Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 7 minor 33 references

Big Pieces of Regular Parabolic (bi-)Lipschitz Images is Equivalent to Parabolic Uniform Rectifiability

T0 review · 1 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-28 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For parabolic Ahlfors–David regular sets, parabolic uniform rectifiability is equivalent to having big pieces of regular parabolic Lipschitz images, and also to having big pieces of regular parabolic bi-Lipschitz images.

desk verdict A significant parabolic analogue of the David-Semmes/Azzam-Schul characterization, but the proof depends on an unproved strengthening of the corona decomposition that a referee must check. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.23250 v1 pith:CZZVHOCT submitted 2026-08-24 math.CA math.AP

Simon Bortz , Matthew Hyde , Mason Sharp This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.CAmath.AP MSC 28A75
keywords parabolicuniformrectifiabilitybigpiecesofLipschitzimagesregularbi-LipschitzLip(11/2)functionsCarlesonmeasurescoronadecompositionspace-timegeometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to characterize parabolic uniformly rectifiable sets—closed subsets of space-time that are quantitatively well approximated by time-independent planes at every location and scale—by a purely structural property. The main theorem states that for any parabolic Ahlfors–David regular set, parabolic uniform rectifiability holds exactly when the set has big pieces of regular parabolic Lipschitz images of $n$-dimensional space-time, and exactly when it has big pieces of regular parabolic bi-Lipschitz images. Regular parabolic maps here fix the time variable up to translation and have spatial components that are Lip(1,1/2) functions with a Carleson measure on their local flatness. If correct, the result gives a concrete geometric description of parabolic uniformly rectifiable sets and completes the parabolic analogue of the classical big-pieces characterization of uniform rectifiability.

What carries the argument

The central machinery has three pieces. First, the corona decomposition theorem (Theorem 2.22, from the cited work [BHH+23a]) which, for any parabolic uniformly rectifiable set, produces a disjoint decomposition into 'bad' cubes with a Carleson packing bound and coherent stopping-time regimes, each regime carrying an $(L,M)$-regular Lip(1,1/2) graph that approximates the set at every cube in the regime to within a controlled multiple of the cube's size. Second, a gluing lemma (Lemma 3.3) that assembles a regular Lip(1,1/2) function from a well-separated family of cubes, provided each piece is locally regular with controlled support or is a bump-weighted regular function; this is what lets the authors patch local images together without losing the Carleson $\gamma$-number bound. Third, a smooth parabolic rotation map (Lemma 5.2) built from Givens rotations: $F(X,t)=(g_{\psi(X,t)}X,t)$ with $\psi(X,t)=\theta\,\eta(\rho(X,t)/R)$, which coincides with a fixed rotation on $B(0,R)$, is the identity outside $B(0,2R)$, preserves parabolic balls, and has spatial components that are regular Lip(1,1/2) functions with constants independent of the angle between the two reference planes. These three tools, together with the bi-Lipschitz decomposition of regular parabolic Lipschitz maps (Theorem 4.2), carry the whole argument.

What would settle it

Construct a parabolic Ahlfors–David regular set that satisfies the Carleson β² condition and, for its corona decomposition, find one semi-coherent stopping-time regime whose approximating regular Lip(1,1/2) graph cannot be chosen with support inside any ball of radius comparable to the regime's top cube that also meets the graph's reference plane; such a configuration would refute Remark 2.24 and invalidate the P-UR to BPRPBI direction of Theorem 1.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is Theorem 1.1: for a closed, parabolic Ahlfors–David regular set $\Sigma\subseteq\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, the three properties (1) $\Sigma$ is parabolic uniformly rectifiable, (2) $\Sigma$ has big pieces of regular parabolic Lipschitz images of $n$-dimensional space-time, and (3) $\Sigma$ has big pieces of regular parabolic bi-Lipschitz images of $n$-dimensional space-time, are equivalent. The proof runs through the chain BPRPLI $\Rightarrow$ P-UR $\Rightarrow$ BPRPBI $\Rightarrow$ BPRPLI, where the last implication is trivial. The first implication is proved by a quantitative bi-Lipschitz decomposition of regular parabolic Lipschitz maps, an extension into higher-dimensional space-time, and a transfer argument that reduces the problem to checking that regular parabolic bi-Lipschitz images satisfy the parabolic geometric lemma. The second, harder implication starts from a corona decomposition of the P-UR set into regular Lip(1,1/2) graphs and uses an induction on the Carleson packing constant; at each step it rotates the reference planes of the approximating images into a common plane using a Givens-rotation map that preserves regularity, glues the rotated images by a local graph, and applies a Main Lemma to produce one large regular parabolic bi-Lipschitz image.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the decomposition of a uniformly rectifiable set into approximating graph patches can be refined so that every sub-patch's support sits inside a single bounded ball that intersects the patch's reference plane; the authors state this follows easily from the cited work but do not give the full proof, and the later gluing argument depends on it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every parabolic uniformly rectifiable set contains, at every point and scale, a large piece (a fixed positive fraction of the parabolic surface measure) of a regular parabolic bi-Lipschitz image of $n$-dimensional space-time, with constants depending only on dimension, the ADR constant, and the P-UR constant.
  • Conversely, the large-scale presence of regular parabolic Lipschitz images (without any lower Lipschitz bound) is enough to force parabolic uniform rectifiability, so in the parabolic category the lower bound is not a hidden extra assumption.
  • The equivalence closes the parabolic analogue of the classical big-pieces characterization of uniform rectifiability; the paper notes its proof also yields a new, simpler proof of the corresponding Euclidean fact.
  • The gluing and rotation lemmas supply a reusable method for combining regular parabolic bi-Lipschitz images whose reference planes are not parallel, which is precisely the difficulty that fails for mere Lipschitz graphs in the known Venetian-blinds obstruction.
  • Since regular parabolic bi-Lipschitz images are parabolic uniformly rectifiable, any finite or controlled union of such images glued by the Main Lemma remains parabolic uniformly rectifiable, so the class of P-UR sets is closed under the paper's gluing operation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension suggested by the proof: the rotation lemma's constants are uniform for angles $0\le\theta\le\pi/2$; it would be worth checking whether the gluing induction still works for larger angles or whether the constants must degrade, which would show where the parabolic geometry differs from the Euclidean one.
  • The bi-Lipschitz decomposition theorem for regular parabolic Lipschitz maps (Theorem 4.2) may be strong enough to yield a parabolic traveling-salesman-type criterion in space-time, with the $\gamma$-numbers playing the role of local flatness measures; the paper does not pursue this.
  • The induction scheme proves more than the theorem states: it shows that the Carleson packing constant controls the quality (L, M, κ, η) of the big-piece images, so an explicit quantitative dependence of the BPRPBI constants on the P-UR constant could be extracted from Section 5.4.
  • The proof's direct gluing approach suggests that any ambient space admitting a corona decomposition and a regular slow-rotation map may enjoy the same equivalence; the Heisenberg group is a natural candidate, but this is our inference, not a claim of the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proves Theorem 1.1: for a parabolic Ahlfors-David regular set Σ⊆R^{n+1}, parabolic uniform rectifiability (P-UR) is equivalent both to having big pieces of regular parabolic Lipschitz images (BPRPLI) and to having big pieces of regular parabolic bi-Lipschitz images (BPRPBI). The direction BPRPLI⇒P-UR is proved in Theorem 4.1 through a quantitative bi-Lipschitz decomposition of regular parabolic maps (Theorem 4.2) and an embedding into a higher-dimensional space-time. The reverse direction P-UR⇒BPRPBI is proved in Theorem 5.1 by an inductive Carleson-packing argument that uses the corona decomposition of Theorem 2.22 and a large gluing/rotation lemma, Lemma 5.31. The final implication BPRPBI⇒BPRPLI is immediate from the definitions.

Significance. If the proof is correct, this is a natural and substantial extension of the David–Semmes characterization of uniformly rectifiable sets to the parabolic setting. The paper introduces a workable definition of regular parabolic (bi-)Lipschitz images, provides explicit constructions preserving the regular Lip(1,1/2) condition, and gives a simplified alternative proof of the Euclidean analogue. The BPRPLI⇒P-UR direction is largely self-contained and convincing. The main caveat is the reliance on a strengthening of the cited corona decomposition that is asserted but not proved in Remark 2.24; this is load-bearing for Theorem 5.1. If that step is supplied, the overall strategy is coherent and the claims are quantitatively precise.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 2, Theorem 2.22(4) and Remark 2.24; Section 5.4, Cases 1 and 2b] The support and intersection assertions in Theorem 2.22(4) and Remark 2.24—namely that for every semi-coherent sub-regime S′ the associated plane P satisfies P∩B((X_{Q(S′)},t_{Q(S′)}),κ diam Q(S′))≠∅ and supp ψ⊆P∩B((X_{Q(S′)},t_{Q(S′)}),κ diam Q(S′))—are not proved. The remark explicitly states that these do not appear in [BHH+23a, Theorem 3.2] and says they "can be easily deduced from the construction," but no deduction is given. This is load-bearing. In Section 5.4, Case 1, the proposed graph map F_{Q0}(x,t)=(ψ(x,t),x,t) is asserted to satisfy property (iii)(a) of H(a+b), i.e., to be the identity outside a ball; this requires supp ψ to be contained in that ball, which is exactly the unproved support assertion. In Case 2b, the application of Lemma 5.31 requires hypotheses (5.34) and (5.35), which are precisely the extra conclusions of Remark 2.24 for the regime S′_0=S_0∩D(Q_0). Without (5.35), Lemma 5.20 cannot produce the glue function g with support in B*, and the construction of F* breaks. The authors should either prove the strengthening, give a precise lemma number where it appears in the cited paper, or explain in detail why the construction in [BHH+23a] yields the quantitative support bound for every sub-regime.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract and Section 1] The abstract cites the authors' earlier work as "[BH12]", but the bibliography contains [BH17] and no [BH12]; the reference should be corrected consistently.
  2. [Section 4.2, proof of Theorem 4.1] The displayed proof is headed "Proof of Theorem 4.2", but it proves Theorem 4.1. In the same proof, the text says "By Theorem 4.17", which should be "By Lemma 4.17".
  3. [Definition 2.16(2)] In the first sentence of part (2), the map is called an "(L,M)-regular parabolic Lipschitz map", but the definition requires a bi-Lipschitz map; the equivalent formulation (2′) is correct.
  4. [Theorem 5.1] The statement says "If Σ is parabolic uniformly rectifiable then E has big pieces...", but the set should be Σ, not E.
  5. [Section 3, proof of Lemma 3.3] The proof refers to equations (5.21), (5.22), and (5.23), which belong to Section 5.2 and are not the hypotheses of Lemma 3.3. The equations should be renumbered or the relevant inequalities should be restated locally, since this makes verification of the gluing lemma unnecessarily hard.
  6. [Lemma 5.2, proof] The sentence "If ψ(X,t),ψ(Y,s), then" appears to have a missing inequality and should read "If ψ(X,t)≠ψ(Y,s), then".
  7. [Lemma 4.5, proof] Equation (4.10) writes H^{n-1}(f(J_0)×{s}), which is notationally confusing because f(J_0) is already a subset of R^{n+1}; the intended fiber of f(J_0) at time s would be clearer as {X∈R^n : (X,s)∈f(J_0)}.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.1's equivalence is not assumed by the cited corona-decomposition and transference results; the load-bearing self-citations are independent support, and the Remark 2.24 issue is an omitted proof rather than a circular reduction.

full rationale

The claimed equivalence is derived from two independent directions, neither of which defines its conclusion into its hypotheses. BPRPLI => P-UR (Theorem 4.1) uses a bi-Lipschitz decomposition theorem (Theorem 4.2) proved in the paper, a gluing lemma (Lemma 3.3) proved in the paper, and cites [BHH+22, Proposition 2.29] only for the stability of the geometric lemma under big pieces; that cited result is parameter-free, assumes the geometric lemma for the approximating images, and does not assert the present theorem. P-UR => BPRPBI (Theorem 5.1) is an induction in Section 5.4 whose base case and inductive step ultimately invoke Theorem 2.22, the corona decomposition from [BHH+23a]; that prior theorem is again an independent structural statement about P-UR sets and does not contain the big-pieces-of-bi-Lipschitz-images conclusion. The one passage that merits attention is Remark 2.24, which concedes that item (4) (the support and plane-intersection control for the graph associated to each semi-coherent sub-regime) is not explicitly in [BHH+23a, Theorem 3.2] and 'can be easily deduced from the construction.' This is a proof gap or correctness risk, because Section 5.4, Case 2b applies Main Lemma 5.31 using (5.34)-(5.35), which are exactly the asserted extensions. It is not, however, a circular step: the asserted extension is not the target theorem, and the deduction, if supplied, would be from the prior construction rather than from the desired equivalence. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no quantity is defined in terms of the result it is used to prove, and no uniqueness or ansatz is imported by self-citation to force the conclusion. Accordingly the derivation chain is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new fitted parameters or ad hoc entities. Its central claim rests on standard results in geometric measure theory and on several theorems from the authors' own prior work, most notably the corona decomposition theorem. The extension in Remark 2.24 is a contextual assumption made to fit the current proof, and it carries verification risk.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Existence of parabolic dyadic decompositions for ADR sets (Lemma 2.18, cited to Christ, David, Hytonen-Kairema)
    Used throughout to discretize the Carleson conditions and set up the induction.
  • domain assumption Corona decomposition of parabolic uniformly rectifiable sets by regular Lip(1,1/2) graphs (Theorem 2.22, cited to [BHH+23a, Theorem 3.2])
    This is the main structural input for the proof of P-UR implies BPRPBI. The paper relies on its quantitative conclusions.
  • ad hoc to paper Extension of Theorem 2.22 to sub-regimes with uniform support bounds and plane intersection (Remark 2.24)
    The authors assert that the cited proof yields this extension, but they do not provide the full verification. This is a load-bearing assertion for the Main Lemma.
  • domain assumption Existence of regularized distance functions for compact sets in parabolic space (Lemma 4.17, cited to [BHH+23b, Lemma 3.24])
    Used in Lemma 4.17 to construct the extra spatial coordinates that make the extended map bi-Lipschitz.
  • domain assumption Transference principle: geometric lemma for n-dimensional images in higher-dimensional space-time implies geometric lemma in the original space (cited to [BHH+22, DS93a, Rig19])
    Used in the proof of Theorem 4.1 to reduce BPRPLI to the case of bi-Lipschitz images.
  • standard math Standard dyadic coding argument (Jones [Jon88], David-Semmes [DS93b]) for partitioning into bi-Lipschitz pieces
    The paper explicitly says 'we shall not include it here' and references the standard argument; it is used to prove Theorem 4.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Big Pieces of Regular Parabolic (bi-)Lipschitz Images is Equivalent to Parabolic Uniform Rectifiability." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CZZVHOCT

@misc{pith2026260823250,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Big Pieces of Regular Parabolic (bi-)Lipschitz Images is Equivalent to Parabolic Uniform Rectifiability},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CZZVHOCT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.23250}
}
abstract

We define the notion of regular parabolic (bi-)Lipschitz images as the parabolic (bi-)Lipschitz maps from $n$-dimensional space time which, up to translation, fix the $t$ variable and whose spatial components are each regular parabolic Lipschitz functions. We show that any parabolic Ahlfors-David regular is parabolic uniformly rectifiable if and only if it has big pieces of parabolic Lipschitz images of $n$-dimensional space time if and only if it has big pieces of parabolic bi-Lipschitz images of $n$-dimensional space time. This further extends the David-Semmes theory to the parabolic setting. Our proof combines the ideas of the first authors previous work [BH12,BHH+22] and some ideas of Azzam and Schul [AS12]. The proof easily adapts (and is far less complicated) to the Euclidean case to give an alternative proof of the analogous fact.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hard S ard: quantitative implicit function and extension theorems for L ipschitz maps

    Jonas Azzam and Raanan Schul. Hard S ard: quantitative implicit function and extension theorems for L ipschitz maps. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 22(5):1062--1123, 2012

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Semi-uniform domains and the \(A_ \) property for harmonic measure

    Jonas Azzam. Semi-uniform domains and the \(A_ \) property for harmonic measure. Int. Math. Res. Not. , 2021(9):6717--6771, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Harmonic measure and approximation of uniformly rectifiable sets

    Simon Bortz and Steve Hofmann. Harmonic measure and approximation of uniformly rectifiable sets. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , 33(1):351--373, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Coronizations and big pieces in metric spaces

    Simon Bortz, John Hoffman, Steve Hofmann, Jose Luis Luna-Garcia, and Kaj Nystr\"om. Coronizations and big pieces in metric spaces. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 72(5):2037--2078, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Bortz, J

    S. Bortz, J. Hoffman, S. Hofmann, J. L. Luna-Garcia, and K. Nystr\"om. Corona decompositions for parabolic uniformly rectifiable sets. J. Geom. Anal. , 33(3):Paper No. 96, 67, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Carleson measure estimates for caloric functions and parabolic uniformly rectifiable sets

    Simon Bortz, John Hoffman, Steve Hofmann, Jos\'e Luis Luna Garc\'ia, and Kaj Nystr\"om. Carleson measure estimates for caloric functions and parabolic uniformly rectifiable sets. Anal. PDE , 16(4):1061--1088, 2023

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Parabolic singular integrals with nonhomogeneous kernels

    Simon Bortz, John Hoffman, Steve Hofmann, Jos\'e Luis Luna Garc\'ia, and Kaj Nystr\"om. Parabolic singular integrals with nonhomogeneous kernels. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , 2026. To appear

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    Solvability of the L ^p D irichlet problem for the heat equation is equivalent to parabolic uniform rectifiability in the case of a parabolic L ipschitz graph

    Simon Bortz, Steve Hofmann, Jos\'e Mar\'ia Martell, and Kaj Nystr\"om. Solvability of the L ^p D irichlet problem for the heat equation is equivalent to parabolic uniform rectifiability in the case of a parabolic L ipschitz graph. Invent. Math. , 239(1):165--217, 2025

    work page 2025

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    A T(b) theorem with remarks on analytic capacity and the C auchy integral

    Michael Christ. A T(b) theorem with remarks on analytic capacity and the C auchy integral. Colloq. Math. , 60/61(2):601--628, 1990

    1990

  2. [10]

    R. R. Coifman, A. McIntosh, and Y. Meyer. L'int\'egrale de C auchy d\'efinit un op\'erateur born\'e sur L 2 \ pour les courbes lipschitziennes. Ann. of Math. (2) , 116(2):361--387, 1982

    1982

  3. [11]

    Bj\"orn E. J. Dahlberg. Estimates of harmonic measure. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. , 65(3):275--288, 1977

    1977

  4. [12]

    Morceaux de graphes lipschitziens et int\'egrales singuli\`eres sur une surface

    Guy David. Morceaux de graphes lipschitziens et int\'egrales singuli\`eres sur une surface. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana , 4(1):73--114, 1988

    1988

  5. [13]

    David and D

    G. David and D. Jerison. Lipschitz approximation to hypersurfaces, harmonic measure, and singular integrals. Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 39(3):831--845, 1990

    1990

  6. [14]

    David and S

    G. David and S. Semmes. Singular integrals and rectifiable sets in R ^n : B eyond L ipschitz graphs. Ast\'erisque , (193):152, 1991

    1991

  7. [15]

    Analysis of and on uniformly rectifiable sets , volume 38 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs

    Guy David and Stephen Semmes. Analysis of and on uniformly rectifiable sets , volume 38 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1993

    1993

  8. [16]

    Quantitative rectifiability and Lipschitz mappings

    Guy David and Stephen Semmes. Quantitative rectifiability and Lipschitz mappings. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. , 337(2):855--889, 1993

    1993

  9. [17]

    A free boundary problem for the parabolic P oisson kernel

    Max Engelstein. A free boundary problem for the parabolic P oisson kernel. Adv. Math. , 314:835--947, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    On singular integrals and quantitative rectifiability in parabolic space and the heisenberg group

    John Hoffman and Ben Jaye. On singular integrals and quantitative rectifiability in parabolic space and the heisenberg group. arXiv preprint , 2026. arXiv:2510.26934

    2026

  11. [19]

    Systems of dyadic cubes in a doubling metric space

    Tuomas Hyt\"onen and Anna Kairema. Systems of dyadic cubes in a doubling metric space. Colloq. Math. , 126(1):1--33, 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Steve Hofmann and John L. Lewis. L^2 solvability and representation by caloric layer potentials in time-varying domains. Ann. of Math. (2) , 144(2):349--420, 1996

    1996

  13. [21]

    Lewis, and Kaj Nystr\"om

    Steve Hofmann, John L. Lewis, and Kaj Nystr\"om. Existence of big pieces of graphs for parabolic problems. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. , 28(2):355--384, 2003

    2003

  14. [22]

    Lewis, and Kaj Nystr\"om

    Steve Hofmann, John L. Lewis, and Kaj Nystr\"om. Caloric measure in parabolic flat domains. Duke Math. J. , 122(2):281--346, 2004

    2004

  15. [23]

    Uniform rectifiability and harmonic measure I : U niform rectifiability implies P oisson kernels in L^p

    Steve Hofmann and Jos\'e Mar\'ia Martell. Uniform rectifiability and harmonic measure I : U niform rectifiability implies P oisson kernels in L^p . Ann. Sci. \'Ec. Norm. Sup\'er. (4) , 47(3):577--654, 2014

    2014

  16. [24]

    Parabolic singular integrals of C alder\'on-type, rough operators, and caloric layer potentials

    Steve Hofmann. Parabolic singular integrals of C alder\'on-type, rough operators, and caloric layer potentials. Duke Math. J. , 90(2):209--259, 1997

    1997

  17. [25]

    Peter W. Jones. Lipschitz and bi- Lipschitz functions. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , 4(1):115--121, 1988

    1988

  18. [26]

    Peter W. Jones. Rectifiable sets and the traveling salesman problem. Invent. Math. , 102(1):1--15, 1990

    1990

  19. [27]

    Kenig and Tatiana Toro

    Carlos E. Kenig and Tatiana Toro. Harmonic measure on locally flat domains. Duke Math. J. , 87(3):509--551, 1997

    1997

  20. [28]

    Kenig and Tatiana Toro

    Carlos E. Kenig and Tatiana Toro. Free boundary regularity for harmonic measures and P oisson kernels. Ann. of Math. (2) , 150(2):369--454, 1999

    1999

  21. [29]

    Kenig and Tatiana Toro

    Carlos E. Kenig and Tatiana Toro. Poisson kernel characterization of R eifenberg flat chord arc domains. Ann. Sci. \'Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) , 36(3):323--401, 2003

    2003

  22. [30]

    Singularity of parabolic measures

    Robert Kaufman and Jang Mei Wu. Singularity of parabolic measures. Compositio Math. , 40(2):243--250, 1980

    1980

  23. [31]

    Lewis and Margaret A

    John L. Lewis and Margaret A. M. Murray. The method of layer potentials for the heat equation in time-varying domains. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 114(545):viii+157, 1995

    1995

  24. [32]

    Daniel Mauldin

    Pertti Mattila and R. Daniel Mauldin. Measure and dimension functions: Measurability and densities. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. , 121(1):81--100, 1997

    1997

  25. [33]

    Quantitative notions of rectifiability in the H eisenberg groups

    S\'everine Rigot. Quantitative notions of rectifiability in the H eisenberg groups. 2019. Preprint, arXiv:1904.06904

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.