Fresnel versus Kummer surfaces: geometrical optics in dispersionless linear (meta)materials and vacuum
read the original abstract
Geometrical optics describes, with good accuracy, the propagation of high-frequency plane waves through an electromagnetic medium. Under such approximation, the behaviour of the electromagnetic fields is characterised by just three quantities: the temporal frequency $\omega$, the spatial wave (co)vector $k$, and the polarisation (co)vector $a$. Numerous key properties of a given optical medium are determined by the Fresnel surface, which is the visual counterpart of the equation relating $\omega$ and $k$. For instance, the propagation of electromagnetic waves in a uniaxial crystal, such as calcite, is represented by two light-cones. Kummer, whilst analysing quadratic line complexes as models for light rays in an optical apparatus, discovered in the framework of projective geometry a quartic surface that is linked to the Fresnel one. Given an arbitrary dispersionless linear (meta)material or vacuum, we aim to establish whether the resulting Fresnel surface is equivalent to, or is more general than, a Kummer surface.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Crystallography, Lorentz violation, and the Standard-Model Extension
Crystal point groups parametrize SME Lorentz-violating coefficients in electromagnetic media, turning birefringent and multiferroic crystals into analogs for high-energy symmetry violations.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.