{"as_of":"2026-08-16T22:54:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:2c0ea3098a8884d3822ebb9fd66e01e463bf6fca12126f0c5d0212486f51bd8b","coverage":[{"denominator":17,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":17,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.799202Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":17,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":17,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2608.08089/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2608.08089/integrity","json":"/paper/2608.08089/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.736272Z","title":"Owen , year = 2013, title =","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2013},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.736272Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:243566b5b6e8a84d6478e2b4ed7900656e0dbfe4c490da3130d0658cb7d0873a","observation_id":"8458c796-4948-4d49-8a5b-33980a482209","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.736272Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.985713Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"69453ca4-05e4-4c46-b32b-6aa51aa5e954","year":1956},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.742006Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:41668c9329d86c68c626b8045d393aacef75d06d6117d032554c1794a59499b3","observation_id":"240017f5-fb9c-475f-8249-1fe78612b121","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.988670Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.976905Z","title":"1964 , publisher=","venue":null,"work_id":"f4cc73e6-a106-4790-93df-cc9877fd3442","year":1964},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.747420Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c89a6309318682d5f29f8d86d1e98c28338c7890f212d0b4d82d53656d585285","observation_id":"38dc341a-c8c4-4ec5-af9c-081eb9a26ab0","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.979763Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.968121Z","title":"2016 , publisher=","venue":null,"work_id":"426bffa0-6993-4a28-a803-98359a22348a","year":2016},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.751410Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1969db0691aba2d03b722ada1bb8bdb4b935485ca00211861c389851d3ffbbff","observation_id":"003ad713-70dc-4869-acfb-8a0ce703c008","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.971262Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.755199Z","title":"2004 , publisher=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.755199Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4cf9518228c9d1234ccbd1ed85c9d7644515ac825ddbb2e2265a6db5768d2540","observation_id":"a57915cf-519f-4266-9759-2e84e35ba0be","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.755199Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.952821Z","title":"and Meng, Xiao-Li , journal=","venue":null,"work_id":"6ec5625e-de1d-4aec-9667-73b40ca9b672","year":2005},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":6,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.759152Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:03d7a2033f174884fd7ee4f70f28a16b09f83fd2b3d1c2d3aa182f05ad6a9443","observation_id":"a739889d-b0fd-4fac-944f-56bac07f6a3c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.956448Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.763174Z","title":"The Annals of Statistics , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":7,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.763174Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b598bd8fa22338665bc21f9c5f11906a0449daa6300dfb58b8ecb6647a22d246","observation_id":"2e351427-bff3-4d84-96fb-8e71f5c6a5e2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.763174Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.934727Z","title":"Biometrika , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"12b8dab7-ee9d-4e0d-ab96-027da3336b3d","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":8,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.766653Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f42c79d7241c896efcafa30a59c4e29dacc1c49fce27cde2f2f4d165ba9e5b7d","observation_id":"e177bbd0-c315-4ea8-ae1a-174643a4f4f2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.938725Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.923799Z","title":"Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"73c807c3-40a5-4d20-a7c1-030fcb3327fb","year":2025},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":9,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.770233Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d620c3ab112bb77955814394e2d642e1269baaec6fb596ad731098ce0be5c509","observation_id":"25d2d012-de55-4097-ab5c-96ea897f08b3","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.927829Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":"10.1093/jrsssb/qkag073","metadata_source":"doi_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.823876Z","title":"Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology , pages =","venue":null,"work_id":"1d46d2f6-5189-407b-b9b3-2e373e2b28e1","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":10,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.773974Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:74e38ea4083492a14faca0d9a0504c49fa2c84096b5a7a6ef9528c44f806b7ac","observation_id":"f34b0469-362c-461c-93bf-a4a0f958fe98","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.828890Z","resolver_source":"doi","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T21:08:26.035227+00:00","source":"crossref_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-13T21:08:26.035227+00:00","source":"openalex_status_cache"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2310.10740","last_updated":"2023-10-16T18:17:20Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:48:39.685894Z","submitted_at":"2023-10-16T18:17:20Z","title":"Unbiased Estimation of Structured Prediction Error","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2310.10740","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2310.10740","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.855108Z","title":"Unbiased Estimation of Structured Prediction Error","venue":"stat.ME","work_id":"5525e479-dd5e-4bbd-8bd3-135ad9731716","year":2023},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.778796Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2310.10740","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:76953e777f8d881dff6345ad32cb42d10f010ac41817d4d04ed45ab5bf8d717f","observation_id":"dd02bbc2-0d7e-4803-b58b-5e01e33b9a74","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.859770Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.912596Z","title":"2006 , publisher=","venue":null,"work_id":"937b50f7-b020-415a-b023-efdf731a53a2","year":2006},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.783154Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:75a9953519fd7965a89982d48e5542f35559c382ec2dd9256a00cff0cc857440","observation_id":"324e63aa-eada-4662-9e49-ecc9fbc0ae7c","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.916589Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.901917Z","title":"Electronic Journal of Statistics , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"c7269679-1326-48ca-bac0-b3e229e42bb4","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":13,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.786764Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:9114c894077204d1bdefb4092e4960c026fd5a855b037f19d3d8dfe42288236b","observation_id":"96dbbaed-c483-4acc-90e5-5e849a99adb7","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.905893Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.890461Z","title":"The Annals of Statistics , pages=","venue":null,"work_id":"0fd30b75-7d04-41a3-be0e-b10861fd0ae6","year":1981},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":14,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.789723Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4583da725a9f693fcf21e3279a0e03c74b074c36779d63260833837f11511d75","observation_id":"e574b063-8d9a-4623-a620-37ef077e5788","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.894596Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.879344Z","title":"Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=","venue":null,"work_id":"9bf956eb-f401-406e-b3ea-72ec7ade4049","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":15,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.792614Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:12c223dc50c44052b2f75ac919b47aee990906f9fe9672acec0ef2a88bef0b03","observation_id":"7e0cc593-0713-4196-b4d2-850a2ef40552","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.883398Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2601.13514","last_updated":"2026-07-26T23:36:41Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-05T09:28:41.490898Z","submitted_at":"2026-01-20T02:03:37Z","title":"Post-selection inference for penalized M-estimators via score thinning","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2601.13514","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2601.13514","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.838988Z","title":"Post-selection inference for penalized M-estimators via score thinning","venue":"stat.ME","work_id":"152f0b11-bf82-476f-969a-f7ad8fd510fc","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":16,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.795746Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2601.13514","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:feae7170dfcf9ddf9479123c429c5a00160de37486ace0dbacd56ca21791471a","observation_id":"a107d196-1a58-40f7-8bf9-c7ccca9ecb0d","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.844063Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"metadata_mismatch"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.867809Z","title":"International Conference on Learning Representations , pages=","venue":null,"work_id":"0042a8d0-2f35-47c2-a5ab-6f40fe5a4541","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation","version":1},"reference_index":17,"source":"arxiv_source","source_observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.799202Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.08089"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5928ba7f61c525ea359bb557792d14ca4741ad978d1228db08fcf6be6b2bc5f5","observation_id":"a7ebaf45-c69c-47ae-8046-166eb3c2bdaf","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-12T00:36:34.871912Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.08089","last_updated":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"math.ST","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T18:10:07.859594Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-08T12:15:03Z","title":"On the optimality of antithetic randomization for cross-validation"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":17,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":2,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":4,"verified_exact":1,"verified_fuzzy":10},"total_outbound_references":17},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 17 of 17 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2608.08089."}