Pith. sign in

REVIEW 14 references

A subquadratic bound for generalized Tur\'an numbers of odd cycles

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-28 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read For all integers l > k ≥ 2, the maximum number of (2k+1)-cycles in an n-vertex graph with no cycles of length at most 2k and no (2l+1)-cycle is O(n^{2 - 1/(k(k+1)(l-k))}).

arxiv 2608.22893 v1 pith:E4BAH5Q5 submitted 2026-08-24 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords mathcalmathscrdenotefreegraphgraphsnumbertext
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Graph theorists study how many copies of a small shape a graph must contain if it is forbidden from containing certain other shapes. This paper considers shapes that are cycles, or loops, of various lengths. Write C_m for a cycle with m vertices. The authors ask: if a graph on n vertices is forbidden from containing any cycle of length 3, 4, ..., 2k, and also forbidden from containing a cycle of length 2l+1, what is the largest possible number of cycles of length 2k+1? They prove an upper bound of order n^{2 - 1/(k(k+1)(l-k))}, which is strictly below quadratic whenever l > k.

The key structural fact is that forbidding all even cycles up to length 2k makes the graph locally tree-like: between any two vertices there is at most one path of length at most k. Around each vertex v, the proof looks at the set of vertices at distance exactly k. Each cycle of length 2k+1 through v picks out an edge between two such far vertices, the edge opposite v. These opposite edges form an auxiliary graph L_v, and a random partition argument shows L_v is sparse, with average degree at most 4(l-k).

The proof then counts objects called flags: a cycle together with an attached path of length l-k at one of its vertices. Every cycle generates many flags, but each flag can be charged to an ordered pair of distinct vertices. A path-counting estimate bounds how many flags can be assigned to one pair. Comparing the lower and upper bounds on the total number of flags yields the desired upper bound on the number of cycles.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.2 states that ex(n, C_{2k+1}, C_{2k} ∪ {C_{2l+1}}) = O_{k,l}( n^{2 - 1/(k(k+1)(l-k))} ) for every pair of integers l > k ≥ 2. Together with the known k = 1 case, this confirms Conjecture 1.1 of Gerbner, Győri, Methuku, and Vizer.

Load-bearing premise

The proof relies on the Alon-Hoory-Linial theorem (Theorem 2.1) that C_{2k}-free graphs have at most (1/2)n^{1+1/k} + (1/2)n edges. This bound is applied at (6) to control m and again in the final substitution in the proof of Theorem 1.2; the claimed subquadratic exponent 2 - 1/(k(k+1)(l-k)) is derived directly from it. If this edge bound had a larger exponent, the argument would not yield a subquadratic result. The proof also uses the Erdős-Gallai theorem (Theorem 2.2) in Lemma 2.3. Both are standard published results, so the practical risk is low, but they are the load-bearing external inputs.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: Theorem 1.2 states that ex(n, C_{2k+1}, C_{2k} ∪ {C_{2l+1}}) = O_{k,l}( n^{2 - 1/(k(k+1)(l-k))} ) for every pair of integers l > k ≥ 2. Together with the known k = 1 case, this confirms Conjecture 1.1 of Gerbner, Győri, Methuku, and Vizer.

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof introduces no fitted parameters and no new physical or mathematical entities; the auxiliary graph L_v and flags are working definitions. The only external inputs are two standard theorems and the finite/simple convention.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math ex(n, C_{2k}) < (1/2)n^{1+1/k} + (1/2)n (Alon, Hoory, Linial, Theorem 2.1)
    Used to bound m in (6) and again in the final substitution of the proof of Theorem 1.2.
  • standard math A graph on N vertices with no P_r has at most (r-2)N/2 edges (Erdős, Gallai, Theorem 2.2)
    Used in Lemma 2.3 to bound e(J) for the P_{2d+2}-free bipartite subgraph J.
  • domain assumption All graphs are finite and simple
    Stated at the beginning of Section 1 as the setting for all extremal definitions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A subquadratic bound for generalized Tur\'an numbers of odd cycles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E4BAH5Q5

@misc{pith2026260822893,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A subquadratic bound for generalized Tur\'an numbers of odd cycles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E4BAH5Q5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.22893}
}
abstract

For a graph $H$ and a family of graphs $\mathcal F$, let $\text{ex}(n,H,\mathcal F)$ denote the maximum number of copies of $H$ in an $\mathcal F$-free graph on $n$ vertices. For every integer $i\ge 3$, let $C_i$ denote the cycle of length $i$. For $r\ge 3$, set $\mathscr {C}_r=\{C_3,C_4,\ldots,C_r\},$ and set $\mathscr {C}_2=\varnothing$. In this paper, we prove that, for all integers $l>k\ge 2$, $$ \text{ex}(n,C_{2k+1},\mathscr {C}_{2k}\cup\{C_{2l+1}\}) =O_{k,l} \left(n^{2-\frac{1}{k(k+1)(l-k)}}\ \ \right). $$ Together with the known upper bounds for the number of triangles in $C_{2l+1}$-free graphs, this confirms a conjecture of Gerbner, Gy\H{o}ri, Methuku, and Vizer.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

14 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. Alon, S. Hoory, and N. Linial, The Moore bound for irregular graphs,Graphs Combin.18(2002), 53–57

  2. [2]

    Alon and C

    N. Alon and C. Shikhelman, ManyT copies inH-free graphs,J. Combin. Theory Ser. B121(2016), 146–172

  3. [3]

    Beke and O

    C. Beke and O. Janzer, On the generalized Turán problem for odd cycles,SIAM J. Discrete Math.38(2024), 2416–2428

  4. [4]

    Bollobás and E

    B. Bollobás and E. Győri, Pentagons vs. triangles,Discrete Math.308(2008), 4332– 4336

  5. [5]

    J. A. Bondy and M. Simonovits, Cycles of even length in graphs,J. Combin. Theory Ser. B16(1974), 97–105

  6. [6]

    Erdős, Extremal problems in graph theory, inTheory of Graphs and Its Applications, Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 1964, 29–36

    P. Erdős, Extremal problems in graph theory, inTheory of Graphs and Its Applications, Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 1964, 29–36

  7. [7]

    Erdős and T

    P. Erdős and T. Gallai, On maximal paths and circuits of graphs,Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar.10(1959), 337–356

  8. [8]

    Gerbner, E

    D. Gerbner, E. Győri, A. Methuku, and M. Vizer, Generalized Turán problems for even cycles,J. Combin. Theory Ser. B145(2020), 169–213

Show all 14 references
  1. [9]

    Gerbner and C

    D. Gerbner and C. Palmer, Survey of generalized Turán problems—counting subgraphs, Electron. J. Combin., Dynamic Surveys, #DS27 (2026). 8

  2. [10]

    Gishboliner and A

    L. Gishboliner and A. Shapira, A generalized Turán problem and its applications,Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN(2020), 3417–3452

  3. [11]

    Grzesik and B

    A. Grzesik and B. Kielak, On the maximum number of odd cycles in graphs without smaller odd cycles,J. Graph Theory99(2022), 240–246

  4. [12]

    Győri and H

    E. Győri and H. Li, The maximum number of triangles inC2k+1-free graphs,Combin. Probab. Comput.21(2012), 187–191

  5. [13]

    Lazebnik, V

    F. Lazebnik, V. A. Ustimenko, and A. J. Woldar, Polarities and2k-cycle-free graphs, Discrete Math.197/198(1999), 503–513

  6. [14]

    A. A. Zykov, On some properties of linear complexes,Mat. Sb. (N.S.)24(66)(1949), 163–188. 9

Pith tools

Reviewed August 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.