{"as_of":"2026-08-09T13:52:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:426464f951d02edfdeb505f5b30da7e44729914c3483b5964822e0d5098e9dcc","coverage":[{"denominator":8,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":8,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:22.024819Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":8,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":8,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.27499/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.27499/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.27499/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.27499"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2502.15657","last_updated":"2025-02-24T18:14:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T14:17:37.842596Z","submitted_at":"2025-02-21T18:28:36Z","title":"Superintelligent Agents Pose Catastrophic Risks: Can Scientist AI Offer a Safer Path?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2502.15657","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:20.844774Z","title":"Utilitarianism, decision theory and eternity","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27499","last_updated":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T01:42:21.484843Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","title":"A dataset of rated conceptual arguments","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:20.844774Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2502.15657","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27499"},"observation_digest":"sha256:34f4ba61994e121852f8b3251e05a20e96ce1de6dae9a17da4d87d13e8e5da8d","observation_id":"8dc66f59-c618-47de-ace8-d640c1b7a8f6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:20.844774Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:22.024819Z","title":"broader context","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1958},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27499","last_updated":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T01:42:21.484843Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","title":"A dataset of rated conceptual arguments","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:22.024819Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27499"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0b74c58f9d9ae58b04879e52f4121d83505d5595153197675d7f9a70d914150e","observation_id":"e83a4fa3-816a-4e0e-a692-42bb2dc2ba10","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:22.024819Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2006.04948","last_updated":"2020-05-30T02:05:16Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T09:27:09.849342Z","submitted_at":"2020-05-30T02:05:16Z","title":"AI Research Considerations for Human Existential Safety (ARCHES)","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2006.04948","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:20.976439Z","title":"AI research considerations for human existential safety (ARCHES)","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27499","last_updated":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T01:42:21.484843Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","title":"A dataset of rated conceptual arguments","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:20.976439Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2006.04948","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27499"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e209309148aac681193f5651e98da3fabe9b204656a4337b55fe6eb2ecfdbc5d","observation_id":"cd827d14-8fdd-483d-9c0a-860e778a10c1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:20.976439Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2407.00215","last_updated":"2024-06-28T19:53:17Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T18:38:46.314431Z","submitted_at":"2024-06-28T19:53:17Z","title":"LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugs","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2407.00215","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.684871Z","title":"Evaluation of an llm in identifying logical fallacies: A call for rigor when adopting llms in hci research","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27499","last_updated":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T01:42:21.484843Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","title":"A dataset of rated conceptual arguments","version":1},"reference_index":39,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.684871Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2407.00215","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27499"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a2927045c2b701b9a17a3934060525b803cd3748eb3008ea86c49b20cd766984","observation_id":"b5b8ce2a-122f-47d0-b665-1c83909c0789","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.684871Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.139639Z","title":"A large-scale dataset for argument quality ranking: Construction and analysis","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27499","last_updated":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T01:42:21.484843Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","title":"A dataset of rated conceptual arguments","version":1},"reference_index":1093,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.139639Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27499"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0fffa1742b48125d95f6c1477df74ec5ae04aa2a4e1a6e766dbb9a6ccb734ff7","observation_id":"9482a420-5d52-44f7-b9aa-f69966545ffb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.139639Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.16946","last_updated":"2025-01-29T14:58:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T00:13:50.977339Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-28T13:45:41Z","title":"Gradual Disempowerment: Systemic Existential Risks from Incremental AI Development","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.16946","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.534745Z","title":"Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful Answers","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27499","last_updated":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T01:42:21.484843Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","title":"A dataset of rated conceptual arguments","version":1},"reference_index":2022,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.534745Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.16946","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27499"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a3808e1d3dd3c87e25d6e4429972100a55ed26a6404692abbda2b957392b55c1","observation_id":"aa57cdc8-5af6-461a-ab02-04c7b1dcc925","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.534745Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2206.05802","last_updated":"2022-06-14T01:16:24Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T13:19:58.934755Z","submitted_at":"2022-06-12T17:40:53Z","title":"Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluators","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2206.05802","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.854754Z","title":"Whose opinions do language models reflect?","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27499","last_updated":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T01:42:21.484843Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","title":"A dataset of rated conceptual arguments","version":1},"reference_index":7160,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.854754Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2206.05802","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27499"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d2c558492cebef858826e5129140b59ddd87af5bed8172cacc619f0bc8e602f2","observation_id":"cb7c9fdb-e009-4aef-a16a-7ee2f41f1bb7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.854754Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2501.12948","last_updated":"2026-01-04T03:57:36Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T02:11:23.670680Z","submitted_at":"2025-01-22T15:19:35Z","title":"DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2501.12948","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.354754Z","title":"Deepseek-R1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in LLMs via reinforcement learning","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27499","last_updated":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T01:42:21.484843Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","title":"A dataset of rated conceptual arguments","version":1},"reference_index":7813,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.354754Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2501.12948","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27499"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6b3129611df138b7b6749ea36066e341a5b747bc77ae43567839d71b5312c98a","observation_id":"c150b5d2-faed-4435-b6f7-b5ffe528585f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T01:28:21.354754Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27499","last_updated":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.AI","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T01:42:21.484843Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-29T22:30:59Z","title":"A dataset of rated conceptual arguments"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":8,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":4,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":4,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":8},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 8 of 8 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.27499."}