Endpoint orthonormal Strichartz estimates

Shunya Toyoshima; Sonae Hadama

Endpoint orthonormal Strichartz estimates

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-27 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves the endpoint orthonormal Strichartz estimate in the full Keel–Tao abstract framework, resolving the Frank–Lewin–Lieb–Seiringer conjecture for the free Schrödinger equation in dimensions d ≥ 2 and the dual conjecture for…

desk verdict This paper proves the long-open endpoint orthonormal Strichartz estimate in the abstract Keel–Tao framework and resolves the FLLS conjecture for the Schrödinger equation in d≥2. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.21823 v1 pith:JZQPUKCV submitted 2026-08-22 math.CA math.APmath.FA

Sonae Hadama , Shunya Toyoshima This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.CAmath.APmath.FA MSC 35B4547B1042B3735Q4135Q49

keywords orthonormalStrichartzestimatesKeel–Taoframeworkrestricted-typeestimateLorentzspacesSchatten–LorentzclassesSchrödingerequationfreetransportBesovrefinement

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes the endpoint (Lorentz) orthonormal Strichartz estimate for any propagator satisfying the same two abstract hypotheses that appear in Keel and Tao's classical theorem: a uniform $L^2$ bound and a dispersive decay $\|U(t)U(\tau)^*\|_{L^1\to L^\infty} \le C_0 |t-\tau|^{-\sigma}$ with $\sigma>1/2$. This closes the one missing range in the orthonormal theory, resolving the conjecture first raised by Frank, Lewin, Lieb, and Seiringer for the free Schrödinger equation in $d\ge 2$, answering the dual Bennett–Bez–Gutiérrez–Lee conjecture for the free transport equation, and producing an optimal Besov refinement of the single-function Strichartz estimate. The paper's interest is that orthonormal Strichartz estimates are the many-body version of classical dispersive bounds, and the endpoint had resisted earlier approaches because of a logarithmic divergence at $\sigma=1/2$.

What carries the argument

The proof is carried by a near–far decomposition of the operator $fUU^*f$ (with $f=\sqrt V$) that splits the double time integral according to whether two time points are separated or close. The novel ingredient is the level-dependent time partition $\ell(k,k') = \varepsilon \lambda 2^{-(k+k')/2} 2^{|k-k'|/4}/B^2$ (equation 4.1), chosen so that the dispersive decay controls the far part through a Hilbert–Schmidt bound (Lemma 4.2) while the energy bound controls the near part (Lemmas 4.4–4.6). The near contribution is reorganized by relative dyadic levels and spectral bands $P_{m,\lambda}$ of $fUU^*f$; a spectral scale $\lambda_*$ is selected so that higher bands have geometrically decaying ranks (Lemma 4.7), and Lemma 5.1 sums the block estimates to a small constant that is absorbed into the lower bound $\lambda_* N_{0,\lambda_*}$.

What would settle it

Compute the far-part bound (4.4) at $\sigma=1/2$, where $r=2$: the discrete kernel $2^{-(r-2)|k|/4}$ becomes identically $1$, so the sum over dyadic levels diverges and the constant in Proposition 5.3 blows up; consistently, the restricted-type estimate (1.6) is known to fail for the free Schrödinger equation in $d=1$, the case $\sigma=1/2$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.4 states that, under Assumptions 1.2 and 1.3 with $\sigma>1/2$, the restricted-type orthonormal Strichartz estimate (1.9) holds at the exponent triple $p=(2\sigma+1)/(2\sigma)$, $q=(2\sigma+1)/(2\sigma-1)$, $r=2\sigma+1$, with operator norm $C=C_\sigma C_0^{2/r} B^{2(r-2)/r}$. By the duality principle this is equivalent to the weak-type Schatten estimate (1.10), namely that the time-integrated operator $\int_I U(t)^*V(t)U(t)\,dt$ lies in the Schatten–Lorentz class $S^{r,\infty}(H)$ with bound in $L^r(I;L^{r/2}(X))$. The proof works on an arbitrary $\sigma$-finite measure space $X$ and interval $I$, so the result is a genuinely abstract endpoint theorem rather than a property of the Schrödinger equation.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests entirely on the decay bound $\|U(t)U(\tau)^*\|_{L^1\to L^\infty} \lesssim |t-\tau|^{-\sigma}$ with $\sigma>1/2$; at $\sigma=1/2$ the summation over dyadic levels ceases to converge and the estimate is known to fail for the Schrödinger equation in $d=1$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The conjecture of Frank, Lewin, Lieb, and Seiringer for the free Schrödinger equation in $d\ge 2$ is settled: the restricted-type estimate (1.6) holds with Lorentz norm $\ell^{(d+1)/d,1}$.
The Bennett–Bez–Gutiérrez–Lee conjecture for the free transport equation, in its dual form, follows for $d\ge 2$: the density estimate (1.7) holds.
The single-function Strichartz estimate is refined to the sharp Besov exponent: $\|e^{it\Delta}\varphi\|_{L^{2p}_t L^{2q}_x} \lesssim \|\varphi\|_{\dot B^0_{2,2p}}$, and no exponent $\kappa<2p$ can replace $2p$.
Any propagator that satisfies the Keel–Tao energy and dispersive hypotheses with $\sigma>1/2$ inherits the endpoint orthonormal estimate, so the result covers a broad class of dispersive evolutions beyond the Schrödinger equation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

At the threshold $\sigma=1/2$ the proof's summation kernel $2^{-(r-2)|k|/4}$ loses summability, and the Schrödinger case $d=1$ fails; this suggests the near–far decomposition is sharp and no abstract endpoint theorem of this type can hold at $\sigma=1/2$.
The level-dependent time partition (4.1) is a transferable device: it could be adapted to endpoint orthonormal estimates for wave, Klein–Gordon, or restriction problems wherever a dispersive decay exponent above $1/2$ is available.
The optimal Besov refinement with $\kappa=2p$ hints at a general principle: orthonormal Strichartz machinery recovers exactly the critical regularity scale for a single function; an analogous sharp refinement for wave equations would be a natural test.
Because only the two Keel–Tao assumptions are used, the theorem should extend to non-Euclidean settings (compact manifolds, Lie groups, graphs) with the same decay; verifying the endpoint there would broaden the resolution well beyond Euclidean space.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The headline result is real: Theorem 1.4 gives the restricted-type endpoint at point A in Figure 1 under exactly the Keel–Tao energy and dispersive hypotheses with σ>1/2. That settles the conjecture Frank–Lewin–Lieb–Seiringer raised, which others had approached only in non-endpoint form. The Besov refinement with optimal κ=2p in Corollary 1.11 is a genuine bonus, not an afterthought, and the transport consequence follows cleanly from the known transfer principle.

What the paper does well: the proof is self-contained and the strategy is transparent. The near-far decomposition with the scale ℓ(k,k′) chosen in (4.1) is the technical core, and the division of labor between energy (near) and dispersive (far) estimates is clear. The spectral band selection via the almost-maximal scale λ∗ in Lemma 4.7 is clever, and the ε^{1/4} absorption in Lemma 5.1 supplies the right smallness. I checked the main chain: Assumption 1.3 with σ>1/2 enters exactly where it should, the dyadic step function reduction is standard, and the density argument for general V is routine. The constants are tracked explicitly, which is a plus.

Soft spots are few. The proof of Lemmas 4.6–4.7 and the summation in Lemma 5.1 is dense, and this is where an independent check would be most valuable. I did not find a gap, but the sheer number of indices (n, m, n′, k, k′) and the two competing smallness conditions in (4.11) make it easy for a reader to get lost. The interpolation argument in Corollary 1.6 is handled a little quickly; it is plausible, but the Lorentz-space inclusions could be spelled out more. Remark 5.2 acknowledges that the ε^{1/4} could be improved to ε^{1/2}, which is honest and not an issue.

The citations look fair. The authors compare with Nguyen, Hoshiya, and Feng–Mondal–Song–Wu explicitly and explain what their theorem adds. The self-citations play no role in the proof. No fitted parameters, no circularity.

This paper deserves a serious referee. The endpoint resolution has been open for a decade and the abstract formulation is the right level of generality. I would recommend acceptance after a careful referee report focuses on the technical lemmas in Section 4.2.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves endpoint orthonormal Strichartz estimates in the abstract Keel--Tao framework. Under Assumptions 1.2 (energy estimate) and 1.3 (dispersive decay with exponent sigma > 1/2), Theorem 1.4 establishes the restricted-type estimate (1.9) with exponents p=(2sigma+1)/(2sigma), q=(2sigma+1)/(2sigma-1), r=2sigma+1, equivalently the weak-type Schatten estimate (1.10). The proof splits the two-time kernel into near and far parts relative to dyadic level sets of V, selects a good spectral scale via Lemma 4.7, and sums the resulting block estimates in Lemma 5.1 to absorb the near contribution. Applications include the Frank--Lewin--Lieb--Seiringer endpoint conjecture for the free Schrodinger equation in dimensions d >= 2 (Corollary 1.8(ii)), the Bennett--Bez--Gutierrez--Lee transport conjecture (Corollary 1.9), and a sharp Besov refinement for single functions (Corollary 1.11).

Significance. If correct, this is a significant advance: it closes a long-standing endpoint conjecture and shows that the original Keel--Tao assumptions, without additional structural hypotheses on the propagator, are sufficient for the orthonormal endpoint estimate. The paper is carefully structured and largely self-contained: the main theorem is stated with explicit dependence on the constants C0 and B, the key length scale ell(k,k') in (4.1) is explicit, and the proof produces concrete, falsifiable consequences for Schrodinger, transport, and Besov refinements. The near-far and eigenvalue-counting argument is technically dense and merits independent verification, but I checked the pivotal estimates (Lemmas 4.2, 4.6, 4.7, and 5.1) and found the chain internally consistent.

minor comments (4)

[Lemma 4.7] The existence of a spectral scale lambda* satisfying Lemma 4.7(i) is asserted with the phrase 'It is easy to see'; since the function zeta -> zeta^r N_{0,zeta} is only a step function, a one-sentence justification (for example, by taking a sequence approaching the supremum and passing to a point where the value is at least half of it) would make the argument fully explicit.
[Section 5.4 and Figure 1] The point F in Figure 1 is used in the proof of Corollary 1.6 but is never defined in the text, and the notations (F,A) and (A,F) are used interchangeably. Because the proof relies on F being the intersection of the segment [B,A] with the line p=q, the authors should define F explicitly and use a consistent ordering for the segments.
[Lemma 5.1] The bound for m >= 1, namely min(w(n,m), 2^{-m}) <= C epsilon^{1/4} 2^{-m/4} 2^{-n/16}, is stated without the case split that justifies it; adding two or three lines showing the two regimes (epsilon 2^{3n/4-m} <= 1 and > 1) would improve readability.
[Section 5.3] The passage from dyadic step functions to general V in L^r(I; L^{r/2}(X)) is described only as a standard density argument; spelling out the completeness of the S^{r,infty} quasi-norm and the identification of the limit operator would make the final step of Theorem 1.4 fully explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the endpoint estimate is derived from the Keel–Tao hypotheses, not from its own conclusion.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: Theorem 1.4 is proved from Assumptions 1.2 and 1.3 via the duality reduction (Section 5.1), an eigenvalue-counting formulation (Sections 2 and 5.2), the near–far decomposition with the explicit length scale ell(k,k') in (4.1), and Lemmas 4.2, 4.6, 4.7, and 5.1. The exponents p, q, r are explicit functions of the assumed decay rate sigma, and the constants C_sigma, C_0, and B are parameters of the hypotheses rather than quantities fitted to the target estimate. The auxiliary constants epsilon and lambda* are chosen for the proof (lambda* almost maximizes zeta^r N_{0,zeta}; epsilon is fixed small depending only on sigma) and are eliminated in the final bound; Remark 5.2 explicitly states that no limiting argument sends epsilon to zero, so no hidden circular small-parameter step is present. The equivalence of (1.9) and (1.10) is not assumed: Section 5.1 supplies the proof through the trace duality inequality (5.2). The passage from dyadic step functions to general V in L^r(I;L^{r/2}(X)) is a genuine density argument based on the operator inequality (5.11) and Lemma 3.2, not a renaming of the conclusion. The self-citations [19], [20], and [21] appear only in the literature review in Section 1.3 and are not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from them. The Schroedinger and transport corollaries are obtained by inserting the known L^1 to L^infinity decay of e^{itDelta} into the abstract theorem, so they are consequences rather than inputs. After considering Remark 5.2 and the explicit duality proof, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theorem is a conditional result in the abstract Keel-Tao framework. It introduces no fitted constants, no new physical objects, and no ad hoc tuning parameters: the only free data are the given energy bound B and dispersive constants C0 and sigma, which are hypotheses rather than fitted values. The near-far decomposition's length scale contains epsilon, a small constant chosen once depending only on sigma, but this is an auxiliary proof parameter that is absorbed into the final constant.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Assumption 1.2 (Energy estimate): U(t) is bounded from H to L2(X) with uniform bound B, and the map t to U(t) phi is continuous.
Standard Keel-Tao hypothesis, true for unitary propagators with energy conservation. No numerical value is fitted; B is given data.
domain assumption Assumption 1.3 (Dispersive estimate): the norm of U(t)U(tau)* from L1(X) to L infinity(X) is at most C0 times |t - tau|^{-sigma} for sigma > 1/2.
The key decay condition; for the free Schrodinger propagator it holds with sigma = d/2, and for d at least 2 this is greater than 1/2. The entire proof is conditional on this estimate.
standard math Standard operator-theoretic facts used in Section 3: Hilbert-Schmidt integral kernel criterion, monotonicity of singular values under operator inequalities, and the Rademacher averaging lemma.
Well-known results cited to Simon, Hiai, and Arendt-Bukhvalov. They introduce no ad hoc structure and are standard tools in Schatten class theory.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Endpoint orthonormal Strichartz estimates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JZQPUKCV

@misc{pith2026260821823,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Endpoint orthonormal Strichartz estimates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JZQPUKCV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.21823}
}

abstract

We establish the orthonormal Strichartz estimates in the abstract Keel--Tao framework, under precisely the same hypotheses as in their original theorem. As an important consequence, we resolve the endpoint conjecture for the Schr\"odinger equation in dimensions $d\ge 2$, which was first raised by Frank, Lewin, Lieb, and Seiringer. This consequence also yields an affirmative answer to the conjecture for the free transport equation, which was stated in dual form by Bennett, Bez, Guti\'errez, and Lee. As a further application, we also establish a refinement of the Strichartz estimate for a single function.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

[1]

Arendt and A

W. Arendt and A. V. Bukhvalov,Integral representations of resolvents and semigroups, Forum Math. 6(1994), no. 1, 111–135

work page 1994
[2]

Bennett, N

J. Bennett, N. Bez, S. Guti´ errez, and S. Lee,On the Strichartz estimates for the kinetic transport equation, Comm. Partial Differential Equations39(2014), 1821–1826

work page 2014
[3]

N. Bez, Y. Hong, S. Lee, S. Nakamura, and Y. Sawano,On the Strichartz estimates for orthonormal systems of initial data with regularity, Adv. Math.354(2019), 106736

work page 2019
[4]

N. Bez, S. Kinoshita, and S. Shiraki,Boundary Strichartz estimates and pointwise convergence for orthonormal systems, Trans. London Math. Soc.11(2024), e70002

work page 2024
[5]

N. Bez, S. Kinoshita, and S. Shiraki,A note on Strichartz estimates for the wave equation with orthonormal initial data, RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku BessatsuB97(2025), 83–101

work page 2025
[6]

N. Bez, S. Lee, and S. Nakamura,Maximal estimates for the Schr¨ odinger equation with orthonormal initial data, Selecta Math. (N.S.)26(2020), Paper No. 52

work page 2020
[7]

N. Bez, S. Lee, and S. Nakamura,Strichartz estimates for orthonormal families of initial data and weighted oscillatory integral estimates, Forum Math. Sigma9(2021), e1

work page 2021
[8]

N. Bez, S. Lee, and S. Nakamura,Orthonormal Strichartz estimates for the wave equation and related geometric inequalities, inVarious Methods for the Analysis of PDEs, ICIAM2023 Springer Series5, Springer, Singapore, 2025, 61–85

work page 2025

Show all 37 references

[9]

T. Chen, Y. Hong, and N. Pavlovi´ c,Global well-posedness of the NLS system for infinitely many fermions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.224(2017), 91–123

2017
[10]

T. Chen, Y. Hong, and N. Pavlovi´ c,On the scattering problem for infinitely many fermions in dimen- sionsd≥3at positive temperature, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire35(2018), 393–416

2018
[11]

Cwikel,On(L po(Ao), Lp1(A1))θ,q, Proc

M. Cwikel,On(L po(Ao), Lp1(A1))θ,q, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.44(1974), 286–292

1974
[12]

G. Feng, S. S. Mondal, M. Song, and H. Wu,Orthonormal Strichartz inequalities and their applications on abstract measure spaces, Math. Z.312(2026), Paper No. 55

2026
[13]

Feng and M

G. Feng and M. Song,Restriction theorems and Strichartz inequalities for the Laguerre operator involving orthonormal functions, J. Geom. Anal.34(2024), Paper No. 287

2024
[14]

R. L. Frank, M. Lewin, E. H. Lieb, and R. Seiringer,Strichartz inequality for orthonormal functions, J. Eur. Math. Soc.16(2014), 1507–1526

2014
[15]

R. L. Frank and J. Sabin,The Stein-Tomas inequality in trace ideals, S´ eminaire Laurent Schwartz– ´Equations aux d´ eriv´ ees partielles et applications. Ann´ ee 2015–2016, Exp. No. XV, 12 pp.´Editions de l’´Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, 2017

2015
[16]

R. L. Frank and J. Sabin,Restriction theorems for orthonormal functions, Strichartz inequalities, and uniform Sobolev estimates, Amer. J. Math.139(2017), 1649–1691

2017
[17]

Ghosh, S

S. Ghosh, S. S. Mondal, and J. Swain,Strichartz inequality for orthonormal functions associated with special Hermite operator, Forum Math.36(2024), 655–669

2024
[18]

Ghosh and J

S. Ghosh and J. Swain,On the Schatten exponent in orthonormal Strichartz estimate for the Dunkl operators, Anal. Math. Phys.14(2024), Paper No. 111, 15 pp

2024
[19]

Hadama,Asymptotic stability of a wide class of stationary solutions for the Hartree and Schr¨ odinger equations for infinitely many particles, Ann

S. Hadama,Asymptotic stability of a wide class of stationary solutions for the Hartree and Schr¨ odinger equations for infinitely many particles, Ann. H. Lebesgue8(2025), 181–218

2025
[20]

Hadama and Y

S. Hadama and Y. Hong,Global well-posedness of the nonlinear Hartree equation for infinitely many particles with singular interaction, J. Funct. Anal.289(2025), 111102

2025
[21]

Hadama and T

S. Hadama and T. Yamamoto,Probabilistic Strichartz estimates in Schatten classes and their appli- cations to the Hartree equation, J. Math. Phys.67(2026), 011504

2026
[22]

Hiai,Log-majorizations and norm inequalities for exponential operators, inLinear Operators, Ba- nach Center Publ.38, Polish Acad

F. Hiai,Log-majorizations and norm inequalities for exponential operators, inLinear Operators, Ba- nach Center Publ.38, Polish Acad. Sci. Inst. Math., Warsaw, 1997, 119–181

1997
[23]

Hoshiya,Orthonormal Strichartz estimate for dispersive equations with potentials, J

A. Hoshiya,Orthonormal Strichartz estimate for dispersive equations with potentials, J. Funct. Anal. 286(2024), 110425

2024
[24]

Hoshiya,Orthonormal Strichartz estimates for Schr¨ odinger operator and their applications to in- finitely many particle systems, J

A. Hoshiya,Orthonormal Strichartz estimates for Schr¨ odinger operator and their applications to in- finitely many particle systems, J. Math. Phys.66(2025), 071505

2025
[25]

Hoshiya,Semiclassical limit of orthonormal Strichartz estimates on scattering manifolds, Pure Appl

A. Hoshiya,Semiclassical limit of orthonormal Strichartz estimates on scattering manifolds, Pure Appl. Anal.7(2025), 1173–1207

2025
[26]

Hoshiya,Uniform resolvent and orthonormal Strichartz estimates for repulsive Hamiltonian, Ann

A. Hoshiya,Uniform resolvent and orthonormal Strichartz estimates for repulsive Hamiltonian, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e (2025)

2025
[27]

Keel and T

M. Keel and T. Tao,Endpoint Strichartz estimates, Amer. J. Math.120(1998), 955–980

1998
[28]

Kinoshita, H

S. Kinoshita, H. Ko, and S. Shiraki,Maximal estimates for orthonormal systems of wave equations, J. Anal. Math.158(2026), no. 2, 683–713

2026
[29]

E. H. Lieb,AnL p bound for the Riesz and Bessel potentials of orthonormal functions, J. Funct. Anal. 51(1983), no. 2, 159–165. 24

1983
[30]

E. H. Lieb and W. E. Thirring,Bound for the kinetic energy of fermions which proves the stability of matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.35(1975), 687–689; Erratum, ibid. 35 (1975), 1116

1975
[31]

Lions and J

J.-L. Lions and J. Peetre,Sur une classe d’espaces d’interpolation, Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. No.19(1964), 5–68

1964
[32]

S. S. Mondal and M. Song,Orthonormal Strichartz inequalities for the(k, a)-generalized Laguerre operator and Dunkl operator, Israel J. Math.269(2025), 697–729

2025
[33]

Nakamura,The orthonormal Strichartz inequality on torus, Trans

S. Nakamura,The orthonormal Strichartz inequality on torus, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.373(2020), 1455–1476

2020
[34]

N. N. Nguyen,Fermionic semiclassicalL p estimates, J. Funct. Anal.286(2024), 110196

2024
[35]

P. J. K. Senapati, P. Boggarapu, S. S. Mondal, and H. Mejjaoli,Restriction theorem for the Fourier–Dunkl transform and its applications to Strichartz inequalities, J. Geom. Anal.34(2024), Paper No. 74

2024
[36]

Simon,Trace Ideals and Their Applications, 2nd ed., Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 120, American Mathematical Society, 2005

B. Simon,Trace Ideals and Their Applications, 2nd ed., Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 120, American Mathematical Society, 2005

2005
[37]

R. S. Strichartz,Restrictions of Fourier transforms to quadratic surfaces and decay of solutions of wave equations, Duke Math. J.44(1977), 705–714. The University of Osaka, Japan Email address:hadama.sonae.sci@osaka-u.ac.jp Saitama University, Japan Email address:s.toyoshima.8...

1977

Pith tools

Reviewed August 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Arendt and A

W. Arendt and A. V. Bukhvalov,Integral representations of resolvents and semigroups, Forum Math. 6(1994), no. 1, 111–135

work page 1994

[2] [2]

Bennett, N

J. Bennett, N. Bez, S. Guti´ errez, and S. Lee,On the Strichartz estimates for the kinetic transport equation, Comm. Partial Differential Equations39(2014), 1821–1826

work page 2014

[3] [3]

N. Bez, Y. Hong, S. Lee, S. Nakamura, and Y. Sawano,On the Strichartz estimates for orthonormal systems of initial data with regularity, Adv. Math.354(2019), 106736

work page 2019

[4] [4]

N. Bez, S. Kinoshita, and S. Shiraki,Boundary Strichartz estimates and pointwise convergence for orthonormal systems, Trans. London Math. Soc.11(2024), e70002

work page 2024

[5] [5]

N. Bez, S. Kinoshita, and S. Shiraki,A note on Strichartz estimates for the wave equation with orthonormal initial data, RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku BessatsuB97(2025), 83–101

work page 2025

[6] [6]

N. Bez, S. Lee, and S. Nakamura,Maximal estimates for the Schr¨ odinger equation with orthonormal initial data, Selecta Math. (N.S.)26(2020), Paper No. 52

work page 2020

[7] [7]

N. Bez, S. Lee, and S. Nakamura,Strichartz estimates for orthonormal families of initial data and weighted oscillatory integral estimates, Forum Math. Sigma9(2021), e1

work page 2021

[8] [8]

N. Bez, S. Lee, and S. Nakamura,Orthonormal Strichartz estimates for the wave equation and related geometric inequalities, inVarious Methods for the Analysis of PDEs, ICIAM2023 Springer Series5, Springer, Singapore, 2025, 61–85

work page 2025