pith. sign in

arxiv: 2410.02620 · v2 · pith:I4HMOZQRnew · submitted 2024-10-03 · ✦ hep-th

Comments on Celestial CFT and AdS₃ String Theory

Igor Mol This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 20:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords celestial CFTH3+ WZNW modelAdS3 string theoryMHV amplitudesholographic dictionaryKlein spaceKnizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations
0
0 comments X

The pith

The H3+ WZNW model, continued from Euclidean AdS3 to ultra-hyperbolic Klein space, holographically produces tree-level MHV amplitudes for gluons and gravitons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends the celestial CFT construction of Ogawa et al. based on the H3+ WZNW model. It demonstrates that analytic continuation to R2^2 Klein space allows the model to generate the correct flat-space MHV scattering amplitudes. This supplies an alternative route that draws on bosonic AdS3 string theory rather than celestial Liouville theory. The work builds an explicit holographic dictionary that translates worldsheet vertex operators into celestial conformal primaries, then uses it to obtain the celestial stress tensor, two- and three-point functions, the OPE, and a set of PDEs that the amplitudes must satisfy.

Core claim

The H3+-WZNW model continued to ultra-hyperbolic Klein space R2^2 supplies a holographic dictionary in which worldsheet operators of Euclidean AdS3 bosonic string theory map to celestial primaries; the resulting celestial stress-energy tensor, correlators, and OPE reproduce the tree-level MHV amplitudes of gluons and gravitons while obeying a system of PDEs obtained from the Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov equations and worldsheet Ward identities.

What carries the argument

The holographic dictionary that maps vertex operators and conformal primaries of the Euclidean AdS3 worldsheet to operators in celestial CFT, thereby converting worldsheet correlation functions into celestial amplitudes.

If this is right

  • The celestial stress-energy tensor, two-point and three-point functions, and OPE are obtained directly from the worldsheet data.
  • Celestial amplitudes satisfy a closed system of partial differential equations derived from the KZ equations and worldsheet Ward identities.
  • The construction supplies an alternative to celestial Liouville theory for generating the same tree-level MHV amplitudes.
  • Vertex operators in celestial CFT are identified with specific worldsheet operators of the bosonic AdS3 string.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dictionary might be used to extract higher-point or non-MHV amplitudes once the continuation is accepted.
  • The approach links string-theoretic methods in AdS3 directly to flat-space scattering without passing through Liouville theory.
  • Testing the continuation on known low-point amplitudes provides a concrete check before attempting more complex correlators.

Load-bearing premise

The analytic continuation of the H3+ WZNW model from Euclidean AdS3 to ultra-hyperbolic Klein space R2^2 preserves the holographic dictionary and produces the correct flat-space MHV amplitudes.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the four-gluon MHV amplitude in the continued model; disagreement with the Parke-Taylor formula would show the continuation fails to preserve the dictionary.

read the original abstract

In a recent work, Ogawa et al. (2024) proposed a model for celestial conformal field theory (CFT) based on the $H_{3}^{+}$-Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten (WZNW) model. In this paper, we extend the model advanced by Ogawa et al. (2024), demonstrating how it can holographically generate tree-level MHV scattering amplitudes for both gluons and gravitons when analytically continued to the ultra-hyperbolic Klein space $\mathbf{R}_{2}^{2}$, thereby offering an alternative to celestial Liouville theory. We construct a holographic dictionary in which vertex operators and conformal primaries in celestial CFT are derived from their worldsheet counterparts in Euclidean $AdS_{3}$ (bosonic) string theory. Within this dictionary, we derive the celestial stress-energy tensor, compute the two- and three-point functions, and determine the celestial operator product expansion (OPE). Additionally, we derive a system of partial differential equations that characterises the celestial amplitudes of our model, utilising the Knizhnik--Zamolodchikov (KZ) equations and worldsheet Ward identities. In the Appendix, we provide a concise introduction to the $H_{3}^{+}$-WZNW model, with emphasis on its connection to Euclidean $AdS_{3}$ string theory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper extends the H₃⁺-WZNW model for celestial CFT proposed by Ogawa et al. (2024) by analytically continuing it from Euclidean AdS₃ bosonic string theory to ultra-hyperbolic Klein space R₂². It constructs a holographic dictionary relating worldsheet vertex operators to celestial primaries, derives the celestial stress-energy tensor, two- and three-point functions, the OPE, and a system of PDEs characterizing celestial amplitudes from the KZ equations together with worldsheet Ward identities. The central claim is that this framework holographically generates tree-level MHV scattering amplitudes for both gluons and gravitons.

Significance. If the analytic continuation preserves the dictionary, the work supplies a concrete string-theoretic alternative to celestial Liouville theory, with explicit worldsheet derivations of the stress tensor, correlators, OPE, and KZ-derived PDEs providing a direct link between the AdS₃ model and flat-space MHV amplitudes. The appendix introduction to the H₃⁺-WZNW model and its connection to Euclidean AdS₃ string theory is a useful reference.

major comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and main construction] The central claim that analytic continuation of the H₃⁺-WZNW model and its vertex operators to R₂² preserves the holographic dictionary and produces the known tree-level MHV amplitudes is asserted in the abstract and introduction but is not supported by an explicit verification step that matches the derived celestial amplitudes to the Parke-Taylor formula (gluons) or the corresponding MHV graviton expressions; this step is load-bearing for the result.
  2. [Derivation of PDEs] The system of PDEs derived from the KZ equations and worldsheet Ward identities (main text) is presented as characterizing the celestial amplitudes, yet no demonstration is given that solutions of these PDEs, after the continuation, reproduce the known MHV amplitudes; without this check the connection to flat-space scattering remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The notation R₂² for ultra-hyperbolic Klein space is introduced without a brief coordinate definition or signature specification in the opening paragraphs; adding this would improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.
  2. [Appendix] The appendix provides a concise introduction to the H₃⁺-WZNW model but does not include a short table comparing the Euclidean AdS₃ and continued R₂² normalizations of the vertex operators; such a table would clarify the continuation step.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the major comments below, agreeing that explicit verification steps are needed to fully support the central claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Introduction and main construction] The central claim that analytic continuation of the H₃⁺-WZNW model and its vertex operators to R₂² preserves the holographic dictionary and produces the known tree-level MHV amplitudes is asserted in the abstract and introduction but is not supported by an explicit verification step that matches the derived celestial amplitudes to the Parke-Taylor formula (gluons) or the corresponding MHV graviton expressions; this step is load-bearing for the result.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification matching the derived celestial amplitudes to the Parke-Taylor formula (and MHV graviton expressions) after analytic continuation is a load-bearing step that is not provided in the current manuscript. The paper derives the holographic dictionary, stress tensor, correlators, OPE, and PDEs from the KZ equations and worldsheet Ward identities, but does not include a direct comparison to the known MHV expressions. We will add this explicit matching (e.g., via low-point correlators) in the revised version. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Derivation of PDEs] The system of PDEs derived from the KZ equations and worldsheet Ward identities (main text) is presented as characterizing the celestial amplitudes, yet no demonstration is given that solutions of these PDEs, after the continuation, reproduce the known MHV amplitudes; without this check the connection to flat-space scattering remains unverified.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript derives the PDEs characterizing the amplitudes but does not demonstrate that their solutions reproduce the known MHV amplitudes after continuation. We will add this explicit check in the revision to verify the connection to flat-space MHV scattering amplitudes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivations independent of target amplitudes

full rationale

The paper extends the externally cited Ogawa et al. (2024) H3+-WZNW model via analytic continuation to R2^2, then derives the celestial dictionary, stress tensor, correlators, OPE, and PDEs directly from the KZ equations plus worldsheet Ward identities. These steps use standard CFT machinery applied to the continued model and do not reduce the claimed MHV amplitude generation to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain. The continuation itself is an explicit modeling assumption rather than a tautological redefinition, and the paper presents the resulting expressions as outputs rather than inputs renamed as predictions. No load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled via self-citation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the H3+ WZNW model from Euclidean AdS3 string theory extends via analytic continuation to generate flat-space amplitudes in Klein space. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond standard components of the model.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The H3+-WZNW model provides a valid starting point for celestial CFT
    Invoked as the base model from the cited prior work.
  • ad hoc to paper Analytic continuation to ultra-hyperbolic Klein space R_2^2 preserves the holographic dictionary and amplitude-generating property
    Key step stated in the abstract for generating MHV amplitudes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5765 in / 1492 out tokens · 30665 ms · 2026-05-23T20:12:35.824653+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    For further elaboration, the i nterested reader is referred to Mol [6]

    Mathematical Preliminaries We must first undertake a brief preparatory discussion to int roduce the mathematical objects needed for our construction. For further elaboration, the i nterested reader is referred to Mol [6]. It is important to note that we shall employ a slightly differe nt notation in this discussion: the variables z, ¯z denote coordinates on...

    work page

  2. [2]

    dr essed

    Celestial Vertex Operators for Gravitons We are now prepared to demonstrate that Eq. (33) can be reform ulated using the celestial vertex operators derived from AdS3 string theory, as detailed in Subsection A 2. We define the “dr essed” vertex operators in celestial CFT for gravitons: Gi (xi) := Γ (2σi) T aiK ai (xi) Ai ˆ d2ziΦ2σ i (xi; zi) , (37) for i = ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    black objects

    proposed a unified framework for all “black objects” wit h near-horizon geometries described by AdS3, encompassing the BTZ solution. Building on these works, we ar e optimistic that insights into black hole solutions in string theory might be employed to study black holes in asymptotically flat spaces, informed by the ideas presented in this paper. In parti...

    work page

  4. [4]

    This observation was given a concrete form in the context of AdS3 string theory by de Boer et al

    H + 3 -WZNW Model Review Brown and Henneaux [50] demonstrated that any theory of 3d gravity with a negative cos- mological constant is endowed with an infinite-dimensional symmetry group that includes two commuting copies of Virasoro algebras, thus describing a 2d CFT. This observation was given a concrete form in the context of AdS3 string theory by de Bo...

    work page

  5. [5]

    plane-wave

    Recall that Euclidean AdS3 can be formulated as the hypersurface H3 ⊂ R1 3 defined by − (u0)2 + ∑3 i=1(ui)2 = − ℓ2. Thus, H3 is a submanifold of R1 3 with constant negative scalar curvature R = − 1/ℓ 2 and an isometry group given by SL (2, C). This space can be parametrised by the coordinates (r, τ, θ ), given by: u0 = √ ℓ2 + r2 cosh τ, u 1 = r sin θ, u 2 ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Kac-Moody Current Algebras We are now prepared to present the first entry of our holograph ic dictionary. Our objective is to describe the construction of Kac-Moody currents within t he celestial CFT–henceforth referred to as celestial Kac-Moody current algebras –derived from worldsheet Kac-Moody currents associated with gauge symmetries. Let Σ denote the ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    (55), which is important for analysing the celestial 2-point function discussed in Subsection III A

    Worldsheet Integrals Related to the 2-Point F unction In this Appendix, we undertake the computation of the integr al over the worldsheet in Eq. (55), which is important for analysing the celestial 2-point function discussed in Subsection III A. We shall proceed with detail, as this calculation exemplifies t he basic reasoning employed to derive the worlds...

    work page

  8. [8]

    function,

    Generalised Dirac Delta F unction on the Worldsheet In this Appendix, we recall how the generalised Dirac delta “ function,” analytically continued in the complex plane, naturally arises in the context of worl dsheet integration. This result proves useful in deriving the celestial 2-point function, as described by our holographic dictionar y in Subsection...

    work page

  9. [9]

    function,

    T riple Worldsheet Integral In this Appendix, we shall compute the worldsheet integral t hat arises in the calculation of the 3-point function of Euclidean AdS3 bosonic string theory, as required for the continuation of t he 44 computations in Subsection B 3. Let σ1, σ 2, σ 3 represent a sequence of exponents, and define the triple complex integral I (σ1, ...

    work page

  10. [10]

    This calculation will prove helpful in deriving the operator product expansion in Subsection III C

    Shadow T ransform of Worldsheet Primaries In this Appendix, we compute an integral involving the confo rmal primary Φ− 1− j3 (x3; z2) of the H + 3 -model. This calculation will prove helpful in deriving the operator product expansion in Subsection III C. We define the integral of interest as: I1 ( j1, j 2, j 3 ⏐ ⏐x3 ) := ˆ d2z2 ˜Φ− 1− j3 (x3; z2) = ˆ d2z1 ...

    work page

  11. [11]

    (B56) To facilitate the computation, we introduce a translation x3 ↦→ ξ := x3 − x1, so that I2 can be recast in the form: I2 = 1 |x1 − x2|2λ 3 ˆ d2ξ 1 |(x2 − x1) − ξ|2λ 1 |ξ|2λ 2

    Worldsheet Integral with T wo Fixed Points In this Appendix, we shall undertake the computation of a wor ldsheet integral which proves helpful for the evaluation of the operator product expansio n as discussed in Subsection III C: I2 ( λ 1, λ 2, λ 3 ⏐ ⏐x1, x 2 ) = 1 |x1 − x2|2λ 3 ˆ d2x3 1 |x2 − x3|2λ 1 |x3 − x1|2λ 2 . (B56) To facilitate the computation, ...

    work page

  12. [12]

    Ogawa, S

    N. Ogawa, S. Takahashi, T. Tsuda, and T. Waki, arXiv prepr int arXiv:2404.12049 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Stieberger, T

    S. Stieberger, T. R. Taylor, and B. Zhu, Physics Letters B 846, 138229 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Stieberger, T

    S. Stieberger, T. R. Taylor, and B. Zhu, Physics Letters B 836, 137588 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Giribet, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03374 (2024)

    G. Giribet, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03374 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Melton, A

    W. Melton, A. Sharma, A. Strominger, and T. Wang, arXiv pr eprint arXiv:2403.18896 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Mol, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10944 (2024)

    I. Mol, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10944 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    On the conformal bootstrap for SL(2,R)-WZNW models

    J. Teschner, arXiv preprint hep-th/9705214 (1997)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  19. [19]

    Teschner, Nuclear Physics B 546, 369 (1999)

    J. Teschner, Nuclear Physics B 546, 369 (1999)

    work page 1999

  20. [20]

    Teschner, Nuclear Physics B 546, 390 (1999)

    J. Teschner, Nuclear Physics B 546, 390 (1999)

    work page 1999

  21. [21]

    Teschner, Nuclear Physics B 571, 555 (2000)

    J. Teschner, Nuclear Physics B 571, 555 (2000)

    work page 2000

  22. [22]

    Ribault and J

    S. Ribault and J. Teschner, Journal of High Energy Physi cs 2005, 014 (2005)

    work page 2005

  23. [23]

    de Boer, H

    J. de Boer, H. Ooguri, H. Robins, and J. Tannenhauser, Jo urnal of High Energy Physics 1998, 026 (1999)

    work page 1998

  24. [24]

    Giveon, D

    A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, and N. Seiberg, arXiv preprint he p-th/9806194 (1998)

    work page arXiv 1998

  25. [25]

    Casali, W

    E. Casali, W. Melton, and A. Strominger, Journal of High Energy Physics 2022, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Melton, A

    W. Melton, A. Sharma, and A. Strominger, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.07820 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Maldacena and H

    J. Maldacena and H. Ooguri, Journal of Mathematical Phy sics 42, 2929 (2001)

    work page 2001

  28. [28]

    Maldacena, H

    J. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, and J. Son, Journal of Mathemat ical Physics 42, 2961 (2001)

    work page 2001

  29. [29]

    Giribet and C

    G. Giribet and C. Nunez, Journal of High Energy Physics 2001, 010 (2001)

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    I. Bars, C. Deliduman, and D. Minic, arXiv preprint hep- th/9907087 (1999)

    work page arXiv 1999

  31. [31]

    D’Hoker and D

    E. D’Hoker and D. H. Phong, Reviews of Modern Physics 60, 917 (1988)

    work page 1988

  32. [32]

    Polchinski, String Theory , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics No

    J. Polchinski, String Theory , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics No. v. 2 (Cam bridge University Press, 1998)

    work page 1998

  33. [33]

    S. J. Parke and T. R. Taylor, Physical Review Letters 56, 2459 (1986)

    work page 1986

  34. [34]

    Elvang and Y.-t

    H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang, arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.1 697 (2013)

    work page 2013

  35. [35]

    Badger, J

    S. Badger, J. Henn, J. C. Plefka, and S. Zoia, Scattering Amplitudes in Quantum Field Theory (Springer Nature, 2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Pasterski, The European Physical Journal C 81, 1062 (2021)

    S. Pasterski, The European Physical Journal C 81, 1062 (2021). 49

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Raclariu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02075 (202 1)

    A.-M. Raclariu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02075 (202 1)

    work page arXiv

  38. [38]

    Strominger, Lectures on the infrared structure of gravity and gauge theory (Princeton University Press, 2018)

    A. Strominger, Lectures on the infrared structure of gravity and gauge theory (Princeton University Press, 2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    F. A. Berezin, Introduction to superanalysis, Vol. 9 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    V. P. Nair, Physics Letters B 214, 215 (1988)

    work page 1988

  41. [41]

    Nair, Physical Review D?Particles, Fields, Gravita tion, and Cosmology 71, 121701 (2005)

    V. Nair, Physical Review D?Particles, Fields, Gravita tion, and Cosmology 71, 121701 (2005)

    work page 2005

  42. [42]

    Pasterski and S.-H

    S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao, Physical Review D 96, 065022 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Donnay, S

    L. Donnay, S. Pasterski, and A. Puhm, Journal of High Ene rgy Physics 2020, 1 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Furugori, N

    H. Furugori, N. Ogawa, S. Sugishita, and T. Waki, Journa l of High Energy Physics 2024, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Simmons-Duffin, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014, 1 (2014)

    D. Simmons-Duffin, Journal of High Energy Physics 2014, 1 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [46]

    Polchinski, String Theory , String Theory 2 Volume Hardback Set (Cambridge University Press, 2001)

    J. Polchinski, String Theory , String Theory 2 Volume Hardback Set (Cambridge University Press, 2001)

    work page 2001

  47. [47]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, and A. Stromi nger, Journal of High Energy Physics 2021, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Gu, Y.-Y

    J. Gu, Y.-Y. Li, and L.-T. Wang, Journal of High Energy Ph ysics 2022, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Stieberger and T

    S. Stieberger and T. R. Taylor, Nuclear Physics B 935, 388 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Applied Conformal Field Theory

    P. Ginsparg, arXiv preprint hep-th/9108028 (1988)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  51. [51]

    Francesco, P

    P. Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal, Conformal Field Theory , Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer, 1997)

    work page 1997

  52. [52]

    Ketov, Conformal Field Theory , G - Reference,Information and Interdisciplinary Subject s Series (World Scientific Pub., 1995)

    S. Ketov, Conformal Field Theory , G - Reference,Information and Interdisciplinary Subject s Series (World Scientific Pub., 1995)

    work page 1995

  53. [53]

    Nastase, F

    H. Nastase, F. Rojas, and C. Rubio, Journal of High Energ y Physics 2022, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    L. P. de Gioia and A.-M. Raclariu, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2303.10037 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  55. [55]

    L. P. de Gioia and A.-M. Raclariu, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [56]

    Banados, C

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim, and J. Zanelli, Physical rev iew letters 69, 1849 (1992)

    work page 1992

  57. [57]

    Cangemi, M

    D. Cangemi, M. Leblanc, and R. B. Mann, Physical Review D 48, 3606 (1993)

    work page 1993

  58. [58]

    Strominger, Journal of High Energy Physics 1998, 009 (1998)

    A. Strominger, Journal of High Energy Physics 1998, 009 (1998)

    work page 1998

  59. [59]

    Crawley, A

    E. Crawley, A. Guevara, N. Miller, and A. Strominger, Jo urnal of High Energy Physics 2022, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Communications in Mathemat ical Physics 104, 207 (1986)

    work page 1986

  61. [61]

    Maldacena and A

    J. Maldacena and A. Strominger, Journal of High Energy P hysics 1998, 005 (1999)

    work page 1998

  62. [62]

    Gawedzki and A

    K. Gawedzki and A. Kupiainen, Nuclear Physics B 320, 625 (1989)

    work page 1989

  63. [63]

    Gawedzki, New symmetry principles in quantum field th eory , 247 (1992)

    K. Gawedzki, New symmetry principles in quantum field th eory , 247 (1992)

    work page 1992

  64. [64]

    Gawedzki, Nuclear Physics B 328, 733 (1989)

    K. Gawedzki, Nuclear Physics B 328, 733 (1989)

    work page 1989

  65. [65]

    Penedones, in New Frontiers in Fields and Strings: TASI 2015 Proceedings of t he 2015 Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (World Scientific, 2017) pp

    J. Penedones, in New Frontiers in Fields and Strings: TASI 2015 Proceedings of t he 2015 Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics (World Scientific, 2017) pp. 75–136

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    Vladimirov, Equations of Mathematical Physics , Monographs and textbooks in pure and applied 50 mathematics (M

    V. Vladimirov, Equations of Mathematical Physics , Monographs and textbooks in pure and applied 50 mathematics (M. Dekker, 1971)

    work page 1971

  67. [67]

    V. A. Smirnov, Evaluating feynman integrals , Vol. 211 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2004)

    work page 2004

  68. [68]

    Weinzierl,Feynman Integrals, arXiv e-prints (Jan., 2022) arXiv:2201.03593 [2201.03593]

    S. Weinzierl, arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.03593 5 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of integrals, series, and products (Academic press, 2014)

    work page 2014