pith. sign in

arxiv: 1012.4871 · v1 · pith:5B6VFPKQnew · submitted 2010-12-22 · 💻 cs.DL

Popular and/or Prestigious? Measures of Scholarly Esteem

classification 💻 cs.DL
keywords popularityprestigecitedhighlymeasuresnumberauthorcitations
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Citation analysis does not generally take the quality of citations into account: all citations are weighted equally irrespective of source. However, a scholar may be highly cited but not highly regarded: popularity and prestige are not identical measures of esteem. In this study we define popularity as the number of times an author is cited and prestige as the number of times an author is cited by highly cited papers. Information Retrieval (IR) is the test field. We compare the 40 leading researchers in terms of their popularity and prestige over time. Some authors are ranked high on prestige but not on popularity, while others are ranked high on popularity but not on prestige. We also relate measures of popularity and prestige to date of Ph.D. award, number of key publications, organizational affiliation, receipt of prizes/honors, and gender.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.