{"as_of":"2026-08-17T05:53:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:d615633fcf7f5ea8a60720e15a5111a5c8fc8e1e33f040a97411f0e252e4336a","coverage":[{"denominator":4,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":4,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.369190Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":4,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":4,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2608.10336/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2608.10336/integrity","json":"/paper/2608.10336/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2608.10336"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.454080Z","title":"Since 𝐿22 is a lower-triangular matrix with real and positive diagonal entries, we have 𝐿22𝐿⊤ 22 = 𝜓 is a positive-definite matrix","venue":null,"work_id":"dd986791-bef1-468b-bfc6-ab855fedfdaf","year":2004},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.10336","last_updated":"2026-08-11T00:37:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:20:02.888064Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-11T00:37:19Z","title":"A Multinomial Probit Model for Asymmetric Choice Responses","version":1},"reference_index":1,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.356239Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.10336"},"observation_digest":"sha256:4e6d8cf8d645d21ef37b9d47a9b1b73b969ca8afe0e61070cbc874069fddd86b","observation_id":"955db347-7a24-40c5-b305-00ba73b71176","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.459302Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.439302Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"66a64675-5204-4dc2-8b05-b187b42e4142","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.10336","last_updated":"2026-08-11T00:37:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:20:02.888064Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-11T00:37:19Z","title":"A Multinomial Probit Model for Asymmetric Choice Responses","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.361060Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.10336"},"observation_digest":"sha256:1bca38969107c3e4a8add6516a918227ef93f014402cbd15a2736a5ba91d0127","observation_id":"54dbee22-a669-4583-b6bd-e5a84ee191ea","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.443857Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.419743Z","title":"Second 𝔼(𝛾) = 0.5 × 1 𝐽−1 , which can be easily imposed by setting 𝐵𝛾 = 0.5 × 1𝐽−1","venue":null,"work_id":"7ae4858b-4131-47fb-8fd9-517f481b4277","year":2000},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.10336","last_updated":"2026-08-11T00:37:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:20:02.888064Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-11T00:37:19Z","title":"A Multinomial Probit Model for Asymmetric Choice Responses","version":1},"reference_index":3,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.364965Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.10336"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8c17f979b2f93db0899df51e948a428f5e452b75b1347e7839584ff2654df361","observation_id":"09f2836c-a8c3-4ba9-ba7f-e31e7a65b9ed","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.427301Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.401366Z","title":"Here, the proposal density 𝑞( ̃𝛿1) is constructed via a Laplace approximation to the condi- tional posterior of ̃𝛿1","venue":null,"work_id":"23ca21dc-3012-48c6-9f5e-5ff9eddd9d3e","year":2010},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.10336","last_updated":"2026-08-11T00:37:19Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:20:02.888064Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-11T00:37:19Z","title":"A Multinomial Probit Model for Asymmetric Choice Responses","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.369190Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.10336"},"observation_digest":"sha256:375a7cf35f61c352c370c2d69646b289466d2b66c527220aa8aeb7f06452189b","observation_id":"8d478207-194b-4995-ad6a-e44268d58af6","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:32:07.407646Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.10336","last_updated":"2026-08-11T00:37:19Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"econ.EM","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T14:20:02.888064Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-11T00:37:19Z","title":"A Multinomial Probit Model for Asymmetric Choice Responses"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":4,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":0,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":1,"verified_exact":0,"verified_fuzzy":3},"total_outbound_references":4},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 17 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 4 of 4 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2608.10336."}