{"as_of":"2026-08-16T22:21:00Z","caps":{"database_statements":6,"inbound":100,"outbound":100},"context_digest":"sha256:5cdccdb3ac04be34efbf9f40db513e9f792a94f07b12a7425b879cc830150813","coverage":[{"denominator":12,"lane":"reference_resolution","note":"Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.","records_observed":12,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.637104Z","state":"measured"},{"denominator":12,"lane":"standing_notices","note":"One-hop event checks from named stored sources.","records_observed":12,"source":"scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","state":"measured"},{"denominator":0,"lane":"inbound_itemization","note":"Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.","records_observed":0,"source":"paper_references, paper_reference_links","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"},{"denominator":1,"lane":"external_citation_measurements","note":"A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.","records_observed":0,"source":"cited_works","source_observed_at":null,"state":"measured"}],"external_citation_measurements":[],"inbound":[],"links":{"evidence":"/evidence","html":"/paper/2608.12489/citation-record","integrity":"/paper/2608.12489/integrity","json":"/paper/2608.12489/citation-record.json","paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"outbound":[{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2220.01530","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.839478Z","title":null,"venue":null,"work_id":"662897f3-b256-49a6-9a0c-f26df3c71eab","year":2018},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":2,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.625801Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d000ea3603399bd65c48bf6370d0c001b58ff00ef7fb4cafcd00ba33057938ef","observation_id":"7e80eaf5-b68b-46c4-b532-3eb1f61d7bec","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.849071Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.279935Z","title":"Clipping does not help","venue":null,"work_id":"dd52e8ef-b85c-4c10-a793-6030ad84bacc","year":2020},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":4,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.613806Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:8bf0b11fe3ecba13f9b31255c5418a12474cb7b22805fa2a123b2cd2a8ce9ac9","observation_id":"b787a9ef-e61c-48d2-a146-58b19f9b24c1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.286958Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2207.00632","last_updated":"2022-07-01T19:18:15Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:00:04.120827Z","submitted_at":"2022-07-01T19:18:15Z","title":"Offline Policy Optimization with Eligible Actions","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"2207.00632","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.597975Z","title":"Naoki Nishimura, Ken Kobayashi, and Kazuhide Nakata","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":5,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.597975Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2207.00632","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:5468974ac13b42f66adb7f364e4de736ce8f40194f3678ebaf918e906bdce942","observation_id":"38911006-a473-49f6-b2eb-576f7622c079","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.597975Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.219251Z","title":"poor model","venue":null,"work_id":"4382a7f9-19f5-477c-88e9-97656d5a5fa3","year":2024},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":11,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.631206Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:6a637c1d175937b88c455a075c2595b8803291ffc617a1dbe6ef5ab295fc1924","observation_id":"0740720b-b718-4b7f-a01e-de79c450a313","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.227851Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"malformed_identifier"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"3120.0595","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.745156Z","title":"shared ref","venue":null,"work_id":"3dc06c42-95bc-403f-b26a-2ef3052f413b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":12,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.637104Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:f2086a0bc382d9aa3d5786a221593ceab661de87ee9529ba8fedb0d10939f087","observation_id":"12a1a8c3-400d-4aa4-90bf-095aaa89d2b1","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.758497Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.242521Z","title":"median relative RMSE","venue":null,"work_id":"34f35be1-ab60-4c5a-ae1f-e5b3b6ebcf00","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":25,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.619623Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d45d4aab6d54b0f6f6af5067ed0ff54807edb3603c8d4e6641d3a182b5e56c40","observation_id":"69ef1131-c185-4106-8d43-d62cd6402da5","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.248123Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_fuzzy"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2202.12958","last_updated":"2022-11-06T23:02:49Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T17:18:33.173552Z","submitted_at":"2022-02-25T20:25:37Z","title":"Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Response","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2202.12958","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2202.12958","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.167845Z","title":"Off-Policy Evaluation with Policy-Dependent Optimization Response","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"0819b9f0-c8fb-4d98-8982-686c39544eb0","year":2022},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":2011,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.580726Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2202.12958","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:c2d431ee3611eba64ee0990e2e9775e11fbb60e8b07140101d316daad200b260","observation_id":"f5dee4ee-2d6b-4ac7-b5d8-efeca1edc54e","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.174671Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2512.03354","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.926801Z","title":"Break- ing determinism: Stochastic modeling for reliable off-policy evaluation in ad auctions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03354,","venue":null,"work_id":"1df89209-f926-4978-b822-cf88fdb58984","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":2017,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.608682Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:09e7756a637e9b57fe942db25638bdac54ff8a4e274d4fd28f00829023e4d6b6","observation_id":"f3973ebd-012e-48cc-923f-a386c9554dee","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.944571Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2605.15108","last_updated":"2026-05-15T16:30:03Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T16:00:25.857201Z","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T17:25:19Z","title":"Logging Policy Design for Off-Policy Evaluation","version":2},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2605.15108","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2605.15108","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.197549Z","title":"Logging Policy Design for Off-Policy Evaluation","venue":"stat.ML","work_id":"53aab5f7-b19c-4394-a999-29e92c1c0c79","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":2019,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.574401Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2605.15108","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:078fbf67a8a6d07abb599ab2a1a915a6231eb9b2bb5674c9698a7342f5968bbc","observation_id":"b5918e7d-73ee-4913-9ed6-39d0ccce3dd2","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.204381Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"1905.09515","last_updated":"2019-05-23T07:49:48Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T05:56:54.393600Z","submitted_at":"2019-05-23T07:49:48Z","title":"Atlantic Causal Inference Conference (ACIC) Data Analysis Challenge 2017","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":null,"doi":null,"metadata_source":null,"pith_arxiv_id":"1905.09515","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.586839Z","title":"Atlantic causal inference conference (acic) data analysis challenge 2017.arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.09515,","venue":null,"work_id":null,"year":2017},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":2022,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.586839Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/1905.09515","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:d373e64765806a6c294e9477453d2da9c3d2a9c64e855931590704ce9430bd7d","observation_id":"f78adb0b-88b4-495b-aada-826561615543","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.586839Z","resolver_source":null,"status":"unresolved"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"reason":"canonical_work_link_unavailable","source_receipts":[],"state":"unavailable"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00915","last_updated":"2026-08-02T00:51:44Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-15T15:12:47.655226Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-02T00:51:44Z","title":"UpliftBench: Revealing Outcome-Regime and Objective Mismatch in Uplift Evaluation","version":1},"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2608.00915","doi":null,"metadata_source":"pith","pith_arxiv_id":"2608.00915","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.104205Z","title":"UpliftBench: Revealing Outcome-Regime and Objective Mismatch in Uplift Evaluation","venue":"cs.LG","work_id":"499c140e-df3b-443d-aea5-79b8f7676056","year":2026},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":2024,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.592073Z"},"links":{"cited_paper":"/paper/2608.00915","citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:dfe0fdd647bbf1d145803ef4bdf3e3aea24edc916bacc9339c38dd4fbbdd2c38","observation_id":"fdb687eb-d5bd-410d-abbf-bcd882ac2568","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.110356Z","resolver_source":"local_arxiv","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}},{"citation":{"cited_paper":null,"cited_work":{"arxiv_id":"2603.21485","doi":null,"metadata_source":"raw_reference","pith_arxiv_id":null,"snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.034554Z","title":"Philip Thomas and Emma Brunskill","venue":null,"work_id":"044cba42-c802-4982-ad8c-49b6f0bd4e4b","year":null},"citing_paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide","version":1},"reference_index":2026,"source":"pdf_text","source_observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:04.603104Z"},"links":{"citing_paper":"/paper/2608.12489"},"observation_digest":"sha256:b1737fcb57f4b9817014ee0ca79eead6e922daf0b3e35d065ceaeebfef0a0bbf","observation_id":"215e8b56-f2a5-4259-b170-f1711790189b","resolution":{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T00:16:05.046332Z","resolver_source":"raw_fallback","status":"verified_exact"},"standing_notice":{"events":[],"observation":"No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00.","reason":null,"source_receipts":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"state":"measured"}}],"paper":{"arxiv_id":"2608.12489","last_updated":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","latest_version":1,"primary_category":"cs.LG","snapshot_observed_at":"2026-08-16T22:10:08.748923Z","submitted_at":"2026-08-12T18:10:10Z","title":"When Can You Trust Offline Evaluation of Equal-Cost Top-k Allocation? A Controlled, Reproducible Benchmark and Practitioner's Guide"},"reference_resolution":{"displayed":12,"state_counts":{"malformed_identifier":1,"metadata_mismatch":0,"parse_uncertain":0,"unresolved":2,"verified_exact":7,"verified_fuzzy":2},"total_outbound_references":12},"refusal":"A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.","schema":"pith.paper-citation-record.v1","standing_sources":[{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:59.297886+00:00","source":"crossref"},{"observed_at":"2026-08-16T06:30:54.164669+00:00","source":"retraction_watch"}],"thesis":"As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 12 of 12 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2608.12489."}