pith. sign in

arxiv: 1509.05935 · v1 · pith:EXQIGKEHnew · submitted 2015-09-19 · 💻 cs.SI

Spotting Suspicious Reviews via (Quasi-)clique Extraction

classification 💻 cs.SI
keywords reviewreviewssuspiciousyelpcliquesgraphslargemany
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

How to tell if a review is real or fake? What does the underworld of fraudulent reviewing look like? Detecting suspicious reviews has become a major issue for many online services. We propose the use of a clique-finding approach to discover well-organized suspicious reviewers. From a Yelp dataset with over one million reviews, we construct multiple Reviewer Similarity graphs to link users that have unusually similar behavior: two reviewers are connected in the graph if they have reviewed the same set of venues within a few days. From these graphs, our algorithms extracted many large cliques and quasi-cliques, the largest one containing a striking 11 users who coordinated their review activities in identical ways. Among the detected cliques, a large portion contain Yelp Scouts who are paid by Yelp to review venues in new areas. Our work sheds light on their little-known operation.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.