Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 minor 45 references

The Higher-Dimensional Nitsche Conjecture: Sharp Bounds and Rigidity

T0 review · 0 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-28 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves sharp upper bounds on the outer radius of any harmonic homeomorphism between spherical annuli in dimensions $n\ge 3$, and shows that equality forces the map to be the explicit radial harmonic homeomorphism up to an…

desk verdict A genuinely new proof of the higher-dimensional Nitsche conjecture with rigidity, written in enough detail to be refereeable; the main chain is coherent and I found no load-bearing gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.27303 v1 pith:BJTNPUED submitted 2026-08-27 math.AP

Bin Deng , Jiahuan Li , Yilu Liu , Xi-Nan Ma This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 31B0535J0535B06
keywords Nitscheconjectureharmonichomeomorphismsphericalannulusrigiditysharpestimatesharmonicsprobabilitycouplingzonalkernels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves the higher-dimensional Nitsche conjecture for spherical annuli in all dimensions $n\ge3$. If $h:A(r,1)\to A(R,1)\subset\mathbb R^n$ is an onto homeomorphism whose coordinate functions are harmonic, the paper establishes the sharp bound $R\le R_{n,+}(r)=nr/(n-1+r^n)$, and the strictly stronger bound $R\le R_{n,-}(r)=nr^{n-1}/(1+(n-1)r^n)$ when $h$ interchanges the two boundary ends. Both constants are attained by explicit radial harmonic maps, and equality forces $h$ itself to be that radial map up to an orthogonal rotation. The proof needs no extension of $h$ to the closed annulus, no boundary homeomorphism, and no sign condition on the Jacobian. A sympathetic reader should take the main insight to be that the topological requirement of nonfolding alone, converted into probability couplings between boundary directions, is enough to fix both the sharp constant and the extremizer.

What carries the argument

The proof is carried by the direction map $q_t(\omega)=h(t,\omega)/|h(t,\omega)|$ on each interior sphere $\{t\}\times S^{n-1}$. Since $h$ is a homeomorphism, $q_t$ has degree $\pm1$ and is surjective; a Borel right inverse $\sigma_t$ then produces the probability coupling $\gamma_t=(x,\sigma_t(x))_\#\mu$ and the vector measure $N_\gamma$. The sharp contraction principle says that for every positive zonal kernel $K$ that is nondecreasing in the scalar product, $\|K N_\gamma\|_{L^1(S^{n-1})}\le \kappa_1$, where $\kappa_1$ is the degree-one spherical-harmonic multiplier; this is proved by layer-cake decomposition and the strict concavity of the spherical-cap barycenter profile $c_n$. Equality in that contraction, for strictly increasing $K$, forces $\gamma=(x,Mx)_\#\mu$ for some $M\in O(n)$. Endpoint transfer operators $T=\partial_t B_t|_{t=r+}$ and $S=-\partial_t A_t|_{t=1-}$ then identify the boundary traces, with a Dirichlet-to-Neumann spectral gap $\lambda_0<\lambda_1<2\lambda_0$ closing the end-preserving case and endpoint H\"older regularity plus uniform convergence of direction maps closing the end-reversing case.

What would settle it

Take $n=3$ and $r=1/2$: the predicted sharp end-preserving outer radius is $R_{3,+}(1/2)=12/17\approx0.7059$. Constructing, by numerical solution of the coordinatewise Laplace equation or otherwise, any harmonic homeomorphism $h:A(1/2,1)\to A(R,1)$ with $R>12/17$ would disprove Theorem 1.1. For rigidity, one could look at a harmonic homeomorphism at exactly $R=12/17$ whose limiting direction coupling is not the graph of a single orthogonal matrix; Proposition 5.1 predicts every such coupling is $M\in O(n)$, so any non-graph coupling would settle the rigidity claim against the paper.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 1.1 together with Theorem 1.2. For $n\ge3$ and $0<r,R<1$, every harmonic homeomorphism $h:A(r,1)\to A(R,1)$ obeys $R\le R_{n,+}(r)=nr/(n-1+r^n)$; if $h$ maps the inner source end to the outer target end, the sharper bound $R\le R_{n,-}(r)=nr^{n-1}/(1+(n-1)r^n)$ holds. Equality in either bound is rigid: $h(t,\omega)=H_{n,r}(t)Q\omega$ in the end-preserving case, with $H_{n,r}(t)=((n-1)t+r^n t^{1-n})/(n-1+r^n)$, and $h(t,\omega)=H^-_{n,r}(t)Q\omega$ in the end-reversing case, with $H^-_{n,r}(t)=r^{n-1}((n-1)t+t^{1-n})/(1+(n-1)r^n)$, where $Q\in O(n)$. The two inequalities are strict for $n\ge3$, reflecting the different roles of the power-law radial modes $1$ and $t^{2-n}$ at the two endpoints.

Load-bearing premise

The whole argument rests on the fact that each intermediate sphere's direction map winds around the target sphere exactly once and therefore covers every direction with a measurable right inverse; if a harmonic homeomorphism could skip some direction on some slice, the probability coupling behind every estimate would not exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Whenever $R>R_{n,+}(r)$, no harmonic homeomorphism from $A(r,1)$ onto $A(R,1)$ exists; the bound is the complete existence threshold.
  • At the threshold, all extremizers agree up to rotation: a non-radial harmonic homeomorphism at the critical thickness cannot exist.
  • Interchanging the ends is strictly harder in $n\ge3$, since $R_{n,-}(r)<R_{n,+}(r)$; the two-dimensional coincidence of values is not structural.
  • Corollary 1.3 converts the result into a scale-invariant modulus bound for arbitrary concentric annuli $A(r_0,r_1)$ and $A(R_0,R_1)$.
  • The absence of any boundary-regularity hypothesis means the obstruction is purely interior: it applies to every harmonic homeomorphism of the open annulus.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same coupling-contraction mechanism should apply to any elliptic boundary-value problem whose annular Poisson kernels are positivity-preserving, strictly increasing zonal kernels; if so, Nitsche-type sharp bounds would follow for a family of linear systems beyond the coordinatewise Laplacian.
  • Equality classification via orthogonal graph couplings suggests a transferable principle: saturation of a zonal contraction inequality selects an isometric coupling, so rigidity may be expected in other modulus problems when a critical endpoint defect vanishes to second order.
  • In the full-ball constraint-map model, the end-preserving Nitsche bound is exactly a sharp lower bound on the contact radius; by duality, the end-reversing critical profile may play the analogous role for obstacle configurations with reversed boundary data, although the paper does not develop that model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proves the sharp higher-dimensional Nitsche bounds for harmonic homeomorphisms between spherical annuli. Theorem 1.1 asserts that for n≥3 and any onto harmonic homeomorphism h:A(r,1)→A(R,1), one has R≤R_{n,+}(r)=nr/(n−1+r^n), and that if h interchanges the two ends then R≤R_{n,-}(r)=nr^{n−1}/(1+(n−1)r^n)<R_{n,+}(r). Theorem 1.2 classifies equality: at either critical value h must be, up to an orthogonal factor, the corresponding radial harmonic map H_{n,r}(t)Qω or H^-_{n,r}(t)Qω. The proof is developed in Sections 2–5: measurable L2 boundary traces and explicit Poisson multipliers (Section 2); a spherical-cap coupling contraction for positive nondecreasing zonal kernels (Section 3); finite-slice degree and one-sided endpoint derivatives giving the sharp bounds (Section 4); and rigidity through transfer kernels, equality classification of the coupling, a Dirichlet-to-Neumann spectral gap for the end-preserving case, and endpoint Hölder regularity for the end-reversing case (Section 5). The manuscript is self-contained up to standard topological, measure-theoretic, and elliptic facts, and it assumes neither continuous boundary extension nor any sign condition on the Jacobian.

Significance. If correct, this is a complete solution of the higher-dimensional Nitsche problem for Euclidean spherical annuli, and the first sharp rigidity classification in this setting. The main technical novelty is the conversion of topological degree into a probability coupling and a sharp contraction inequality for vector measures under zonal kernels; this is a genuine new mechanism rather than a transcription of the planar proof. The constants and extremizers are explicit and parameter-free, and the rigidity statements are strong. I checked the algebraic identities in (2.9)–(2.11), (5.14)–(5.15), (5.24)–(5.26), (5.44), and (5.48) and found them consistent. The densest steps, Lemma 5.2 (strict monotonicity and smoothness of the transfer kernels) and Lemma 5.5 (C^{0,1/2} endpoint regularity and uniform convergence of the direction maps), are argued in detail; I did not find a gap. Overall, I regard the central claims as credible and within the scope of this journal.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Eq. (5.52)] The derivation of the displayed estimate 0≤1−|m_s(ω)|≤(1−R)/R·α(1−s)/β(1−s)≤Cs is compressed. From R<α+Rβ|m_s| and β=1−α, the rearrangement Rβ(1−|m_s|)<α(1−R) gives the estimate; adding this one-line step would help the reader verify the direction of the inequality.
  2. [§5, Lemma 5.2] The notation C^m(S^{n−1}×S^{n−1}) for the zonal kernels is slightly ambiguous because K_T and K_S are ultimately functions of the scalar product; the text should state explicitly that the C^m norm is taken with respect to the two sphere variables.
  3. [§1, The constraint-map vortex] The discussion of constraint-map vortices is interesting and motivates the end-preserving branch, but it is not used in the proofs; a sentence at the start of that subsection marking it as contextual would prevent the reader from expecting a later application.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity; sharp bounds and rigidity are derived internally from degree, couplings, and spectral estimates, with self-citations only contextual.

full rationale

The derivation chain for Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 is self-contained. The end-permutation lemma (Lemma 2.1), measurable trace representation (Lemma 2.2), degree/surjectivity and Borel right-inverse step (Lemma 4.1), and the sharp zonal-kernel contraction (Proposition 3.3) are all proved in the paper from standard topological, measure-theoretic, and elliptic facts. The constants R_{n,+} and R_{n,-} are first generated by solving the radial ODE H''+(n-1)H'/t-(n-1)H/t^2=0 in Section 2.1; the proof then forces any harmonic homeomorphism's outer radius to satisfy the same bounds, so the target constants are not assumed. At critical equality, the rigidity classification is internal: Proposition 5.1 proves the orthogonal-graph equality case for strictly increasing kernels, Lemma 5.2 constructs the limiting transfer kernels with explicit multipliers, Lemma 5.4 uses the explicitly checked spectral gap lambda0<lambda1<2lambda0, and Lemma 5.5 derives the C^{0,1/2} trace and uniform convergence of the direction maps. No imported 'uniqueness theorem' from the authors' prior work is load-bearing. The self-citations [6] and [37] appear in motivational or contextual passages: [6] identifies the constraint-map vortex in the application section, while the same radial profile is independently derived in Section 2.1; [37] is a background remark on p-harmonic gradient maps and is not used in the proofs. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no displayed equation reduces the conclusion to an input by construction. The least externally verified components, such as strict monotonicity of transfer kernels in Lemma 5.2 and endpoint Holder regularity in Lemma 5.5, are argued in detail and are natural verification targets rather than circular steps; I assign 1 rather than 0 only to acknowledge the presence of non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: the constants R_{n,+} and R_{n,-} are explicit formulas in r and n, derived rather than calibrated. The proof relies on standard measure-theoretic, topological, and elliptic tools; the main novel ingredients such as cap concavity, the contraction inequality, and the equality classification are proven inside the paper. No new entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Borel right-inverse theorem for continuous surjections between compact metric spaces
    Invoked in Lemma 4.1 to obtain the measurable selector σ_t and the coupling γ_t; the paper cites Bogachev [2, Theorem 6.9.7].
  • standard math Standard degree theory for maps between spheres
    Used in Lemma 4.1 to conclude deg(q_t)=±1 from the homotopy equivalence of the inclusion and radial projection; cited to Hatcher [13, Section 2.2].
  • standard math Hopf boundary lemma, maximum principle, and Green-function estimates on smooth bounded domains
    Used in Lemmas 3.1 and 5.2 to prove positivity and strict angular monotonicity of annular Poisson kernels and their transfer limits; cited to Gilbarg-Trudinger [12].
  • standard math Disintegration of probability measures and Fubini/Tonelli for kernel integrals on standard Borel spaces
    Used in Propositions 3.3 and 5.1 to pass from couplings to conditional expectations and to justify layer-cake representations; cited to Kallenberg [22] and Bogachev [2].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Higher-Dimensional Nitsche Conjecture: Sharp Bounds and Rigidity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BJTNPUED

@misc{pith2026260827303,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Higher-Dimensional Nitsche Conjecture: Sharp Bounds and Rigidity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BJTNPUED}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.27303}
}
abstract

Let $n\ge3$ and let $h:\A(r,1)\to\A(R,1)\subset\mathbb R^n$ be an onto homeomorphism with harmonic coordinate functions. We prove the sharp Nitsche bound \[ R\le R_{n,+}(r):=\frac{nr}{n-1+r^n}, \] and, when $h$ interchanges the two ends, the strictly stronger sharp bound \[ R\le R_{n,-}(r):=\frac{nr^{n-1}}{1+(n-1)r^n}. \] Both critical cases are rigid: equality forces, up to an orthogonal transformation, the corresponding end-preserving or end-reversing radial harmonic homeomorphism. No continuous extension to the closed annulus, boundary homeomorphism, boundary Jacobian, or sign condition on the Jacobian is assumed. The proof converts the nonzero degree of each interior direction map into a probability coupling and establishes a sharp contraction principle for vector measures under positive zonal kernels, using the strict concavity of spherical-cap barycenters. At either critical value, a second-order endpoint defect forces equality for a limiting transfer kernel, whose equality classification yields an orthogonal coupling graph. The remaining trace is locked by a Dirichlet-to-Neumann spectral gap in the end-preserving case and by endpoint H\"older regularity and uniform convergence of the direction maps in the end-reversing case.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Astala, T

    K. Astala, T. Iwaniec, and G. J. Martin,Deformations of annuli with smallest mean distortion, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.195(2010), no. 3, 899–921

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    V. I. Bogachev,Measure Theory, vol. 2, Springer, Berlin, 2007

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Bshouty, A

    D. Bshouty, A. Lyzzaik, A. Rasila, and A. Vasudevarao,Moduli of doubly connected domains under univalent harmonic maps, J. Geom. Anal.32(2022), Paper No. 152

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Chen and D

    J. Chen and D. Kalaj,Dirichlet-type energy of mappings between two concentric annuli, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations60(2021), no. 6, Paper No. 205, 20 pp

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Clunie and T

    J. Clunie and T. Sheil-Small,Harmonic univalent functions, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Ser. A I Math.9(1984), 3–25

    1984

  6. [6]

    B. Deng, J. Li, Y. Liu, and X.-N. Ma,Global minimality and rigidity of the constraint map vortex, arXiv:2608.24805, 2026

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Duren,Harmonic Mappings in the Plane, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol

    P. Duren,Harmonic Mappings in the Plane, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 156, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Eells, Jr

    J. Eells, Jr. and J. H. Sampson,Harmonic mappings of Riemannian manifolds, Amer. J. Math.86(1964), 109–160

    work page 1964

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Figalli, A

    A. Figalli, A. Guerra, S. Kim, and H. Shahgholian,Constraint maps: singularities vs. free boundaries, arXiv:2407.21128, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Figalli, A

    A. Figalli, A. Guerra, S. Kim, and H. Shahgholian,Constraint maps: insights and related themes, La Matematica5(2026), Paper No. 26

    2026

  3. [11]

    Figalli, S

    A. Figalli, S. Kim, and H. Shahgholian,Constraint maps with free boundaries: the obstacle case, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.248(2024), Paper No. 79

    2024

  4. [12]

    Gilbarg and N

    D. Gilbarg and N. S. Trudinger,Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 2001

    2001

  5. [13]

    Hatcher,Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    A. Hatcher,Algebraic Topology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    2002

  6. [14]

    Iwaniec, N.-T

    T. Iwaniec, N.-T. Koh, L. V. Kovalev, and J. Onninen,Existence of energy-minimal diffeo- morphisms between doubly connected domains, Invent. Math.186(2011), no. 3, 667–707

    2011

  7. [15]

    Iwaniec, L

    T. Iwaniec, L. V. Kovalev, and J. Onninen,Harmonic mappings of an annulus, Nitsche conjecture and its generalizations, Amer. J. Math.132(2010), no. 5, 1397–1428

    2010

  8. [16]

    Iwaniec, L

    T. Iwaniec, L. V. Kovalev, and J. Onninen,The Nitsche conjecture, J. Amer. Math. Soc.24 (2011), no. 2, 345–373. 29

    2011

  9. [17]

    Iwaniec, L

    T. Iwaniec, L. V. Kovalev, and J. Onninen,The harmonic mapping problem and affine capacity, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A141(2011), no. 5, 1017–1030

    2011

  10. [18]

    Iwaniec, L

    T. Iwaniec, L. V. Kovalev, and J. Onninen,Doubly connected minimal surfaces and extremal harmonic mappings, J. Geom. Anal.22(2012), no. 3, 726–762

    2012

  11. [19]

    Iwaniec and J

    T. Iwaniec and J. Onninen,p-harmonic energy of deformations between punctured balls, Adv. Calc. Var.2(2009), no. 1, 93–107

    2009

  12. [20]

    Iwaniec and J

    T. Iwaniec and J. Onninen,Neohookean deformations of annuli, existence, uniqueness and radial symmetry, Math. Ann.348(2010), no. 1, 35–55

    2010

  13. [21]

    Iwaniec and J

    T. Iwaniec and J. Onninen,n-Harmonic Mappings Between Annuli: The Art of Integrating Free Lagrangians, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.218(2012), no. 1023

    2012

  14. [22]

    Kallenberg,Foundations of Modern Probability, 3rd ed., Springer, Cham, 2021

    O. Kallenberg,Foundations of Modern Probability, 3rd ed., Springer, Cham, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Kalaj,On the Nitsche conjecture for harmonic mappings inR2 and R3, Israel J

    D. Kalaj,On the Nitsche conjecture for harmonic mappings inR2 and R3, Israel J. Math. 150(2005), 241–251

    2005

  16. [24]

    Kalaj,On the univalent solution of PDE∆u =f between spherical annuli, J

    D. Kalaj,On the univalent solution of PDE∆u =f between spherical annuli, J. Math. Anal. Appl.327(2007), no. 1, 1–11

    2007

  17. [25]

    Kalaj,Harmonic maps between annuli on Riemann surfaces, Israel J

    D. Kalaj,Harmonic maps between annuli on Riemann surfaces, Israel J. Math.182(2011), 123–147

    2011

  18. [26]

    Kalaj,On a J

    D. Kalaj,On a J. C. C. Nitsche type inequality for the hyperbolic spaceH3, Potential Anal. 41(2014), no. 3, 931–943

    2014

  19. [27]

    Kalaj and S

    D. Kalaj and S. Ponnusamy,Polyharmonic mappings and J. C. C. Nitsche type inequalities, Glas. Mat. Ser. III49(69) (2014), no. 1, 163–178

    2014

  20. [28]

    Kalaj,Deformations of annuli on Riemann surfaces and the generalization of Nitsche conjecture, J

    D. Kalaj,Deformations of annuli on Riemann surfaces and the generalization of Nitsche conjecture, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2)93(2016), no. 3, 683–702

    2016

  21. [29]

    Kalaj,On J

    D. Kalaj,On J. C. C. Nitsche type inequality for annuli on Riemann surfaces, Israel J. Math. 218(2017), no. 1, 67–81

    2017

  22. [30]

    Kalaj,(n,ρ )-harmonic mappings and energy minimal deformations between annuli, Calc

    D. Kalaj,(n,ρ )-harmonic mappings and energy minimal deformations between annuli, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations58(2019), no. 2, Paper No. 51

    2019

  23. [31]

    Kalaj,Harmonic maps between two concentric annuli inR3, Adv

    D. Kalaj,Harmonic maps between two concentric annuli inR3, Adv. Calc. Var.14(2021), no. 3, 303–312

    2021

  24. [32]

    Kalaj and J.-F

    D. Kalaj and J.-F. Zhu,The existence of minimizers of energy for diffeomorphisms between two-dimensional annuli inR2 andR 3, Nonlinear Anal.217(2022), Paper No. 112764

    2022

  25. [33]

    Koski and J

    A. Koski and J. Onninen,Radial symmetry ofp-harmonic minimizers, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.230(2018), no. 1, 321–342

    2018

  26. [34]

    R. S. Laugesen,Injectivity can fail for higher-dimensional harmonic extensions, Complex Variables Theory Appl.28(1996), no. 4, 357–369. 30

    1996

  27. [35]

    Lewy,On the non-vanishing of the Jacobian in certain one-to-one mappings, Bull

    H. Lewy,On the non-vanishing of the Jacobian in certain one-to-one mappings, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.42(1936), no. 10, 689–692

    1936

  28. [36]

    Lewy,On the non-vanishing of the Jacobian of a homeomorphism of harmonic gradients, Ann

    H. Lewy,On the non-vanishing of the Jacobian of a homeomorphism of harmonic gradients, Ann. of Math. (2)88(1968), no. 3, 518–529

    1968

  29. [37]

    J. Li, Y. Liu, and X.-N. Ma,A local Lewy theorem forp-harmonic function with non-zero gradient inR 3, arXiv:2608.08810, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Lin,Lectures on elliptic free boundary problems, inLectures on the Analysis of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Part 4, Morningside Lectures in Mathematics, vol

    F.-H. Lin,Lectures on elliptic free boundary problems, inLectures on the Analysis of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations, Part 4, Morningside Lectures in Mathematics, vol. 4, Higher Education Press and International Press, 2016, pp. 115–193

    2016

  31. [39]

    Lyzzaik,The modulus of the image annuli under univalent harmonic mappings and a conjecture of Nitsche, J

    A. Lyzzaik,The modulus of the image annuli under univalent harmonic mappings and a conjecture of Nitsche, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2)64(2001), no. 2, 369–384

    2001

  32. [40]

    G. J. Martin and M. McKubre-Jordens,Deformations with smallest weightedLp average distortion and Nitsche-type phenomena, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2)85(2012), no. 2, 282–300

    2012

  33. [41]

    J. C. C. Nitsche,On the modulus of doubly connected regions under harmonic mappings, Amer. Math. Monthly69(1962), 781–782

    1962

  34. [42]

    J. C. C. Nitsche,A necessary condition for the existence of certain minimal surfaces, J. Math. Mech.13(1964), 659–666

    1964

  35. [43]

    Schoen and K

    R. Schoen and K. Uhlenbeck,A regularity theory for harmonic maps, J. Differential Geom. 17(1982), no. 2, 307–335

    1982

  36. [44]

    Weitsman,Univalent harmonic mappings of annuli and a conjecture of J

    A. Weitsman,Univalent harmonic mappings of annuli and a conjecture of J. C. C. Nitsche, Israel J. Math.124(2001), 327–331

    2001

  37. [45]

    J. C. Wood,Lewy’s theorem fails in higher dimensions, Math. Scand.69(1991), 166. (Bin Deng) School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, P.R. China. Email address: dbmath@whu.edu.cn (Jiahuan Li) School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Sci...

    1991

Pith tools

Reviewed August 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.