{"as_of":"2026-08-17T15:53:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:418eb86f9732953f443387a57b14579bb877df871038a7a182aec182e6da1667","coverage":[{"denominator":37,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":37,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.121442Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":37,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":37,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.27743/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.27743/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.27743/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.019518Z","title":"EFX: A simpler approach and an (almost) optimal guarantee via rainbow cycle number.Oper","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.019518Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7bd474cbcb184f1a4d398ee5a2424ad16c7527973d7956d86481bcf4ae519754","observation_id":"1d17770e-661a-4530-ac18-deea847da1f1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.019518Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.023726Z","title":"A counterexample to EFXn≥3 agents,m≥n+ 5 items, submodular valuations via SAT-solving","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.023726Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dd3dbc22358f471751343599e9ed0865d8ef0e200f7f6e46f6dcca457fd16e1c","observation_id":"99d68790-c270-4c9d-b55c-cef106543208","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.023726Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.027089Z","title":"Voudouris, and Xiaowei Wu","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.027089Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3e480f9cbc40c42c851feebafadcb5722689276c6c82f3bcdabc112178a073b7","observation_id":"e52fc680-06e5-4fbd-bc59-db5fd1800d94","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.027089Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.030154Z","title":"Maximum Nash welfare and other stories about EFX.Theoret","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.030154Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f39ecaa5e85c9d66adefc11b446c93b2e97ec01fee90c849825f397a2747b759","observation_id":"9672c7a0-f027-4919-ad53-55f0602d48f4","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.030154Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.033531Z","title":"Pushing the frontier on approximate EFX allocations","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.033531Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:e1fc6b710829d11abef5bdaa49af4ccc20243097b66a4ec94fb5dbc9567db575","observation_id":"52a15403-e67c-4921-a6b2-8edbd4be1fd1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.033531Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.036908Z","title":"Multiple birds with one stone: Beating 1/2 for EFX and GMMS via envy cycle elimination.Theoret","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.036908Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:34b98a8560dd72d0ab51d228699f7f9b4d1f74e4742bbd58dfdddf7e7d102092","observation_id":"f323112b-94ff-483c-a34f-0ba7de1639dd","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.036908Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.040041Z","title":"Computing welfare-maximizing fair allocations of indivisible goods.European Journal of Operational Research, 307(2):773–784, 2023","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.040041Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2541fd1b633b67e19f8545b182c14f9996470b9e9f6f2a0875f5c49ccee59169","observation_id":"225ca4c3-b60d-4d32-b442-02162aef2470","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.040041Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.042885Z","title":"Fairness concepts for indivis- ible items with externalities","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.042885Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0814d814aec9ec7e600068c675b029dfc2e7371d70b2c942bc1fd87b64f628bb","observation_id":"0cc05345-1b0c-4d19-88f2-699d50151c82","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.042885Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.045723Z","title":"Groupwise maximin fair allocation of indivisible goods","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.045723Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:278bd91766aea95bead716248da70d88c65dc843f7f6d52e2ae1dd7b61c97fe5","observation_id":"f3f24b42-0aa8-433d-a29e-4383de1a448f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.045723Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.048529Z","title":"Fairness towards groups of agents in the allocation of indivisible items","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.048529Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c7d1e84d9d9d530c9731b2a3cc6066168f349946380b59227c76f2246c07bd1c","observation_id":"7a5c657f-0460-44a5-8619-dd3dd61165af","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.048529Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.051296Z","title":"The combinatorial assignment problem: Approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes.J","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.051296Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dadbd1602e15ff5fab5448144958a165de6b733ea991bb2f02d1ec8cd10fdd17","observation_id":"76ab0adc-88cc-4148-a218-c0324513c07f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.051296Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.054191Z","title":"Procaccia, Nisarg Shah, and Junxing Wang","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.054191Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:73584281ce2300722c92e5e93584363f1c36f17aaeebbdf9d5df0f77dc72856f","observation_id":"f1c118ff-a050-4dc4-a0a3-c7bc2f79022b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.054191Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.057236Z","title":"Procaccia, Nisarg Shah, and Junxing Wang","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.057236Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4ebdc4491b5fa6253b12bdf01492b28d72eddedd15306b74f53834b146075f27","observation_id":"db0cb3f5-6ef9-4e43-9621-43519f98f23b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.057236Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.060055Z","title":"A new lower bound for multicolor discrepancy with applications to fair division","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.060055Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:ecea582ff1cb921b66338624c837230a6c4f45831f7e98b90d8a7dfa1352f432","observation_id":"3d599280-4598-4043-8bc5-a9878e140865","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.060055Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.062577Z","title":"EFX exists for three agents.J","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.062577Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:48a2d06db186b172ed109e94eb6b0c471f2bbced3942850df3670526c1ac4905","observation_id":"b7445398-03a3-418f-820a-bc2616620130","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.062577Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.065140Z","title":"Tight asymp- totic bounds for fair division with externalities.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13287, 2026","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.065140Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b01caecd3262020f6e078b7a69b74458d91f8be430a5cbf5104b0e6cebd7749c","observation_id":"e65011ee-f1c6-49ac-8e65-da4208fce69f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.065140Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.067830Z","title":"The complex- ity of fair division of indivisible items with externalities","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.067830Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:93e3de1e5848060f2829dc782e23791df4f52bec6d3011574e264367fb877219","observation_id":"ce41dd3e-9560-46cf-975d-f6b4d6841b6a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.067830Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.070346Z","title":"Almost envy-freeness, envy-rank, and Nash social welfare matchings","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":18,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.070346Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d9138fcb1bf5efaf55f1d88e94ff648c56c97d109ea90d17f3ded08cb4ec292f","observation_id":"4c721d67-2dcf-4da1-a485-e9d9c3e936a2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.070346Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.072610Z","title":"wh freeman New York, 2002","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2002},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":19,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.072610Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5322abcd1a8bcef0e35090fa744aceb27f9a14445627cf916126d7fa34e2692b","observation_id":"48d8bc9f-6ecb-4349-a9f1-004ba246cc2c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.072610Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2508.13432","last_updated":"2025-08-19T01:11:58Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T17:11:31.832235Z","submitted_at":"2025-08-19T01:11:58Z","title":"Fair Division Among Couples and Small Groups","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2508.13432","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.075141Z","title":"Fair division among couples and small groups.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13432, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":20,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.075141Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2508.13432","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:793e454ac02068271a53e8f8007e933d9c4a37c1684305a1a2c6394dc8f28c0c","observation_id":"1129c53c-bc2a-4851-8571-8f6f6790b94a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.075141Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.078556Z","title":"Near fairness in matroids","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2014},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":21,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.078556Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c9f95352e1a2ce0de5d4eeec4da8daff8db793335a5270b6996cd71df5a7821f","observation_id":"99739e5f-25a8-4eae-b34f-de9ee11f4216","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.078556Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.081245Z","title":"Strategic nonparticipation.The RAND Journal of Economics, 27(1):84–98, 1996","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":1996},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":22,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.081245Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:07d541e7f0ca6350d8d649407dfb5094730e5294a84385a0f652ba2c13801906","observation_id":"e0618723-0d01-4d5d-a916-d1dbc38c3f01","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.081245Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.083987Z","title":"Fair and efficient balanced allocation for indivisible goods","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":23,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.083987Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:51d3163581a82777b770f7f315a4f4f0557f4d026d0e0f46902680a88f49db52","observation_id":"1e133075-b8ba-4b6c-a86d-8332b07bb0c9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.083987Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.086543Z","title":"Almost envy-freeness in group resource allocation.Theoretical Computer Science, 841:110–123, 2020","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":24,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.086543Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d4df3886bca8ee98c45cc38660be4ff9af7ba25304a9a40ca43f54c6a98df3f4","observation_id":"a3e3830b-430a-4950-b4df-27fa476919ef","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.086543Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.089442Z","title":"Lipton, Evangelos Markakis, Elchanan Mossel, and Amin Saberi","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.089442Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c27e80bcd1858e53e0ee92f71ce326afa565012ce41aa9b94cb079ab5230b416","observation_id":"d7bc247f-8419-4f45-a1cc-7bb0005ea493","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.089442Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2512.24105","last_updated":"2026-05-12T12:34:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-13T13:27:48.776037Z","submitted_at":"2025-12-30T09:27:50Z","title":"Multilevel Fair Allocation with Matroid-Rank Preferences","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2512.24105","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.092098Z","title":"Multi-level fair allo- cation.CoRR, abs/2512.24105, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":26,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.092098Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2512.24105","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6169ba1b79dea0d962db7b035e5bcde41e1c67af499c9935e6eba9e10765a2e8","observation_id":"53e797ae-7c84-43f9-8361-1e81b23efeaa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.092098Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.094950Z","title":"Counterexamples to EFX for submodular and subad- ditive valuations, 2026","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":27,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.094950Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8a92424b53f03d6d10d6b1d06c1588037324426801f5f9569eddf5e7a311446d","observation_id":"f94d8964-e115-4e00-bad1-e4f5d0a98f89","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.094950Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.097594Z","title":"Tight lower bound for multicolor discrepancy","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":28,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.097594Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b6e5f64159a2500933efeb36fcc87f82581f8fe09f4be7f078ae3b44cf06c4ab","observation_id":"e637b10c-5438-4bda-955f-3ced791ccd4f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.097594Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.100296Z","title":"Almost envy-freeness for groups: Improved bounds via discrepancy theory.Theoretical Computer Science, 930:179–195, 2022","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":29,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.100296Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:19b9e0123a591eef832a0a1f758ed2860391b0fcdfc699edc234e46682903873","observation_id":"b5372f84-fe68-41ed-8200-d591abf5e5ec","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.100296Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.103044Z","title":"Ordinal maximin guarantees for group fair division","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":30,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.103044Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:72d5b5aca03531b0aff6a86250b298e0bfff23432c44dcb3fb86d8fcc9237d0c","observation_id":"37b794a9-678e-4a43-8fe9-11d5b37d1648","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.103044Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.105734Z","title":"Improved EFX approximation guarantees under ordinal-based assumptions","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":31,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.105734Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a2d1c53c0a00abb974ac73b1203a2a7bcb38cf06890c45c9d6bc96c2f09dff3c","observation_id":"458c30bf-e5ce-48e2-a5a6-6a11fbac5b6a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.105734Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.108240Z","title":"Automating food drop: The power of two choices for dynamic and fair food allocation","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":32,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.108240Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3b4d0b52a82263c1e32855a57397627cb192682ca04c9b4b72d8d6939efb4c39","observation_id":"bed54666-41cd-4e54-9bc8-8a18a9d80f7b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.108240Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.110874Z","title":"Fair allocation with special externalities","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":33,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.110874Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9acdfaa359757631e944b74a123732f6a212c110d6bcf5b9edd694e99be26d80","observation_id":"9370bfeb-69b3-400a-b5b6-f8c59c7b5241","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.110874Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.113451Z","title":"Almost envy-freeness with general valuations.SIAM J","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":34,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.113451Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:cc174330b493a38649a506d295d491dd1c0f5a2e22ad418bd4ed90072efd5994","observation_id":"f62c0dbe-e294-42bb-8e71-22abf3f74465","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.113451Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.115969Z","title":"Springer, 2003","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2003},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":35,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.115969Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1c8ecfd1b58c4d40860031543b1feb04883efbdfa4ac738f6ab291da52c433ac","observation_id":"144f1388-1956-4ea5-b075-b5849c3b233e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.115969Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.118656Z","title":"Externalities and fairness","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2019},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":36,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.118656Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6b39a711cd6230e2d82ca7e9dc7a1987c01a720457c4f9f41d27649e29b380e3","observation_id":"12f83cab-e236-4570-bd5c-ec05be56d72c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.118656Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.121442Z","title":"A general framework for fair allocation under matroid rank valuations.ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 13(3):1–32, 2025","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division","version":1},"reference_index":37,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.121442Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.27743"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6b72be9c716ad22f7009f8e3c89fbbad54f4c6c5d104fb4f322416f42ee200b6","observation_id":"64c4a9d8-9a0a-475d-a8de-93ef8b444866","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-01T02:17:44.121442Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.27743","last_updated":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.GT","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-17T05:48:56.505475Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T06:32:55Z","title":"Delegated Fair Division"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":37,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":37,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":37},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:58.91139+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-17T06:30:54.323127+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 37 of 37 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.27743."}