pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.18320 · v1 · pith:HVQPTJJOnew · submitted 2025-10-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

The implications of inflation for the last ACT

Zhi-Chong Qiu , Ye-Huang Pang , Qing-Guo Huang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords inflationary modelsscalar spectral indexearly dark energyf(R) gravitycosmological constraintsACT DR6 dataHubble tension
0
0 comments X

The pith

A non-perturbative exponential f(R) inflation model with higher-order corrections fits the ACT-preferred scalar spectral index.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests slow-roll inflationary models inside Lambda CDM against a combined dataset from Planck 2018, ACT DR6, DESI DR2 and BICEP/Keck 2018. Standard Starobinsky R squared inflation falls outside the two-sigma region, yet a parameterized potential proportional to phi to the alpha still works for small alpha. The authors introduce a non-perturbative exponential f(R) model that adds subleading curvature corrections beyond R squared, such as R cubed or R to the fourth. Numerical and MCMC analysis shows this version matches the higher scalar spectral index favored by ACT. When early dark energy is included together with the SH0ES Hubble constant prior, the same model permits even larger departures from pure Starobinsky inflation.

Core claim

Within the Lambda CDM framework using the P-ACT-LB-BK18 data set, the potential V(phi) proportional to phi to the alpha works for small alpha, but Starobinsky R squared inflation lies outside the 2 sigma region. A proposed non-perturbative exponential f(R) inflation model, incorporating subleading corrections beyond R squared including terms like R cubed or R to the fourth, aligns well with the ACT-preferred value of the scalar spectral index through numerical calculations and Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis. Within the early dark energy framework, the model accommodates greater deviations from the original Starobinsky R squared inflation when the SH0ES prior on H0 is added.

What carries the argument

The non-perturbative exponential f(R) inflation model that includes higher-order curvature corrections beyond R squared to adjust the predicted scalar spectral index.

If this is right

  • Starobinsky R squared inflation is excluded at more than 2 sigma by the P-ACT-LB-BK18 data set.
  • Parameterized slow-roll models with small alpha in the potential proportional to phi to the alpha remain compatible with observations.
  • The exponential f(R) model reproduces the ACT value of the scalar spectral index.
  • In the early dark energy framework the model allows larger deviations from pure Starobinsky inflation once the SH0ES H0 prior is included.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If quantum gravity requires higher-order curvature terms, they may systematically improve the fit of inflation models to current CMB data.
  • Similar exponential corrections could be applied to other modified-gravity inflationary scenarios to test whether they relieve tensions with spectral-index measurements.
  • Future CMB experiments with tighter constraints on the tensor-to-scalar ratio could distinguish the exponential f(R) predictions from simple power-law potentials.

Load-bearing premise

The combined Planck, ACT, DESI and BICEP/Keck data sets are internally consistent and the SH0ES H0 prior can be added inside the early dark energy framework without introducing systematics that shift the inferred scalar spectral index.

What would settle it

A new, independent measurement of the scalar spectral index lying clearly outside the range obtained from the MCMC chains of the exponential f(R) model on the same data combination.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.18320 by Qing-Guo Huang, Ye-Huang Pang, Zhi-Chong Qiu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The constraints on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The potential of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The predictions of the non-perturbative exponen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Constraints on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explored a parameterized slow-roll inflationary model within the $\Lambda$CDM framework, utilizing a combination of data from Planck 2018, ACT DR6, DESI DR2, and BICEP/Keck 2018 (P-ACT-LB-BK18). Additionally, we incorporated the SH0ES prior on $H_0$ (P-ACT-LB-BK18-$H_0$) to analyze the model within the early dark energy (EDE) framework. While the model with a potential $V(\phi)\propto \phi^\alpha$ for small values of $\alpha$ still fits the data, the Starobinsky $R^2$ inflation falls outside the $2\sigma$ region. On the other hand, in a self-consistent quantum theory of gravity, higher-order corrections to $R$ are typically anticipated. In response, we proposed a non-perturbative exponential $f(R)$ inflation model, wherein the subleading corrections beyond $R^2$ including terms like $R^3$ or $R^4$. Using numerical calculations and Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) analysis with the P-ACT-LB-BK18 data set, we demonstrate that this model can align well with the ACT-preferred value of the scalar spectral index. Additionally, within the early dark energy (EDE) framework, it accommodates greater deviations from the original Starobinsky $R^2$ inflation model when incorporating the SH0ES prior on $H_0$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a non-perturbative exponential f(R) inflation model that incorporates subleading higher-order corrections (such as R³ and R⁴ terms) beyond the Starobinsky R² model. Using MCMC analysis on the P-ACT-LB-BK18 dataset combination (Planck 2018 + ACT DR6 + DESI DR2 + BICEP/Keck 2018), it claims this model aligns with the ACT-preferred scalar spectral index n_s; the analysis is extended to an early dark energy (EDE) framework that includes the SH0ES H0 prior to allow greater deviations from Starobinsky inflation.

Significance. If the MCMC results are robust, the work supplies a concrete, observationally viable extension of f(R) inflation motivated by quantum gravity expectations for higher-order curvature corrections. It could help reconcile inflationary predictions with the latest ACT constraints on n_s while exploring EDE solutions to the Hubble tension, offering falsifiable predictions for future CMB and BAO data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Model definition and numerical/MCMC sections] The explicit functional form of the proposed non-perturbative exponential f(R) model (including how the R³ or R⁴ corrections are implemented) is not supplied, nor are the prior ranges or the precise parameterization of the slow-roll potential used in the numerical calculations. Without these, the MCMC results demonstrating alignment with the ACT n_s value cannot be independently verified or reproduced.
  2. [MCMC analysis and results] The central claim that the model 'aligns well' with ACT data rests on MCMC posteriors for n_s, yet no goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., χ² values, effective degrees of freedom, or posterior predictive checks) or convergence diagnostics are reported for either the baseline P-ACT-LB-BK18 run or the EDE+SH0ES extension. This omission is load-bearing because the abstract's assertion of support for the ACT-preferred n_s cannot be assessed for statistical significance.
  3. [EDE framework and SH0ES prior analysis] The EDE extension with the SH0ES H0 prior assumes that any dataset tensions (particularly the mild ACT–Planck tension on n_s and the interaction of DESI BAO with H0) do not systematically shift the inferred spectral index. No dedicated consistency tests or sensitivity runs isolating these effects are presented, which directly impacts the robustness of the claimed greater deviations from Starobinsky inflation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction use 'P-ACT-LB-BK18' without an explicit definition of the acronym on first use; a table or footnote listing the exact data releases and likelihoods would improve clarity.
  2. [Results and discussion] Comparison to the power-law potential V(φ) ∝ φ^α is mentioned but lacks a direct side-by-side table of best-fit parameters or n_s values across models, which would help readers gauge the improvement offered by the exponential f(R) form.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and indicate the revisions that will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model definition and numerical/MCMC sections] The explicit functional form of the proposed non-perturbative exponential f(R) model (including how the R³ or R⁴ corrections are implemented) is not supplied, nor are the prior ranges or the precise parameterization of the slow-roll potential used in the numerical calculations. Without these, the MCMC results demonstrating alignment with the ACT n_s value cannot be independently verified or reproduced.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit functional form, implementation of higher-order corrections, prior ranges, and slow-roll parameterization are necessary for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will supply the complete non-perturbative exponential f(R) expression, detail how the R³ and R⁴ terms are included, list the exact prior ranges used in the MCMC runs, and clarify the slow-roll potential parameterization. These additions will allow independent verification of the reported alignment with the ACT-preferred n_s. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [MCMC analysis and results] The central claim that the model 'aligns well' with ACT data rests on MCMC posteriors for n_s, yet no goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., χ² values, effective degrees of freedom, or posterior predictive checks) or convergence diagnostics are reported for either the baseline P-ACT-LB-BK18 run or the EDE+SH0ES extension. This omission is load-bearing because the abstract's assertion of support for the ACT-preferred n_s cannot be assessed for statistical significance.

    Authors: We acknowledge that goodness-of-fit metrics and convergence diagnostics are required to substantiate the statistical significance of our results. In the revised manuscript we will report χ² values for the best-fit models, effective degrees of freedom, and Gelman-Rubin convergence statistics for both the baseline P-ACT-LB-BK18 and EDE+SH0ES analyses. These quantities will enable readers to evaluate the robustness of the claimed support for the ACT-preferred scalar spectral index. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [EDE framework and SH0ES prior analysis] The EDE extension with the SH0ES H0 prior assumes that any dataset tensions (particularly the mild ACT–Planck tension on n_s and the interaction of DESI BAO with H0) do not systematically shift the inferred spectral index. No dedicated consistency tests or sensitivity runs isolating these effects are presented, which directly impacts the robustness of the claimed greater deviations from Starobinsky inflation.

    Authors: While the combined P-ACT-LB-BK18 dataset is constructed to incorporate the relevant constraints simultaneously, we recognize the value of explicit sensitivity tests. In the revised manuscript we will add dedicated consistency checks and sensitivity runs that isolate the effects of ACT–Planck differences on n_s and the influence of the SH0ES prior within the EDE framework. These tests will directly address the robustness of the reported greater deviations from Starobinsky inflation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model proposed from theory then fitted to data

full rationale

The paper first proposes a non-perturbative exponential f(R) inflation model motivated by higher-order corrections in quantum gravity, distinct from Starobinsky R^2. It then performs numerical calculations and MCMC fits to the P-ACT-LB-BK18 dataset (and EDE extension with SH0ES prior) to demonstrate consistency with the ACT-preferred scalar spectral index. No quoted equations or steps show a prediction reducing by construction to a fitted input, self-definitional loop, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The central claim rests on external data constraints rather than internal redefinition, making the derivation self-contained against benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so specific free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be exhaustively extracted. The model implicitly introduces at least one new functional form for f(R) whose coefficients are adjusted to data.

free parameters (1)
  • coefficients in exponential f(R) expansion
    Higher-order terms beyond R^2 are included and must be constrained by the MCMC fit to the combined data sets.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Slow-roll conditions remain valid for the parameterized potential and the proposed f(R) model
    Invoked when mapping the model to the scalar spectral index and comparing with ACT data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5807 in / 1343 out tokens · 43083 ms · 2026-05-21T20:35:03.666390+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Harrison-Zeldovich attractor: From Planck to ACT results

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0

    Nonminimal derivative coupling realizes the Harrison-Zeldovich attractor for monomial, hilltop, and α-attractor E-models, pulling them to the scale-invariant spectrum suggested by ACT data.

  2. Positive Running of the Spectral Index for Scalar Theory and Modified Gravity

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Positive running of the spectral index is achievable in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity with viable inflation, unlike standard scalar field and F(R) models which face challenges.

  3. Echoes of $R^3$ modification and Goldstone preheating in the CMB-BAO landscape

    hep-ph 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    An R^3 modification to R^2-Higgs inflation fits the high n_s by inducing Goldstone preheating that reconciles CMB and inflationary energy scales.

  4. String-inspired Gauss-Bonnet Gravity Inflation and ACT

    gr-qc 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    MCMC analysis of sixteen ghost-free f(R,G) inflation models shows all reproduce ns ≈ 0.97 at 60 e-folds with stable μ ≈ 0.1, preference set by Hubble parametrization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers · 21 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmo- logical Models Without Singularity,

    Alexei A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmo- logical Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B91, 99–102 (1980)

    work page 1980

  2. [2]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

    Alan H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D23, 347–356 (1981)

    work page 1981

  3. [3]

    A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogene- ity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,

    Andrei D. Linde, “A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogene- ity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,” Phys. Lett. B108, 389–393 (1982)

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,

    Andreas Albrecht and Paul J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220–1223 (1982)

    work page 1982

  5. [5]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and $\Lambda$CDM Parameters

    Thibaut Louiset al.(ACT), “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters,” (2025), arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models

    Erminia Calabreseet al.(ACT), “The Atacama Cosmol- ogy Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmolog- ical Models,” (2025), arXiv:2503.14454 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), “DESI 2024 VI: cosmologi- cal constraints from the measurements of baryon acous- tic oscillations,” JCAP02, 021 (2025), arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP, Keck), “Improved Con- straints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151301 (2021), arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Kallosh and A

    Renata Kallosh and Andrei Linde, “On the Present Sta- tus of Inflationary Cosmology,” (2025), arXiv:2505.13646 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Kallosh, A

    Renata Kallosh, Andrei Linde, and Diederik Roest, “ACT, SPT, and chaotic inflation,” (2025), arXiv:2503.21030 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Has ACT measured ra- diative corrections to the tree-level Higgs-like inflation?

    Ioannis D. Gialamas, Alexandros Karam, Antonio Racioppi, and Martti Raidal, “Has ACT measured ra- diative corrections to the tree-level Higgs-like inflation?” (2025), arXiv:2504.06002 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Non-minimal coupling in light of ACT,

    Qing Gao, Yungui Gong, Zhu Yi, and Fengge Zhang, “Non-minimal coupling in light of ACT,” (2025), arXiv:2504.15218 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Berera, S

    Arjun Berera, Suddhasattwa Brahma, Zizang Qiu, Rud- nei O. Ramos, and Gabriel S. Rodrigues, “The early universe isACT-ingwarm,” (2025), arXiv:2504.02655 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Brahma and J

    Suddhasattwa Brahma and Jaime Calder´ on-Figueroa, “Is the CMB revealing signs of pre-inflationary physics?” (2025), arXiv:2504.02746 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Dioguardi and A

    Christian Dioguardi and Alexandros Karam, “Palatini linear attractors are back in action,” Phys. Rev. D111, 123521 (2025), arXiv:2504.12937 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Higgs-Modular Inflation,

    Shuntaro Aoki, Hajime Otsuka, and Ryota Yanagita, “Higgs-Modular Inflation,” (2025), arXiv:2504.01622 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Dioguardi, A

    Christian Dioguardi, Antonio J. Iovino, and Antonio Racioppi, “Fractional attractors in light of the latest ACT observations,” Phys. Lett. B868, 139664 (2025), arXiv:2504.02809 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Salvio, (2025), arXiv:2504.10488 [hep-ph]

    Alberto Salvio, “Independent connection in ACTion dur- ing inflation,” (2025), arXiv:2504.10488 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Supersymmet- ric Hybrid Inflation in light of Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 6, Planck 2018 and LB-BK18,

    Mansoor Ur Rehman and Qaisar Shafi, “Supersymmet- ric Hybrid Inflation in light of Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 6, Planck 2018 and LB-BK18,” 6 (2025), arXiv:2504.14831 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Increase of ns in regularized pole inflation & Einstein-Cartan grav- ity,

    Minxi He, Muzi Hong, and Kyohei Mukaida, “Increase of ns in regularized pole inflation & Einstein-Cartan grav- ity,” (2025), arXiv:2504.16069 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Drees and Y

    Manuel Drees and Yong Xu, “Refined predictions for Starobinsky inflation and post-inflationary constraints in light of ACT,” Phys. Lett. B867, 139612 (2025), arXiv:2504.20757 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Reheat- ing ACTs on Starobinsky and Higgs inflation,

    D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, “Reheat- ing ACTs on Starobinsky and Higgs inflation,” (2025), arXiv:2505.01129 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Reconciling Nonminimally Coupled Higgs Inflation with ACT DR6 Observations through Reheating

    Lang Liu, Zhu Yi, and Yungui Gong, “Reconciling Higgs Inflation with ACT Observations through Reheating,” (2025), arXiv:2505.02407 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Yin, (2025), arXiv:2505.03004 [hep-ph]

    Wen Yin, “Higgs-like inflation under ACTivated mass,” (2025), arXiv:2505.03004 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Keeping the relation between the Starobinsky model and no-scale supergravity ACTive,

    Ioannis D. Gialamas, Theodoros Katsoulas, and Kyr- iakos Tamvakis, “Keeping the relation between the Starobinsky model and no-scale supergravity ACTive,” (2025), arXiv:2505.03608 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Mohammadi, Q

    Yogesh, Abolhassan Mohammadi, Qiang Wu, and Tao Zhu, “Starobinsky like inflation and EGB Gravity in the light of ACT,” (2025), arXiv:2505.05363 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Im- proved Predictions on Higgs-Starobinsky Inflation and Reheating with ACT DR6 and Primordial Gravitational Waves,

    Md Riajul Haque, Sourav Pal, and Debarun Paul, “Im- proved Predictions on Higgs-Starobinsky Inflation and Reheating with ACT DR6 and Primordial Gravitational Waves,” (2025), arXiv:2505.04615 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Potential Reconstruction from ACT Observa- tions Leading to Polynomialα-Attractor,

    Zhu Yi, Xingzhi Wang, Qing Gao, and Yungui Gong, “Potential Reconstruction from ACT Observa- tions Leading to Polynomialα-Attractor,” (2025), arXiv:2505.10268 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Curvature corrections to Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT results,

    Andrea Addazi, Yermek Aldabergenov, and Sergei V. Ketov, “Curvature corrections to Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT results,” (2025), arXiv:2505.10305 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    ACT-ing on inflation: Implications of non Bunch-Davies initial condition and reheating on single-field slow roll models

    Suvashis Maity, “ACT-ing on inflation: Implications of non Bunch-Davies initial condition and reheating on single-field slow roll models,” (2025), arXiv:2505.10534 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    The polynomial potential inflation in light of ACT observa- tions,

    Zhi-Zhang Peng, Zu-Cheng Chen, and Lang Liu, “The polynomial potential inflation in light of ACT observa- tions,” (2025), arXiv:2505.12816 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Constraining Reheating Temperature, Inflaton-SM Coupling and Dark Matter Mass in Light of ACT DR6 Observations,

    Rajesh Mondal, Sourav Mondal, and Ayan Chakraborty, “Constraining Reheating Temperature, Inflaton-SM Coupling and Dark Matter Mass in Light of ACT DR6 Observations,” (2025), arXiv:2505.13387 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Are single-field models of inflation and PBH production ruled out by ACT observations?

    Daniel Frolovsky and Sergei V. Ketov, “Are single-field models of inflation and PBH production ruled out by ACT observations?” (2025), arXiv:2505.17514 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Minimal Plateau Inflation in light of ACT DR6 Observations,

    Md Riajul Haque and Debaprasad maity, “Minimal Plateau Inflation in light of ACT DR6 Observations,” (2025), arXiv:2505.18267 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Kinetically Modified Palatini Inflation Meets ACT Data,

    C. Pallis, “Kinetically Modified Palatini Inflation Meets ACT Data,” (2025), arXiv:2505.23243 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Nonminimal infrared gravitational reheating in light of ACT,

    Ayan Chakraborty, Debaprasad Maity, and Rajesh Mondal, “Nonminimal infrared gravitational reheating in light of ACT,” (2025), arXiv:2506.02141 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Primordial Black Holes SaveR 2 Inflation,

    Kazunori Kohri and Xinpeng Wang, “Primordial Black Holes SaveR 2 Inflation,” (2025), arXiv:2506.06797 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    α-attractor inflation modified by GUP in light of ACT observations,

    Hana Heidarian, Milad Solbi, Soma Heydari, and Kay- oomars Karami, “α-attractor inflation modified by GUP in light of ACT observations,” (2025), arXiv:2506.10547 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Inflationary attractors and radiative corrections in light of ACT,

    William J. Wolf, “Inflationary attractors and radiative corrections in light of ACT,” (2025), arXiv:2506.12436 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Smooth hy- brid inflation in light of ACT DR6 data,

    Nobuchika Okada and Osamu Seto, “Smooth hy- brid inflation in light of ACT DR6 data,” (2025), arXiv:2506.15965 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Observational constraints on inflationary models with non-minimally derivative coupling by ACT,

    Qing Gao, Yanjiang Qian, Yungui Gong, and Zhu Yi, “Observational constraints on inflationary models with non-minimally derivative coupling by ACT,” (2025), arXiv:2506.18456 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    The fate of Quasi-Exponential infla- tion in the light of ACT-DR6,

    Barun Kumar Pal, “The fate of Quasi-Exponential infla- tion in the light of ACT-DR6,” (2025), arXiv:2506.20744 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    ACT-Inspired Kaehler-Based Inflationary At- tractors,

    C. Pallis, “ACT-Inspired Kaehler-Based Inflationary At- tractors,” (2025), arXiv:2507.02219 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Power Law Plateau Inflation and Primary Gravitational Waves in the light of ACT,

    Abolhassan Mohammadi, Yogesh, and Anzhong Wang, “Power Law Plateau Inflation and Primary Gravitational Waves in the light of ACT,” (2025), arXiv:2507.06544 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    ACT observations, reheating, and Starobinsky and Higgs in- flation,

    D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, “ACT observations, reheating, and Starobinsky and Higgs in- flation,” Phys. Rev. D112, 023544 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Split supersymme- try and hybrid inflation in light of Atacama Cosmology Telescope DR6 data,

    Nobuchika Okada and Qaisar Shafi, “Split supersymme- try and hybrid inflation in light of Atacama Cosmology Telescope DR6 data,” (2025), arXiv:2507.16246 [hep- ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    In- flationary Models with Gauss-Bonnet Coupling in Light of ACT Observations,

    Yigan Zhu, Qing Gao, Yungui Gong, and Zhu Yi, “In- flationary Models with Gauss-Bonnet Coupling in Light of ACT Observations,” (2025), arXiv:2508.09707 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Resurrecting vanilla power law infla- tion with the aid of continuous spontaneous localiza- tion in the ACT era,

    Suratna Das, “Resurrecting vanilla power law infla- tion with the aid of continuous spontaneous localiza- tion in the ACT era,” Phys. Rev. D112, 023543 (2025), arXiv:2508.14602 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    TheR 2-Higgs inflation:R 3 contribu- tion and preheating after ACT and SPT data,

    Tanmoy Modak, “TheR 2-Higgs inflation:R 3 contribu- tion and preheating after ACT and SPT data,” (2025), arXiv:2509.02979 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Genesis–Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT data,

    Han Gil Choi, Pavel Petrov, and Seong Chan Park, “Genesis–Starobinsky inflation can explain the ACT data,” (2025), arXiv:2509.04832 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Heavy Field Effects on Inflationary Models in Light of ACT Data,

    Shuntaro Aoki, Hajime Otsuka, and Ryota Yanagita, “Heavy Field Effects on Inflationary Models in Light of ACT Data,” (2025), arXiv:2509.06739 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Loop quantum inflation with inverse volume corrections in light of ACT data,

    Farough Parvizi, Soma Heydari, Milad Solbi, and Kay- oomars Karami, “Loop quantum inflation with inverse volume corrections in light of ACT data,” (2025), arXiv:2510.03882 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Radiative-Corrected Higgs Inflation in Light of the Latest ACT Observations,

    Jureeporn Yuennan, Farruh Atamurotov, and Phong- pichit Channuie, “Radiative-Corrected Higgs Inflation in Light of the Latest ACT Observations,” (2025), arXiv:2510.05770 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Ferreira, E

    Elisa G. M. Ferreira, Evan McDonough, Lennart Balken- hol, Renata Kallosh, Lloyd Knox, and Andrei Linde, “The BAO-CMB Tension and Implications for Inflation,” (2025), arXiv:2507.12459 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Alexei Starobinsky and Modern Cosmol- ogy,

    Andrei Linde, “Alexei Starobinsky and Modern Cosmol- ogy,” (2025), arXiv:2509.01675 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    A polynomial f(R) inflation model

    Qing-Guo Huang, “A polynomial f(R) inflation model,” JCAP02, 035 (2014), arXiv:1309.3514 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  58. [58]

    Starobinsky inflation in the swampland,

    Dieter L¨ ust, Joaquin Masias, Benjamin Muntz, and Marco Scalisi, “Starobinsky inflation in the swampland,” JHEP07, 186 (2024), arXiv:2312.13210 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [59]

    Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe

    L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess, “Tensions between 7 the Early and the Late Universe,” Nature Astron.3, 891 (2019), arXiv:1907.10625 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    Eleonora Di Valentino, Olga Mena, Supriya Pan, Luca Visinelli, Weiqiang Yang, Alessandro Melchiorri, David F. Mota, Adam G. Riess, and Joseph Silk, “In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,” Class. Quant. Grav.38, 153001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies

    Elcio Abdallaet al., “Cosmology intertwined: A re- view of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anoma- lies,” JHEAp34, 49–211 (2022), arXiv:2203.06142 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    Breuval, A

    Louise Breuval, Adam G. Riess, Stefano Casertano, Wenlong Yuan, Lucas M. Macri, Martino Romaniello, Yukei S. Murakami, Daniel Scolnic, Gagandeep S. Anand, and Igor Soszy´ nski, “Small Magellanic Cloud Cepheids Observed with the Hubble Space Telescope Provide a New Anchor for the SH0ES Distance Ladder,” Astrophys. J.973, 30 (2024), arXiv:2404.08038 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [63]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karimet al.(DESI), “DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cos- mological Constraints,” (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    The impact of the Hubble tension on the evidence for dynamical dark energy,

    Ye-Huang Pang, Xue Zhang, and Qing-Guo Huang, “The impact of the Hubble tension on the evidence for dynamical dark energy,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 68, 280410 (2025), arXiv:2503.21600 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Cosmological implications of ultra-light axion-like fields

    Vivian Poulin, Tristan L. Smith, Daniel Grin, Tanvi Kar- wal, and Marc Kamionkowski, “Cosmological implica- tions of ultralight axionlike fields,” Phys. Rev. D98, 083525 (2018), arXiv:1806.10608 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension

    Vivian Poulin, Tristan L. Smith, Tanvi Karwal, and Marc Kamionkowski, “Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension,” Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 221301 (2019), arXiv:1811.04083 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Acoustic Dark Energy: Potential Conver- sion of the Hubble Tension,

    Meng-Xiang Lin, Giampaolo Benevento, Wayne Hu, and Marco Raveri, “Acoustic Dark Energy: Potential Conver- sion of the Hubble Tension,” Phys. Rev. D100, 063542 (2019), arXiv:1905.12618 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    New early dark energy,

    Florian Niedermann and Martin S. Sloth, “New early dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D103, L041303 (2021), arXiv:1910.10739 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Ye and Y.-S

    Gen Ye and Yun-Song Piao, “Is the Hubble tension a hint of AdS phase around recombination?” Phys. Rev. D101, 083507 (2020), arXiv:2001.02451 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Karwal, M

    Tanvi Karwal, Marco Raveri, Bhuvnesh Jain, Justin Khoury, and Mark Trodden, “Chameleon early dark en- ergy and the Hubble tension,” Phys. Rev. D105, 063535 (2022), arXiv:2106.13290 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    Testingn s = 1 in light of the latest ACT and SPT data,

    Ze-Yu Peng, Jun-Qian Jiang, Hao Wang, and Yun-Song Piao, “Testingn s = 1 in light of the latest ACT and SPT data,” (2025), arXiv:2509.11902 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Constraints on the spectral index for the inflation models in string landscape

    Qing-Guo Huang, “Constraints on the spectral index for the inflation models in string landscape,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 061303 (2007), arXiv:0706.2215 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  73. [73]

    Inflation model constraints from data released in 2015

    Qing-Guo Huang, Ke Wang, and Sai Wang, “Infla- tion model constraints from data released in 2015,” Phys. Rev. D93, 103516 (2016), arXiv:1512.07769 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  74. [74]

    Towards Inflation in String Theory

    Shamit Kachru, Renata Kallosh, Andrei D. Linde, Juan Martin Maldacena, Liam P. McAllister, and Sandip P. Trivedi, “Towards inflation in string theory,” JCAP10, 013 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0308055

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  75. [75]

    Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models

    Jesus Torrado and Antony Lewis, “Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models,” JCAP05, 057 (2021), arXiv:2005.05290 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  76. [76]

    Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models

    Antony Lewis, Anthony Challinor, and Anthony Lasenby, “Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models,” Astrophys. J.538, 473–476 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9911177

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  77. [77]

    Crossing the Phantom Divide with Parameterized Post-Friedmann Dark Energy

    Wenjuan Fang, Wayne Hu, and Antony Lewis, “Cross- ing the Phantom Divide with Parameterized Post- Friedmann Dark Energy,” Phys. Rev. D78, 087303 (2008), arXiv:0808.3125 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [78]

    Cmb power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology,

    Cullan Howlett, Antony Lewis, Alex Hall, and Anthony Challinor, “Cmb power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology,” Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2012, 027–027 (2012)

    work page 2012

  79. [79]

    Early dark energy does not restore cosmological concordance,

    J. Colin Hill, Evan McDonough, Michael W. Toomey, and Stephon Alexander, “Early dark energy does not restore cosmological concordance,” Phys. Rev. D102, 043507 (2020), arXiv:2003.07355 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences,

    Andrew Gelman and Donald B. Rubin, “Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences,” Statist. Sci.7, 457–472 (1992)

    work page 1992

Showing first 80 references.