pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21787 · v1 · pith:6QEXNPVJnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🧬 q-bio.PE

Drivers of Transient Dynamics and Persistence in Dengue: Insights from Sensitivity and Stochastic Modeling

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 07:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE
keywords denguesensitivity analysisstochastic modelvector-host dynamicsvertical transmissionepidemic persistencewaning immunitySobol indices
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mosquito-to-human ratio and recovery rate top the sensitivity ranking in a dengue model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a stochastic model of dengue spread between people and mosquitoes that incorporates waning human immunity, outside introductions of the virus, and transmission from mother mosquitoes to their eggs. It applies sensitivity analysis to epidemic measures such as peak size and duration, then ranks how much each parameter affects those outcomes. The analysis shows that the number of mosquitoes per person and the speed at which infected people stop being infectious exert the strongest influence, stronger even than the rate of bites between people and mosquitoes. This ordering points toward control tactics that shield sick individuals from mosquitoes during outbreaks rather than blanket reductions in contacts. The model further indicates that vertical transmission helps the virus persist between seasons by lowering the threshold for long-term presence and by creating egg-based reservoirs that can restart outbreaks.

Core claim

The paper establishes that in its stochastic vector-host dengue model the vector-host population ratio and host recovery rate carry the largest first-order and total sensitivity indices for epidemic summary statistics, outranking contact rates and thereby directing seasonal control toward protecting infectious hosts from mosquito bites. Vertical transmission reduces the persistence threshold, low spatial coupling raises infectious endemic equilibria, and host-vector covariance at the endemic equilibrium remains asynchronous across the contact-rate plane, revealing two niches per strain and a fluctuation-driven mechanism for high vertical transmission that sustains viral reservoirs between .

What carries the argument

Multivariate Sobol sensitivity analysis performed on epidemic summary statistics generated by the stochastic vector-host model that includes waning immunity, exogenous infection, and vertical transmission.

If this is right

  • Seasonal control programs should emphasize measures that keep mosquitoes from biting people who already have dengue.
  • Vertical transmission from adult mosquitoes to eggs lowers the population threshold needed for the virus to remain endemic.
  • Reduced movement between human populations raises the number of infectious individuals at equilibrium.
  • Asynchronous host-vector fluctuations at equilibrium create separate niches that allow multiple strains to coexist and support viral persistence through egg reservoirs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sensitivity ordering could appear in models of other mosquito-borne viruses such as Zika or chikungunya that share the same vectors.
  • Collecting local data on mosquito densities and average recovery times might allow early prediction of which neighborhoods will see larger seasonal outbreaks.
  • Adding realistic urban movement patterns to the model could test whether the current ranking of controls still holds in densely connected cities.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen stochastic model with waning immunity, outside virus introductions, and vertical transmission faithfully represents the main processes that govern real dengue spread and persistence.

What would settle it

Field data showing no systematic link between measured mosquito-to-human ratios and observed dengue case counts or outbreak sizes across multiple sites would contradict the sensitivity ranking.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21787 by Cesar Alberto Rosales-Alcantar, Marcos A. Capistr\'an.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dengue transmission model with vertical transmission in vectors. The diagram shows a compartmental model of dengue transmission between humans and mosquitoes. Humans are divided into susceptible (Sh), infectious (Ih), and recovered (Rh) classes. Mosquitoes are divided into susceptible (Sv) and infectious (Iv) classes. Susceptible humans are infected at rate λh through bites from infectious mosquitoes. They… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mean first–order (S1, blue) and total–order (ST , orange) Sobol sensitivity indices of the dengue model parameters, averaged across outbreak summary statistics (peak incidence, area under the curve, stan￾dard deviation, and minimum incidence). The vector–to–host ratio C is the dominant parameter, exhibiting the largest total–order sensitivity index and indicating a strong influence that includes interactio… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: All simulations were conducted while holding the deterministic reproduction number fixed at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: First-order Sobol indices (S1) of dengue model parameters are shown for each outbreak statistic: maximum, minimum, standard deviation, and area under the curve (AUC) of human (Ih) and vector (Iv) infectious fractions. The vector-to-host ratio C strongly affects maxima and minima in both populations, while the human recovery rate γh dominates the variance and AUC of human infections. Vertical transmission p… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Basic reproduction number and variance of infectious classes at the endemic equilibrium as func [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Gillespie realizations of the dengue transmission model for two parameter pairs lying on the same [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate how key epidemiological parameters shape both seasonal epidemics and the persistence of dengue transmission. Our findings confirm known mechanistic drivers of epidemic variability and introduce a ranking of parameter importance in our dengue model, which in turn informs the prioritization of public health policies. We propose a stochastic vector-host model with waning immunity, exogenous infection, and vertical transmission. To assess parameter influence, we first qualitatively analyze the macroscopic model. We then perform a multivariate Sobol sensitivity analysis of epidemic summary statistics, and examine the variance of the endemic equilibrium as a function of model parameters. We show that the macroscopic model is well posed, vertical transmission lowers the threshold for persistence, and low spatial coupling increases infectious endemic equilibria. The vector-host population ratio and host recovery rate have the largest first-order and total sensitivity indices, surpassing the contact rates; this implies that control measures during seasonal dengue should prioritize protecting infectious hosts from mosquito bites. Finally, we show that the covariance of hosts and vectors at the endemic equilibrium is asynchronous in the contact-rate plane. This robust pattern has epidemiological, ecological and evolutive interpretations. A dengue strain has two niches to exploit during the endemic regime, and coexisting strain have two niches each. Moreover, large fluctuations in a given strain during the endemic regime provide a mechanistic explanation for high vertical transmission, enabling viral reservoirs that can hatch and trigger outbreaks in the following season. We argue that our model and results can be adapted to address specific public health questions to guide dengue control using field data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a stochastic vector-host model for dengue incorporating waning immunity, exogenous infection, and vertical transmission. It qualitatively analyzes the macroscopic model, conducts multivariate Sobol sensitivity analysis on epidemic summary statistics, and examines variance of the endemic equilibrium as a function of parameters. Key results include well-posedness of the macroscopic model, lowering of the persistence threshold by vertical transmission, increase in infectious endemic equilibria with low spatial coupling, dominance of vector-host population ratio and host recovery rate in first-order and total Sobol indices over contact rates (implying prioritization of protecting infectious hosts from mosquito bites for seasonal control), and asynchronous host-vector covariance at endemic equilibrium with interpretations for strain niches, coexistence, and vertical transmission as a reservoir mechanism.

Significance. If the sensitivity rankings prove robust and the mapping from parameter influence to intervention effect sizes is clarified, the work could usefully inform dengue control prioritization by elevating vector-host ratios and recovery rates relative to contact rates. The stochastic formulation, analysis of transient dynamics, and persistence thresholds add mechanistic insight beyond deterministic approaches. The covariance findings and niche interpretations provide ecological context that may aid understanding of strain persistence and outbreak triggers.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and sensitivity results] Abstract (policy implication paragraph): the claim that dominance of vector-host ratio and host recovery rate in Sobol indices implies control should prioritize protecting infectious hosts from mosquito bites is not supported by the presented analysis. Bite protection primarily modulates contact/transmission rates (shown to have lower indices), while recovery rate is a fixed biological parameter not directly altered by such interventions; no explicit mapping from sensitivity indices to intervention effect sizes or alternative control levers (e.g., on vector density) is provided to bridge this gap.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model description] Model formulation section: provide the full set of stochastic differential equations or transition rates, including explicit terms for waning immunity, exogenous infection, and vertical transmission, to support reproducibility and verification of the macroscopic analysis.
  2. [Sensitivity analysis] Sensitivity analysis section: specify the exact epidemic summary statistics used for Sobol indices, the sampling ranges for parameters, and any convergence diagnostics for the indices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript. We appreciate the referee's positive assessment of the stochastic modeling approach, sensitivity analysis, and potential implications for dengue control. We address the major comment on the abstract below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to ensure all claims are precisely supported by the analysis.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and sensitivity results] Abstract (policy implication paragraph): the claim that dominance of vector-host ratio and host recovery rate in Sobol indices implies control should prioritize protecting infectious hosts from mosquito bites is not supported by the presented analysis. Bite protection primarily modulates contact/transmission rates (shown to have lower indices), while recovery rate is a fixed biological parameter not directly altered by such interventions; no explicit mapping from sensitivity indices to intervention effect sizes or alternative control levers (e.g., on vector density) is provided to bridge this gap.

    Authors: We agree that the original phrasing in the abstract draws an implication that is not directly supported by the presented results. The Sobol analysis shows high sensitivity for the vector-host ratio (suggesting leverage through vector density reduction) and host recovery rate, but bite protection interventions would indeed act primarily through contact or transmission rates, which rank lower. Recovery rate is a fixed biological parameter not explicitly tied to modeled interventions. No quantitative mapping from indices to effect sizes was performed. In the revised version, we will remove the specific claim about prioritizing protection of infectious hosts from mosquito bites. The abstract will instead report the sensitivity rankings and note that the vector-host ratio's prominence may inform vector control strategies, while clarifying that direct links to intervention effect sizes require additional analysis beyond the current scope. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; sensitivity rankings are computed outputs

full rationale

The paper proposes an explicit stochastic vector-host model with waning immunity, exogenous infection and vertical transmission, then applies qualitative macroscopic analysis followed by multivariate Sobol sensitivity on epidemic summary statistics and endemic-equilibrium variance. The reported ranking (vector-host ratio and recovery rate dominating contact rates) is produced by these numerical procedures on the chosen parameter set and is not equivalent to any model input by construction. No self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The control implication is an interpretive step downstream of the computed indices rather than a tautological reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract does not list explicit free parameters or axioms, but the model construction itself rests on standard compartmental assumptions plus the addition of waning immunity, vertical transmission, and exogenous infection; without the full text these cannot be audited.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5806 in / 1123 out tokens · 25888 ms · 2026-05-22T07:21:13.854508+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    K. Dietz. Transmission and control of arbovirus diseases. In D. Ludwig and K. L. Cooke, editors, Epidemiology. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1975. Proceedings of a SIMS Conference on Epidemiology, Alta, Utah, 1974

  2. [2]

    Some a priori pathometric equations

    Ronald Ross. Some a priori pathometric equations. British medical journal, 1(2830):546, 1915

  3. [3]

    An application of the theory of probabilities to the study of a priori pathometry.—part i

    Ronald Ross. An application of the theory of probabilities to the study of a priori pathometry.—part i. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing papers of a mathematical and physical character, 92(638):204–230, 1916

  4. [4]

    The analysis of equilibrium in malaria

    George Macdonald. The analysis of equilibrium in malaria. Tropical diseases bulletin, 49(9):813–829, 1952

  5. [5]

    The epidemiology and control of malaria

    George Macdonald et al. The epidemiology and control of malaria. The Epidemiology and Control of Malaria., 1957

  6. [6]

    Analysis of a dengue disease transmission model

    Lourdes Esteva and Cristobal Vargas. Analysis of a dengue disease transmission model. Mathematical biosciences, 150(2):131–151, 1998

  7. [7]

    How important is vertical transmission in mosquitoes for the persistence of dengue? insights from a mathematical model

    Ben Adams and Michael Boots. How important is vertical transmission in mosquitoes for the persistence of dengue? insights from a mathematical model. Epidemics, 2(1):1–10, 2010

  8. [8]

    Stochasticity and heterogeneity in host–vector models

    Alun L Lloyd, Ji Zhang, and A Morgan Root. Stochasticity and heterogeneity in host–vector models. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 4(16):851–863, 2007

  9. [9]

    The effects of weather and climate change on dengue

    Felipe J Col´ on-Gonz´ alez, Carlo Fezzi, Iain R Lake, and Paul R Hunter. The effects of weather and climate change on dengue. PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 7(11):e2503, 2013

  10. [10]

    Stochastic amplification in epidemics

    David Alonso, Alan J McKane, and Mercedes Pascual. Stochastic amplification in epidemics. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(14):575–582, 2007

  11. [11]

    Transmission of four serotypes of dengue virus in several asian countries literature review

    Nismawati Natsir, A Arsunan Arsin, Hasanuddin Ishak, Ilham Alimuddin, Masni Masni, Muham- mad Nasrun Massi, and Anwar Mallongi. Transmission of four serotypes of dengue virus in several asian countries literature review. Pharmacognosy Journal, 15(6s), 2023

  12. [12]

    Ross, macdonald, and a theory for the dynamics and control of mosquito-transmitted pathogens

    David L Smith, Katherine E Battle, Simon I Hay, Christopher M Barker, Thomas W Scott, and F El- lis McKenzie. Ross, macdonald, and a theory for the dynamics and control of mosquito-transmitted pathogens. PLoS pathogens, 8(4):e1002588, 2012

  13. [13]

    Recasting the theory of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission dynamics and control

    David L Smith, T Alex Perkins, Robert C Reiner, Christopher M Barker, Tianchan Niu, Luis Fernando Chaves, Alicia M Ellis, Dylan B George, Arnaud Le Menach, Juliet RC Pulliam, et al. Recasting the theory of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission dynamics and control. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 108(4):185–197, 2014

  14. [14]

    Blyuss, Carlo Delfin S

    Ma´ ıra Aguiar, Anam Vizda, Konstantin B. Blyuss, Carlo Delfin S. Estadilla, Bruno V. Guerrero, Dami´ an Knopoff, Bob W. Kooi, Akhil Kumar Srivastav, Vanessa Steindorf, and Nico Stollenwerk. Mathemat- ical models for dengue fever epidemiology: A 10-year systematic review. Mathematical Biosciences, 351:108933, 2022

  15. [15]

    Density of aedes aegypti and dengue virus trans- mission risk in two municipalities of northwestern antioquia, colombia

    Wilber G´ omez-Vargas, Paola Astrid R´ ıos-Tapias, Katerine Marin-Vel´ asquez, Erika Giraldo-Gallo, ´Angela Segura-Cardona, and Margarita Arboleda. Density of aedes aegypti and dengue virus trans- mission risk in two municipalities of northwestern antioquia, colombia. PLoS ONE, 19(1):e0295317, 2024

  16. [16]

    Mathematical modeling of dengue virus serotypes prop- agation in mexico

    Gilberto S´ anchez-Gonz´ alez and Renaud Cond´ e. Mathematical modeling of dengue virus serotypes prop- agation in mexico. Plos one, 18(7):e0288392, 2023. 19

  17. [17]

    Significance of vertical transmission of arboviruses in mosquito-borne disease epidemiology

    Oliver Chinonso Mbaoma, Stephanie Margarete Thomas, and Carl Beierkuhnlein. Significance of vertical transmission of arboviruses in mosquito-borne disease epidemiology. Parasites & vectors, 18(1):137, 2025

  18. [18]

    Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission

    Pauline Van den Driessche and James Watmough. Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. Mathematical biosciences, 180(1-2):29–48, 2002

  19. [19]

    A brief history of r 0 and a recipe for its calculation

    Johan Andre Peter Heesterbeek. A brief history of r 0 and a recipe for its calculation. Acta biotheoretica, 50(3):189–204, 2002

  20. [20]

    Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output

    Andrea Saltelli, Paola Annoni, Ivano Azzini, Francesca Campolongo, Marco Ratto, and Stefano Taran- tola. Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Computer physics communications, 181(2):259–270, 2010

  21. [21]

    Herman and W

    J. Herman and W. Usher. Salib: An open-source python library for sensitivity analysis., 2017. MISC

  22. [22]

    An effective rate equation approach to reaction kinetics in small volumes: Theory and application to biochemical reactions in nonequilibrium steady-state conditions

    R Grima. An effective rate equation approach to reaction kinetics in small volumes: Theory and application to biochemical reactions in nonequilibrium steady-state conditions. The Journal of chemical physics, 133(3):035101, 2010

  23. [23]

    Intrinsic noise analyzer: a software package for the exploration of stochastic biochemical kinetics using the system size expansion.PloS one, 7(6):e38518, 2012

    Philipp Thomas, Hannes Matuschek, and Ramon Grima. Intrinsic noise analyzer: a software package for the exploration of stochastic biochemical kinetics using the system size expansion.PloS one, 7(6):e38518, 2012

  24. [24]

    Bayesian inference of biochemical kinetic parameters using the linear noise approximation

    Micha l Komorowski, B¨ arbel Finkenst¨ adt, Claire V Harper, and David A Rand. Bayesian inference of biochemical kinetic parameters using the linear noise approximation. BMC bioinformatics, 10(1):343, 2009

  25. [25]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2019

    Simo S¨ arkk¨ a and Arno Solin.Applied Stochastic Differential Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2019

  26. [26]

    Redefining dengue surveillance: Revolutionizing dengue control with efficient adult mosquito traps

    Sivagnaname Narayanasame, Iyyappan Velan, and Vetrivel Baskar. Redefining dengue surveillance: Revolutionizing dengue control with efficient adult mosquito traps. J Vector Borne Dis, 2025. Online ahead of print, December 24, 2025

  27. [27]

    Multicountry study of aedes aegypti pupal productivity survey methodology: findings and recommendations

    Dana A Focks, Neal Alexander, Elci Villegas, World Health Organization, et al. Multicountry study of aedes aegypti pupal productivity survey methodology: findings and recommendations. Technical report, World Health Organization, 2006

  28. [28]

    A global assembly of adult female mosquito mark-release-recapture data to inform the control of mosquito-borne pathogens

    Carlos A Guerra, Robert C Reiner Jr, T Alex Perkins, Steve W Lindsay, Janet T Midega, Oliver J Brady, Christopher M Barker, William K Reisen, Laura C Harrington, Willem Takken, et al. A global assembly of adult female mosquito mark-release-recapture data to inform the control of mosquito-borne pathogens. Parasites & vectors, 7(1):276, 2014

  29. [29]

    The time series seasonal patterns of dengue fever and associated weather variables in bangkok (2003-2017)

    Sittisede Polwiang. The time series seasonal patterns of dengue fever and associated weather variables in bangkok (2003-2017). BMC infectious diseases, 20(1):208, 2020

  30. [30]

    Bayesian spatial and spatio-temporal approaches to modelling dengue fever: a systematic review

    Aswi Aswi, SM Cramb, Paula Moraga, and Kerrie Mengersen. Bayesian spatial and spatio-temporal approaches to modelling dengue fever: a systematic review. Epidemiology & Infection, 147:e33, 2019. 20