{"as_of":"2026-08-19T21:08:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:0d25d7e84e65f519dd3870cb7a021107fc572a103874901e68c7285d75117dd1","coverage":[{"denominator":43,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":43,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.513469Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":45,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":45,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":2,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":2,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T04:28:19.069743Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"pith","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T04:28:19.147020Z","state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2607.17811","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T23:47:36.977797Z","title":"When one good is not enough: EF1 and pareto optimality are not compatible for submodular valuations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.17811, 2026","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.23367","last_updated":"2026-07-25T21:17:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T01:31:47.345382Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-25T21:17:38Z","title":"Fair Division with Strictly Increasing Valuations: A Tight Threshold for Two-Agent EF1 and PO","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T23:47:36.977797Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2607.17811","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.23367"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3ab0efa5362b8cb4852e6ed460d41a32e04b94da16984d77c5244e00af5ea2c1","observation_id":"e3e59866-db37-4f07-bfb4-4bb2745c9bc8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T23:47:36.977797Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2607.17811","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-14T04:28:19.147020Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","venue":"cs.GT","work_id":"83715f37-6d25-4cfc-bbfb-cf66b4478b0d","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08966","last_updated":"2026-08-10T00:04:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T13:13:23.660186Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-10T00:04:07Z","title":"Best-of-Both-Worlds Fairness and Pareto Optimality","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-14T04:28:19.069743Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2607.17811","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08966"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f6fcbf85d5343f6924bcf60dc32ddfa586dca4400929eb8f3f481d68b4e3d34e","observation_id":"1c2c325e-1a20-48f6-be13-1e0a9d5ea64d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-14T04:28:19.154605Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.17811/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.17811/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.17811/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.487940Z","title":"Fair allocation of indivisible goods and chores.Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 36(1):3, 2022","venue":null,"work_id":"a4161796-0dd3-49a6-9aba-912b0d780994","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.375866Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:48cbdf98a425a37b38103d7d4cc7f398b296f44b1602896d6bb238daef966dd2","observation_id":"644d20df-577a-4546-8a43-881c1e8f1444","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.491537Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.379972Z","title":"Fair and truthful mechanisms for dichotomous valuations","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.379972Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ac79c827e61e0d32291a58636e7f7640662b2fde3e1791935001d6430fae082","observation_id":"e74bc707-9435-468f-9a96-fc2b90d18086","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.379972Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.383463Z","title":"Compatibility of Fairness and Nash Welfare under Subadditive Valuations","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.383463Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d72614b57598e29a7eb9cc3401bbfc0edeaedc2611bf46afae82536414b8beb0","observation_id":"a4b55486-af55-4e71-b1c5-73e1cb31ca77","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.383463Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2509.18673","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.300978Z","title":"Introspectively envy-free and efficient allocation of indivisible mixed manna, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":"544bce47-ca33-4687-ab2a-4adb2bdef9b0","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.387640Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:355050428bf2d356f1fbbb03dc35e092aed0141b41fc37a542f597a65df4a893","observation_id":"5f748a9d-8cb8-4816-81e0-0940af4a9dc0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.306575Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.391151Z","title":"Finding fair and efficient allocations","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.391151Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c58f793a9367759d3f52740fee4f51ea1bb7c09cf52b3af21798fd1f937943f5","observation_id":"ef9eedb0-c2cb-46fb-8790-4ed359acc873","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.391151Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.478326Z","title":"Sundaram","venue":null,"work_id":"69766d32-dfdc-4575-92af-6476b6a94a5c","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.394425Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:296811360a767f72fdf0adba66d8d9c8ccf74cd51fb7d66e54e4071b7045e040","observation_id":"0a2670fd-d588-42eb-a994-86bafbbc3de8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.481634Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.469037Z","title":"Optimal bounds on the price of fairness for indivisible goods","venue":null,"work_id":"dcdac12f-8872-4bf3-b485-3aedf17bc688","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.401095Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2af15d182237b88ec2c81a8bcc20402b9e046272446981edd3b96e9c68977dda","observation_id":"0cd93ea5-f892-4cfa-80c5-1e8b37588f9c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.472447Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.459349Z","title":"The price of fairness for indivisible goods.Theory of Computing Systems, 65(7):1069–1093, 2021","venue":null,"work_id":"9d36e50b-5f19-42c1-92ec-8716bd782ada","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.407773Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5507ed431a12281ecacd32bd60659bdac1b7571f7a828bbf829ca68459951cc4","observation_id":"9e34d91e-2f1d-49e2-9911-da9295dd454d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.463026Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-64946-3_25","metadata_source":"openalex","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T11:03:46.409680Z","title":null,"venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","work_id":"c1f53cd8-1268-4380-b948-8f2b2fe8c9b7","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.404470Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:db23c63886e74a0ef59eb9ff950efefcd578cc1b32efc3e3c75ea88415559c26","observation_id":"a4481773-5877-4a2a-92fe-5487a788c68f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.656505Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.4230/lipics.approx/random.2021.1","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.637525Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"3b391d2f-cde8-4113-97f2-752c68e849b6","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.414852Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d3354badb5bbc775c56d79cc581fdc75d28e197d24a0b2740047740cacda672e","observation_id":"99bf967c-29e9-4c90-b658-fd058936f878","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.640859Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.411539Z","title":"Finding fair and effi- cient allocations for matroid rank valuations.ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 9(4):21:1–21:41, 2021","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.411539Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bf8e465d936c4748ddbe172b398842a6d66d2b1ce1191d2ff60f6d853f130b35","observation_id":"ca6828ee-f819-40fc-9cab-10f64fda1a24","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.411539Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.421607Z","title":"Procaccia, Nisarg Shah, and Junxing Wang","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.421607Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:37e7068e234c2cdfe83c04f095bdf7ae77e27a483757f13e51221fa3003c03ce","observation_id":"dcb496bb-cdaf-442e-b5d9-e6c3fb3e54d5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.421607Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.418189Z","title":"The combinatorial assignment problem: Approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes.Journal of Political Economy, 119(6):1061–1103, 2011","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.418189Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bc0522978344f72bf3faa2ae79b7bac84bbeb60cff7097ae22638058b7b8ff92","observation_id":"2a4a153c-388b-46a1-802b-1e1d3852c293","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.418189Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.427894Z","title":"Procaccia, Nisarg Shah, and Junxing Wang","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.427894Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2bd12f48817a86e5cbe5924e8099bce72ff9b9e84ecd2563185adb481ec4cec1","observation_id":"7c4ca775-7064-455c-aa56-10261eafa87c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.427894Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.424743Z","title":"Envy-freeness up to any item with high Nash welfare: The virtue of donating items","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.424743Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5cc486c3cb927689222f0870aa07ff03c59ca977d2c27a911a056c9418d2cb11","observation_id":"218a5f76-34e4-4ed7-899c-dd39b33a774f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.424743Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.449623Z","title":"Are gross substi- tutes a substitute for submodular valuations?, 2021","venue":null,"work_id":"285f20f4-6c3a-454c-8168-ab3b8ea4e181","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.434179Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e15c2a28f9babdd61975e165baa820b8f0ba5a6fb716797fc61d799ddac0f249","observation_id":"cfe748d3-c724-4e63-b6e6-261b79205b4d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.453071Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16665","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.616276Z","title":"Fair and efficient allocations under subadditive valuations","venue":null,"work_id":"8798ed2d-75c8-4f3a-aa17-49157c9d552b","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.431136Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:74ddbf6a797eec36dba8e8c44bfd9990a002bf601e04983b01ccdb0352e5c818","observation_id":"b2be8fc4-5342-40c1-aed9-b277203d32e6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.619901Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.440337Z","title":"Computing fair and efficient allocations with few utility values.Theoretical Computer Science, 962:113932, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.440337Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b7c1c512a1e5286fb5d18cad11e247cb19c3d0997942c5266607683a4eebfb5d","observation_id":"4b06f819-708f-4391-bd7f-2276cdb1d5fb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.440337Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.440268Z","title":"How to fairly allocate easy and dif- ficult chores","venue":null,"work_id":"7fd65812-d3a5-43d2-94b3-035324045504","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.437400Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8651b4052252571805ef15b398ad340a075b01c5ac98b87da484f2f6a5165716","observation_id":"821946b3-a249-41a0-a2b1-0dba5574f4bd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.443756Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20436","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.606441Z","title":"Fair and efficient allocations of chores under bivalued preferences","venue":null,"work_id":"3268d9c9-9504-4e31-8c82-01b947a655dd","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.447079Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8ede8cbd039de0d261ab582aab312469242a1ff6c2e11969611e9d3359c0b1a7","observation_id":"9e327c58-c17e-4920-a9f4-1389dd836ed0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.609898Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2410.12966","last_updated":"2024-10-16T18:58:28Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-18T20:42:50.656056Z","submitted_at":"2024-10-16T18:58:28Z","title":"EF1 for Mixed Manna with Unequal Entitlements","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2410.12966","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.443626Z","title":"EF1 for mixed manna with unequal entitlements, 2024","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.443626Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2410.12966","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d113a865543572d0caa96c7478bc68c93753a60707ae558f77e8f81465e87982","observation_id":"75ee464c-ee2e-4ce0-a601-bec4fdc63c70","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.443626Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.453212Z","title":"Walrasian equilibrium with gross substitutes.Journal of Economic Theory, 87(1):95–124, 1999","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1999},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.453212Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:315001ec9c28ab9ff44b8ef5bb07fe019e5956427e697ad6e20606eb0f7edab8","observation_id":"8f6f94d2-3ad4-4f4d-8e24-9af1cb23d5db","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.453212Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.430781Z","title":"Near fairness in matroids","venue":null,"work_id":"1d5abc66-6857-4261-8bc0-2904b94be863","year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.450166Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5d0a60cf35a7bcb7850e30ab18bc6d86626d1bca6f822bd5f847ec8235215962","observation_id":"56dfd1dd-7597-472f-9d01-fd33de9c38fd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.434226Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.421254Z","title":"Maximin share allocations for assign- ment valuations: Extended abstract","venue":null,"work_id":"d97c58cf-9653-4f03-81f6-88aaba785632","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.459457Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:98a507322c45fb58ee29c8aa9a698d6c0e015be861093ca6c9910450672bd588","observation_id":"e9560e03-3bed-49e5-b689-e3afb1e1370f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.424592Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.456236Z","title":"Kelso, Jr","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1982},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.456236Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ab9d63f6966485d4054093df5bf1429ebfe56a7fc2623e467f17af719c7e2832","observation_id":"22b3e674-2e12-46ab-b813-8b4e8de71a99","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.456236Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.465752Z","title":"Gross substitutability: An algorithmic survey.Games and Economic Behavior, 106:294–316, 2017","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.465752Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cc1b6201289bed5ab6174dc0c84133eb5a02670c584a151f916bf2ec17749a19","observation_id":"41ecf476-751f-4b71-974d-b510942ad4ec","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.465752Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2005","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.590448Z","title":"Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities.Games and Economic Behavior, 55(2):270–296, 2006","venue":null,"work_id":"03bac682-514c-44c0-b143-602b6aa22e27","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.462334Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:68236e801fffa706a3ba5e2245d249d378df3ac0a740ac55f7de0eb83ce824fd","observation_id":"9a2a21bc-e592-4de3-908d-06d600c73155","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.594331Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.471998Z","title":"Mixed fair division: A survey","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.471998Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3442b68299687bc80bbf17aa65251d09ff0d7741dd14ccd8adb81aa528527eb5","observation_id":"375e1517-7a69-43d2-a389-e891a9e781c1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.471998Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.469116Z","title":"Lipton, Evangelos Markakis, Elchanan Mossel, and Amin Saberi","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.469116Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d7bb2a769d9b0cffd07ea95cf5232a1d8cc595e2f1c04888fc9baf4ac5d90a9f","observation_id":"48c66fd3-21f9-4019-9ee5-511b52425f5f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.469116Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-18660-7","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.568484Z","title":"A polynomial-time algorithm for fair and efficient allocation with a fixed number of agents","venue":null,"work_id":"466f2394-08ea-4a9c-bad2-664900ca0c30","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.478542Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c43a80ece9ed9d71d88631fdf368f333e12d74094d7c0a275689395552141e24","observation_id":"7007a8e2-1eb2-46c6-a842-06a03a5c157c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.572107Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.06451","last_updated":"2026-05-07T15:46:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-11T07:00:49.753910Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-07T15:46:34Z","title":"Counterexamples to EFX for Submodular and Subadditive Valuations","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2605.06451","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.475085Z","title":"Counterexamples to EFX for submodular and subad- ditive valuations, 2026","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.475085Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.06451","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2e729d225253c61a7c484aefb98668b19b23d60baa09817fc59ecdaebbb8afc2","observation_id":"a7b142a4-5daa-4050-8955-470a86251796","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.475085Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1609/aaai.v35i6.16703","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.556409Z","title":"On fair and efficient allocations of indivisible goods","venue":null,"work_id":"6a294f4b-9091-4145-b194-36fe6a306edd","year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.487524Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:81a35e5403a74f2a20023ea6b00d9d317b01f89628c1f207c4f133fffaa0cbf6","observation_id":"add8159d-f178-4400-9c50-c5957e7f8e77","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.561517Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.411278Z","title":"Existence of fair and efficient allocation of indivisible chores","venue":null,"work_id":"e3c6f7f3-102c-4786-85eb-61a4f9d6ab9f","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.481600Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3b4f33e441dcb75d4b8225e5ec4babbb212e7fdbe983875af10d2148e5c81129","observation_id":"543a395f-0235-4ff5-9189-cf43b2a2b8d1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.414938Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.400265Z","title":"Springer, 2003","venue":null,"work_id":"c6ba5ec4-28de-4f9b-bffb-fcd82a11913f","year":2003},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.493998Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3561ae9ab86cfc8df8a44281154932bc8b73967dca6e2016eeb8a7482b0c6f4f","observation_id":"c4db99c2-85a4-49f0-8dac-4066ad9c24b6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.403675Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.497005Z","title":"Fair allocation rules","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.497005Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:22fb88924b5e0a24de4ae21eef5a47c5b5c4263746a7f952fae41966d9fa539f","observation_id":"a4dacf95-15ac-4681-82fd-5582f410e3ea","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.497005Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.490508Z","title":"Almost envy-freeness with general valuations.SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 34(2):1039–1068, 2020","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.490508Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9ee7a6a00866c45fef2fb48ce9a80d582b803cfb910855e2d13677e3a206f144","observation_id":"81785c26-4cb6-443b-bacd-de31976affe5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.490508Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.503334Z","title":"A general framework for fair allocation under matroid rank valuations","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.503334Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:54f841085210bb5d7f25b22fe380efd9ead7b83573120880878a5f6c802e0a9f","observation_id":"0a0f6309-a27e-421a-8d18-27daf6d984c8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.503334Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.390517Z","title":"Yankee swap: A fast and simple fair allocation mechanism for matroid rank valuations","venue":null,"work_id":"638876b2-e12f-4fac-8f1f-5664184ca241","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":38,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.506339Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c2ff6aff2ffb1dc09c790ad580784233396be998877e402e6343f17d27b2a7ca","observation_id":"381a9458-47e4-4308-9d36-cdf93718d38d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.393983Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.500126Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1974},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.500126Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:62a2c7670c4fa78b7c1ae0880084e82feb61f090f3d37a30594e83fdd32db55e","observation_id":"23216426-793b-4404-afcc-753903a5828c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.500126Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.380939Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"27c3da5b-8bc4-46f6-befc-3369b48e8e35","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":42,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.510425Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:adcdb8c80aa7b6dff06365e452652b5b79ad07cf8cdb153993c117e4e7f3bc5e","observation_id":"e33d3c67-6aed-4322-a7ec-401d1267740e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.384204Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"parse_uncertain"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.370922Z","title":"Again, by the definition ofρ, 1> 1 α (r+2ε)≥ 1 α v1(X1), r> 1 α t≥ 1 α v2(X2), and 1> 1 α r≥ 1 α vk(Xk) (k≥3)","venue":null,"work_id":"d9eb21b4-be3d-40fa-bab4-23b4525fe14e","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":43,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.513469Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3a1a2d13d7a9acfe2e9e8b23a6c87cf333e26a94961da4a5f7c10fcb4ebd82e7","observation_id":"a8dfdff0-d285-46d4-9581-60ac4e6753d2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:15.374305Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.4230/lipics.esa.2020.11","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.662889Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"25f5bf75-0e0f-4d77-a0cc-d8eef9c2cee0","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":2020,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.397802Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8f3dca8d8dcb4c6222c22ddb632e865d6f12411bcb7dba7cb59e123f4c825681","observation_id":"0998fca6-7787-44fe-8e3e-2879cbdd15c5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.666204Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.484359Z","title":"URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09544","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations","version":1},"reference_index":2026,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.484359Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.17811"},"observation_digest":"sha256:70aea8a01659f94293831e2bd24a61805b8f3ed612729d3e027444d6e9427ab4","observation_id":"269ab43a-8430-427f-8ee3-3d2417b39de3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:45:14.484359Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.17811","last_updated":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.GT","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-19T09:00:03.887676Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-20T10:57:38Z","title":"When One Good Is Not Enough: EF1 and Pareto Optimality Are Not Compatible for Submodular Valuations"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":43,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":4,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":1,"unresolved":20,"verified_exact":9,"verified_fuzzy":9},"total_outbound_references":43},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:44.657259+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-19T06:32:39.956319+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 19 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 43 of 43 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.17811."}