Semantic Grounding of Digital Twin Metamodels Using RDF Graphs

Cedric Pruski; Faima Abbasi; Jean-S\'ebastien Sottet

arxiv: 2512.15281 · v2 · pith:DFKSSDO5new · submitted 2025-12-17 · 💻 cs.SE

Semantic Grounding of Digital Twin Metamodels Using RDF Graphs

Faima Abbasi , Jean-S\'ebastien Sottet , Cedric Pruski This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 16:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.SE

keywords Digital TwinsRDF GraphsOntology AlignmentMetamodelsSemantic EmbeddingsLLM ReasoningSemantic ConsistencyInteroperability

0 comments

The pith

Graph-based alignment with embeddings and LLM reasoning maps digital twin metamodels to ontologies while preserving semantic consistency.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes a semantic grounding pipeline for multi-layered digital twins to resolve heterogeneity between abstraction layers. The approach organizes layers in a flexible modeling framework, lifts the metamodel to an RDF graph, and aligns it with an ontology using the SSM-OM method that integrates semantic embeddings, lexical similarity, and LLM reasoning. Validation via RDF tests, a digital twin case study, and OAEI benchmarks confirms accurate correspondences, interoperability, and cross-layer traceability. Readers should care because it replaces inflexible static mappings with a dynamic, validated process that keeps digital twins accurate reflections of their physical counterparts.

Core claim

The central discovery is that lifting DT metamodels to RDF graphs and applying SSM-OM alignment, which uses semantic embeddings, lexical similarity, and large language model reasoning, accurately establishes and validates correspondences with ontologies, thereby ensuring semantic consistency in multi-layered digital twins as evidenced by the RDF tests, use case, and benchmark results.

What carries the argument

SSM-OM, a graph-based alignment approach that combines semantic embeddings, lexical similarity, and LLM reasoning to establish and validate correspondences between the lifted metamodel RDF graph and the ontology.

If this is right

Consistent interoperability is maintained across different layers of abstraction in digital twins.
Semantic mismatches are detected and resolved automatically, avoiding inconsistencies.
Cross-layer traceability supports dynamic updates between the digital and actual twin.
The approach shows strong performance on OAEI benchmarks, indicating reliability for alignment tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Industrial applications of digital twins could see reduced development time by automating semantic alignment.
Future work might integrate this with real-time data streams for adaptive modeling.
Similar techniques could apply to other multi-model systems in engineering domains.

Load-bearing premise

That semantic embeddings combined with lexical similarity and LLM reasoning will reliably detect and resolve semantic mismatches without introducing new inconsistencies or requiring extensive manual validation.

What would settle it

Observing incorrect alignments in the DT use case that cause synchronization failures between the metamodel and ontology, or poor results on OAEI benchmark datasets.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2512.15281 by Cedric Pruski, Faima Abbasi, Jean-S\'ebastien Sottet.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Indoor Air Quality Exemplar Metamodel Definition 1. Given set of heterogeneous models in a multi-layered, modeldriven DT and data sources from the physical system. Each model is defined by an instance at the model layer, an entity at the metamodel layer, and a concept at the ontology layer. The model layer connects directly to real data values from the physical system. Our goal is to align metamodel entit… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Illustration of SSM-OM Listing 1.4. Metamodel Semantic Reference function setSemanticReferences(modelElements, semanticMappings) { modelElements.forEach(element => { const name = element.__name; const mapping = semanticMappings[name]; if (mapping && mapping.ontology_uri) { element.setSemanticReference(mapping.ontology_uri); console.log("Semantic reference set for ${name} -> ${ mapping.ontology_uri}"); } })… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Digital Twins (DTs) represent digital counterparts of physical systems, assets, or processes, referred to as the actual twin (AT). DTs integrate heterogeneous data, models, and semantic technologies to support monitoring, simulation, prediction, and optimization, enabling informed decision-making while maintaining a dynamic and accurate reflection of the AT. A key challenge is aligning heterogeneous models, which can cause semantic mismatches, inconsistencies, and synchronization issues. Existing approaches relying on static mappings and manual updates are often inflexible and error-prone. In this study, we address heterogeneity challenge in multi-layered DT, by introducing semantic grounding pipeline for multi-layered DTs that enables consistent and reliable interoperability between abstraction layers. We make three contributions. First, we design and implement multi-layered DT using flexible modelling framework, to organize data, model and metamodel layers. Second, we semantically lift DT metamodel to RDF graph for unified representation. Finally, we present a graph-based alignment approach (SSM-OM), which leverages semantic embeddings, lexical similarity, and large language model (LLM) reasoning to accurately establish and validate correspondences between the lifted metamodel and ontology. We validate correctness, interoperability, cross-layer traceability, domain applicability and general empirical performance through RDF tests, a DT usecase, and ontology alignment evaluation initiative (OAEI) benchmarks, demonstrating semantic consistency in multi-layered DT.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a concrete pipeline for lifting DT metamodels to RDF and aligning them with a hybrid embedding-lexical-LLM method, but the LLM step has no visible checks against introduced inconsistencies.

read the letter

The core contribution is a three-step pipeline for multi-layered digital twins: build the layers with a flexible modeling framework, lift the metamodel to an RDF graph, and run SSM-OM to align it with an ontology using embeddings, lexical similarity, and LLM reasoning. They test this on RDF consistency checks, one DT use case, and OAEI benchmarks. That combination is a straightforward extension of existing semantic tech to the DT setting, and the paper does a decent job spelling out the interoperability and traceability goals that matter in practice for monitoring and optimization tasks. The approach is described clearly enough that someone could re-implement the lifting and basic alignment steps. The main weakness is exactly the one the stress-test flags. The abstract and validation summary give no prompt templates, temperature settings, few-shot examples, or post-processing audit for the LLM component. Without that, it is hard to know whether the reported semantic consistency actually rules out LLM-fabricated alignments that still pass the RDF checks. OAEI results are useful but are not DT-specific, so they do not directly address layering or traceability issues. The paper also does not report quantitative error rates or ablation results, which leaves the performance claims thin. This is the kind of applied software-engineering paper that would interest people building or maintaining industrial digital twins who already work with RDF or ontology tools. It is not reshaping a core research area, but the pipeline is specific enough to be worth looking at for replication or extension. I would send it to peer review so the authors can supply the missing LLM validation details and any quantitative results that exist in the full manuscript.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a semantic grounding pipeline for multi-layered Digital Twins to resolve heterogeneity and semantic mismatches across abstraction layers. It contributes a flexible modeling framework for organizing data/model/metamodel layers, lifts the DT metamodel into an RDF graph for unified representation, and introduces the SSM-OM graph-based alignment method that combines semantic embeddings, lexical similarity, and LLM reasoning to establish and validate correspondences with an ontology. Correctness, interoperability, traceability, and empirical performance are asserted via RDF consistency tests, a single DT use case, and OAEI benchmarks.

Significance. If the central claims hold after addressing validation gaps, the work would provide a timely, practical method for automated semantic alignment in Digital Twin systems, reducing reliance on static/manual mappings and supporting consistent multi-layer interoperability. The integration of RDF lifting with embedding+LLM alignment is a relevant contribution to semantic technologies in software engineering and systems modeling.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and SSM-OM description] Abstract and SSM-OM description: the claim that SSM-OM 'accurately establish[es] and validate[s] correspondences' rests on LLM reasoning, yet no prompt templates, temperature settings, few-shot examples, or post-LLM consistency audit (human or automated) are described. Without these, it is impossible to rule out fabricated alignments or new mismatches that still pass the subsequent RDF checks.
[Validation section] Validation section: OAEI benchmarks and the DT use case are cited to demonstrate 'semantic consistency' and 'general empirical performance,' but no quantitative alignment metrics (precision, recall, F1), error analysis, or comparison against baseline ontology alignment systems are reported. This leaves the interoperability and cross-layer traceability claims without measurable support.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'RDF tests' and 'a DT usecase' without specifying the test cases, consistency rules checked, or any quantitative outcomes from the use case.
[Method description] Notation for the lifted metamodel and the SSM-OM alignment steps could be clarified with a small running example or diagram to improve readability for readers unfamiliar with the specific DT layering.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach assumes standard semantic web representations and LLM capabilities without introducing new free parameters or invented entities in the abstract description.

axioms (1)

domain assumption RDF graphs can serve as a unified representation that resolves heterogeneity across DT abstraction layers
Invoked in the semantic lifting step of the pipeline.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5778 in / 1124 out tokens · 56144 ms · 2026-05-21T16:58:28.567807+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We propose a semantics and structure-aware metamodel ontology matching (SSM-OM) method that integrates metamodels with domain ontologies... hybrid method... graph-based embeddings, lexical similarity, and reasoning with LLMs
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

score(cs, ct) = β·semantic_score + (1−β)·Jaccard(cs, ct)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems

Abbasi, F., Brimont, P., Pruski, C., Sottet, J.S.: Understanding semantic drift in model driven digital twins. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. pp. 419–430 (2024)

work page 2024
[2]

In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)

Abbasi, F., Muzammal, M., Qu, Q.: A decentralized approach for negative link prediction in large graphs. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW). pp. 144–150. IEEE (2018)

work page 2018
[3]

Online Social Networks and Media31, 100222 (2022)

Abbasi, F., Muzammal, M., Qureshi, K.N., Javed, I.T., Margaria, T., Crespi, N.: Exploiting optimised communities in directed weighted graphs for link prediction. Online Social Networks and Media31, 100222 (2022)

work page 2022
[4]

Future Generation Computer Systems p

Abbasi, F., Pruski, C., Sottet, J.S.: Semantic drift evaluation in language and data- specific digital twin frameworks. Future Generation Computer Systems p. 108240 (2025)

work page 2025
[5]

In: 2019 22nd International Multitopic Conference (INMIC)

Abbasi,F.,Talat,R.,Muzammal,M.:Anensembleframeworkforlinkpredictionin signed graph. In: 2019 22nd International Multitopic Conference (INMIC). pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)

work page 2019
[6]

Ahmed, N., Kwok, H.C., Hamdaqa, M., Assunção, W.K.: Smatch-m-llm: Semantic similarityinmetamodelmatchingwithlargelanguagemodels.In:2025IEEE/ACM 22nd International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR). pp. 199–

work page
[7]

In: International Knowledge Graph and Seman- tic Web Conference

Amini, R., Norouzi, S.S., Hitzler, P., Amini, R.: Towards complex ontology align- ment using large language models. In: International Knowledge Graph and Seman- tic Web Conference. pp. 17–31. Springer (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

Data10(3), 35 (2025)

Anik, S.M.H., Gao, X., Meng, N.: A comprehensive indoor environment dataset from single-family houses in the us. Data10(3), 35 (2025)

work page 2025
[9]

In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops)

Franco, F., Lamazzi, L., Bedogni, L.: A multi-layer architecture for human dig- ital twin. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops). pp. 122–127. IEEE Computer Society (2025)

work page 2025
[10]

Cognitive Compu- tation14(2), 749–763 (2022)

Giabelli, A., Malandri, L., Mercorio, F., Mezzanzanica, M., Nobani, N.: Embed- dings evaluation using a novel measure of semantic similarity. Cognitive Compu- tation14(2), 749–763 (2022)

work page 2022
[11]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21902 (2025)

Giglou, H.B., D’Souza, J., Karras, O., Auer, S.: Ontoaligner: A comprehen- sive modular and robust python toolkit for ontology alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21902 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[12]

Software and Systems Modeling pp

Gil, S., Kamburjan, E., Talasila, P., Larsen, P.G.: An architecture for coupled digital twins with semantic lifting. Software and Systems Modeling pp. 1–26 (2024)

work page 2024
[13]

in 2021 acm

Govindasamy, H.S., Jayaraman, R., Taspinar, B., Lehner, D., Wimmer, M.: Air quality management: An exemplar for model-driven digital twin engineering. in 2021 acm. In: IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Lan- guages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C). pp. 229–232

work page 2021
[14]

In: Proceedings of the 12th knowledge capture conference 2023

Hertling, S., Paulheim, H.: Olala: Ontology matching with large language models. In: Proceedings of the 12th knowledge capture conference 2023. pp. 131–139 (2023)

work page 2023
[15]

Computers in Industry133, 103508 (2021)

Hribernik, K., Cabri, G., Mandreoli, F., Mentzas, G.: Autonomous, context-aware, adaptive digital twins—state of the art and roadmap. Computers in Industry133, 103508 (2021)

work page 2021
[16]

IEEE Transactions on Communications (2025) 16 F

Jia, P., Wang, X., Shen, X.: Hierarchical digital twin for efficient 6g network or- chestration via adaptive attribute selection and scalable network modeling. IEEE Transactions on Communications (2025) 16 F. Abbasi et al

work page 2025
[17]

Advanced Engineering Informatics53, 101706 (2022)

Jia, W., Wang, W., Zhang, Z.: From simple digital twin to complex digital twin part i: A novel modeling method for multi-scale and multi-scenario digital twin. Advanced Engineering Informatics53, 101706 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

In: International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems

Kappel, G., Kapsammer, E., Kargl, H., Kramler, G., Reiter, T., Retschitzegger, W., Schwinger, W., Wimmer, M.: Lifting metamodels to ontologies: A step to the semantic integration of modeling languages. In: International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. pp. 528–542. Springer (2006)

work page 2006
[19]

In: 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)

Kräuter, T.: Towards behavioral consistency in heterogeneous modeling scenar- ios. In: 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C). pp. 666–671. IEEE (2021)

work page 2021
[20]

Ifac-PapersOnline 51(11), 1016–1022 (2018)

Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., Sihn, W.: Digital twin in man- ufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. Ifac-PapersOnline 51(11), 1016–1022 (2018)

work page 2018
[21]

In: 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)

Lehner, D., Garmendia, A., Wimmer, M.: Towards flexible evolution of digital twins with fluent apis. In: 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). pp. 1–4. IEEE (2021)

work page 2021
[22]

Miller, W.D.: The future of systems engineering: Realizing the systems engineering vision2035.In:TransdisciplinarityandtheFutureofEngineering,pp.739–747.IOS Press (2022)

work page 2022
[23]

Future Generation Computer Systems 102, 827–837 (2020)

Muzammal, M., Abbasi, F., Qu, Q., Talat, R., Fan, J.: A decentralised approach for link inference in large signed graphs. Future Generation Computer Systems 102, 827–837 (2020)

work page 2020
[24]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14032 (2025)

Nguyen, L., Barcelos, E., French, R., Wu, Y.: Kroma: Ontology matching with knowledge retrieval and large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14032 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Digital Twin1(2), 3 (2024)

Pronost, G., Mayer, F., Camargo, M., Dupont, L.: Digital twins along the product lifecycle: A systematic literature review of applications in manufacturing: [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. Digital Twin1(2), 3 (2024)

work page 2024
[26]

Semantic Web14(4), 639–657 (2023)

Ruckhaus, E., Anton-Bravo, A., Scrocca, M., Corcho, O.: Applying the lot method- ology to a public bus transport ontology aligned with transmodel: Challenges and results. Semantic Web14(4), 639–657 (2023)

work page 2023
[27]

John Wiley & Sons (2012)

Runeson, P., Host, M., Rainer, A., Regnell, B.: Case study research in software engineering: Guidelines and examples. John Wiley & Sons (2012)

work page 2012
[28]

In: Workshop on Flexible Model Driven Eng.(FlexMDE) (2016)

Sottet, J.S., Biri, N.: Jsmf: a flexible javascript modelling framework. In: Workshop on Flexible Model Driven Eng.(FlexMDE) (2016)

work page 2016
[29]

Sottet, J.S., Brimont, P., Pruski, C., Abbasi, F.: How to leverage digital twin for system design?

work page
[30]

Systems11(2), 99 (2023)

Sottet, J.S., Pruski, C.: Data and model harmonization research challenges in a nation wide digital twin. Systems11(2), 99 (2023)

work page 2023
[31]

Scientific Reports15(1), 12835 (2025)

Su, C., Tang, X., Jiang, Q., Han, Y., Wang, T., Jiang, D.: Digital twin system for manufacturing processes based on a multi-layer knowledge graph model. Scientific Reports15(1), 12835 (2025)

work page 2025
[32]

Journal of Manufacturing Systems64, 372–389 (2022)

Tao, F., Xiao, B., Qi, Q., Cheng, J., Ji, P.: Digital twin modeling. Journal of Manufacturing Systems64, 372–389 (2022)

work page 2022
[33]

Science of computer programming101, 136–152 (2015)

Wieringa, R., Daneva, M.: Six strategies for generalizing software engineering the- ories. Science of computer programming101, 136–152 (2015)

work page 2015
[34]

Computers in Industry 140, 103648 (2022) Heterogeneous Model Alignment in Digital Twin 17

Woitsch, R., Sumereder, A., Falcioni, D.: Model-based data integration along the product & service life cycle supported by digital twinning. Computers in Industry 140, 103648 (2022) Heterogeneous Model Alignment in Digital Twin 17

work page 2022
[35]

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing64, 101958 (2020)

Zheng, P., Sivabalan, A.S.: A generic tri-model-based approach for product-level digital twin development in a smart manufacturing environment. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing64, 101958 (2020)

work page 2020

[1] [1]

In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems

Abbasi, F., Brimont, P., Pruski, C., Sottet, J.S.: Understanding semantic drift in model driven digital twins. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 27th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. pp. 419–430 (2024)

work page 2024

[2] [2]

In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)

Abbasi, F., Muzammal, M., Qu, Q.: A decentralized approach for negative link prediction in large graphs. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW). pp. 144–150. IEEE (2018)

work page 2018

[3] [3]

Online Social Networks and Media31, 100222 (2022)

Abbasi, F., Muzammal, M., Qureshi, K.N., Javed, I.T., Margaria, T., Crespi, N.: Exploiting optimised communities in directed weighted graphs for link prediction. Online Social Networks and Media31, 100222 (2022)

work page 2022

[4] [4]

Future Generation Computer Systems p

Abbasi, F., Pruski, C., Sottet, J.S.: Semantic drift evaluation in language and data- specific digital twin frameworks. Future Generation Computer Systems p. 108240 (2025)

work page 2025

[5] [5]

In: 2019 22nd International Multitopic Conference (INMIC)

Abbasi,F.,Talat,R.,Muzammal,M.:Anensembleframeworkforlinkpredictionin signed graph. In: 2019 22nd International Multitopic Conference (INMIC). pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)

work page 2019

[6] [6]

Ahmed, N., Kwok, H.C., Hamdaqa, M., Assunção, W.K.: Smatch-m-llm: Semantic similarityinmetamodelmatchingwithlargelanguagemodels.In:2025IEEE/ACM 22nd International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR). pp. 199–

work page

[7] [7]

In: International Knowledge Graph and Seman- tic Web Conference

Amini, R., Norouzi, S.S., Hitzler, P., Amini, R.: Towards complex ontology align- ment using large language models. In: International Knowledge Graph and Seman- tic Web Conference. pp. 17–31. Springer (2024)

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Data10(3), 35 (2025)

Anik, S.M.H., Gao, X., Meng, N.: A comprehensive indoor environment dataset from single-family houses in the us. Data10(3), 35 (2025)

work page 2025

[9] [9]

In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops)

Franco, F., Lamazzi, L., Bedogni, L.: A multi-layer architecture for human dig- ital twin. In: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops). pp. 122–127. IEEE Computer Society (2025)

work page 2025

[10] [10]

Cognitive Compu- tation14(2), 749–763 (2022)

Giabelli, A., Malandri, L., Mercorio, F., Mezzanzanica, M., Nobani, N.: Embed- dings evaluation using a novel measure of semantic similarity. Cognitive Compu- tation14(2), 749–763 (2022)

work page 2022

[11] [11]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21902 (2025)

Giglou, H.B., D’Souza, J., Karras, O., Auer, S.: Ontoaligner: A comprehen- sive modular and robust python toolkit for ontology alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21902 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[12] [12]

Software and Systems Modeling pp

Gil, S., Kamburjan, E., Talasila, P., Larsen, P.G.: An architecture for coupled digital twins with semantic lifting. Software and Systems Modeling pp. 1–26 (2024)

work page 2024

[13] [13]

in 2021 acm

Govindasamy, H.S., Jayaraman, R., Taspinar, B., Lehner, D., Wimmer, M.: Air quality management: An exemplar for model-driven digital twin engineering. in 2021 acm. In: IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Lan- guages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C). pp. 229–232

work page 2021

[14] [14]

In: Proceedings of the 12th knowledge capture conference 2023

Hertling, S., Paulheim, H.: Olala: Ontology matching with large language models. In: Proceedings of the 12th knowledge capture conference 2023. pp. 131–139 (2023)

work page 2023

[15] [15]

Computers in Industry133, 103508 (2021)

Hribernik, K., Cabri, G., Mandreoli, F., Mentzas, G.: Autonomous, context-aware, adaptive digital twins—state of the art and roadmap. Computers in Industry133, 103508 (2021)

work page 2021

[16] [16]

IEEE Transactions on Communications (2025) 16 F

Jia, P., Wang, X., Shen, X.: Hierarchical digital twin for efficient 6g network or- chestration via adaptive attribute selection and scalable network modeling. IEEE Transactions on Communications (2025) 16 F. Abbasi et al

work page 2025

[17] [17]

Advanced Engineering Informatics53, 101706 (2022)

Jia, W., Wang, W., Zhang, Z.: From simple digital twin to complex digital twin part i: A novel modeling method for multi-scale and multi-scenario digital twin. Advanced Engineering Informatics53, 101706 (2022)

work page 2022

[18] [18]

In: International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems

Kappel, G., Kapsammer, E., Kargl, H., Kramler, G., Reiter, T., Retschitzegger, W., Schwinger, W., Wimmer, M.: Lifting metamodels to ontologies: A step to the semantic integration of modeling languages. In: International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems. pp. 528–542. Springer (2006)

work page 2006

[19] [19]

In: 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C)

Kräuter, T.: Towards behavioral consistency in heterogeneous modeling scenar- ios. In: 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems Companion (MODELS-C). pp. 666–671. IEEE (2021)

work page 2021

[20] [20]

Ifac-PapersOnline 51(11), 1016–1022 (2018)

Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., Sihn, W.: Digital twin in man- ufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. Ifac-PapersOnline 51(11), 1016–1022 (2018)

work page 2018

[21] [21]

In: 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA)

Lehner, D., Garmendia, A., Wimmer, M.: Towards flexible evolution of digital twins with fluent apis. In: 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). pp. 1–4. IEEE (2021)

work page 2021

[22] [22]

Miller, W.D.: The future of systems engineering: Realizing the systems engineering vision2035.In:TransdisciplinarityandtheFutureofEngineering,pp.739–747.IOS Press (2022)

work page 2022

[23] [23]

Future Generation Computer Systems 102, 827–837 (2020)

Muzammal, M., Abbasi, F., Qu, Q., Talat, R., Fan, J.: A decentralised approach for link inference in large signed graphs. Future Generation Computer Systems 102, 827–837 (2020)

work page 2020

[24] [24]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14032 (2025)

Nguyen, L., Barcelos, E., French, R., Wu, Y.: Kroma: Ontology matching with knowledge retrieval and large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14032 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[25] [25]

Digital Twin1(2), 3 (2024)

Pronost, G., Mayer, F., Camargo, M., Dupont, L.: Digital twins along the product lifecycle: A systematic literature review of applications in manufacturing: [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]. Digital Twin1(2), 3 (2024)

work page 2024

[26] [26]

Semantic Web14(4), 639–657 (2023)

Ruckhaus, E., Anton-Bravo, A., Scrocca, M., Corcho, O.: Applying the lot method- ology to a public bus transport ontology aligned with transmodel: Challenges and results. Semantic Web14(4), 639–657 (2023)

work page 2023

[27] [27]

John Wiley & Sons (2012)

Runeson, P., Host, M., Rainer, A., Regnell, B.: Case study research in software engineering: Guidelines and examples. John Wiley & Sons (2012)

work page 2012

[28] [28]

In: Workshop on Flexible Model Driven Eng.(FlexMDE) (2016)

Sottet, J.S., Biri, N.: Jsmf: a flexible javascript modelling framework. In: Workshop on Flexible Model Driven Eng.(FlexMDE) (2016)

work page 2016

[29] [29]

Sottet, J.S., Brimont, P., Pruski, C., Abbasi, F.: How to leverage digital twin for system design?

work page

[30] [30]

Systems11(2), 99 (2023)

Sottet, J.S., Pruski, C.: Data and model harmonization research challenges in a nation wide digital twin. Systems11(2), 99 (2023)

work page 2023

[31] [31]

Scientific Reports15(1), 12835 (2025)

Su, C., Tang, X., Jiang, Q., Han, Y., Wang, T., Jiang, D.: Digital twin system for manufacturing processes based on a multi-layer knowledge graph model. Scientific Reports15(1), 12835 (2025)

work page 2025

[32] [32]

Journal of Manufacturing Systems64, 372–389 (2022)

Tao, F., Xiao, B., Qi, Q., Cheng, J., Ji, P.: Digital twin modeling. Journal of Manufacturing Systems64, 372–389 (2022)

work page 2022

[33] [33]

Science of computer programming101, 136–152 (2015)

Wieringa, R., Daneva, M.: Six strategies for generalizing software engineering the- ories. Science of computer programming101, 136–152 (2015)

work page 2015

[34] [34]

Computers in Industry 140, 103648 (2022) Heterogeneous Model Alignment in Digital Twin 17

Woitsch, R., Sumereder, A., Falcioni, D.: Model-based data integration along the product & service life cycle supported by digital twinning. Computers in Industry 140, 103648 (2022) Heterogeneous Model Alignment in Digital Twin 17

work page 2022

[35] [35]

Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing64, 101958 (2020)

Zheng, P., Sivabalan, A.S.: A generic tri-model-based approach for product-level digital twin development in a smart manufacturing environment. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing64, 101958 (2020)

work page 2020