487Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.734336Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.734336Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4a789e1f6ca18885de7ac9095d82c4379409920b8dc81e3f7698813a2086bc93","observation_id":"d91affcf-5d15-4a52-9833-c14cfd1b1b1f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.734336Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.892264Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.892264Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f787c03f8df09c2123a3dae11ff8a4ad7637db3315df1a07e234ac58ad4d5d39","observation_id":"32c75703-2982-4893-9118-8aa0c6901165","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.892264Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.103067Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.103067Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e4ef22abd5baae9d5cbe1a513436a91b09647a019661a45c55a530576fc697b3","observation_id":"f06222f3-9daa-4909-a16b-df964fc6c96b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.103067Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.257121Z","title":"If none: <citations>NONE</citations>","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.257121Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dbb6aa5a451bd72dc08869dfd2e4b67bbdca640fde600525a4dc5c1d99e0aff2","observation_id":"112534cc-37f0-41e1-bfe3-5927eb8377c7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.257121Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.412865Z","title":"If you reach 4, answer with your best guess","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.412865Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4acc949ad89c6cb93debda3f8ec5cc93d0f9434dadb2acc4fb9a5afb73457555","observation_id":"02acdbc0-2b10-4a3e-a3b5-d3f29d44ba84","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.412865Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.577040Z","title":"A.2 Static reader prompt The reader used to compute SRUwith in Section 2.6.1 is constrained to the supplied document and to a bare answer span","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.577040Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1e2df12fb1fd7f17722d1633d423f59b374701d24c3419d81ee36cb7c31c601c","observation_id":"dc31a1e4-584b-4323-9ee4-1e3d9b348588","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:47.577040Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.069751Z","title":"InProceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search","version":1},"reference_index":2023,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.069751Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.15253"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f6603565de356049cff65a1fddd9e3f15d9fb435dce26a71f157e918e4edfb50","observation_id":"33717c92-2fb4-4bcf-bd74-4df08476a5f2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T23:47:46.069751Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.15253","last_updated":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.IR","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T13:57:13.926713Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-16T17:48:29Z","title":"Bridge Evidence: Static Retrieval Utility Does Not Predict Causal Utility in Multi-Step Agentic Search"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":22,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":22,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":22},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T06:32:39.529945+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 22 of 22 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2607.15253."}