REVIEW 3 cited by
Extreme magnification of a star at redshift 1.5 by a galaxy-cluster lens
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Galaxy-cluster gravitational lenses can magnify background galaxies by a total factor of up to ~50. Here we report an image of an individual star at redshift z=1.49 (dubbed "MACS J1149 Lensed Star 1 (LS1)") magnified by >2000. A separate image, detected briefly 0.26 arcseconds from LS1, is likely a counterimage of the first star demagnified for multiple years by a >~3 solar-mass object in the cluster. For reasonable assumptions about the lensing system, microlensing fluctuations in the stars' light curves can yield evidence about the mass function of intracluster stars and compact objects, including binary fractions and specific stellar evolution and supernova models. Dark-matter subhalos or massive compact objects may help to account for the two images' long-term brightness ratio.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
TDEs on FIRE: Illuminating the Cosmic Evolution of Tidal Disruption Rates
FIRE-2 simulations show per-galaxy tidal disruption rates peak near z=2.5 at 4e-4 per year, correlate with SFR and central density, and remain high in satellite galaxies at early times.
-
Periodic Gravitational Lensing with Oscillating Boson Stars
Oscillating boson stars should produce periodic gravitational lensing: phase-locked photometric spikes and astrometric wobbles as a radial caustic pulses.
-
Wide binaries in ultra-faint dwarf galaxies as a probe of extended dark objects
Wide binaries in Boötes I exclude dark-matter fractions down to ~10^-3 to 10^-2 for extended dark objects between 0.1 and 3000 solar masses with radii up to 10^7 solar radii, implying P_R ≲ 5×10^-6 at k ≈ 4×10^2-3×10^...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.