Benchmarking Sequential Feedback Optimization for Wind Farm Power Maximization

This paper benchmarks sequential feedback optimization (SFO) for wind farm power maximization using a medium-fidelity dynamic flow model. We compare SFO with two well-established approaches, adjoint-based economic model predictive control (AMPC) and extremum seeking control (ESC), under a common nine-turbine layout and identical operating constraints. The comparison focuses on steady-state power production and computational efficiency, both relevant for real-time implementation. The simulation results illustrate that SFO achieves higher steady-state power while preserving real-time feasibility, AMPC provides a better transient performance at a higher online computational cost and without guarantees of convergence to the steady-state optimum, and ESC offers a computationally inexpensive model-free baseline that may converge to locally optimal solutions. These results provide a practical reference for selecting wind farm control strategies and for designing scalable, real-time optimization methods.