{"as_of":"2026-08-09T20:15:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:8cfc31c8ec789fc305d856bef695101dbc039121796a53ac7d1ab4e524c54968","coverage":[{"denominator":15,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":15,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.313320Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":15,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":15,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2607.28119/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2607.28119/integrity","json":"/paper/2607.28119/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.283409Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.283409Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:bf31b0128445c0130982955714c6691d326640f04337b8bce931d8f4fd9e83ad","observation_id":"c2ce3e2c-fa2b-43a9-96fe-a99b1132b445","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.283409Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.290624Z","title":"For version 1 prompt, ambiguity is avoided","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.290624Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:44b921c2bebd85759212f8d1e48f5fa90db932257879a2bd5417c1a104048604","observation_id":"7ccf8f50-04c8-4739-98c8-47f600cbfa9a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.290624Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.264925Z","title":"Section 7 concludes, and Section 8 contains a discussion of problematic issues and limitations, as well as the following steps","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.264925Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b8ba3210c763d95d2067463f5cbf43d0bbdca9defee76df1f3f163a70b814666","observation_id":"681268cd-b67b-4164-9780-8d920e151a25","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.264925Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.310194Z","title":"Uncertain","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.310194Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1553c3cb63a1387f5848bceeff9242a6808f3deecef6a04e53d8d4a36a29f9e9","observation_id":"f72839a6-5313-4741-9265-f79d5b1e7964","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.310194Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.280087Z","title":"Affect was supposed to be used if the sentence expresses feelings or emotions (e.g","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.280087Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1ec1e409162db731485c316d067a6ad6c24c50bb13a294e552ce7e89e20d67c7","observation_id":"2faf6965-545b-4893-912e-29077331913b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.280087Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.287584Z","title":"The assistance of ChatGPT 5.0","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.287584Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:79cfcd913763ebe1382066c99fa6cf522fd85451eb62832ff517f8378fba49fc","observation_id":"3d96ba8e-862c-4783-bf6a-7d5f1c257475","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.287584Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.293701Z","title":"Do NOT invent extra information [...]","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.293701Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:3aac78bbe55106178ccf946373c65f54e02cd27b240b99fc72819806a270dd87","observation_id":"2f9be6d8-9ee2-4b40-a73c-ec3e338caffa","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.293701Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.297121Z","title":"Instead, we focus on agreement between humans and LLMs","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.297121Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0d53eacf9a18414c09cce4676fa6f293c4fe8cdfcf22e8a048e6f12bc4bbf830","observation_id":"94e80cd0-9640-4df2-8262-22f5236b354e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.297121Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2304.03262","last_updated":"2023-04-18T14:45:18Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-06T15:13:06.155585Z","submitted_at":"2023-04-06T17:47:29Z","title":"When do you need Chain-of-Thought Prompting for ChatGPT?","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2304.03262","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.303190Z","title":"Without knowing if annotators see a sentence as evaluative because of explicit or implicit Attitude, we are unfortunately not able to differentiate this","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.303190Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2304.03262","citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8a0354cff6a13b0298f1cc842b9bb571f497ac0d4725b61eed9b5095d7147579","observation_id":"565ff6b2-fd29-4c16-a4b2-1e9f71d5d1af","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.303190Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.313320Z","title":"Despite everything, she stood tall and smiled","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.313320Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:7be5344e6f5c0c72fab168a9331696b1cfc72a7b48fb18dabd48347b6f92af11","observation_id":"8b09dbb4-7dcf-4d5a-88b3-4fb21d90e182","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.313320Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.307002Z","title":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972 Dong, M., & Fang, A","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":49,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.307002Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c0a8c09b39e4d7084ea2f1defc299458483f6c49acc088ebd344bafa39c5ee2a","observation_id":"847c8593-6570-4647-a407-21413b3080b9","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.307002Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.273330Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2011},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":1960,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.273330Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:a8a69119b202826a527bc5a1e19c01133538d4a12eafb4cf498d033f0f9f997f","observation_id":"13a32c7c-1628-448d-870c-e5bdab50c7bb","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.273330Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.300180Z","title":"Still, we consider some aspects in the design of the qualitative study as reasons for low agreement","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2021},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":2015,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.300180Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:723c6133d057e9242d7bd4f902d79bbdb50c66420f7cacb6ac4ce05707883336","observation_id":"7b5aecc8-7e33-4536-8b31-5d57a672783e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.300180Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.276667Z","title":"However, difficult examples were discussed in class together","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2012},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":2018,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.276667Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:297b95c7fe0b6c93428ef90c9392694bad8cce391d2aafe29f7ec09f5ca07424","observation_id":"d7796d58-6373-4b96-9f7e-cf9027661d05","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.276667Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.269517Z","title":"They reported a mean PABAK agreement score of 0.69","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language","version":1},"reference_index":2022,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.269517Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2607.28119"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5cbf1a418810ecc453ae010c1c1723a397eae3ee125f0a3457a34d6b63477e1d","observation_id":"9d434f9f-b37b-4bc9-84cd-9e07feedab59","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-07-31T17:19:08.269517Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.28119","last_updated":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.CL","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-08T02:19:04.135960Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-30T12:28:54Z","title":"Challenges in annotations by humans and LLMs: A case study of evaluative language"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":15,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":15,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":0},"total_outbound_references":15},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-09T06:30:57.326959+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 9 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 15 of 15 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2607.28119."}