Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 references

The asymptotic behavior of the rectangle partition function $p(m,n)$

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-28 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read For every fixed width m, the rectangle partition number p(m,n) satisfies log p(m,n) = π√(2mH_m/3)√n + O(log n), settling the conjecture.

arxiv 2608.22955 v1 pith:5UYBJUCK submitted 2026-08-24 math.CO math.NT

classification math.COmath.NT
keywords partitionsblocksintegernumberrectanglesqrtapproacharrangement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies p(m,n), the number of ways to break an m by n rectangle into smaller rectangles with whole-number sides. Two breakings are considered the same if they use the same collection of block sizes, even if the blocks are arranged differently. With this definition, p(1,n) is exactly the classical number of integer partitions of n, so p(m,n) is a two-dimensional generalization of one of the oldest objects in number theory.

The main result gives the growth rate of p(m,n) when the width m is fixed and the height n grows. The logarithm of p(m,n) is about a constant times the square root of n, plus a correction of size log n. The constant is expressed through the harmonic numbers H_m. The proof has two parts. For the upper bound, the authors count all multisets of rectangular blocks whose total area is mn, without checking whether they fit together. The generating function for these multisets factors into products of simple geometric series, and a short estimate gives the right exponential rate. For the lower bound, they construct a large family of genuine tilings. They reserve vertical columns for blocks of each possible smaller side, pack the blocks into horizontal strips inside the columns, and fill all leftover area with unit squares.

The construction is injective: different choices of the input partitions produce different multisets of blocks, so the number of tilings is at least the product of the sizes of the input families. An inequality involving the harmonic numbers guarantees that the columns fit side by side. The result confirms a conjecture from the authors' earlier work and extends earlier proofs for widths 2 and 3 to every fixed width.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.1 states that for every fixed positive integer m, as n→∞, log p(m,n)=π√(2mH_m/3)√n+O(log n), and moreover p(m,n)≤exp(π√(2mH_m/3)√n) for all n≥m. If the paper is correct, the conjecture from [2] is true in the stronger logarithmic-error form, and the leading constant is exactly π√(2mH_m/3).

Load-bearing premise

The lower bound in Section 4 rests on Lemma 3.4, which asserts that the family A(A,l) of partitions with parts restricted to {A,...,ν_l} and total size at most σ_l still has size exp(π√(2/3)√l+O(log l)). This lemma imports Hardy-Ramanujan growth into the restricted family; if the restriction cost more than a power of l, the product construction would yield too few tilings and the main constant would not match. The lemma is proved, but it is the most fragile load-bearing step in the paper.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: Theorem 1.1 states that for every fixed positive integer m, as n→∞, log p(m,n)=π√(2mH_m/3)√n+O(log n), and moreover p(m,n)≤exp(π√(2mH_m/3)√n) for all n≥m. If the paper is correct, the conjecture from [2] is true in the stronger logarithmic-error form, and the leading constant is exactly π√(2mH_m/3).

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants enter. The leading constant is derived, not tuned. Proof-internal parameters such as K=m^2, T_{a,n}, c_{a,n}, σ_l and ν_l are chosen to make the construction work and are eliminated from the final constants. The paper postulates no new mathematical entities.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Hardy-Ramanujan asymptotic formula p(t) = (1/(4√3 t)) exp(π√(2t/3))(1+O(t^{-1/2}))
    Used in Section 2 to obtain (2.1), and again in Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4 to estimate log p(σ_l). This is the only nontrivial external analytic input.
  • standard math Euler's identity ∑_{k=1}∞ 1/k^2 = π^2/6
    Used in Lemma 3.2 to bound the Euler products in the upper bound.
  • standard math Multiset generating functions factor into Euler products: ∑_{ℓ≥0} U_m(ℓ)x^ℓ = ∏_{a=1}^m ∏_{b=a}∞ (1-x^{ab})^{-1}
    Used in Section 4 to count multisets of canonical rectangles with total area mn in the upper-bound argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The asymptotic behavior of the rectangle partition function $p(m,n)$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5UYBJUCK

@misc{pith2026260822955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The asymptotic behavior of the rectangle partition function $p(m,n)$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5UYBJUCK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.22955}
}
abstract

Let $p(m,n)$ denote the number of partitions of a rectangle $m\times n$ into integer-sided rectangular blocks, where two partitions are indistinguishable if they consist of the same multiset of blocks, regardless of their geometric arrangement. We present an elementary approach to show that, for every fixed positive integer $m$, $$ \log p(m,n)=\pi\sqrt{\tfrac{2mH_m}{3}}\sqrt{n}+O(\log n), \qquad \text{as }n\to\infty, $$ where $H_m$ denotes the $m$-th harmonic number. This confirms a conjecture recently posed by the authors and generalizes the Hardy--Ramanujan formula for integer partitions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.22955 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The decomposition of the rectangle m × n used in the proof of the lower bound of Theorem 1.1 for m = 5. The hatched strips are tiled by the rectangles coming from λ2, λ3, λ4, λ5, and the white strips of height 1 receive the rectangles coming from λ1 together with the unit squares. Remark 4.2. For m ≤ 3, the known asymptotic formulae for p(m, n) exhibit a polynomial factor in front of the exponential term; see [1, 2]… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

3 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gajdzica, R

    K. Gajdzica, R. Visser and M. Zakarczemny,Rectangle partitions generalizing integer partitions, Annals of Combinatorics (2026)

  2. [2]

    A note on the partition function of a rectangle

    K. Gajdzica and M. Zakarczemny,A note on the partition function of a rectangle,https://arxiv. org/abs/2608.08762v1[math.CO], preprint

  3. [3]

    G. H. Hardy and S. Ramanujan,Asymptotic formulae in combinatory analysis, Proc. London Math. Soc. (2)17(1918), 75–115. Theoretical Computer Science Department, F aculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Łojasiewicza 6, 30-348 Kraków, Poland Email address:krystian.gajdzica@uj.edu.pl Department of Applied Mathematics, F aculty of...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.