Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 43 references

Parity Anomaly as Modular Commutator with Massless Dirac Fermion

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-27 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a gapless 2D electron system with a single massless Dirac cone, the modular commutator — an entanglement probe of topological data — converges to a half-quantized value $3J/\pi = 1/2$, revealing the parity anomaly from the…

desk verdict Solid numerical discovery; the proof claim outruns the argument, but the paper deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.26078 v1 pith:ZHRCSZCB submitted 2026-08-26 cond-mat.str-el hep-latquant-ph

Meng Zeng This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elhep-latquant-ph
keywords modularcommutatorparityanomalymasslessDiracconechiralcentralchargehalf-quantizationentanglementgaplesstopologicalphasesHaldanemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what the modular commutator $J(A,B,C)=i\langle[K_{AB},K_{BC}]\rangle$ — an entanglement quantity that reads off the chiral central charge of a gapped two-dimensional state — measures when the bulk becomes gapless. For a system with a single massless Dirac cone it finds that $J$ remains sharp, converging to half the gapped value, $3J/\pi=\frac12$, with corrections that decay as a power law in subsystem size. The paper interprets this half-quantization as the entanglement shadow of the parity anomaly: the massive partner of the massless cone acts as a Pauli-Villars regulator that breaks parity, and $J$ detects that breaking. When a protected chiral edge mode coexists with the bulk node, the value becomes $3J/\pi=c_-+\frac12$, so $J$ measures total chirality. This matters because it extends a wavefunction-only diagnostic of topological data to gapless states, turning the parity anomaly into an information-theoretic observable.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the modular commutator $J(A,B,C)\equiv i\langle[K_{AB},K_{BC}]\rangle$ with $K_X=-\log\rho_X$, evaluated on Gaussian free-fermion states through the single-particle modular Hamiltonian $K_X=\log[(1-G_X)/G_X]$. The proof of half-quantization combines two pieces: an energy-scale decomposition of $J$ into high- and low-energy parts (Eq. (5)), and an emergent reflection symmetry of the massless Dirac cone, implemented by $q_y\to -q_y$, $\psi(q_x,q_y)\to\sigma_x\psi(q_x,-q_y)$, which makes the low-energy contribution odd in the mass $m$. The high-energy part is assumed continuous across the gap-closing transition, so averaging $J(\pm\delta)$ isolates the jump and yields the half-integer. The gapped massive cone at the other valley acts as the parity-breaking Pauli-Villars regulator whose effect $J$ detects.

What would settle it

Compute $3J/\pi$ at criticality for a lattice model with a single massless Dirac node but two different high-energy regularizations—say, Haldane next-nearest-neighbor hopping phase $\phi$ replaced by $\pi-\phi$ or an added next-nearest-neighbor hopping term that keeps the node but changes the massive partner—and check whether the thermodynamic-limit value remains exactly $1/2$. If the value moves off $1/2$, the assumed continuity of the high-energy contribution is violated and the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that for a gapless 2D free-fermion ground state with one massless Dirac cone, the modular commutator is well defined and satisfies $3J/\pi=(C_++C_-)/2=C_-+\frac12$ in the thermodynamic limit, where $C_\pm$ are the Chern numbers of the two gapped phases adjacent to the transition. The result is a half-integer, the finite-size corrections are power law rather than exponential, and the value is robust to deforming the tripartition, tuning the Dirac velocity, and making the cone anisotropic. The half-quantized value is carried by the gapped massive partner of the massless node, which plays the role of the Pauli-Villars regulator; this is why the paper reads $J$ as an information-theoretic measurement of the parity anomaly. When chiral edge modes coexist with the bulk Dirac node, the formula becomes $3J/\pi=c_-+\frac12$. Quadratic nodes and Fermi surfaces do not show this robust half-quantization: the quadratic-node value depends on curvature, and the Fermi-surface value depends on the tripartition.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that an energy-scale cutoff cleanly separates the modular commutator's response into a low-energy part, whose correlation function is $G(r)\sim e^{-mr}/r^2$, and a high-energy part, whose correlation function is $G(r)\sim e^{-\Lambda r}$ and whose contribution $Q_>(m)$ vanishes, so the high-energy contribution is continuous across the transition.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At a Chern transition between $C_+$ and $C_-$, the modular commutator of the gapless ground state converges to $(C_++C_-)/2$, so entanglement alone can detect what happens to a topological invariant as the gap closes.
  • When protected chiral edge modes coexist with a bulk Dirac node, $3J/\pi=c_-+\frac12$; the modular commutator then measures the system's total chirality rather than separating bulk and edge contributions.
  • The related FSV wavefunction formula for Hall conductance also returns the half-quantized value at the Dirac node, so the half-integer is not specific to the modular commutator but appears in other single-wavefunction probes.
  • Quadratic nodes and Fermi surfaces destroy the robust quantization: the quadratic-node value depends on the node's curvature, while the Fermi-surface value depends on the shape of the tripartition, making $J$ a distinguishing diagnostic of the kind of gaplessness.
  • At the Dirac point the conditional mutual information saturates rather than decaying exponentially, showing that the area law of a single Dirac cone is a different type from the one assumed by the original entanglement-bootstrap derivation of the gapped formula.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the half-quantization proof uses only emergent reflection symmetry and an energy-scale separation, I would expect $3J/\pi=\frac12$ to survive in interacting Dirac critical points even though the Gaussian free-fermion numerics no longer apply; the paper leaves this as an open direction.
  • A direct modular-Hamiltonian derivation would likely connect the half-quantized value to the Atiyah-Patodi-Singer eta invariant of the Dirac operator, making $J$ a wavefunction-only realization of the parity anomaly rather than an analogy; the paper says this derivation remains open.
  • A practical diagnostic suggests itself: in numerical studies of candidate gapless Dirac materials, a converged $3J/\pi=\frac12$ would point to a single parity-odd Dirac node, while a curvature-dependent value would indicate a quadratic node and a tripartition-dependent value would indicate a Fermi surface.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the modular commutator J of free-fermion Haldane-type models tuned to gapless critical points. It reports numerically that for a single massless Dirac cone, 3J/π converges to a half-integer value (C_+ + C_-)/2, with power-law finite-size corrections, and to c_- + 1/2 when protected chiral edge modes coexist with the bulk node. The authors interpret the half-quantization as an information-theoretic manifestation of the parity anomaly, with the massive partner node playing the role of a Pauli-Villars regulator. They also report that quadratic nodes and Fermi surfaces do not exhibit robust half-quantization. The central derivation is a symmetry/heuristic argument based on separating high- and low-energy contributions.

Significance. If established, the half-quantization of the modular commutator would be a valuable extension of this entanglement diagnostic beyond gapped phases, and its connection to the parity anomaly is conceptually appealing. The numerical part is clean: exact diagonalization of free-fermion correlation matrices, checks of the entanglement area law and Markov-property violation, robustness under tripartition deformation and parameter tuning, and a useful comparison between Dirac, quadratic, and Fermi-surface gaplessness. However, the proof of the central formula is not rigorous as written, and the finite-size numerics alone do not constitute a derivation. The gap between the abstract's 'We prove' and the text's 'heuristic argument' is a substantive issue.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III.B, Eq. (6)] The proof of Eq. (4) hinges on the oddness relation Φ_l(-m) = -Φ_l(m), justified by an 'emergent reflection symmetry' ψ(q_x,q_y) -> σ_x ψ(q_x,-q_y) of the Dirac Hamiltonian. On the lattice, however, the gapless node sits at K while the parity-related point is K', where the partner node has a mass of order 2M_c. The proposed transformation does not preserve the low-energy subspace used to define Φ_l: it maps low-energy states near K to high-energy states near K'. Thus the oddness is an additional assumption, not a consequence of a microscopic or emergent low-energy symmetry. Without it, Eq. (6) only fixes J(δ)+J(-δ), and J(0) is not constrained to equal (C_+ + C_-)/2. The statement in the abstract that the half-quantization is proved is therefore not supported by the argument given.
  2. [Appendix D, Eqs. (D6)-(D9)] The continuity of the high-energy contribution Φ_h(m) used in Eq. (6) is not established. The argument that Q_>(m) → 0 relies on assumed correlation functions G(r) ~ e^{-mr}/r^2 at low energy and G(r) ~ e^{-Λ r} at high energy, together with a separation of scales 1/R << Λ << Δ_UV. These scaling forms are heuristics; a large excitation energy does not by itself make the matrix elements in Eq. (D6) small, and the modular commutator is a nonlocal functional of the reduced density matrices rather than a simple integral of the single-particle Green function. The step 'Q_>(m) → 0' therefore needs a controlled derivation before Eq. (4) can be called a proof.
  3. [Abstract, Sec. III.B, Sec. VI] The manuscript simultaneously says 'We prove the half-quantization' (abstract) and describes the derivation as a 'heuristic symmetry argument' (Sec. III.B), while Sec. VI lists a first-principle demonstration as an open problem. This mismatch is not cosmetic: the central claim of the paper is the derivation, not only the numerical observation. The authors should either supply a rigorous derivation of Φ_l oddness and Φ_h continuity, or explicitly reframe the result as a numerical conjecture supported by a heuristic argument.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III.B] The notation Φ_l(0) is used both for the value at m = 0 (set to zero by oddness) and for the one-sided limits Φ_l(0±) = ±1/2; please clarify these distinct uses.
  2. [Fig. 2(d)] The power-law decay of the finite-size correction is stated but the fitted exponent and the system sizes used in the fit are not given; adding them would strengthen the claim.
  3. [Appendix A, Fig. 5(b)] The claim that the conditional mutual information 'saturates' at the critical point should be quantified by specifying the plateau value and the range of subsystem sizes over which saturation is observed.
  4. [Eq. (7)] The interlayer coupling term written as 't_c 1' should be typeset as t_c times the 2x2 identity matrix to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: half-quantization is a direct numerical result with an explicitly heuristic proof, not a construction from its own conclusion.

full rationale

The central claim that 3J/pi = 1/2 at a single-Dirac-node critical point is established by direct numerical evaluation of the modular commutator (Eq. 1) via the free-fermion correlation-matrix formula (Eq. 3). This computation is independent of the symmetry argument and is not fitted to the target value; the paper reports power-law convergence to 1/2 as an observed result. The proof in Sec. III.B is explicitly labeled a 'heuristic symmetry argument' and depends on additional assumptions (oddness of the low-energy contribution and continuity of the high-energy contribution) that are neither derived from the lattice model nor equivalent to the claim. Appendix D further labels the correlation-function estimates as heuristic, and the Conclusion states that a first-principle derivation from modular Hamiltonians remains an open problem. These are acknowledged limitations or correctness risks, not circular reductions: Eq. (4) does not follow from Eq. (5) by construction, and the gapped Chern numbers C_+ and C_- enter as external inputs through the established gapped relation J = (pi/3)c_-, not as the target value. The single self-citation ([38], Banerjee and Zeng) appears only as an example of similar coupled-layer constructions in Sec. IV and is not load-bearing. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity, even though the proof's rigor is limited.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central result depends mainly on standard free-fermion techniques and the Haldane model parameters. The most significant assumption is the energy-scale separation and continuity of the high-energy modular commutator contribution, which is heuristic. No truly new physical entity is introduced; the Pauli-Villars interpretation is a reinterpretation of an existing massive cone. The free parameters are model parameters chosen to realize the phases, not fitted to the half-quantized result.

free parameters (6)
  • NN hopping t = 1 (set to 1)
    Sets the energy scale; not fitted.
  • NNN hopping t_2 = 0.2 (chosen unless otherwise stated)
    Chosen to realize the desired phase transitions; the main result is checked at this value. Not fitted to the target result.
  • phase phi = -pi/2 (chosen)
    Chosen to break time-reversal and realize the Haldane phases. Standard parameter.
  • staggered potential M = tuned across the transition (e.g., M=-0.6 for gapped case)
    M is the tuning parameter for the mass; the critical point is at M = +/- M_c. The half-quantization is claimed at the critical point, not fitted.
  • interlayer coupling t_c = 0.3 (for the double-layer model)
    Chosen for the coexistence setup; the result is shown for this value.
  • quadratic-node parameters = t tilde_1 = 1, t tilde_2 = 1/3
    Chosen to realize a quadratic node; the MC of the quadratic node depends on curvature, which is acknowledged.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The ground state is a Gaussian state for free fermions, and the modular Hamiltonian is given by Eq. (3).
    Standard free-fermion result from Peschel; used throughout.
  • domain assumption The modular commutator is well-defined for gapless states on a finite torus; the thermodynamic limit exists.
    The paper computes J for finite systems and extrapolates; for Fermi surfaces it argues J is not well-defined due to tripartition dependence.
  • ad hoc to paper The energy-scale separation in Appendix D: 1/R << Lambda << Delta_UV, with high-energy modes continuous and m-independent.
    This assumption is the core of the symmetry proof and is not rigorously proven; it is a heuristic scaling argument.
  • domain assumption The parity transformation q_y -> -q_y maps h(m) to h(-m) and flips the sign of the low-energy MC contribution.
    Used in the proof of half-quantization; assumes the modular commutator behaves covariantly under this reflection.
  • domain assumption The area law remains valid for the Dirac node case despite the gapless bulk.
    Checked numerically and via Widom formula references; the paper acknowledges it is a different type of area law than in gapped phases.
invented entities (1)
  • Physical Pauli-Villars regulator as the massive partner of the massless Dirac cone
    purpose: To explain the origin of the half-quantized MC and connect to the parity anomaly
    This is an interpretation of the gapped cone in the Haldane model, not a new entity. The massive cone is already present in the model; the paper assigns it the role of the regulator.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Parity Anomaly as Modular Commutator with Massless Dirac Fermion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZHRCSZCB

@misc{pith2026260826078,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Parity Anomaly as Modular Commutator with Massless Dirac Fermion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZHRCSZCB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.26078}
}
abstract

The modular commutator $J(A,B,C) = i\langle[K_{AB},K_{BC}]\rangle$ extracts the chiral central charge $c_-$ from a single bulk wavefunction of a \emph{gapped} 2d state, where $3J/\pi=c_-$. Inspired by the recent developments in the field of gapless symmetry-protected topological phases, we ask: what does the modular commutator measure, if it is well-defined at all, when the 2d bulk becomes \textit{gapless}? Several interesting new insights can already be obtained using the simple Haldane honeycomb model. For the critical point hosting an isolated Dirac node we find that $J$ remains sharp: it converges to a \textit{half-quantized} value, with corrections that decay as a power law in the subsystem size rather than exponentially, mirroring the power-law correlations in gapless systems. We prove the half-quantization using an emergent reflection symmetry of the massless Dirac cone, and show that the half-quantized contribution comes from the other gapped cone (the massive partner of the massless one). This massive partner can be interpreted as the physical incarnation of the Pauli-Villars regulator, which is the origin of the parity-breaking level-$\frac{1}{2}$ Chern-Simons term (with half-quantized Hall conductance) and the parity anomaly. When protected chiral edge modes coexist with a bulk Dirac node we obtain $3J/\pi = c_-+\frac{1}{2}$. The half-quantization is also shown to be robust against tripartition deformation, tuning Dirac velocity and Dirac cone anisotropy. We further investigate other types of gaplessness---quadratic nodes (in contrast to linear Dirac) and the case with Fermi surface---and show that the robust half-quantization of $J$ is lost in such non-Dirac cases. These results generalize the modular commutator beyond gapped phases, and at the same time provide an information-theoretic measurement of the parity anomaly.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.26078 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Setup. (a) Tripartition used in this work: three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (c) plots the measured MC in different cases. The non-trivial gapped case simply gives the Chern number, which in this case is just the CCC c−, agreeing with Eq. (2). Quite interestingly, the MC (scaled by 3/π) con￾verges to 1/2 at the critical point with a single Dirac cone, even though there is no chiral (Majorana) edge mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Chiral edge mode coexisting with a bulk Dirac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) Schematic figures for quadratic node (left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Markov property check. (a) The chain triparti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Effects of linear velocity (a) and anisotropy (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: (a) The FSV formula applied to the gapped and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Levin and X.-G

    M. Levin and X.-G. Wen, Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110405 (2006)

    2006

  2. [2]

    Parity Anomaly as Modular Commutator with Massless Dirac Fermion

    The half-quantization is also shown to be robust against tripartition deformation, tuning Dirac velocity and Dirac cone anisotropy. We further investigate other types of gaplessness—quadratic nodes (in contrast to linear Dirac) and the case with Fermi surface—and show that the robust half-quantization ofJis lost in such non-Dirac cases. These results gene...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement en- tropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 110404 (2006)

    2006

  4. [4]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall effect states, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 010504 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    B. Shi, K. Kato, and I. H. Kim, Fusion rules from entan- glement, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)418, 168164 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Shi and I

    B. Shi and I. H. Kim, Entanglement bootstrap approach for gapped domain walls, Phys. Rev. B103, 115150 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Shi and I

    B. Shi and I. H. Kim, Domain wall topological entangle- ment entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 141602 (2021). 6

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    I. H. Kim, B. Shi, K. Kato, and V. V. Albert, Chiral central charge from a single bulk wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 176402 (2022)

    2022

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    I. H. Kim, B. Shi, K. Kato, and V. V. Albert, Modu- lar commutator in gapped quantum many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B106, 075147 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Y. Zou, B. Shi, J. Sorce, I. T. Lim, and I. H. Kim, Mod- ular commutators in conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 260402 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Fan, From entanglement generated dynamics to the gravitational anomaly and chiral central charge, Phys

    R. Fan, From entanglement generated dynamics to the gravitational anomaly and chiral central charge, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 260403 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Maity, A

    A. Maity, A. Kumar, and V. Tripathi, Identifying chiral topological order in microscopic spin models by modular commutator, arXiv:2510.06086 (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Gass and M

    J. Gass and M. Levin, Many-body systems with spuri- ous modular commutators, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 256604 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quan- tum systems, Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment2007, P08024 (2007)

    2007

  7. [15]

    X.-J. Yu, L. Xu, and H.-Q. Lin, Topological physics in quantum critical systems, Physics Reports1160, 1 (2026)

    2026

  8. [16]

    Peschel, Calculation of reduced density matrices from correlation functions, J

    I. Peschel, Calculation of reduced density matrices from correlation functions, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.36, L205 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    Peschel and V

    I. Peschel and V. Eisler, Reduced density matrices and entanglement entropy in free lattice models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.42, 504003 (2009)

    2009

  10. [18]

    parity anomaly

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect with- out Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

    1988

  11. [19]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment2004, P06002 (2004)

    2004

  12. [20]

    Gioev and I

    D. Gioev and I. Klich, Entanglement entropy of fermions in any dimension and the Widom conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 100503 (2006)

    2006

  13. [21]

    M. M. Wolf, Violation of the entropic area law for fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 010404 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Swingle, Entanglement entropy and the Fermi surface, Phys

    B. Swingle, Entanglement entropy and the Fermi surface, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 050502 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Fradkin and J

    E. Fradkin and J. E. Moore, Entanglement entropy of 2d conformal quantum critical points: hearing the shape of a quantum drum, Physical review letters97, 050404 (2006)

    2006

  16. [24]

    Li, T.-C

    X. Li, T.-C. Lin, J. McGreevy, and B. Shi, Strict area law entanglement versus chirality, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 180402 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Topological insulators with inver- sion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B76, 045302 (2007)

    2007

  18. [26]

    Senthil, Symmetry-protected topological phases of quantum matter, Annu

    T. Senthil, Symmetry-protected topological phases of quantum matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 299 (2015)

    2015

  19. [27]

    A. J. Niemi and G. W. Semenoff, Axial-anomaly-induced fermion fractionization and effective gauge-theory actions in odd-dimensional space-times, Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2077 (1983)

    1983

  20. [28]

    A. N. Redlich, Gauge noninvariance and parity noncon- servation of three-dimensional fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 18 (1984)

    1984

  21. [29]

    G. W. Semenoff, Condensed-matter simulation of a three- dimensional anomaly, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 2449 (1984)

    1984

  22. [30]

    Jackiw, Fractional charge and zero modes for pla- nar systems in a magnetic field, Phys

    R. Jackiw, Fractional charge and zero modes for pla- nar systems in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D29, 2375 (1984)

    1984

  23. [31]

    Alvarez-Gaum´ e, S

    L. Alvarez-Gaum´ e, S. Della Pietra, and G. Moore, Anomalies and odd dimensions, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)163, 288 (1985)

    1985

  24. [32]

    Witten, Fermion path integrals and topological phases, Rev

    E. Witten, Fermion path integrals and topological phases, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035001 (2016)

    2016

  25. [33]

    M. F. Atiyah, V. K. Patodi, and I. M. Singer, Spectral asymmetry and Riemannian geometry. I, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.77, 43 (1975)

    1975

  26. [34]

    M. Mogi, Y. Okamura, M. Kawamura, R. Yoshimi, K. Yasuda, A. Tsukazaki, K. S. Takahashi, T. Mori- moto, N. Nagaosa, M. Kawasaki, Y. Takahashi, and Y. Tokura, Experimental signature of the parity anomaly in a semi-magnetic topological insulator, Nat. Phys.18, 390 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    R. Fan, R. Sahay, and A. Vishwanath, Extracting the quantum Hall conductance from a single bulk wave func- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 186301 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Verresen, N

    R. Verresen, N. G. Jones, and F. Pollmann, Topology and edge modes in quantum critical chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 057001 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    Verresen, Topology and edge states survive quan- tum criticality between topological insulators (2020), arXiv:2003.05453, arXiv:2003.05453 [cond-mat.str-el]

    R. Verresen, Topology and edge states survive quan- tum criticality between topological insulators (2020), arXiv:2003.05453, arXiv:2003.05453 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Y. Guo, S. Yang, and X.-J. Yu, Generalized Li–Haldane correspondence in critical free-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Research8, 023203 (2026)

    2026

  31. [39]

    Banerjee and M

    A. Banerjee and M. Zeng, Entanglement spectrum of gap- less topological phases: A case study with topological superconductors, Phys. Rev. B114, 055104 (2026)

    2026

  32. [40]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Berry curvature on the fermi surface: Anomalous hall effect as a topological fermi-liquid prop- erty, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 206602 (2004)

    2004

  33. [41]

    Mao, Y.-M

    B.-B. Mao, Y.-M. Ding, Z. Wang, S. Hu, and Z. Yan, Sampling reduced density matrix to extract fine levels of entanglement spectrum and restore entanglement hamil- tonian, Nature Communications16, 2880 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Moy and E

    B. Moy and E. Fradkin, Chern insulator boundary criti- cality, arXiv:2608.18199 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Hayden, R

    P. Hayden, R. Jozsa, D. Petz, and A. Winter, Structure of states which satisfy strong subadditivity of quantum entropy with equality, Commun. Math. Phys.246, 359 (2004). 7 FIG. 5: Markov property check. (a) The chain triparti- tionABCof a 3w×3wsquare. (b) CMI: decays expo- nen...

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.