Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 minor 35 references

The parabolic Dini-$\beta$ condition and absolute continuity of surface and caloric measure

T0 review · 0 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-28 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that for a parabolic Lipschitz graph, absolute continuity of surface measure with respect to caloric measure is equivalent to a square Dini-beta condition and to covering by countably many regular parabolic Lipschitz…

desk verdict Strong qualitative equivalence for parabolic Lipschitz graphs, but Section 5's proof of (c)=>(b) has a normalization error that breaks the argument as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.23240 v1 pith:JR7IT3ZC submitted 2026-08-24 math.AP math.CA

Simon Bortz , Moritz Egert , Sandra Ferris , Olli Saari This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.CA MSC 35K2031C4528A7535K0535R3542B25
keywords parabolicLipschitzgraphcaloricmeasuresurfaceabsolutecontinuityDini-betaconditionJonesbetanumbersrectifiabilityregularLip(11/2)functions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that for any domain lying above a parabolic Lipschitz graph, the qualitative mutual absolute continuity of parabolic surface measure and caloric measure is completely characterized by a single analytic condition: a square Dini-type integral of the parabolic Jones beta-numbers being finite at almost every boundary point. Theorem 1.3 shows this condition is also equivalent to the boundary being covered, up to a surface-null set, by countably many regular parabolic Lipschitz graphs, a concrete notion of qualitative parabolic rectifiability. A companion theorem shows the same integral condition, imposed only up to a set of caloric measure zero, forces caloric measure to be absolutely continuous with respect to surface measure. The result matters because it turns a measure-theoretic question about the heat equation into a pointwise, checkable geometric quantity, completing the qualitative picture left open by the quantitative theory.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the parabolic Jones ($L^2$) $\beta$-numbers $\hat\beta(f,X;r)$, which measure, over a parabolic ball of radius $r$ centered at a boundary point $X$, the $L^2$ distance of the graph $\partial\Omega_f$ to the best-fitting $n$-dimensional affine subspace that is vertical, normalized by $r$. Condition (1.4) is the square Dini integral of these numbers, $\int_0^1 \hat\beta(f,X;r)^2 \frac{dr}{r}$. The mechanism carrying the argument is Lemma 4.3, the selective mollification $f_K$: on a compact set $K$ where the Dini-$\beta$ integral is uniformly bounded, $f$ is frozen, while on Whitney cubes of the complement it is replaced by averaged values; the lemma asserts $f_K$ is a regular $\mathrm{Lip}(1,1/2)$ function whose $\beta$-numbers satisfy a Carleson measure estimate on every parabolic cube. This regular approximation (a subgraph for the direction $\sigma\ll\omega$, a supergraph for $\omega\ll\sigma$) is then fed into the quantitative $A_\infty$ theory, which provides mutual absolute continuity on the regular graph; the implication $(b)\Rightarrow(a)$ and Theorem 1.5 rest on this mechanism, and, through transitivity together with the Green-function sawtooth construction of Section 3, the indirect route from $(b)$ to $(c)$ as well.

What would settle it

Compute the Carleson measure norm of the $\beta$-numbers of the selective mollification $f_K$ for a concrete compact set $K$ satisfying (4.4) inside a Weierstrass-type parabolic Lipschitz graph; if any parabolic cube disjoint from $K$ violates the estimate of Lemma 4.3, the lemma is false. Alternatively, exhibit a parabolic Lipschitz graph with $\sigma_f\ll\omega_f$ but for which the integral (1.4) diverges on a $\sigma_f$-positive set, directly contradicting (a)-implies-(b).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.3 proves that for a parabolic Lipschitz function $f\colon \mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$, the following are equivalent: (a) parabolic surface measure $\sigma_f$ is absolutely continuous with respect to caloric measure $\omega_f$ in the time-truncated sense of Definition 1.1; (b) the square Dini-$\beta$ integral $\int_0^1 \hat\beta(f,X;r)^2 \frac{dr}{r}$ is finite for $\sigma_f$-almost every boundary point $X$; and (c) the graph $\partial\Omega_f$ is covered, up to a $\sigma_f$-null set, by countably many regular $\mathrm{Lip}(1,1/2)$ graphs, where 'regular' means the half-order time derivative lies in parabolic BMO. Theorem 1.5 adds that if the same integral is finite up to a set of caloric measure zero, then caloric measure is absolutely continuous with respect to surface measure. The authors present this as the qualitative counterpart to the existing quantitative $A_\infty$ theory, and as evidence that covering by regular Lipschitz graphs is the right notion of parabolic rectifiability in the context of parabolic PDEs.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result leans on the lemma that a compact chunk of the graph with a bounded square Dini-beta integral can be smoothed by selective mollification into a regular parabolic Lipschitz graph with uniformly controlled beta averages on all scales; if that smoothing lemma fails, the implication from the Dini condition to absolute continuity, and with it the equivalence chain, collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Absolute continuity $\sigma_f\ll\omega_f$ for a parabolic Lipschitz graph can be checked by a purely local, pointwise integral of $\hat\beta(f,X;r)^2 \frac{dr}{r}$ over scales.
  • Any graph for which $\sigma_f$ and $\omega_f$ are mutually singular, in particular the classical Weierstrass-type examples, must fail the Dini-$\beta$ condition on a set of positive surface measure.
  • Covering by countably many regular $\mathrm{Lip}(1,1/2)$ graphs is exactly the qualitative parabolic rectifiability notion that matches absolute continuity of caloric measure.
  • If the Dini-$\beta$ integral converges up to a set of caloric measure zero, then $\omega_f^Y\ll\sigma_f$, so a merely $\omega$-almost-everywhere analytic condition yields one-sided absolute continuity.
  • The equivalence supplies a construction principle: from absolute continuity alone one builds sawtooth domains whose Green-function level sets produce regular $\mathrm{Lip}(1,1/2)$ graphs covering almost all of $\partial\Omega_f$.
  • Since $(a)\Rightarrow(c)$ and $(b)\Rightarrow(a)$ hold, $(b)\Rightarrow(c)$ follows: the Dini condition alone guarantees a countable regular-graph cover.
  • The chain of equivalences lets one transfer qualitative absolute continuity through regular approximations: the regular graph $\tilde f$ built from $f_K$ has mutually absolutely continuous measures, and the maximum principle pushes the comparison back to $f$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the Dini-$\beta$ condition likely interpolates with the quantitative $A_\infty$ theory; a uniform Carleson bound on the beta-numbers is known to characterize solvability of the $L^p$ Dirichlet problem, while bare finiteness gives only qualitative absolute continuity, so quantifying the divergence rate of the integral may yield intermediate $A_p$-type information.
  • Editorial inference: because the selective mollification $f_K$ is explicit, one can test Lemma 4.3 numerically on finite parabolic grids by computing its beta-number Carleson norm and comparing it with the Dini integral of $f$ on $K$; a numerical violation would be a serious check of the theorem's core step.
  • Editorial inference: the graphical hypothesis is likely removable in part: the elliptic analogues suggest that the equivalence between square-Dini beta finiteness and countable regular-graph covering should hold for general parabolic sets with Ahlfors-David regular boundaries, a question the authors explicitly leave open.
  • Editorial inference: for explicit singular examples such as the Weierstrass-type graphs, the rate at which $\int_0^r \hat\beta(\cdot,\rho)^2 \frac{d\rho}{\rho}$ diverges as $r\to 0$ should predict the size (Hausdorff dimension) of the set where caloric and surface measure are mutually singular; quantifying that rate could yield a sharp modulus of singularity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: Theorem 1.3 proves that for a parabolic Lipschitz function $f\colon \mathbb{R}^n\to\mathbb{R}$, the following are equivalent: (a) parabolic surface measure $\sigma_f$ is absolutely continuous with respect to caloric measure $\omega_f$ in the time-truncated sense of Definition 1.1; (b) the square Dini-$\beta$ integral $\int_0^1 \hat\beta(f,X;r)^2 \frac{dr}{r}$ is finite for $\sigma_f$-almost every

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper studies parabolic Lipschitz graph domains Ω_f = {x_0 > f(x,t)} and proves, in Theorem 1.3, that the following three qualitative conditions are equivalent: (a) the time-truncated absolute continuity of parabolic surface measure σ_f with respect to caloric measure (Definition 1.1); (b) the square Dini-β condition ∫_0^1 β^(f,X;r)^2 dr/r < ∞ for σ_f-a.e. X ∈ ∂Ω_f, where β^ is a parabolic version of Jones' L^2 β-numbers; and (c) the graph is covered, up to a σ_f-null set, by countably many regular Lip(1,1/2) graphs. Theorem 1.5 adds that if the same Dini-β condition holds up to a set of caloric measure zero for a fixed pole, then caloric measure is absolutely continuous with respect to surface measure. The proof is organized as the implications (a)⇒(c) in Section 3, (b)⇒(a) in Section 4, and (c)⇒(b) in Section 5, after a reduction to flat coordinates in Section 2. The new technical core is Lemma 4.3, a selective-mollification argument producing a regular Lip(1,1/2) function from a compact set with uniformly bounded square Dini-β integral.

Significance. If correct, this is a complete qualitative characterization of absolute continuity between surface measure and caloric measure on parabolic Lipschitz graphs, directly complementing the quantitative A_∞ results of Lewis--Murray [LM95] and Bortz--Hofmann--Martell--Nyström [BHMN25]. The paper is clearly organized and the main theorems are stated precisely. The proof of Lemma 4.3 is a genuine new device, and Theorem 1.5 is a useful addition in the spirit of elliptic results of Azzam--Akman--Mourgoglou--Wu. The manuscript is honest about its reliance on prior work: several key lemmas in Section 3 (Lemma 3.9, 3.10, 3.14) are quoted from [BFHPH25, BHMN25, BHH+23b] with only sketches, but these are published or openly available results with independent derivations, so this is acceptable. Overall the paper offers a falsifiable geometric condition and a coherent route to qualitative parabolic rectifiability.

minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 5, displayed inequality before (5.1)] The displayed inequality for βˇ(f,x;r)^2 drops the normalization inherent in Definition (2.11): the second term should be 2L_j^2 \fint_{Q(x,r)} (dist(z,E_j)/r)^2 dz (equivalently, the denominator is r^{n+1}, not r^n). With this correction, the quantity I in (5.1) is exactly the integral of the corrected error term, and the subsequent estimate using r ≥ |x-z| ≥ dist(z,E_j) yields the integrable kernel |x-z|^{-n}, which is integrable in the parabolic metric of homogeneous dimension n+1. Thus the proof of (c)⇒(b) is valid after this local correction; as printed, the inequality is dimensionally inconsistent because βˇ^2 is dimensionless.
  2. [Section 4, Lemma 4.3] The displayed estimate for the term II appears to have reversed integration limits, reading ∫_ρ^{dist(y,K)/60}; the intended domain is ∫_{dist(y,K)/60}^ρ, and when dist(y,K)>ρ the lower limit should be ρ/60. The surrounding paragraph indicates that this is a typographical slip, but it should be corrected.
  3. [Section 3, proof of (a)⇒(c)] After applying Lemma 3.15 in 4Q_0, the measure estimate for E_k should read |E_k| ≥ (1-ε_k)|4Q_0| rather than (1-ε_k)|Q_0|; the final covering conclusion is unchanged up to a harmless constant depending only on the dilation factor.
  4. [Lemma 3.10] In the treatment of type 4 cubes, the text says one can connect any Q_i to Q_1 by 2^{k+4}n cubes and then writes a bound containing '2^{k+4}3^{n+1}Nn'; the exponent/constant appears to contain a typo (likely 2^{k+4}3^{n+1}N). Please clarify the arithmetic so the BMO estimate can be checked line by line.
  5. [Proof of Theorem 1.5] The comparison 0 < ω^{X_0}(K) ≤ μ^{X_0}(K) is stated without explanation. Since Ω_\tilde{f} is a superdomain containing the pole X_0 and \tilde{f} = f on K, the inequality follows from the maximum principle for caloric measure, but a brief justification should be added.
  6. [Throughout] There are several minor typos: 'Whiteny' for 'Whitney' in Section 2.3, 'parition' for 'partition' in Section 4, 'sawtoowth' for 'sawtooth' in Section 3.5, and the informal 'Roll Tide!' in the acknowledgments is better omitted from a journal article.
  7. [Lemma 4.3, proof of II_1] In the estimate of II_1, the Dini-β hypothesis (4.4) controls scales only up to r=1, while the cube side ρ may exceed 1. For scales r>1 the term should instead be bounded by the global Lipschitz constant L; this is standard but should be stated explicitly for completeness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Dini-β, regular covering, and absolute continuity are independently defined; self-citations supply prior parameter-free results, and the Section 5 issue is a correctness concern, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The Dini-β condition in (1.4) is defined through parabolic β-numbers in (1.2)/(2.11), with no reference to caloric measure absolute continuity, so condition (b) is not a renamed form of condition (a). The regular Lip(1,1/2) covering condition (c) is also an independent geometric statement. The main technical lemma, Lemma 4.3, is proved in the paper using an argument said to be 'essentially from [DS91, BHH+23b]'; the cited works are prior parameter-free results, not statements of Theorem 1.3, and the proof still contains the substantive selective mollification and Carleson estimate argument. Similarly, the Section 3 use of lemmas from [BHMN25] and [BFHPH25] and the use of [LM95] in Section 4 convert already-established regularity results into absolute continuity statements; these are self-citations but carry independent content and do not assume the target equivalence. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the same authors to force a choice. The reviewer-flagged Section 5 normalization issue is a potential correctness defect in the proof of (c)=>(b), not a circular step in which an output is identified with an input by construction, so it does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proof depends on a chain of deep results from prior literature, several by the same authors. None of these are fitted or circular; they are established analytic theorems. The main new input (Lemma 4.3) is stated and sketched in the paper. No free parameters or invented entities appear.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Existence, uniqueness and comparison principles for caloric measure in parabolic Lipschitz graph domains (Perron solutions).
    Used to define omega_f and to compare caloric measures of nested domains in Section 4.
  • domain assumption Lemma 3.2: the regularized distance h_E is Lip(1,1/2) with D_t^{1/2} h_E in BMO; quoted from [BHH+23b].
    Underlies the construction of regular approximating graphs in Section 3.
  • domain assumption Lemma 3.3: for the adjoint Green's function, |grad G| ~ partial_{x0} G ~ G/dist inside Carleson regions; non-degeneracy quoted from prior work.
    Shows level sets of Green's function are graphs (Lemma 3.4); sourced from [BHMN25].
  • domain assumption Lemma 3.9: Carleson square-function and pointwise estimates for psi_{E,Q0}; from [BFHPH25] with 'the same proof works' for the present psi.
    Input to the BMO bound Lemma 3.10.
  • domain assumption Proposition 2.7 and Remark 2.8: f is regular (D_t^{1/2} f in BMO) iff its beta-square function satisfies a Carleson measure bound; known to experts (HLN03, HLN04, Hof97).
    Converts Carleson estimates into regularity of the mollified functions.
  • domain assumption [LM95]: caloric measure for regular Lip(1,1/2) graphs is A_infinity with respect to surface measure.
    Used to get mu(K)>0 from |K|>0 in Section 4.
  • domain assumption Lemma 3.14: Green's function G(X) ~ omega^{X0}(Delta(X)) / dist(X, Omega^c)^{n-1}; quoted from [HL01, FGS84, FS97, FSY99].
    Bridges caloric measure size and Green's function in Lemma 3.15.
  • standard math Lemma 3.7: backward Harnack for Green's function, C(n,eta,L); stated with reference.
    Used in Corollary 3.8 to make M-goodness independent of slope.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The parabolic Dini-$\beta$ condition and absolute continuity of surface and caloric measure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JR7IT3ZC

@misc{pith2026260823240,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The parabolic Dini-$\beta$ condition and absolute continuity of surface and caloric measure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JR7IT3ZC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.23240}
}
abstract

We show if $\partial \Omega$ is the graph of a parabolic Lipschitz function, then parabolic surface measure $\sigma$ of $\partial \Omega$ is absolutely continuous with respect to its caloric measure if and only if a (square) Dini-$\beta$ condition is satisfied. More specifically, the (square) Dini-$\beta$ condition is that \[\int_0^1 \hat{\beta}(X,t,r)^2 \frac{dr}{r} < \infty, \quad \text{$\sigma$-a.e. } (X,t) \in \partial \Omega.\] Here $\hat{\beta}$ is a parabolic version of the Jones ($L^2$) $\beta$-numbers. We show that these conditions are satisfied if and only if the graph is covered by a countable collection of {\it regular} Lipschitz graphs, that is, graphs with additional in-time regularity in the form of a half order time derivative in the parabolic BMO space. This supports the view that covering by {\it regular} Lipschitz graphs is the right notion for qualitative parabolic rectifiability in the context of parabolic PDEs. We also show that if \[\int_0^1 \hat{\beta}(X,t,r)^2 \frac{dr}{r} < \infty\] up to a set of caloric measure zero then the caloric measure is absolutely continuous with respect to surface measure.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Absolute continuity of harmonic measure for domains with lower regular boundaries

    Murat Akman, Jonas Azzam, and Mihalis Mourgoglou. Absolute continuity of harmonic measure for domains with lower regular boundaries. Adv. Math. , 345:1206--1252, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Rectifiability and elliptic measures on 1-sided NTA domains with A hlfors- D avid regular boundaries

    Murat Akman, Matthew Badger, Steve Hofmann, and Jos\'e Mar\'ia Martell. Rectifiability and elliptic measures on 1-sided NTA domains with A hlfors- D avid regular boundaries. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 369(8):5711--5745, 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Rectifiability, interior approximation and harmonic measure

    Murat Akman, Simon Bortz, Steve Hofmann, and Jos\'e Mar\'ia Martell. Rectifiability, interior approximation and harmonic measure. Ark. Mat. , 57(1):1--22, 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Rectifiability of harmonic measure

    Jonas Azzam, Steve Hofmann, Jos\'e Mar\'ia Martell, Svitlana Mayboroda, Mihalis Mourgoglou, Xavier Tolsa, and Alexander Volberg. Rectifiability of harmonic measure. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 26(3):703--728, 2016

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Characterization of n -rectifiability in terms of J ones' square function: P art II

    Jonas Azzam and Xavier Tolsa. Characterization of n -rectifiability in terms of J ones' square function: P art II . Geom. Funct. Anal. , 25(5):1371--1412, 2015

    2015

  6. [6]

    A Variable Coefficient Free Boundary Problem for $L^p$-solvability of Parabolic Dirichlet Problems in Graph Domains

    Simon Bortz, Sandra Ferris, Pablo Hidalgo-Palencia, and Steve Hofmann. A variable coefficient free boundary problem for l^p -solvability of parabolic Dirichlet problems in graph domains. Preprint. arXiv:2503.00873, 2025

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    On big pieces approximations of parabolic hypersurfaces

    Simon Bortz, John Hoffman, Steve Hofmann, Jose Luis Luna-Garcia, and Kaj Nystr\"om. On big pieces approximations of parabolic hypersurfaces. Ann. Fenn. Math. , 47(1):533--571, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Bortz, J

    S. Bortz, J. Hoffman, S. Hofmann, J. L. Luna-Garcia, and K. Nystr\"om. Corona decompositions for parabolic uniformly rectifiable sets. J. Geom. Anal. , 33(3):Paper No. 96, 67, 2023

    2023

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Carleson measure estimates for caloric functions and parabolic uniformly rectifiable sets

    Simon Bortz, John Hoffman, Steve Hofmann, Jos\'e Luis Luna Garc\'ia, and Kaj Nystr\"om. Carleson measure estimates for caloric functions and parabolic uniformly rectifiable sets. Anal. PDE , 16(4):1061--1088, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Solvability of the L ^p D irichlet problem for the heat equation is equivalent to parabolic uniform rectifiability in the case of a parabolic L ipschitz graph

    Simon Bortz, Steve Hofmann, Jos\'e Mar\'ia Martell, and Kaj Nystr\"om. Solvability of the L ^p D irichlet problem for the heat equation is equivalent to parabolic uniform rectifiability in the case of a parabolic L ipschitz graph. Invent. Math. , 239(1):165--217, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Caffarelli, Eugene B

    Luis A. Caffarelli, Eugene B. Fabes, and Carlos E. Kenig. Completely singular elliptic-harmonic measures. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 30(6):917--924, 1981

    1981

  4. [12]

    Bj\"orn E. J. Dahlberg. Estimates of harmonic measure. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 65(3):275--288, 1977

    1977

  5. [13]

    David and D

    G. David and D. Jerison. Lipschitz approximation to hypersurfaces, harmonic measure, and singular integrals. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 39(3):831--845, 1990

    1990

  6. [14]

    David and S

    G. David and S. Semmes. Singular integrals and rectifiable sets in R ^n : B eyond L ipschitz graphs. Ast\'erisque , (193):152, 1991

    1991

  7. [15]

    Evans and Ronald F

    Lawrence C. Evans and Ronald F. Gariepy. Wiener's criterion for the heat equation. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 78(4):293--314, 1982

    1982

  8. [16]

    Quantitative R eifenberg theorem for measures

    Nick Edelen, Aaron Naber, and Daniele Valtorta. Quantitative R eifenberg theorem for measures. Math. Z. , 310(3):Paper No. 45, 70, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    Fabes, Nicola Garofalo, and Sandro Salsa

    Eugene B. Fabes, Nicola Garofalo, and Sandro Salsa. Comparison theorems for temperatures in noncylindrical domains. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat. (8) , 77(1-2):1--12, 1984

    1984

  10. [18]

    Fabes, David S

    Eugene B. Fabes, David S. Jerison, and Carlos E. Kenig. Necessary and sufficient conditions for absolute continuity of elliptic-harmonic measure. Ann. of Math. (2) , 119(1):121--141, 1984

    1984

  11. [19]

    E. B. Fabes and M. V. Safonov. Behavior near the boundary of positive solutions of second order parabolic equations. In Proceedings of the conference dedicated to P rofessor M iguel de G uzm\'an ( E l E scorial, 1996) , volume 3, pages 871--882, 1997

    1996

  12. [20]

    E. B. Fabes, M. V. Safonov, and Yu Yuan. Behavior near the boundary of positive solutions of second order parabolic equations. II . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 351(12):4947--4961, 1999

    1999

  13. [21]

    A weak reverse H \"older inequality for caloric measure

    Alyssa Genschaw and Steve Hofmann. A weak reverse H \"older inequality for caloric measure. J. Geom. Anal. , 30(2):1530--1564, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Structure theory of parabolic nodal and singular sets

    Max Hallgren, Robert Koirala, and Zilu Ma. Structure theory of parabolic nodal and singular sets. Preprint. arXiv:2511.11570, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Steve Hofmann and John L. Lewis. L^2 solvability and representation by caloric layer potentials in time-varying domains. Ann. of Math. (2) , 144(2):349--420, 1996

    1996

  16. [24]

    Steve Hofmann and John L. Lewis. The D irichlet problem for parabolic operators with singular drift terms. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 151(719):viii+113, 2001

    2001

  17. [25]

    Lewis, and Kaj Nystr\"om

    Steve Hofmann, John L. Lewis, and Kaj Nystr\"om. Existence of big pieces of graphs for parabolic problems. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. , 28(2):355--384, 2003

    2003

  18. [26]

    Lewis, and Kaj Nystr\"om

    Steve Hofmann, John L. Lewis, and Kaj Nystr\"om. Caloric measure in parabolic flat domains. Duke Math. J. , 122(2):281--346, 2004

    2004

  19. [27]

    Parabolic singular integrals of C alder\'on-type, rough operators, and caloric layer potentials

    Steve Hofmann. Parabolic singular integrals of C alder\'on-type, rough operators, and caloric layer potentials. Duke Math. J. , 90(2):209--259, 1997

    1997

  20. [28]

    Singularity of parabolic measures

    Robert Kaufman and Jang Mei Wu. Singularity of parabolic measures. Compositio Math. , 40(2):243--250, 1980

    1980

  21. [29]

    Lewis and Margaret A

    John L. Lewis and Margaret A. M. Murray. The method of layer potentials for the heat equation in time-varying domains. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 114(545):viii+157, 1995

    1995

  22. [30]

    Lewis and Judy Silver

    John L. Lewis and Judy Silver. Parabolic measure and the D irichlet problem for the heat equation in two dimensions. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 37(4):801--839, 1988

    1988

  23. [31]

    om and Martin Str\

    Kaj Nystr\"om and Martin Str\"omqvist. On the parabolic L ipschitz approximation of parabolic uniform rectifiable sets. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , 33(4):1397--1422, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Bounded mean oscillation with O rlicz norms and duality of H ardy spaces

    Jan-Olov Str\"omberg. Bounded mean oscillation with O rlicz norms and duality of H ardy spaces. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. , 82(6):953--955, 1976

    1976

  25. [33]

    Characterization of n -rectifiability in terms of J ones' square function: part I

    Xavier Tolsa. Characterization of n -rectifiability in terms of J ones' square function: part I . Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 54(4):3643--3665, 2015

    2015

  26. [34]

    Jang Mei G. Wu. On parabolic measures and subparabolic functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 251:171--185, 1979

    1979

  27. [35]

    On singularity of harmonic measure in space

    Jang-Mei Wu. On singularity of harmonic measure in space. Pacific J. Math. , 121(2):485--496, 1986

    1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.