pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.17756 · v2 · pith:HSLH5VMLnew · submitted 2026-04-20 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex· nucl-th· quant-ph

Polarization, Maximal Concurrence, and Pure States in High-Energy Collisions

Yu-Xuan Liu , Wei Qi , Luo-Ting He , Bo-Wen Xiao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 06:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-exnucl-thquant-ph
keywords spin polarizationconcurrencequantum entanglementtwo-qubit systemZ boson decayparity violationhigh-energy collisions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Local spin polarization imposes an upper bound on concurrence in two-qubit systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives an upper bound on concurrence for two-qubit systems at fixed local polarization vectors, showing that larger polarization reduces the highest reachable entanglement. The bound is saturated by certain pure states when the two particles carry identical polarizations. The authors apply the relation to the parity-violating decay chain e+e− → Z0 → q q-bar and find that concurrence reaches its allowed maximum only in restricted kinematic regions and remains markedly lower than the unpolarized limit. A reader would care because the result supplies a process-independent link between a measurable classical quantity (polarization) and a quantum resource (entanglement) in collider final states.

Core claim

We establish a quantitative relation between local spin polarization and quantum entanglement in two-qubit systems by deriving an upper bound on the concurrence at fixed local polarizations, showing that increasing polarization constrains the maximum achievable entanglement. We further demonstrate that this bound is saturated by pure states in certain cases with identical polarizations. As a concrete physical application, we consider the parity-violating process e+e− → Z0 → q q-bar, which generates final-state spin polarization. We show that the maximal concurrence is attained in specific kinematic regions and is significantly reduced relative to the unpolarized case.

What carries the argument

Upper bound on concurrence expressed in terms of the two local polarization vectors of a two-qubit density matrix.

If this is right

  • Higher local polarization forces a lower ceiling on achievable concurrence.
  • Pure states saturate the bound when the two polarization vectors are identical.
  • In Z-boson decays the maximum concurrence occurs only inside limited kinematic windows.
  • Entanglement is suppressed relative to the unpolarized baseline once polarization is present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same polarization-concurrence relation could be tested in other two-body final states such as Higgs decays or top-pair production.
  • Collider analyses aiming to detect entanglement might preferentially select events with small measured polarization.
  • Extension of the bound to mixed states or to higher-dimensional systems would require new calculations but follows the same logic.

Load-bearing premise

The two particles form a two-qubit system whose joint state is captured by a density matrix with well-defined local polarization vectors.

What would settle it

Observation of concurrence values exceeding the derived upper bound at measured polarization vectors in e+e− → Z0 → q q-bar events would falsify the bound.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.17756 by Bo-Wen Xiao, Luo-Ting He, Wei Qi, Yu-Xuan Liu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Numerical verification of the boundary of concurrence for general density matrices. The green points are obtained from 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Feynman diagram of electron–positron scattering via [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Concurrence of the final-state qq¯ pair in e − e + annihilation near the Z 0 pole as a function of the quark speed u and scattering angle variable z = cos θ. The left and right panels correspond to up-type and down-type quarks, respectively. The maximal values in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We establish a quantitative relation between local spin polarization and quantum entanglement in two-qubit systems by deriving an upper bound on the concurrence at fixed local polarizations, showing that increasing polarization constrains the maximum achievable entanglement. We further demonstrate that this bound is saturated by pure states in certain cases with identical polarizations. As a concrete physical application, we consider the parity-violating process $e^+e^- \to Z^0 \to q\bar{q}$, which generates final-state spin polarization. We show that the maximal concurrence is attained in specific kinematic regions and is significantly reduced relative to the unpolarized case. These results establish a general, process-independent framework connecting local polarization, maximal entanglement, and the role of pure states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives an upper bound on the concurrence C of a two-qubit density matrix given fixed local polarization (Bloch) vectors P1 and P2, shows that the bound is saturated by certain pure states when the polarizations are identical, and applies the result to the parity-violating process e+e−→Z0→qq¯, finding that the maximal attainable concurrence occurs in specific kinematic regions and is reduced relative to the unpolarized case. The framework is presented as process-independent.

Significance. If the derivation is correct, the work supplies a concrete, quantitative link between local polarization and an entanglement monotone that is directly applicable to collider processes whose spin density matrices are known from the Standard Model. The explicit saturation by pure states and the collider example provide falsifiable predictions that could be tested with spin-correlation observables.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that an upper bound is derived and saturated by pure states, but the main text should include the explicit functional form of the bound (e.g., C_max(P1,P2)) and the conditions under which saturation occurs, preferably with the relevant equation number referenced in the abstract.
  2. In the collider application, the kinematic regions where maximal concurrence is attained should be stated quantitatively (e.g., ranges of cosθ or s) rather than qualitatively, so that the reduction relative to the unpolarized case can be compared directly with experimental cuts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The central derivation is an upper bound on concurrence C for a two-qubit density matrix at fixed Bloch vectors P1, P2, obtained from the standard parametrization of two-qubit states and the definition of concurrence; this is a direct mathematical consequence of the two-qubit formalism and does not reduce to any fitted parameter or self-citation. The collider application invokes the known spin density matrix for the parity-violating process e+e−→Z→q q-bar, which is an external standard result independent of the present work. No load-bearing step relies on self-definition, renaming, or an ansatz imported via the authors' prior papers; the bound and its saturation by pure states are self-contained within standard quantum information.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard definitions from quantum information theory applied to a particle-physics process; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Concurrence is a valid entanglement monotone for two-qubit mixed states and local polarization is given by the Bloch vector of each reduced density matrix.
    The bound is stated in terms of these standard quantities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5663 in / 1343 out tokens · 49473 ms · 2026-05-25T06:27:27.154081+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Controlling Quantum discord and steering in Electron-Positron Annihilation Using Polarized Beams

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Polarized lepton beams control quantum discord and steering in hyperon-antihyperon pairs from e+e- annihilation, with discord persisting in separable states via transverse polarization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 23 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Ashmanet al.[European Muon], Phys

    J. Ashmanet al.[European Muon], Phys. Lett. B206(1988), 364 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91523-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91523-7 1988

  2. [2]

    Airapetianet al.[HERMES], Phys

    A. Airapetianet al.[HERMES], Phys. Rev. D75(2007), 012007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.012007 [arXiv:hep- ex/0609039 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.012007 2007

  3. [3]

    Precision Electroweak Measurements on the Z Resonance

    S. Schaelet al.[ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group and SLD Heavy Flavour Group], Phys. Rept.427(2006), 257-454 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.006 [arXiv:hep-ex/0509008 [hep-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.006 2006

  4. [4]

    Bunce, R

    G. Bunce, R. Handler, R. March, P. Martin, L. Pondrom, M. Sheaff, K. J. Heller, O. Overseth, P. Skubic and T. Devlin,et al.Phys. Rev. Lett.36(1976), 1113-1116 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.36.1113

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.36.1113 1976

  5. [5]

    Z. T. Liang and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005), 102301 [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006), 039901] doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.102301 [arXiv:nucl-th/0410079 [nucl-th]]. 10

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.102301 2005

  6. [6]

    Global $\Lambda$ hyperon polarization in nuclear collisions: evidence for the most vortical fluid

    L. Adamczyket al.[STAR], Nature548(2017), 62-65 doi:10.1038/nature23004 [arXiv:1701.06657 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1038/nature23004 2017

  7. [7]

    Global polarization of $\Lambda$ hyperons in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}$ = 200 GeV

    J. Adamet al.[STAR], Phys. Rev. C98(2018), 014910 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.014910 [arXiv:1805.04400 [nucl-ex]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.014910 2018

  8. [8]

    Maximizing the spin correlation of top quark pairs produced at the LHC

    P. Uwer, Phys. Lett. B609(2005), 271-276 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.01.005 [arXiv:hep-ph/0412097 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.01.005 2005

  9. [9]

    Hentschinski, D

    M. Hentschinski, D. E. Kharzeev, K. Kutak and Z. Tu, Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) no.24, 241901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.241901 [arXiv:2305.03069 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.241901 2023

  10. [10]

    Afik and J

    Y . Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) no.9, 907 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01902-1 [arXiv:2003.02280 [quant-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01902-1 2021

  11. [11]

    Afik and J

    Y . Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) no.22, 221801 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.221801 [arXiv:2209.03969 [quant-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.221801 2023

  12. [12]

    Afik and J

    Y . Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, Quantum6(2022), 820 doi:10.22331/q-2022-09-29-820 [arXiv:2203.05582 [quant-ph]]

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2022-09-29-820 2022

  13. [13]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han and M. Low, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.3, 033004 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.033004 [arXiv:2407.01672 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.033004 2025

  14. [14]

    S. Wu, C. Qian, Y . G. Yang and Q. Wang, Chin. Phys. Lett.41(2024) no.11, 110301 doi:10.1088/0256- 307X/41/11/110301 [arXiv:2402.16574 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1088/0256- 2024

  15. [15]

    A. J. Barr, M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.139(2024), 104134 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2024.104134 [arXiv:2402.07972 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2024.104134 2024

  16. [16]

    Ehatäht, M

    K. Ehatäht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola and C. Veelken, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.3, 032005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.032005 [arXiv:2311.17555 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.032005 2024

  17. [17]

    Y . Guo, X. Liu, F. Yuan and H. X. Zhu, Research2025(2025), 0552 doi:10.34133/research.0552 [arXiv:2406.05880 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.34133/research.0552 2025

  18. [18]

    R. A. Morales, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138(2023) no.12, 1157 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04784-7 [arXiv:2306.17247 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04784-7 2023

  19. [19]

    S. J. Parke and Y . Shadmi, Phys. Lett. B387(1996), 199-206 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00998-7 [arXiv:hep- ph/9606419 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(96)00998-7 1996

  20. [20]

    M. M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari and K. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) no.9, 093002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.093002 [arXiv:2211.10513 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.093002 2023

  21. [21]

    Positivity in Amplitudes and Quantum Entanglement

    R. Aoude, G. Elor, G. N. Remmen and O. Sumensari, [arXiv:2402.16956 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Bernal, Phys

    A. Bernal, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.11, 116007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.116007 [arXiv:2310.10838 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.116007 2024

  23. [23]

    QCD-corrected spin analysing power of jets in decays of polarized top quarks

    A. Brandenburg, Z. G. Si and P. Uwer, Phys. Lett. B539(2002), 235-241 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02098-1 [arXiv:hep-ph/0205023 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02098-1 2002

  24. [24]

    Hentschinski, D

    M. Hentschinski, D. E. Kharzeev, K. Kutak and Z. Tu, Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024) no.12, 120501 doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad910b [arXiv:2408.01259 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad910b 2024

  25. [25]

    D. F. V . James, P. G. Kwiat, W. J. Munro and A. G. White, Phys. Rev. A64(2001) no.5, 052312 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052312 [arXiv:quant-ph/0103121 [quant-ph]]. 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052312 2001

  26. [26]

    Kowalska and E

    K. Kowalska and E. M. Sessolo, JHEP07(2024), 156 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)156 [arXiv:2404.13743 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)156 2024

  27. [27]

    X. L. Li, X. Liu, F. Yuan and H. X. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) no.9, L091502 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L091502 [arXiv:2308.10942 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.l091502 2023

  28. [28]

    Maltoni, C

    F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou, JHEP09(2024), 001 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2024)001 [arXiv:2404.08049 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2024)001 2024

  29. [29]

    Severi and E

    C. Severi and E. Vryonidou, JHEP01(2023), 148 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2023)148 [arXiv:2210.09330 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2023)148 2023

  30. [30]

    Subba and R

    A. Subba and R. Rahaman, [arXiv:2404.03292 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  31. [31]

    Jumaniyozov, S

    C. Severi, C. D. Boschi, F. Maltoni and M. Sioli, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) no.4, 285 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 022-10245-9 [arXiv:2110.10112 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052- 2022

  32. [32]

    S. Wu, C. Qian, Q. Wang and X. R. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.5, 054012 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.054012 [arXiv:2406.16298 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.054012 2024

  33. [33]

    S. Li, W. Shen and J. M. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.11, 1195 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13584-x [arXiv:2401.01162 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13584-x 2024

  34. [34]

    Mahlon and S

    G. Mahlon and S. J. Parke, Phys. Rev. D53(1996), 4886-4896 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.4886 [arXiv:hep- ph/9512264 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.53.4886 1996

  35. [35]

    Z. Dong, D. Gonçalves, K. Kong and A. Navarro, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) no.11, 115023 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.115023 [arXiv:2305.07075 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.115023 2024

  36. [36]

    J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. A. Casas, Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) no.8, 666 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10630- 4 [arXiv:2205.00542 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10630- 2022

  37. [37]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) no.9, 823 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11935-8 [arXiv:2302.00683 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11935-8 2023

  38. [38]

    Ghosh and R

    D. Ghosh and R. Sharma, JHEP08(2023), 146 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2023)146 [arXiv:2303.03375 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2023)146 2023

  39. [39]

    C. D. White and M. J. White, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) no.11, 116016 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.116016 [arXiv:2406.07321 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.116016 2024

  40. [40]

    T. Han, M. Low and T. A. Wu, JHEP07(2024), 192 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)192 [arXiv:2310.17696 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)192 2024

  41. [41]

    Y . Du, X. G. He, C. W. Liu and J. P. Ma, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.11, 1255 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025- 15003-1 [arXiv:2409.15418 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025- 2025

  42. [42]

    R. A. Morales, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) no.6, 581 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12921-4 [arXiv:2403.18023 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12921-4 2024

  43. [43]

    L. Yang, Y . K. Song and S. Y . Wei, Phys. Rev. D111(2025) no.5, 054035 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.054035 [arXiv:2410.20917 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.054035 2025

  44. [44]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and G. Panizzo, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) no.16, 16 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.161801 [arXiv:2102.11883 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.161801 2021

  45. [45]

    Aoude, E

    R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni and L. Mantani, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) no.5, 055007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.055007 [arXiv:2203.05619 [hep-ph]]. 12

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.055007 2022

  46. [46]

    Y . Afik, F. Fabbri, M. Low, L. Marzola, J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, M. M. Altakach, N. A. Asbah, Y . Bai, H. Banks and A. J. Barr,et al.Eur. Phys. J. Plus140(2025) no.9, 855 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06752- 9 [arXiv:2504.00086 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06752- 2025

  47. [47]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and L. Marzola, JHEP11(2025), 005 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2025)005 [arXiv:2505.02902 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2025)005 2025

  48. [48]

    Cheng and B

    K. Cheng and B. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) no.1, 1 doi:10.1103/gmqz-v4cl [arXiv:2501.03321 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/gmqz-v4cl 2025

  49. [49]

    W. Qi, Z. Guo and B. W. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.5, 054048 doi:10.1103/6ycn-x3yj [arXiv:2506.12889 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/6ycn-x3yj 2026

  50. [50]

    Cheng, T

    K. Cheng, T. Han and S. Trifinopoulos, [arXiv:2510.23773 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    S. J. Lin, M. J. Liu, D. Y . Shao and S. Y . Wei, JHEP11(2025), 082 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2025)082 [arXiv:2507.15387 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2025)082 2025

  52. [52]

    Low, Phys

    M. Low, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) no.9, 096008 doi:10.1103/15c3-mg5l [arXiv:2508.10979 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/15c3-mg5l 2025

  53. [53]

    Hatta and J

    Y . Hatta and J. Schoenleber, [arXiv:2511.04537 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  54. [54]

    X. Q. Xi, K. B. Chen, X. B. Tong, S. Y . Wei and J. Wu, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) no.12, 1458 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15193-8 [arXiv:2510.06103 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15193-8 2025

  55. [55]

    J. Gu, S. J. Lin, D. Y . Shao, L. T. Wang and S. X. Yang, [arXiv:2510.13951 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    Y . C. Guo, T. Han, M. Low and Y . Su, [arXiv:2602.02719 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  57. [57]

    Fucilla and Y

    M. Fucilla and Y . Hatta, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) no.3, L031504 doi:10.1103/gbk8-z3dd [arXiv:2509.05267 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/gbk8-z3dd 2026

  58. [58]

    Quantum entanglement between partons in a strongly coupled quantum field theory

    W. Zhang, W. Qian, Y . Zhou, Y . Li and Q. Wang, [arXiv:2512.21228 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    H. W. Zhang, X. Cao and T. F. Feng, [arXiv:2602.10389 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  60. [60]

    Quantum entanglement in electron-nucleus collisions: Role of the linearly polarized gluon distribution

    M. Fucilla, Y . Hatta and B. W. Xiao, [arXiv:2604.11697 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    Aadet al.[ATLAS], Nature633(2024) no.8030, 542-547 doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07824-z [arXiv:2311.07288 [hep-ex]]

    G. Aadet al.[ATLAS], Nature633(2024) no.8030, 542-547 doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07824-z [arXiv:2311.07288 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07824-z 2024

  62. [62]

    Hayrapetyanet al.[CMS], Rept

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.[CMS], Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024) no.11, 117801 doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad7e4d [arXiv:2406.03976 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad7e4d 2024

  63. [63]

    B. E. Aboonaet al.[STAR], Nature650(2026) no.8100, 65-71 doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09920-0 [arXiv:2506.05499 [hep-ex]]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09920-0 2026

  64. [64]

    W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998), 2245-2248 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245 [arXiv:quant- ph/9709029 [quant-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.2245 1998

  65. [65]

    Entanglement of a Pair of Quantum Bits

    S. Hill and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett.78(1997), 5022-5025 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5022 [arXiv:quant-ph/9703041 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.5022 1997

  66. [66]

    Universal state inversion and concurrence in arbitrary dimensions

    P. Rungta, V . Bužek, C. M. Caves, M. Hillery and G. J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. A64(2001) no.4, 042315 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.64.042315 [arXiv:quant-ph/0102040 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.64.042315 2001

  67. [67]

    M. Ali, A. R. P. Rau and G. Alber, Phys. Rev. A81(2010) no.4, 042105 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.042105 [arXiv:1002.3429 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.81.042105 2010

  68. [68]

    J. Wang, H. Batelaan, J. Podany and A. F. Starace, J. Phys. B39(2006), 4343-4353 doi:10.1088/0953- 4075/39/21/001 [arXiv:quant-ph/0503116 [quant-ph]]. 13

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0953- 2006

  69. [69]

    W. J. Munro, D. F. V . James, A. G. White and P. G. Kwiat, Phys. Rev. A64(2001) no.3, 030302 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.64.030302 [arXiv:quant-ph/0103113 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.64.030302 2001

  70. [70]

    G. Baio, D. Chruscinski, P. Horodecki, A. Messina and G. Sarbicki, Phys. Rev. A99(2019), 062312 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.062312 [arXiv:1904.07650 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.99.062312 2019

  71. [71]

    C. J. Zhang, Y . X. Gong, Y . S. Zhang and G. C. Guo, Phys. Rev. A78(2008), 042308 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.042308 [arXiv:0806.2598 [quant-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreva.78.042308 2008

  72. [72]

    Tracing CP violation in the production of top quark pairs by multiple TeV proton-proton collisions

    W. Bernreuther and A. Brandenburg, Phys. Rev. D49(1994), 4481-4492 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.49.4481 [arXiv:hep-ph/9312210 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.4481 1994

  73. [73]

    Signatures of Higgs Bosons in the Top Quark Decay Channel at Hadron Colliders

    W. Bernreuther, M. Flesch and P. Haberl, Phys. Rev. D58(1998), 114031 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.58.114031 [arXiv:hep-ph/9709284 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.58.114031 1998

  74. [74]

    The spin density matrix of top quark pairs produced in electron-positron annihilation including QCD radiative corrections

    A. Brandenburg, M. Flesch and P. Uwer, Phys. Rev. D59(1999), 014001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.014001 [arXiv:hep-ph/9806306 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.014001 1999

  75. [75]

    A New Twist on Top Quark Spin Correlations

    M. Baumgart and B. Tweedie, JHEP03(2013), 117 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2013)117 [arXiv:1212.4888 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep03(2013)117 2013

  76. [76]

    A set of top quark spin correlation and polarization observables for the LHC: Standard Model predictions and new physics contributions

    W. Bernreuther, D. Heisler and Z. G. Si, JHEP12(2015), 026 doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2015)026 [arXiv:1508.05271 [hep-ph]]. 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2015)026 2015