pith. sign in

arxiv: 2408.07255 · v2 · pith:AAVRRM6Dnew · submitted 2024-08-14 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· nucl-ex· nucl-th

Dihadron azimuthal asymmetry and light-quark dipole moments at the Electron-Ion Collider

Xin-Kai Wen , Bin Yan , Zhite Yu , C.-P. Yuan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 22:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exnucl-exnucl-th
keywords dihadron azimuthal asymmetrylight-quark dipole momentsElectron-Ion Collidersemi-inclusive deep inelastic scatteringCP violationnew physics operatorstransverse quark polarization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Azimuthal asymmetries between collinear hadron pairs in unpolarized semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering at the EIC arise linearly from light-quark dipole moments through interference with Standard Model amplitudes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a method to extract light-quark electric and magnetic dipole moments by measuring azimuthal asymmetries in dihadron production during lepton scattering off unpolarized protons at the Electron-Ion Collider. These asymmetries appear only because the dipole operators interfere with Standard Model processes, producing a signal that scales directly with the dipole couplings rather than quadratically. The approach is presented as capable of strengthening existing limits on the operators by roughly a factor of ten while remaining uncontaminated by other new-physics contributions and while determining both the real and imaginary parts of the couplings at the same time.

Core claim

In semi-inclusive deep inelastic lepton scattering off an unpolarized proton, the azimuthal asymmetry between a pair of collinear hadrons is generated exclusively by the interference between light-quark dipole operators and Standard Model amplitudes; the resulting asymmetry is therefore linear in the dipole couplings, permitting both an order-of-magnitude improvement in constraints and the simultaneous extraction of real and imaginary parts.

What carries the argument

Dihadron azimuthal asymmetry generated by dipole-Standard Model interference in unpolarized semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering

If this is right

  • Existing limits on light-quark dipole operators can be strengthened by an order of magnitude.
  • The extracted signals remain free of contamination from other new-physics operators.
  • Both real and imaginary parts of the dipole couplings can be determined in the same measurement.
  • Potential CP-violating effects can be probed through the imaginary parts at collider energies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A nonzero imaginary part would constitute direct evidence of CP violation in the light-quark sector at high scales.
  • The same data set could be reanalyzed with different hadron species to cross-check the flavor structure of any observed dipole moments.
  • If the linear dependence holds, even dipole moments well below current bounds could become visible once EIC luminosity reaches design values.

Load-bearing premise

The observed azimuthal asymmetries come only from dipole-Standard Model interference and depend linearly on the dipole couplings, with all other operators and higher-order effects negligible.

What would settle it

If the measured azimuthal asymmetries either fail to vanish when dipole couplings are set to zero in Monte Carlo simulations or deviate from the predicted linear dependence on the real and imaginary parts of the couplings, the central claim would be ruled out.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2408.07255 by Bin Yan, C.-P. Yuan, Xin-Kai Wen, Zhite Yu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. LO kinematic configuration of the dihadron produc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Expected constraints on the real and imaginary parts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose a novel method to probe light-quark dipole moments by examining the azimuthal asymmetries between a collinear pair of hadrons in semi-inclusive deep inelastic lepton scattering off an unpolarized proton target at the Electron-Ion Collider. These asymmetries provide a means to observe transversely polarized quarks, which arise exclusively from the interference between the dipole and the Standard Model interactions, thereby depending linearly on the dipole couplings. We demonstrate that this novel approach can enhance current constraints on light-quark dipole operators by an order of magnitude, free from contamination of other new physics effects. Furthermore, it allows for a simultaneous determination of both the real and imaginary parts of the dipole couplings, offering a new avenue for investigating potential $CP$-violating effects at high energies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a novel method to constrain light-quark dipole moments via azimuthal asymmetries in dihadron production within semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering off an unpolarized proton at the Electron-Ion Collider. The asymmetries are argued to originate exclusively from dipole-Standard Model interference, yielding linear dependence on the dipole couplings. This enables an order-of-magnitude improvement over existing bounds without contamination from other new-physics operators and permits simultaneous extraction of the real and imaginary parts of the couplings, including potential CP-violating effects.

Significance. If the exclusivity of the interference term and the linearity are established by the explicit cross-section calculation, the result would constitute a meaningful advance in effective-field-theory phenomenology at the EIC. It supplies a clean, high-energy probe for dimension-six dipole operators on light quarks and opens access to imaginary parts that are otherwise difficult to isolate, thereby strengthening the physics case for precision dihadron measurements.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that the method is 'free from contamination of other new physics effects' is presented without a forward reference to the section or equation where the vanishing of other operator contributions is shown; adding such a pointer would improve readability.
  2. The kinematic cuts and background estimates mentioned in the abstract as part of the sensitivity study should be summarized with explicit numerical values or ranges in the main text to allow direct comparison with existing EIC projections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our work and for recommending minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives azimuthal asymmetries from the interference between dipole operators and SM interactions, yielding linear dependence on the couplings by explicit construction in the amplitude. This structure is presented as following from the operator interference (abstract and weakest-assumption section), not from fitting the observable to itself or renaming a fitted parameter as a prediction. No self-citation chain, uniqueness theorem, or ansatz smuggling is invoked to close the central claim; the order-of-magnitude enhancement and Re/Im extraction rest on the stated exclusivity of the interference term, which is an external assumption rather than an internal reduction. The derivation therefore remains independent of its own fitted outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of collinear factorization in SIDIS and the effective-field-theory description of dipole operators; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Azimuthal asymmetries arise exclusively from dipole-SM interference and depend linearly on the dipole couplings.
    This premise is required for the claimed cleanliness and order-of-magnitude improvement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5670 in / 1229 out tokens · 21146 ms · 2026-05-23T22:08:00.889646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nucleon Energy Correlators as a Probe of Light-Quark Dipole Operators at the Electron-Ion Collider

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Nucleon energy correlators access linear effects from light-quark dipole operators via azimuthal asymmetries in the target fragmentation region at the EIC.

  2. On Exclusive Coherent Production of Bosons in Electron-Proton Collisions

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A phenomenological 2-to-3 framework is constructed for exclusive boson electroproduction that matches flux-factorized predictions near Q^{2}=0 while capturing finite-Q^{2} effects at larger virtualities.

  3. Braking protons at the EIC: from invisible meson decay to new physics searches

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The EIC can probe invisible pseudoscalar meson decays down to branching ratios of 10^{-8} and invisibly decaying ALPs with couplings up to 10^5 GeV for masses 0.1-2 GeV.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment and the Fine Structure Constant

    D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell, and G. Gabrielse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120801 (2008), 0801.1134

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  2. [2]

    D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g-2), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161802 (2023), 2308.06230

    work page arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Study of Tau-pair Production in Photon-Photon Collisions at LEP and Limits on the Anomalous Electromagnetic Moments of the Tau Lepton

    J. Abdallah et al. (DELPHI), Eur. Phys. J. C 35, 159 (2004), hep-ex/0406010

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    Search for the Electric Dipole Moment of the tau Lepton

    K. Inami et al. (Belle), Phys. Lett. B 551, 16 (2003), hep-ex/0210066

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  5. [5]

    D. Y. Shao, B. Yan, S.-R. Yuan, and C. Zhang (2023), 2310.14153

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Buchmuller and D

    W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B 268, 621 (1986)

    work page 1986

  7. [7]

    Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

    B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, JHEP 10, 085 (2010), 1008.4884

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    X. Li, B. Yan, and C. P. Yuan (2024), 2405.04069

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Anomalous Higgs couplings in angular asymmetries of H --> Zl+l- and e+e- --> HZ

    M. Beneke, D. Boito, and Y.-M. Wang, JHEP 11, 028 (2014), 1406.1361

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  10. [10]

    Beyond Higgs Couplings: Probing the Higgs with Angular Observables at Future $e^+ e^-$ Colliders

    N. Craig, J. Gu, Z. Liu, and K. Wang, JHEP 03, 050 (2016), 1512.06877

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  11. [11]

    Probing New Physics Scales from Higgs and Electroweak Observables at $e^+ e^-$ Higgs Factory

    S.-F. Ge, H.-J. He, and R.-Q. Xiao, JHEP 10, 007 (2016), 1603.03385

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  12. [12]

    Constraining Higgs boson effective couplings at electron-positron colliders

    H. Khanpour and M. Mohammadi Najafabadi, Phys. Rev. D 95, 055026 (2017), 1702.00951

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  13. [13]

    W. H. Chiu, S. C. Leung, T. Liu, K.-F. Lyu, and L.-T. Wang, JHEP 05, 081 (2018), 1711.04046

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    The leptonic future of the Higgs

    G. Durieux, C. Grojean, J. Gu, and K. Wang, JHEP 09, 014 (2017), 1704.02333

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  15. [15]

    Improved Formalism for Precision Higgs Coupling Fits

    T. Barklow, K. Fujii, S. Jung, R. Karl, J. List, T. Ogawa, M. E. Peskin, and J. Tian, Phys. Rev. D 97, 053003 (2018), 1708.08912

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Li, C.-D

    H.-D. Li, C.-D. L¨ u, and L.-Y. Shan, Chin. Phys. C 43, 103001 (2019), 1901.10218

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    K. Rao, S. D. Rindani, and P. Sarmah, Nucl. Phys. B 950, 114840 (2020), 1904.06663

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Yan, Phys

    B. Yan, Phys. Lett. B 822, 136709 (2021), 2105.04530

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    X.-K. Wen, B. Yan, Z. Yu, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 241801 (2023), 2307.05236

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Boughezal, D

    R. Boughezal, D. de Florian, F. Petriello, and W. Vogel- sang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 075028 (2023), 2301.02304

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Wang, X.-K

    H.-L. Wang, X.-K. Wen, H. Xing, and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. D 109, 095025 (2024), 2401.08419

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Al Ali et al., Rept

    H. Al Ali et al., Rept. Prog. Phys. 85, 084201 (2022), 2103.14043

    work page arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    Accettura et al., Eur

    C. Accettura et al. (2023), 2303.08533

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    M. B. Hecht, C. D. Roberts, and S. M. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. C 64, 025204 (2001), nucl-th/0101058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  25. [25]

    Nucleon tensor charges and electric dipole moments

    M. Pitschmann, C.-Y. Seng, C. D. Roberts, and S. M. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 91, 074004 (2015), 1411.2052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    T. Liu, Z. Zhao, and H. Gao, Phys. Rev. D 97, 074018 (2018), 1704.00113

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Tiesinga, P

    E. Tiesinga, P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025010 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Schneider et al., Science 358, 1081 (2017)

    G. Schneider et al., Science 358, 1081 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    B. K. Sahoo, Phys. Rev. D 95, 013002 (2017), 1612.09371

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    Abel et al., Phys

    C. Abel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 081803 (2020), 2001.11966

    work page arXiv 2020

  32. [32]

    Reduced Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of $^{199}$Hg

    B. Graner, Y. Chen, E. G. Lindahl, and B. R. Heckel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 161601 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 119, 119901 (2017)], 1601.04339

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Neutron Electric Dipole Moment from Beyond the Standard Model

    T. Bhattacharya, V. Cirigliano, and R. Gupta, PoS LA TTICE2012, 179 (2012), 1212.4918

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  34. [34]

    Mena and L

    C. Mena and L. F. Palhares, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094006 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Kawaguchi and M

    M. Kawaguchi and M. Huang, Chin. Phys. C 47, 064103 6 (2023), 2205.08169

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    P. J. A. Bicudo, J. E. F. T. Ribeiro, and R. Fernandes, Phys. Rev. C 59, 1107 (1999), hep-ph/9806243

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  37. [37]

    G. L. Kane, G. A. Ladinsky, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 45, 124 (1992)

    work page 1992

  38. [38]

    Yu and C

    Z. Yu and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 112001 (2022), 2110.11539

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    J. C. Collins, S. F. Heppelmann, and G. A. Ladinsky, Nucl. Phys. B 420, 565 (1994), hep-ph/9305309

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  40. [40]

    Measuring transverse spin correlations by 4-particle correlations in $e^+ e^-\to 2 \ {\rm jets}$

    X. Artru and J. C. Collins, Z. Phys. C 69, 277 (1996), hep-ph/9504220

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    R. L. Jaffe, X.-m. Jin, and J. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1166 (1998), hep-ph/9709322

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  42. [42]

    R. L. Jaffe, X.-m. Jin, and J.-a. Tang, Phys. Rev. D 57, 5920 (1998), hep-ph/9710561

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  43. [43]

    Two-hadron interference fragmentation functions. Part I: general framework

    A. Bianconi, S. Boffi, R. Jakob, and M. Radici, Phys. Rev. D 62, 034008 (2000), hep-ph/9907475

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  44. [44]

    Two-hadron interference fragmentation functions. Part II: a model calculation

    A. Bianconi, S. Boffi, R. Jakob, and M. Radici, Phys. Rev. D 62, 034009 (2000), hep-ph/9907488

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  45. [45]

    Transverse Polarisation of Quarks in Hadrons

    V. Barone, A. Drago, and P. G. Ratcliffe, Phys. Rept. 359, 1 (2002), hep-ph/0104283

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  46. [46]

    Two-hadron semi-inclusive production including subleading twist

    A. Bacchetta and M. Radici, Phys. Rev. D 69, 074026 (2004), hep-ph/0311173

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  47. [47]

    Asymmetries involving dihadron fragmentation functions: from DIS to e+e- annihilation

    A. Bacchetta, F. A. Ceccopieri, A. Mukherjee, and M. Radici, Phys. Rev. D 79, 034029 (2009), 0812.0611

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  48. [48]

    Parton Fragmentation Functions

    A. Metz and A. Vossen, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 91, 136 (2016), 1607.02521

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  49. [49]

    Evidence for a Transverse Single-Spin Asymmetry in Leptoproduction of pi+pi- Pairs

    A. Airapetian et al. (HERMES), JHEP 06, 017 (2008), 0803.2367

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  50. [50]

    Invariant-mass and fractional-energy dependence of inclusive production of di-hadrons in $e^+e^-$ annihilation at $\sqrt{s}=$ 10.58 GeV

    R. Seidl et al. (Belle), Phys. Rev. D 96, 032005 (2017), 1706.08348

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Transverse spin-dependent azimuthal correlations of charged pion pairs measured in p$^\uparrow$+p collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 500 GeV

    L. Adamczyk et al. (STAR), Phys. Lett. B 780, 332 (2018), 1710.10215

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    G. D. Alexeev et al. (COMPASS), Phys. Lett. B 845, 138155 (2023), 2301.02013

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Single-spin asymmetries: the Trento conventions

    A. Bacchetta, U. D’Alesio, M. Diehl, and C. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 70, 117504 (2004), hep-ph/0410050

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  54. [54]

    Cocuzza, A

    C. Cocuzza, A. Metz, D. Pitonyak, A. Prokudin, N. Sato, and R. Seidl (Jefferson Lab Angular Momentum (JAM)), Phys. Rev. D 109, 034024 (2024), 2308.14857

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Z. Yu, K. A. Mohan, and C. P. Yuan (2022), 2211.00845

    work page arXiv 2022

  56. [56]

    First glances at the transversity parton distribution through dihadron fragmentation functions

    A. Bacchetta, A. Courtoy, and M. Radici, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 012001 (2011), 1104.3855

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [57]

    First Extraction of Transversity from a Global Analysis of Electron-Proton and Proton-Proton Data

    M. Radici and A. Bacchetta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 192001 (2018), 1802.05212

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Pitonyak, C

    D. Pitonyak, C. Cocuzza, A. Metz, A. Prokudin, and N. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 011902 (2024), 2305.11995

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Cocuzza, A

    C. Cocuzza, A. Metz, D. Pitonyak, A. Prokudin, N. Sato, and R. Seidl (JAM), Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 091901 (2024), 2306.12998

    work page arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Yu, Ph.D

    Z. Yu, Ph.D. thesis (2023), 2308.13080

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    B. Yan, Z. Yu, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B822, 136697 (2021), 2107.02134

    work page arXiv 2021

  62. [62]

    Electron Ion Collider: The Next QCD Frontier - Understanding the glue that binds us all

    A. Accardi et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 268 (2016), 1212.1701

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Boughezal, A

    R. Boughezal, A. Emmert, T. Kutz, S. Mantry, M. Nycz, F. Petriello, K. S ¸im¸ sek, D. Wiegand, and X. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 106, 016006 (2022), 2204.07557

    work page arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report

    R. Abdul Khalek et al., Nucl. Phys. A 1026, 122447 (2022), 2103.05419

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    Boughezal, E

    R. Boughezal, E. Mereghetti, and F. Petriello, Phys. Rev. D 104, 095022 (2021), 2106.05337

    work page arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    Constraints on Fermion Magnetic and Electric Moments from LEP-I

    R. Escribano and E. Masso, Nucl. Phys. B 429, 19 (1994), hep-ph/9403304

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  67. [67]

    NLO QCD corrections to SM-EFT dilepton and electroweak Higgs boson production, matched to parton shower in POWHEG

    S. Alioli, W. Dekens, M. Girard, and E. Mereghetti, JHEP 08, 205 (2018), 1804.07407

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  68. [68]

    da Silva Almeida, N

    E. da Silva Almeida, N. Rosa-Agostinho, O. J. P. ´Eboli, and M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. D 100, 013003 (2019), 1905.05187

    work page arXiv 2019

  69. [69]

    Abdul Khalek et al

    R. Abdul Khalek et al. (2022), 2203.13199

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    Boughezal, F

    R. Boughezal, F. Petriello, and D. Wiegand, Phys. Rev. D 101, 116002 (2020), 2004.00748

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    H. T. Li, B. Yan, and C. P. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137300 (2022), 2112.07747

    work page arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    Yan, Phys

    B. Yan, Phys. Lett. B 833, 137384 (2022), 2203.01510

    work page arXiv 2022

  73. [73]

    Davoudiasl, R

    H. Davoudiasl, R. Marcarelli, and E. T. Neil, JHEP 02, 071 (2023), 2112.04513

    work page arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    Liu and B

    Y. Liu and B. Yan, Chin. Phys. C 47, 043113 (2023), 2112.02477

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Batell, T

    B. Batell, T. Ghosh, T. Han, and K. Xie, JHEP 03, 020 (2023), 2210.09287

    work page arXiv 2023

  76. [76]

    Davoudiasl, R

    H. Davoudiasl, R. Marcarelli, and E. T. Neil (2023), 2307.00102

    work page arXiv 2023

  77. [77]

    Cirigliano, K

    V. Cirigliano, K. Fuyuto, C. Lee, E. Mereghetti, and B. Yan, JHEP 03, 256 (2021), 2102.06176

    work page arXiv 2021

  78. [78]

    J. L. Zhang et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1053, 168276 (2023), 2207.10261

    work page arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Electron-to-Tau Lepton Flavor Violation at the Electron-Ion Collider

    M. Gonderinger and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, JHEP 11, 045 (2010), [Erratum: JHEP 05, 047 (2012)], 1006.5063

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  80. [80]

    Balkin, O

    R. Balkin, O. Hen, W. Li, H. Liu, T. Ma, Y. Soreq, and M. Williams (2023), 2310.08827

    work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.