{"as_of":"2026-08-07T17:39:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:4fe1819df63094886a8695f58ba9093a5eb0a3c4a6df61d7fad71339b8bf5a80","coverage":[{"denominator":11,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":11,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.371354Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":11,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":11,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2608.01559/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2608.01559/integrity","json":"/paper/2608.01559/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2506.18768","last_updated":"2025-06-11T06:55:40Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T04:45:33.276933Z","submitted_at":"2025-06-11T06:55:40Z","title":"ASP2LJ : An Adversarial Self-Play Laywer Augmented Legal Judgment Framework","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2506.18768","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2506.18768","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.922283Z","title":"ASP2LJ : An Adversarial Self-Play Laywer Augmented Legal Judgment Framework","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"453fefd5-050f-4e2c-b1cc-185ab232d115","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:49.467465Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2506.18768","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:617ba990542a0818892acaf9325aa1ef22f9bd99968d876a7da9f3891921f138","observation_id":"c2c32e78-e550-4058-aaca-30c77f3fc0e8","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.927402Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:06.003166Z","title":"ACL Findings 2025.https://aclanthology.org/2025.findings-acl.304/","venue":null,"work_id":"9baecf9b-7707-4ee2-bebd-d0b0db891f7a","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:49.590367Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:0e24e052ede0fc3f386fc25140498055780d2d2c0768fb98d3e95c7acc95d5d1","observation_id":"ab74e565-d4fa-41e9-acac-5f7013f09938","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:06.008681Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2510.03405","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.894786Z","title":"arXiv:2510.03405.https://arxiv","venue":null,"work_id":"afd00e91-0710-4f08-8303-8df8cc21306e","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:49.700555Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:24f086a71af1741cd68e088e0737b45a0352f66c0de7979b6b9bd8557b453524","observation_id":"a06667dc-f81f-4bb9-80e9-caed198278f1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.905377Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2603.28488","last_updated":"2026-08-01T20:26:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-06T23:24:25.057232Z","submitted_at":"2026-03-30T14:23:15Z","title":"Courtroom-Style Multi-Agent Debate with Progressive RAG and Role-Switching for Controversial Claim Verification","version":3},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2603.28488","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2603.28488","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.676240Z","title":"Courtroom-Style Multi-Agent Debate with Progressive RAG and Role-Switching for Controversial Claim Verification","venue":"cs.CL","work_id":"61f2fe07-147e-49f9-a000-9b3bb93b6b54","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:49.745681Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2603.28488","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d1e78bcdb5f46b7265d6f85ae4c71d4e1dee961b9364e5d26f715322fde8b909","observation_id":"bb6e05cb-409a-49e2-afc1-d4a85102f82e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.739659Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1805.00899","last_updated":"2018-10-22T17:36:07Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T15:33:17.783178Z","submitted_at":"2018-05-02T16:27:32Z","title":"AI safety via debate","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1805.00899","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:49.795309Z","title":"AI Safety via Debate","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:49.795309Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1805.00899","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f0eb258c63a7be39ba2dda44f67bf661c0118d1da93609b32d9d68dfcf7ef2ac","observation_id":"ee92250a-2a21-496a-8552-5341f3c6264f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:49.795309Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.984218Z","title":"Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Reasoners (SPIN)","venue":null,"work_id":"38fa5b62-2941-4724-9579-eb687db30316","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:49.903269Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:53c30492df68a72f0ab45732cccb9678bff823598615c4a2e9b92d1adb42fd85","observation_id":"72d5f3c3-8d3d-4a5c-8d98-fbc3bcb8ec70","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.990642Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2212.08073","last_updated":"2022-12-15T06:19:23Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-02T04:53:58.766070Z","submitted_at":"2022-12-15T06:19:23Z","title":"Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2212.08073","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.030256Z","title":"Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.030256Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2212.08073","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:2b517925d0e020fc73b5ecf75423633e687d6dea542c66afe0431e79c259acc3","observation_id":"e3602f1e-e3cd-4584-b2bb-21e79d777b4f","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.030256Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.968281Z","title":"Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understanding","venue":null,"work_id":"03ccdbdf-9bf3-4d1d-8b3d-185ad9bd7895","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.126946Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b6e2900eec55829e9a1fee31cbc785f0fb73f07196e6a37f3b485db509bd53ee","observation_id":"4677e43a-eefc-4a12-ada6-0006af86c803","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.973067Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.953254Z","title":"Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models","venue":null,"work_id":"28bfed99-bb78-4252-8bb3-ccfcd05ce143","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.207040Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d764a18fbcb985158aa220665fb1718f0d48446a5abed1d740bbe6f54bee3012","observation_id":"35e2a91b-5ad2-40e8-96be-69aa5b71ee45","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.957965Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.938011Z","title":"Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models","venue":null,"work_id":"2a479509-69e7-48ae-9668-8731245c0e82","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.285993Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:80eeb4a30c5edabbe75a713032cc13a636c1afd722ae8f908d1abef5fcabae6b","observation_id":"1b011512-0cb6-487f-99ce-c4b1a7d1028a","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:13:05.942766Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08255","last_updated":"2026-07-09T09:00:52Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:56:08.664148Z","submitted_at":"2026-07-09T09:00:52Z","title":"Compete Then Collaborate: Frontier AI Teachers Build a Verifiable Curriculum to Improve a Coding Student Beyond Imitation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2607.08255","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2607.08255","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.491283Z","title":"Compete Then Collaborate: Frontier AI Teachers Build a Verifiable Curriculum to Improve a Coding Student Beyond Imitation","venue":"cs.AI","work_id":"e210885e-5ccf-4e46-b775-6613a8696ecb","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.371354Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2607.08255","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.01559"},"observation_digest":"sha256:282b9b7041942cebdeda1f517eb881fb6d5e118aad69ba50bf23ccb8bb829fc5","observation_id":"be90f7c4-4243-48ec-8a9f-5f5d84418e82","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T00:12:50.546849Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.01559","last_updated":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.AI","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-07T10:57:21.839787Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-03T00:31:34Z","title":"Does the Competitive Component of Adversarial Self-Play Improve Legal Reasoning? A Controlled Negative Result"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":11,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":1,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":2,"verified_exact":3,"verified_fuzzy":5},"total_outbound_references":11},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:17.273281+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-07T06:34:11.927384+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 7 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 11 of 11 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2608.01559."}