pith. sign in

arxiv: 2002.04615 · v3 · pith:5H5VGDJZnew · submitted 2020-02-11 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc

New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Signals from Cosmological Phase Transitions

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 22:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords gravitational wavesfirst-order phase transitionssensitivity curvesLISAsignal-to-noise ratiocosmological phase transitionsDECIGOBBO
0
0 comments X

The pith

Peak-integrated sensitivity curves represent projected reach for gravitational waves from early-universe phase transitions by folding in the expected signal spectrum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs peak-integrated sensitivity curves, or PISCs, for detectors including LISA, DECIGO, and BBO. These curves incorporate the characteristic frequency dependence of gravitational-wave signals produced by strong first-order phase transitions rather than assuming a generic power-law form. As a result they directly encode the expected signal-to-noise ratio for such signals and permit immediate comparison between theoretical spectra and experimental sensitivity. Semianalytical fit functions are supplied so that model builders can evaluate prospects without repeated numerical integration. The construction is presented as a bookkeeping device that will be revised whenever improved calculations of the signal shape become available.

Core claim

The author defines peak-integrated sensitivity curves that integrate the detector noise weighted by the actual spectral shape of the gravitational-wave signal expected from a cosmological strong first-order phase transition; the resulting curves therefore give a faithful representation of the projected experimental sensitivity and directly encode the attainable signal-to-noise ratio for that class of signals.

What carries the argument

Peak-integrated sensitivity curves (PISCs), constructed by weighting the strain noise power spectrum with the normalized spectral shape of the phase-transition signal and integrating over frequency to obtain a single sensitivity number at the peak frequency.

If this is right

  • Theoretical predictions for the gravitational-wave spectrum from any given model can be compared directly with experimental reach by reading off the height of the model's peak relative to the PISC.
  • The curves encode the expected signal-to-noise ratio, so a model whose peak lies above the PISC by a stated factor immediately indicates the corresponding detection significance.
  • PISCs for LISA, DECIGO, and BBO are supplied together with semianalytical fits that allow rapid evaluation without recomputing the integral.
  • The same construction can be repeated for any future detector once its strain noise spectrum is known.
  • Whenever new calculations revise the expected signal shape, the PISCs can be recomputed to keep the comparison current.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the curves are defined relative to a specific template, they are most useful when the underlying phase-transition model produces a spectrum close to the standard broken-power-law form assumed in the fits.
  • The method could be extended to other transient or narrow-band signals whose spectra are known a priori, such as those from cosmic strings or primordial black-hole binaries.
  • Model scans that previously used power-law-integrated curves can be re-run with PISCs to obtain more accurate exclusion or discovery projections for phase-transition scenarios.
  • The Zenodo release of the numerical curves allows immediate reuse in companion analyses of concrete models such as the real-scalar-singlet extension.

Load-bearing premise

The expected frequency spectrum of the gravitational-wave signal from a strong first-order phase transition is already known to sufficient accuracy to serve as a fixed template.

What would settle it

A measured phase-transition gravitational-wave spectrum whose shape deviates enough from the template used to build the PISC that the signal-to-noise ratio inferred from the curve differs by more than a factor of two from the ratio computed with the actual measured spectrum.

read the original abstract

Gravitational waves (GWs) from strong first-order phase transitions (SFOPTs) in the early Universe are a prime target for upcoming GW experiments. In this paper, I construct novel peak-integrated sensitivity curves (PISCs) for these experiments, which faithfully represent their projected sensitivities to the GW signal from a cosmological SFOPT by explicitly taking into account the expected shape of the signal. Designed to be a handy tool for phenomenologists and model builders, PISCs allow for a quick and systematic comparison of theoretical predictions with experimental sensitivities, as I illustrate by a large range of examples. PISCs also offer several advantages over the conventional power-law-integrated sensitivity curves (PLISCs); in particular, they directly encode information on the expected signal-to-noise ratio for the GW signal from a SFOPT. I provide semianalytical fit functions for the exact numerical PISCs of LISA, DECIGO, and BBO. In an appendix, I moreover present a detailed review of the strain noise power spectra of a large number of GW experiments. The numerical results for all PISCs, PLISCs, and strain noise power spectra presented in this paper can be downloaded from the Zenodo online repository [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3689582]. In a companion paper [1909.11356], the concept of PISCs is used to perform an in-depth study of the GW signal from the cosmological phase transition in the real-scalar-singlet extension of the standard model. The PISCs presented in this paper will need to be updated whenever new theoretical results on the expected shape of the signal become available. The PISC approach is therefore suited to be used as a bookkeeping tool to keep track of the theoretical progress in the field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces peak-integrated sensitivity curves (PISCs) for gravitational-wave detectors (LISA, DECIGO, BBO) targeting signals from strong first-order phase transitions. PISCs are constructed numerically by folding the expected GW spectral shape (taken from prior literature) into the signal-to-noise ratio integral, yielding curves that directly encode projected SNR; semianalytical fits are supplied, an appendix reviews strain noise power spectra for many experiments, and all numerical results plus fits are released on Zenodo.

Significance. If the numerical construction is reproducible, PISCs provide a practical, shape-aware alternative to PLISCs that directly reports expected SNR and serves as a bookkeeping device for updating with new theoretical signal templates. The public data release, explicit fits, and comprehensive noise-spectra appendix are concrete strengths that increase the work's utility for model builders.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (definition of PISC): the integration limits and normalization convention for the template shape S(f) are not stated explicitly enough to allow independent reproduction of the quoted SNR values; this is load-bearing for the central claim that PISCs 'faithfully represent' the projected sensitivity.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 and associated fits: the semianalytical fit functions are presented without quoted goodness-of-fit metrics or residual plots over the full frequency range, making it impossible to assess how faithfully they reproduce the exact numerical PISCs used for the SNR claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 caption: the frequency axis label is missing units; this should be corrected for clarity.
  2. [Appendix A] Appendix A: several references to external noise curves lack page or equation numbers, complicating cross-checks.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and the recommendation for minor revision. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (definition of PISC): the integration limits and normalization convention for the template shape S(f) are not stated explicitly enough to allow independent reproduction of the quoted SNR values; this is load-bearing for the central claim that PISCs 'faithfully represent' the projected sensitivity.

    Authors: We agree that greater explicitness is needed for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph in §3 that states the precise frequency integration limits employed in the SNR integral and the normalization convention for the template shape S(f) (with peak value set to unity). This will directly address the concern and allow independent verification of the quoted SNR values. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 1] Table 1 and associated fits: the semianalytical fit functions are presented without quoted goodness-of-fit metrics or residual plots over the full frequency range, making it impossible to assess how faithfully they reproduce the exact numerical PISCs used for the SNR claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative fit-quality information would strengthen the presentation. While the exact numerical PISCs remain available on Zenodo for users requiring maximum precision, we will revise the manuscript to include goodness-of-fit metrics (maximum relative deviation and reduced chi-squared) for the semianalytical functions over the relevant frequency range, together with a brief statement on the size of residuals. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

PISCs are constructed from external noise spectra (detailed in appendix) and fixed GW signal templates drawn from prior literature calculations, with all numerical results and fits released externally via Zenodo. The companion paper citation [1909.11356] applies the PISCs but does not supply the load-bearing definition or justification for their construction. No step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a parameter fitted inside this paper or to a self-citation chain; the central claim remains independently verifiable against the supplied noise curves and external signal shapes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms or invented entities are stated. The method relies on external signal-shape templates and detector noise spectra from the literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5861 in / 1059 out tokens · 16811 ms · 2026-05-23T22:32:58.455370+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 23 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multimessenger Signatures of Tilted, Self-Gravitating, Black Hole Disks

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Tilted massive black hole disks develop persistent m=1 nonaxisymmetric modes, launch Blandford-Znajek jets whose collimation depends on spin orientation, and emit gravitational waves in the first self-consistent GRMHD...

  2. Gravitational wave emission from nonspherical collapse in an early matter-dominated era using N-body simulations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Full numerical N-body treatment is required for reliable gravitational wave predictions from nonspherical collapse in early matter-dominated eras, with resulting spectra mappable to detector sensitivities via horizon ...

  3. New gravitational-wave templates for metastable cosmic strings: Loop breaking versus network collapse

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Metastable cosmic strings produce a gravitational wave background that is best modeled with three parameters (string tension Gμ plus independent time scales t_LB and t_NC), yielding a compact analytical spectrum when ...

  4. Cosmic Collider Gravitational Waves sourced by Right-handed Neutrino production from Bubbles: Testing Seesaw, Leptogenesis and Dark Matter

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bubble collisions in a seesaw model produce right-handed neutrinos that source novel gravitational waves detectable by LISA, ET, and LVK while allowing the lightest RHN to explain dark matter or enable leptogenesis.

  5. Gravitational waves from axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism. Part I. Pure axion inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0

    In pure axion inflation, detectable gravitational wave signals arise only in parameter regions with strong backreaction that violate the upper bound on ΔN_eff.

  6. Imprint of domain wall annihilation on induced gravitational waves

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Domain wall annihilation imprints a two-peaked spectrum on induced gravitational waves via an early matter-dominated phase and entropy dilution.

  7. Accidental Peccei-Quinn Symmetry from Chiral Gauge Symmetry and Mirror QCD

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A chiral U(1) gauge symmetry generates an accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry broken by mirror QCD, solving the strong CP problem without a light axion while supplying WIMP dark matter, stochastic gravitational waves, an...

  8. Gravitational waves from axion inflation in the gradient expansion formalism. Part II. Fermionic axion inflation

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Schwinger fermion production in axion inflation damps gauge fields, enabling observable primordial gravitational waves in LISA/ET bands while satisfying ΔN_eff limits and identifying a new damped-oscillation backreact...

  9. Reviving WIMP dark matter with temperature-dependent couplings

    hep-ph 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Temperature-dependent DM couplings mediated by a scalar field's VEV that drops after a first-order phase transition allow sufficient early-universe annihilations for the observed relic density while evading current di...

  10. Isotropy, anisotropies and non-Gaussianity in the scalar-induced gravitational-wave background: diagrammatic approach for primordial non-Gaussianity up to arbitrary order

    astro-ph.CO 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Extends diagrammatic approach for scalar-induced gravitational waves to arbitrary-order local PNG, deriving semi-analytic spectra for energy density, anisotropies, bispectrum and trispectrum up to quartic terms.

  11. Dark Matter Production from Bubble Collisions during a First-Order Phase Transition at the End of Inflation

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bubble collisions during a first-order phase transition at the end of inflation can generate the observed dark matter abundance in a restricted region of parameter space via direct production and spectator decays.

  12. Transient Parity Violation during Inflation: Implications for PTA Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A transient parity-violating phase during inflation generates a robust blue-tilted (n_T ≃ 2) primordial gravitational wave spectrum at small scales with nearly maximal helicity coherence and linear polarization, offer...

  13. Uncool soft-wall transitions and gravitational waves

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Soft-wall warped geometries yield rapid, mildly supercooled phase transitions whose TeV-scale gravitational wave signals are accessible to space-based interferometers.

  14. Exponential Quintessence Model: Analytical Quantification of the Fine-Tuning Problem in Dark Energy

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Exponential quintessence with an assumed kination epoch relaxes the dark energy fine-tuning problem by dozens of orders of magnitude relative to a cosmological constant.

  15. Dark Matter Freeze-in from a $Z^\prime$ Reheaton

    hep-ph 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dark matter freezes in from non-thermal Z' decays before reheating ends in an inflationary model with a secluded U(1)_D gauge sector, Z' reheaton, and lattice treatment of non-perturbative effects, opening viable para...

  16. Stochastic Gravitational Waves from Modulated Reheating

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A spectator scalar in modulated reheating with large Higgs-like couplings generates detectable scalar-induced stochastic gravitational waves for BBO and DECIGO, but only outside perturbative low-energy extrapolations.

  17. Observable CMB B-modes from Cosmological Phase Transitions

    astro-ph.CO 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Phase transitions in dark sectors can generate CMB B-modes with amplitudes competitive with inflation but peaking at smaller angular scales.

  18. Probing radiative electroweak symmetry breaking with colliders and gravitational waves

    hep-ph 2024-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Radiative electroweak symmetry breaking with a logarithmic potential yields analytical vacuum solutions, four thermal history patterns, and supercooled FOPT gravitational waves whose signals combined with collider dat...

  19. Accretion Effects on Primordial Black Hole Reheating Constraints

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Accretion on primordial black holes prolongs matter domination and shifts reheating constraints from isocurvature gravitational waves and mergers toward smaller formation masses and initial abundances.

  20. Metastable strings at PTAs: classical stability analysis

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Classical instabilities in metastable strings from two-step symmetry breaking can restrict the viable parameter space for explaining the PTA gravitational wave signal.

  21. Gravitational waves from CP domain wall collapse and electron EDM in a complex singlet model with dimension-five Yukawa interactions

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    In a complex singlet model with dimension-five Yukawa couplings, current electron EDM bounds already restrict part of the parameter space where gravitational waves from CP domain wall collapse would be detectable.

  22. Precision Analysis for $\boldsymbol{H_0}$ Using Upcoming Multi-band Gravitational Wave Observations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Multi-band GW observations of PBHs can reduce H0 uncertainty to ≲2 km/s/Mpc (conservative) or O(0.1) km/s/Mpc (optimistic) via Fisher forecasts on M_PBH and f_PBH.

  23. ACT DR6+Planck impact on inflation with non-zero vacuum expectation value and the post-inflationary behavior

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Updated constraints on non-zero VEV parameter M from ACT+Planck data, plus lattice simulations showing oscillon formation and reheating implications.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

216 extracted references · 216 canonical work pages · cited by 23 Pith papers · 120 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Experiments

    K. Schmitz, “ New Sensitivity Curves for Gravitational-Wave Experiments .” https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3689582

  2. [2]

    Alanne, T

    T. Alanne, T. Hugle, M. Platscher, and K. Schmitz, A fresh look at the gravitational-wave signal from cosmological phase transitions , JHEP 03 (2020) 004, [ arXiv:1909.11356]

  3. [3]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102, [arXiv:1602.03837]

  4. [4]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, G. M. Harry, Advanced LIGO: The next generation of gravitational wave detectors, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 084006

  5. [5]

    Advanced LIGO

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, J. Aasi et al., Advanced LIGO, Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 074001, [ arXiv:1411.4547]

  6. [6]

    Advanced Virgo: a 2nd generation interferometric gravitational wave detector

    VIRGO Collaboration, F. Acernese et al., Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , Class. Quant. Grav. 32 (2015) 024001, [arXiv:1408.3978]

  7. [7]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs , Phys. Rev. X9 (2019) 031040, [ arXiv:1811.12907]

  8. [8]

    GW190425: Ob- servation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass∼ 3.4M⊙,

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. Abbott et al., GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4M⊙, Astrophys. J. Lett. 892 (2020), no. 1 L3, [arXiv:2001.01761]

  9. [9]

    Open data from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., Open data from the first and second observing runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , arXiv:1912.11716

  10. [10]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 161101, [arXiv:1710.05832]

  11. [11]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 241103, [ arXiv:1606.04855]

  12. [12]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2 , Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 221101, [arXiv:1706.01812]. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 129901]

  13. [13]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 141101, [ arXiv:1709.09660]

  14. [14]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , Astrophys. J. 851 (2017), no. 2 L35, [arXiv:1711.05578]

  15. [15]

    Gravitational Wave Experiments and Early Universe Cosmology

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational wave experiments and early universe cosmology , Phys. Rept. 331 (2000) 283–367, [ gr-qc/9909001]

  16. [16]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., Search for the isotropic stochastic background using data from Advanced LIGO’s second observing run , Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 061101, [ arXiv:1903.02886]

  17. [17]

    Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves

    C. Caprini and D. G. Figueroa, Cosmological Backgrounds of Gravitational Waves , Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 163001, [ arXiv:1801.04268]. – 45 –

  18. [18]

    Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds

    N. Christensen, Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds , Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019) 016903, [arXiv:1811.08797]

  19. [19]

    Mazumdar and G

    A. Mazumdar and G. White, Review of cosmic phase transitions: their significance and experimental signatures, Rept. Prog. Phys. 82 (2019) 076901, [ arXiv:1811.01948]

  20. [20]

    M. B. Hindmarsh, M. L¨ uben, J. Lumma, and M. Pauly, Phase transitions in the early universe, arXiv:2008.09136

  21. [21]

    D. J. Weir, Gravitational waves from a first order electroweak phase transition: a brief review , Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A376 (2018), no. 2114 20170126, [ arXiv:1705.01783]

  22. [22]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    LISA Collaboration, H. Audley et al., Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, arXiv:1702.00786

  23. [23]

    The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky

    J. Baker et al., The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky , arXiv:1907.06482

  24. [24]

    Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions

    C. Caprini et al., Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: Gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions, JCAP 1604 (2016) 001, [ arXiv:1512.06239]

  25. [25]

    Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update , JCAP 03 (2020) 024, [ arXiv:1910.13125]

    C. Caprini et al., Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update , JCAP 03 (2020) 024, [ arXiv:1910.13125]

  26. [26]

    P. S. B. Dev and A. Mazumdar, Probing the Scale of New Physics by Advanced LIGO/VIRGO, Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 104001, [ arXiv:1602.04203]

  27. [27]

    F. P. Huang, Z. Qian, and M. Zhang, Exploring dynamical CP violation induced baryogenesis by gravitational waves and colliders , Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 015014, [ arXiv:1804.06813]

  28. [28]

    Model Discrimination in Gravitational Wave spectra from Dark Phase Transitions

    D. Croon, V. Sanz, and G. White, Model Discrimination in Gravitational Wave spectra from Dark Phase Transitions, JHEP 08 (2018) 203, [ arXiv:1806.02332]

  29. [29]

    Probing the seesaw scale with gravitational waves

    N. Okada and O. Seto, Probing the seesaw scale with gravitational waves , Phys. Rev. D98 (2018) 063532, [ arXiv:1807.00336]

  30. [30]

    High Scale Electroweak Phase Transition: Baryogenesis & Symmetry Non-Restoration

    I. Baldes and G. Servant, High scale electroweak phase transition: baryogenesis & symmetry non-restoration, JHEP 10 (2018) 053, [ arXiv:1807.08770]

  31. [31]

    Revisiting electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a real singlet scalar

    C.-W. Chiang, Y.-T. Li, and E. Senaha, Revisiting electroweak phase transition in the standard model with a real singlet scalar , Phys. Lett. B789 (2019) 154–159, [ arXiv:1808.01098]

  32. [32]

    Resonant Di-Higgs Production at Gravitational Wave Benchmarks: A Collider Study using Machine Learning

    A. Alves, T. Ghosh, H.-K. Guo, and K. Sinha, Resonant Di-Higgs Production at Gravitational Wave Benchmarks: A Collider Study using Machine Learning , JHEP 12 (2018) 070, [arXiv:1808.08974]

  33. [33]

    Strong gravitational radiation from a simple dark matter model

    I. Baldes and C. Garcia-Cely, Strong gravitational radiation from a simple dark matter model , JHEP 05 (2019) 190, [ arXiv:1809.01198]

  34. [34]

    Ellis, M

    J. Ellis, M. Lewicki, and J. M. No, On the Maximal Strength of a First-Order Electroweak Phase Transition and its Gravitational Wave Signal , JCAP 1904 (2019) 003, [arXiv:1809.08242]

  35. [35]

    Leptophilic dark matter from gauged lepton number: Phenomenology and gravitational wave signatures

    E. Madge and P. Schwaller, Leptophilic dark matter from gauged lepton number: Phenomenology and gravitational wave signatures , JHEP 02 (2019) 048, [ arXiv:1809.09110]

  36. [36]

    Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions in Models with Charged Singlets

    A. Ahriche, K. Hashino, S. Kanemura, and S. Nasri, Gravitational Waves from Phase Transitions in Models with Charged Singlets , Phys. Lett. B789 (2019) 119–126, [arXiv:1809.09883]

  37. [37]

    Gravitational waves from conformal symmetry breaking

    T. Prokopec, J. Rezacek, and B. ´Swie˙ zewska,Gravitational waves from conformal symmetry breaking, JCAP 1902 (2019) 009, [ arXiv:1809.11129]

  38. [38]

    Phase Transitions in Twin Higgs Models

    K. Fujikura, K. Kamada, Y. Nakai, and M. Yamaguchi, Phase Transitions in Twin Higgs Models, JHEP 12 (2018) 018, [ arXiv:1810.00574]. – 46 –

  39. [39]

    Gravitational waves and electroweak baryogenesis in a global study of the extended scalar singlet model

    A. Beniwal, M. Lewicki, M. White, and A. G. Williams, Gravitational waves and electroweak baryogenesis in a global study of the extended scalar singlet model , JHEP 02 (2019) 183, [arXiv:1810.02380]

  40. [40]

    Gravitational Waves from First-Order Phase Transitions: LIGO as a Window to Unexplored Seesaw Scales

    V. Brdar, A. J. Helmboldt, and J. Kubo, Gravitational Waves from First-Order Phase Transitions: LIGO as a Window to Unexplored Seesaw Scales , JCAP 1902 (2019) 021, [arXiv:1810.12306]

  41. [41]

    Miura, H

    K. Miura, H. Ohki, S. Otani, and K. Yamawaki, Gravitational Waves from Walking Technicolor, JHEP 10 (2019) 194, [ arXiv:1811.05670]

  42. [42]

    Probing Trans-electroweak First Order Phase Transitions from Gravitational Waves

    A. Addazi, A. Marcian` o, and R. Pasechnik, Probing Trans-electroweak First Order Phase Transitions from Gravitational Waves, MDPI Physics 1 (2019) 92–102, [ arXiv:1811.09074]

  43. [43]

    V. R. Shajiee and A. Tofighi, Electroweak Phase Transition, Gravitational Waves and Dark Matter in Two Scalar Singlet Extension of The Standard Model , Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019), no. 4 360, [ arXiv:1811.09807]

  44. [44]

    Phase transition and vacuum stability in the classically conformal B-L model

    C. Marzo, L. Marzola, and V. Vaskonen, Phase transition and vacuum stability in the classically conformal B–L model , Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019), no. 7 601, [ arXiv:1811.11169]

  45. [45]

    Dark, Cold, and Noisy: Constraining Secluded Hidden Sectors with Gravitational Waves

    M. Breitbach, J. Kopp, E. Madge, T. Opferkuch, and P. Schwaller, Dark, Cold, and Noisy: Constraining Secluded Hidden Sectors with Gravitational Waves , JCAP 1907 (2019) 007, [arXiv:1811.11175]

  46. [46]

    Multistep Strongly First Order Phase Transitions from New Fermions at the TeV Scale

    A. Angelescu and P. Huang, Multistep Strongly First Order Phase Transitions from New Fermions at the TeV Scale , Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 055023, [ arXiv:1812.08293]

  47. [47]

    Collider and Gravitational Wave Complementarity in Exploring the Singlet Extension of the Standard Model

    A. Alves, T. Ghosh, H.-K. Guo, K. Sinha, and D. Vagie, Collider and Gravitational Wave Complementarity in Exploring the Singlet Extension of the Standard Model , JHEP 04 (2019) 052, [arXiv:1812.09333]

  48. [48]

    Kannike and M

    K. Kannike and M. Raidal, Phase Transitions and Gravitational Wave Tests of Pseudo-Goldstone Dark Matter in the Softly Broken U(1) Scalar Singlet Model , Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 115010, [ arXiv:1901.03333]

  49. [49]

    Fairbairn, E

    M. Fairbairn, E. Hardy, and A. Wickens, Hearing without seeing: gravitational waves from hot and cold hidden sectors , JHEP 07 (2019) 044, [ arXiv:1901.11038]

  50. [50]

    Gravitational waves from the minimal gauged $U(1)_{B-L}$ model

    T. Hasegawa, N. Okada, and O. Seto, Gravitational waves from the minimal gauged U(1)B−L model, Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 095039, [ arXiv:1904.03020]

  51. [51]

    A. J. Helmboldt, J. Kubo, and S. van der Woude, Observational prospects for gravitational waves from hidden or dark chiral phase transitions , Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 055025, [arXiv:1904.07891]

  52. [52]

    P. S. B. Dev, F. Ferrer, Y. Zhang, and Y. Zhang, Gravitational Waves from First-Order Phase Transition in a Simple Axion-Like Particle Model , JCAP 1911 (2019) 006, [arXiv:1905.00891]

  53. [53]

    F. P. Huang and E. Senaha, Enhanced Z boson decays as a new probe of first-order electroweak phase transition at future lepton colliders , Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 035014, [arXiv:1905.10283]

  54. [54]

    Bian, H.-K

    L. Bian, H.-K. Guo, Y. Wu, and R. Zhou, Gravitational wave and collider searches for electroweak symmetry breaking patterns, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 035011, [arXiv:1906.11664]

  55. [55]

    Mohamadnejad, Gravitational waves from scale-invariant vector dark matter model: Probing below the neutrino-floor , Eur

    A. Mohamadnejad, Gravitational waves from scale-invariant vector dark matter model: Probing below the neutrino-floor , Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020), no. 3 197, [ arXiv:1907.08899]

  56. [56]

    Kannike, K

    K. Kannike, K. Loos, and M. Raidal, Gravitational Wave Signals of Pseudo-Goldstone Dark – 47 – Matter in the Z3 Complex Singlet Model , Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 035001, [arXiv:1907.13136]

  57. [57]

    L. Bian, W. Cheng, H.-K. Guo, and Y. Zhang, Gravitational waves triggered by B− L charged hidden scalar and leptogenesis , arXiv:1907.13589

  58. [58]

    A. Paul, B. Banerjee, and D. Majumdar, Gravitational wave signatures from an extended inert doublet dark matter model , JCAP 1910 (2019) 062, [ arXiv:1908.00829]

  59. [59]

    Dunsky, L

    D. Dunsky, L. J. Hall, and K. Harigaya, Dark Matter, Dark Radiation and Gravitational Waves from Mirror Higgs Parity , JHEP 02 (2020) 078, [ arXiv:1908.02756]

  60. [60]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Balazs, A. Fowlie, G. Pozzo, G. White, and Y. Zhang, Strong first-order phase transitions in the NMSSM – a comprehensive survey , JHEP 11 (2019) 151, [arXiv:1908.11847]

  61. [61]

    L. Bian, Y. Wu, and K.-P. Xie, Electroweak phase transition with composite Higgs models: calculability, gravitational waves and collider searches , JHEP 12 (2019) 028, [arXiv:1909.02014]

  62. [62]

    Brdar, L

    V. Brdar, L. Graf, A. J. Helmboldt, and X.-J. Xu, Gravitational Waves as a Probe of Left-Right Symmetry Breaking, JCAP 1912 (2019) 027, [ arXiv:1909.02018]

  63. [63]

    X. Wang, F. P. Huang, and X. Zhang, Gravitational wave and collider signals in complex two-Higgs doublet model with dynamical CP-violation at finite temperature , Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 015015, [ arXiv:1909.02978]

  64. [64]

    Alves, D

    A. Alves, D. Gon¸ calves, T. Ghosh, H.-K. Guo, and K. Sinha, Di-Higgs Production in the 4b Channel and Gravitational Wave Complementarity , JHEP 03 (2020) 053, [arXiv:1909.05268]

  65. [65]

    De Curtis, L

    S. De Curtis, L. Delle Rose, and G. Panico, Composite Dynamics in the Early Universe , JHEP 12 (2019) 149, [ arXiv:1909.07894]

  66. [66]

    Addazi, A

    A. Addazi, A. Marcian` o, A. P. Morais, R. Pasechnik, R. Srivastava, and J. W. Valle, Gravitational footprints of massive neutrinos and lepton number breaking , Phys. Lett. B 807 (2020) 135577, [ arXiv:1909.09740]

  67. [67]

    Greljo, T

    A. Greljo, T. Opferkuch, and B. A. Stefanek, Gravitational Imprints of Flavor Hierarchies , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 171802, [ arXiv:1910.02014]

  68. [68]

    Archer-Smith, D

    P. Archer-Smith, D. Linthorne, and D. Stolarski, Gravitational Wave Signals from Multiple Hidden Sectors, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095016, [ arXiv:1910.02083]

  69. [69]

    Aoki and J

    M. Aoki and J. Kubo, Gravitational waves from chiral phase transition in a conformally extended standard model, JCAP 04 (2020) 001, [ arXiv:1910.05025]

  70. [70]

    E. Hall, T. Konstandin, R. McGehee, H. Murayama, and G. Servant, Baryogenesis From a Dark First-Order Phase Transition , JHEP 04 (2020) 042, [ arXiv:1910.08068]

  71. [71]

    Brdar, A

    V. Brdar, A. J. Helmboldt, and M. Lindner, Strong Supercooling as a Consequence of Renormalization Group Consistency, JHEP 12 (2019) 158, [ arXiv:1910.13460]

  72. [72]

    Haba and T

    N. Haba and T. Yamada, Gravitational waves from phase transition in minimal SUSY U(1)B−L model, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 075027, [ arXiv:1911.01292]

  73. [73]

    Carena, Z

    M. Carena, Z. Liu, and Y. Wang, Electroweak phase transition with spontaneous Z 2-breaking, JHEP 08 (2020) 107, [ arXiv:1911.10206]

  74. [74]

    E. Hall, T. Konstandin, R. McGehee, and H. Murayama, Asymmetric Matters from a Dark First-Order Phase Transition, arXiv:1911.12342

  75. [75]

    Heurtier and H

    L. Heurtier and H. Partouche, Spontaneous Freeze Out of Dark Matter From an Early Thermal Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 043527, [ arXiv:1912.02828]. – 48 –

  76. [76]

    M. J. Baker, J. Kopp, and A. J. Long, Filtered Dark Matter at a First Order Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 151102, [ arXiv:1912.02830]

  77. [77]

    Chway, T

    D. Chway, T. H. Jung, and C. S. Shin, Dark matter filtering-out effect during a first-order phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095019, [ arXiv:1912.04238]

  78. [78]

    Delle Rose, G

    L. Delle Rose, G. Panico, M. Redi, and A. Tesi, Gravitational Waves from Supercool Axions, JHEP 04 (2020) 025, [ arXiv:1912.06139]

  79. [79]

    Von Harling, A

    B. Von Harling, A. Pomarol, O. Pujol` as, and F. Rompineve, Peccei-Quinn Phase Transition at LIGO, JHEP 04 (2020) 195, [ arXiv:1912.07587]

  80. [80]

    Chiang and B.-Q

    C.-W. Chiang and B.-Q. Lu, First-order electroweak phase transition in a complex singlet model with Z3 symmetry, JHEP 07 (2020) 082, [ arXiv:1912.12634]

Showing first 80 references.