Multi-Objective Tweezers in Scattering Media

Cl\'ement Ferise; David Globosits; Jakob H\"upfl; Marlene Hudler; Matthieu Mall\'ejac; Romain Fleury; Stefan Rotter; Tristan Nerson

arxiv: 2511.22279 · v3 · pith:MCCIKOR7new · submitted 2025-11-27 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · physics.optics

Multi-Objective Tweezers in Scattering Media

Tristan Nerson , Jakob H\"upfl , Cl\'ement Ferise , David Globosits , Marlene Hudler , Matthieu Mall\'ejac , Stefan Rotter , Romain Fleury This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 18:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph physics.optics

keywords radiation forceoptical tweezersacoustic tweezersscattering mediamulti-objective optimizationmomentum transferPareto optimalitywave shaping

0 comments

The pith

Shaping waves in scattering media achieves maximal force or torque on one object and Pareto-optimal control on multiple objects with exact bounds on incompatible goals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that incident acoustic or electromagnetic waves can be shaped to control momentum transfer to objects inside a complex scattering medium. For one object the method delivers the highest possible force or torque allowed by the medium. For several objects it identifies the full set of best trade-offs between competing objectives and supplies hard upper bounds on what can be achieved simultaneously. A reader would care because this extends wave-based tweezers from clean environments to realistic turbid settings such as tissue or colloidal suspensions. The result matters for applications that require selective, simultaneous manipulation of cells, microrobots or drug carriers without line-of-sight access.

Core claim

Radiation forces and torques can be harnessed by tailoring the incident wave so that momentum transfer to multiple objects occurs simultaneously in a complex scattering medium. For a single object the theory returns the maximal achievable force or torque. For multiple objects it returns Pareto-optimal actuation together with exact bounds on the simultaneous realization of incompatible objectives.

What carries the argument

The linear response operator of the known scattering medium that maps a chosen incident field to the resulting force and torque vectors on each object, allowing optimization of the incident field for desired momentum transfers.

If this is right

Selective manipulation of individual objects becomes possible inside turbid media without direct mechanical contact.
Competing goals such as moving two objects in opposite directions are bounded exactly rather than found by trial and error.
The same framework applies to both sound and light, widening the range of usable wave tweezers.
Applications such as targeted drug delivery or organoid handling gain quantitative performance limits.
Multi-objective control can be extended to time-varying objectives by recomputing the optimal field at each step.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Real-time updating of the medium response operator could allow control inside slowly changing biological environments.
The derived bounds may connect to inverse-design problems that recover medium properties from measured forces.
Numerical tests in simple scatterer geometries would quickly show whether the predicted maxima are reachable in practice.

Load-bearing premise

The scattering medium is treated as perfectly known and linear so the incident wave can be computed exactly to produce any desired momentum transfer.

What would settle it

Apply the computed optimal incident wave to a calibrated single object in a measured scattering medium and record whether the observed force or torque reaches the value predicted by the theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.22279 by Cl\'ement Ferise, David Globosits, Jakob H\"upfl, Marlene Hudler, Matthieu Mall\'ejac, Romain Fleury, Stefan Rotter, Tristan Nerson.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Collective and selective manipulation of objects in scattering media. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Probability density function of expectation values of Hermitian matrices of size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Further examples of bi-objective optimization for which [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Radiation forces and torques enable the manipulation of objects with acoustic and electromagnetic waves. Yet, harnessing them in complex scattering media remains a formidable challenge, especially when multiple objects must be controlled under competing objectives. Here, we demonstrate that sound or light can be shaped to tailor momentum transfer to multiple objects simultaneously in a complex scattering medium. For a single object, our theory yields the maximal achievable force or torque; for multiple objects, it produces Pareto-optimal actuation and exact bounds on the simultaneous realization of incompatible objectives. This opens new applications for wave tweezers, enabling selective and precise manipulation of objects within complex media, ranging from the handling of cells, organoids, or microrobots, to targeted drug delivery in biological media.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives a clean theoretical map from force/torque goals to optimal incident fields in scattering media, with exact Pareto bounds for conflicting multi-object cases.

read the letter

The core contribution is a way to compute the best incident wave for pushing or rotating several objects at once inside a known scattering medium, plus exact limits on what you can achieve when the objectives pull in different directions. For one object it reduces to an eigenvalue problem on the quadratic force expression; for multiple objects it uses weighted sums to trace the Pareto front and bound the trade-offs. That is the new piece relative to earlier single-object tweezer work. The derivations stay inside the linear scattering model and the stress-test check found no internal contradictions or circularity once the medium response operator is taken as given. The math is straightforward and the bounds follow directly from the formulation. The main limitation is the assumption that the scattering medium is fully known and linear, so the response operator can be inverted or diagonalized exactly. Real biological or turbid samples will have measurement noise and possible weak nonlinearities, and the paper does not quantify how much those degrade the predicted optima. There are also no numerical examples or robustness tests in the material I saw, which leaves open how tight the bounds remain once you move from theory to simulation. This work is aimed at people already doing wave manipulation in complex media who need a systematic way to handle competing goals rather than trial-and-error shaping. A reader working on optical or acoustic tweezers for cells or microrobots would find the Pareto construction useful as a starting point. It is solid enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee who can check the derivations against the full equations and ask for at least one concrete numerical case.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework for shaping acoustic or electromagnetic waves to tailor momentum transfer to objects in complex scattering media. For a single object, it derives the maximal achievable force or torque; for multiple objects, it yields Pareto-optimal actuation and exact bounds on incompatible objectives, under the assumption of a known linear scattering medium whose response operator maps the desired force/torque vector to the required incident field.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work provides a systematic method for multi-objective wave-based manipulation in turbid environments, with exact Pareto bounds as a notable strength. This could enable new applications in biological media, such as handling cells or targeted drug delivery, and in microrobotics. The internal consistency under linear scattering and absence of hidden circularity or unaccounted coupling strengthen the assessment.

minor comments (3)

Abstract: the phrase 'exact bounds on the simultaneous realization of incompatible objectives' would benefit from a brief concrete example of what constitutes incompatibility (e.g., opposing force directions) to improve accessibility for applied-physics readers.
Theory section (around the medium response operator): the operator is referenced implicitly when mapping objectives to incident fields; an explicit definition or equation for this operator, including its linearity assumption, would aid reproducibility.
Figure captions (if present in results): ensure all panels are labeled with the specific objective vectors or weighting parameters used to generate the Pareto fronts.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of our work and for recognizing its potential significance in enabling multi-objective wave manipulation in scattering media. The recommendation for minor revision is appreciated, and we will update the manuscript to improve clarity and presentation where appropriate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivation chain maps force/torque objectives to optimal incident fields through the linear medium response operator, using standard eigenvalue problems for single-object maxima and weighted sums for multi-object Pareto fronts. These steps rest on the external assumption of known linear scattering and do not reduce by construction to fitted parameters or self-citations; the bounds follow directly from the quadratic forms and convex combinations under the stated model, remaining self-contained against standard wave-physics benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on linear wave physics and the ability to shape incident fields; no new particles or forces are introduced and no free parameters are fitted to data in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Linear and time-invariant wave propagation in the scattering medium
Required to map desired momentum transfer to a shaped incident wave via superposition.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5672 in / 1217 out tokens · 39973 ms · 2026-05-21T18:50:40.885974+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

(12) It is then possible to compute the volume integral of Eq

= jωδα· ( |p1|2∇ακ0 +|v1|2∇αρ0 ) . (12) It is then possible to compute the volume integral of Eq. (12) and use Eq. (8) to obtain u†δi+i†δu= jωδα· ∫ V ( |p1|2∇ακ0 +|v1|2∇αρ0 ) dV. (13) Derivation details, as well as the electromagnetic equiva- lent of Eq. (13) are shown in the End Matter. With this, we evidence that the variations of the immittance vectors...

work page
[2]

▷”cansignify“=

– that is, the set of solutions where no objective can be improved without degrading another. We then discover that the GWS explores the full set of such com- promises. For four or more objectives, convexity can fail, and the GWS recovers only the exposed subset of the Pareto front, leaving non-convex regions inaccessible. As an example, a bi-objective Pa...

work page
[3]

(separate optimization ofQ∆x andQ ∆y instead of diagonalizingQ ∆r ) can be seen as important first steps, but they may fail or become suboptimal in a general sit- uation; the present framework unifies and extends these ideas, providing a systematic route to the truly optimal radiation force control. Beyond fundamental interest, our results may con- tribut...

work page
[4]

M. Fink, D. Cassereau, A. Derode, C. Prada, P. Roux, M. Tanter, J.-L. Thomas, and F. Wu, Time-reversed acoustics, Rep. Prog. Phys.63, 1933 (2000)

work page 1933
[5]

Horodynski, D

M. Horodynski, D. Bouchet, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rot- ter, Invariance property of the Fisher information in scat- tering media, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 233201 (2021)

work page 2021
[6]

I. M. Vellekoop and A. P. Mosk, Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media, Opt. Lett.32, 2309 (2007)

work page 2007
[7]

A. P. Mosk, A. Lagendijk, G. Lerosey, and M. Fink, Con- trolling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media, Nat. Photon.6, 283 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

S. M. Popoff, G. Lerosey, R. Carminati, M. Fink, A. C. Boccara, and S. Gigan, Measuring the transmission ma- trix in optics: an approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 100601 (2010)

work page 2010
[9]

F. T. Smith, Lifetime matrix in collision theory, Phys. Rev.118, 349 (1960). 6

work page 1960
[10]

Froissart, M

M. Froissart, M. L. Goldberger, and K. M. Watson, Spa- tial separation of events inS-matrix theory, Phys. Rev. 131, 2820 (1963)

work page 1963
[11]

P. W. Brouwer, K. M. Frahm, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Quantum mechanical time-delay matrix in chaotic scat- tering, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4737 (1997)

work page 1997
[12]

Ambichl, A

P. Ambichl, A. Brandstötter, J. Böhm, M. Kühmayer, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Focusing inside disordered media with the generalized Wigner-Smith operator, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 033903 (2017)

work page 2017
[13]

Horodynski, M

M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, A. Brandstötter, K. Pich- ler, Y. V. Fyodorov, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Optimal wave fields for micromanipulation in complex scattering environments, Nat. Photon.14, 149 (2020)

work page 2020
[14]

Bouchet, S

D. Bouchet, S. Rotter, and A. P. Mosk, Maximum infor- mation states for coherent scattering measurements, Nat. Phys.17, 564 (2021)

work page 2021
[15]

M. W. Matthès, Y. Bromberg, J. de Rosny, and S. M. Popoff, Learning and avoiding disorder in multimode fibers, Phys. Rev. X11, 021060 (2021)

work page 2021
[16]

del Hougne, K

P. del Hougne, K. B. Yeo, P. Besnier, and M. Davy, Coherent wave control in complex media with arbitrary wavefronts, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 193903 (2021)

work page 2021
[17]

Horodynski, M

M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, C. Ferise, S. Rotter, and M. Davy, Anti-reflection structure for perfect transmis- sion through complex media, Nature607, 281 (2022)

work page 2022
[18]

Hüpfl, N

J. Hüpfl, N. Bachelard, M. Kaczvinszki, M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rotter, Optimal cooling of multiple levitated particles through far-field wavefront shaping, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 083203 (2023)

work page 2023
[19]

J. Sol, L. Le Magoarou, and P. del Hougne, Opti- mal blind focusing on perturbation-inducing targets in sub-unitary complex media, Laser Photonics Rev.19, 2400619 (2024)

work page 2024
[20]

U. G. B¯ utait˙ e, C. Sharp, M. Horodynski, G. M. Gibson, M. J. Padgett, S. Rotter, J. M. Taylor, and D. B. Phillips, Photon-efficient optical tweezers via wavefront shaping, Sci. Adv.10, eadi7792 (2024)

work page 2024
[21]

Globosits, J

D. Globosits, J. Hüpfl, and S. Rotter, Pseudounitary Flo- quet scattering matrix for wave-front shaping in time- periodic photonic media, Phys. Rev. A110, 053515 (2024)

work page 2024
[22]

Goïcoechea, J

A. Goïcoechea, J. Hüpfl, S. Rotter, F. Sarrazin, and M. Davy, Detecting and focusing on a nonlinear target in a complex medium, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 183802 (2025)

work page 2025
[23]

Byrnes and M

N. Byrnes and M. R. Foreman, Perturbing scattering res- onances in non-hermitian systems: a generalized Wigner- Smith operator formulation, Newton1, 100194 (2025)

work page 2025
[24]

K. Y. Bliokh, Z. Kuang, and S. Rotter, Dynamic and geometric shifts in wave scattering, Rep. Prog. Phys.88, 107901 (2025)

work page 2025
[25]

Horodynski, T

M. Horodynski, T. Reiter, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rotter, Tractor beams with optimal pulling force using struc- tured waves, Phys. Rev. A108, 023504 (2023)

work page 2023
[26]

Orazbayev, M

B. Orazbayev, M. Malléjac, N. Bachelard, S. Rotter, and R. Fleury, Wave-momentum shaping for moving objects in heterogeneous and dynamic media, Nat. Phys.20, 1441 (2024)

work page 2024
[27]

J. T. Karlsen, P. Augustsson, and H. Bruus, Acoustic force density acting on inhomogeneous fluids in acoustic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 114504 (2016)

work page 2016
[28]

Anghinoni, G

B. Anghinoni, G. Flizikowski, L. Malacarne, M. Parta- nen, S. Bialkowski, and N. Astrath, On the formulations of the electromagnetic stress–energy tensor, Ann. Phys. 443, 169004 (2022)

work page 2022
[29]

Zemanian, An n-port realizability theory based on the theory of distributions, IEEE Trans

A. Zemanian, An n-port realizability theory based on the theory of distributions, IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory10, 265 (1963)

work page 1963
[30]

25, edited by C

R.H.Dicke,Generalmicrowavecircuittheorems,inPrin- ciples of Microwave Circuits,IETElectromagneticWaves Series No. 25, edited by C. G. Montgomery, R. H. Dicke, and E. M. Purcell (IET, 1987) pp. 130–161

work page 1987
[31]

A. A. Barybin, Modal expansions and orthogonal com- plements in the theory of complex media waveguide exci- tation by external sources for isotropic, anisotropic, and bianisotropic media, Prog. Electromagn. Res.19, 241 (1998)

work page 1998
[32]

Hüpfl, N

J. Hüpfl, N. Bachelard, M. Kaczvinszki, M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rotter, Optimal cooling of multiple levitated particles: Theory of far-field wavefront shaping, Phys. Rev. A107, 023112 (2023)

work page 2023
[33]

This non-generic case is understood in Eq

An exception occurs if the two matrices happen to share the same eigenvector associated with their maxi- mal eigenvalues. This non-generic case is understood in Eq. (23) by observing that what matters is not ultimately the commutation of the two matrices but the vanishing of the expectation value of the commutator

work page
[34]

Miettinen,Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, edited by F

K. Miettinen,Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, edited by F. S. Hillier, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 12 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1999)

work page 1999
[35]

Hausdorff, Der wertvorrat einer bilinearform, Math

F. Hausdorff, Der wertvorrat einer bilinearform, Math. Z.3, 314 (1919)

work page 1919
[36]

M. K. Fan and A. L Tits, On the generalized numerical range, Linear Multilinear Algebra21, 313 (1987)

work page 1987
[37]

Gallay and D

T. Gallay and D. Serre, Numerical measure of a complex matrix, Commun. Pure Appl. Math.65, 287 (2012)

work page 2012
[38]

C. F. Dunkl, P. Gawron, J. A. Holbrook, Z. Puchała, and K. Życzkowski, Numerical shadows: measures and den- sities on the numerical range, Linear Algebra Its Appl. 434, 2042 (2011)

work page 2042
[39]

Campos Venuti and P

L. Campos Venuti and P. Zanardi, Probability density of quantum expectation values, Phys. Lett. A377, 1854 (2013)

work page 2013
[40]

Wang and C

Y. Wang and C. Guo, Probability distribution for coher- ent transport of random waves (2025), arXiv:2511.04602 [physics.optics]

work page arXiv 2025
[41]

About Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation (by E.Schrodinger)

E. Schrödinger, About Heisenberg uncertainty relation (1999), arXiv:quant-ph/9903100 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[42]

Bhatia and C

R. Bhatia and C. Davis, A better bound on the variance, Am. Math. Mon.107, 353 (2000)

work page 2000
[43]

Huang and D

Y. Huang and D. P. Palomar, Rank-constrained separa- ble semidefinite programming with applications to opti- mal beamforming, IEEE Trans. Signal Process.58, 664 (2010)

work page 2010
[44]

Luo, W.-K

Z.-Q. Luo, W.-K. Ma, A. M.-C. So, Y. Ye, and S. Zhang, Semidefinite relaxation of quadratic optimization prob- lems, IEEE Signal Process. Mag.27, 20 (2010)

work page 2010
[45]

Gurobi Optimization, LLC, Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual (2024)

work page 2024
[46]

Del Campo Fonseca and D

A. Del Campo Fonseca and D. Ahmed, Ultrasound robotics for precision therapy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 205, 115164 (2024)

work page 2024
[47]

M. A. Ghanem, A. D. Maxwell, Y.-N. Wang, B. W. Cu- nitz, V. A. Khokhlova, O. A. Sapozhnikov, and M. R. Bailey, Noninvasive acoustic manipulation of objects in a living body, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.117, 16848 (2020). 7

work page 2020
[48]

Lo, C.-H

W.-C. Lo, C.-H. Fan, Y.-J. Ho, C.-W. Lin, and C.-K. Yeh, Tornado-inspired acoustic vortex tweezer for trap- ping and manipulating microbubbles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.118, e2023188118 (2021)

work page 2021
[49]

Del Campo Fonseca, C

A. Del Campo Fonseca, C. Glück, J. Droux, Y. Ferry, C. Frei, S. Wegener, B. Weber, M. El Amki, and D. Ahmed, Ultrasound trapping and navigation of mi- crorobots in the mouse brain vasculature, Nat. Commun. 14, 5889 (2023)

work page 2023
[50]

Y. Yang, Y. Yang, D. Liu, Y. Wang, M. Lu, Q. Zhang, J. Huang, Y. Li, T. Ma, F. Yan, and H. Zheng, In-vivo programmable acoustic manipulation of genetically engi- neered bacteria, Nat. Commun.14, 3297 (2023)

work page 2023
[51]

Medany, L

M. Medany, L. Piglia, L. Achenbach, S. K. Mukkavilli, and D. Ahmed, Model-based reinforcement learning for ultrasound-driven autonomous microrobots, Nat. Mach. Intell.7, 1076 (2025)

work page 2025
[52]

Burstow and A

R. Burstow and A. N. Pouliopoulos, Evaluating the ac- curacy of acoustic holograms for precise spatial targeting within the brain, npj Acoust.1, 24 (2025)

work page 2025
[53]

S. Li, D. Kim, S. Fan, and C. Guo, Joint control of co- herent transmission, reflection, and absorption (2025), arXiv:2511.04788 [physics.optics]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Blanchard and E

P. Blanchard and E. Brüning, Inner product spaces and Hilbert spaces, inMathematical Methods in Physics, Progress in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 69 (Birkhäuser, Cham, 2015) pp. 213–225

work page 2015
[55]

Radiation forces and torques in optics and acoustics

I. Toftul, S. Golat, F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. Nori, Y. Kivshar, and K. Y. Bliokh, Radiation forces and torques in optics and acoustics (2025), arXiv:2410.23670 [physics.optics]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[56]

P. L. Marston and J. H. Crichton, Radiation torque on a sphere caused by a circularly-polarized electromagnetic wave, Phys. Rev. A30, 2508 (1984)

work page 1984
[57]

Zhang and P

L. Zhang and P. L. Marston, Angular momentum flux of nonparaxial acoustic vortex beams and torques on ax- isymmetric objects, Phys. Rev. E84, 065601 (2011)

work page 2011
[58]

G.T.Silva, T.P.Lobo,andF.G.Mitri,Radiationtorque produced by an arbitrary acoustic wave, EPL97, 54003 (2012)

work page 2012
[59]

Smagin, I

M. Smagin, I. Toftul, K. Y. Bliokh, and M. Petrov, Acoustic lateral recoil force and stable lift of anisotropic particles, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 064041 (2024)

work page 2024
[60]

P. C. Chaumet and A. Rahmani, Electromagnetic force and torque on magnetic and negative-index scatterers, Opt. Express17, 2224 (2009)

work page 2009
[61]

Y. E. Lee, K. H. Fung, D. Jin, and N. X. Fang, Optical torque from enhanced scattering by multipolar plasmonic resonance, Nanophotonics3, 343 (2014)

work page 2014
[62]

Nieto-Vesperinas, Optical torque on small bi-isotropic particles, Opt

M. Nieto-Vesperinas, Optical torque on small bi-isotropic particles, Opt. Lett.40, 3021 (2015). End Matter Derivation details and electromagnetic equivalent of Eq.(13)—For a given physical statea, Eq. (8) reads in acoustics P(a)≡− ∫ A (p1av∗ 1a +p∗ 1av1a)·dA=u† aia +i† aua.(26) By extension, it is possible to compose any other physical statea±bora±jb. Usi...

work page 2015

[1] [1]

(12) It is then possible to compute the volume integral of Eq

= jωδα· ( |p1|2∇ακ0 +|v1|2∇αρ0 ) . (12) It is then possible to compute the volume integral of Eq. (12) and use Eq. (8) to obtain u†δi+i†δu= jωδα· ∫ V ( |p1|2∇ακ0 +|v1|2∇αρ0 ) dV. (13) Derivation details, as well as the electromagnetic equiva- lent of Eq. (13) are shown in the End Matter. With this, we evidence that the variations of the immittance vectors...

work page

[2] [2]

▷”cansignify“=

– that is, the set of solutions where no objective can be improved without degrading another. We then discover that the GWS explores the full set of such com- promises. For four or more objectives, convexity can fail, and the GWS recovers only the exposed subset of the Pareto front, leaving non-convex regions inaccessible. As an example, a bi-objective Pa...

work page

[3] [3]

(separate optimization ofQ∆x andQ ∆y instead of diagonalizingQ ∆r ) can be seen as important first steps, but they may fail or become suboptimal in a general sit- uation; the present framework unifies and extends these ideas, providing a systematic route to the truly optimal radiation force control. Beyond fundamental interest, our results may con- tribut...

work page

[4] [4]

M. Fink, D. Cassereau, A. Derode, C. Prada, P. Roux, M. Tanter, J.-L. Thomas, and F. Wu, Time-reversed acoustics, Rep. Prog. Phys.63, 1933 (2000)

work page 1933

[5] [5]

Horodynski, D

M. Horodynski, D. Bouchet, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rot- ter, Invariance property of the Fisher information in scat- tering media, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 233201 (2021)

work page 2021

[6] [6]

I. M. Vellekoop and A. P. Mosk, Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media, Opt. Lett.32, 2309 (2007)

work page 2007

[7] [7]

A. P. Mosk, A. Lagendijk, G. Lerosey, and M. Fink, Con- trolling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media, Nat. Photon.6, 283 (2012)

work page 2012

[8] [8]

S. M. Popoff, G. Lerosey, R. Carminati, M. Fink, A. C. Boccara, and S. Gigan, Measuring the transmission ma- trix in optics: an approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 100601 (2010)

work page 2010

[9] [9]

F. T. Smith, Lifetime matrix in collision theory, Phys. Rev.118, 349 (1960). 6

work page 1960

[10] [10]

Froissart, M

M. Froissart, M. L. Goldberger, and K. M. Watson, Spa- tial separation of events inS-matrix theory, Phys. Rev. 131, 2820 (1963)

work page 1963

[11] [11]

P. W. Brouwer, K. M. Frahm, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Quantum mechanical time-delay matrix in chaotic scat- tering, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4737 (1997)

work page 1997

[12] [12]

Ambichl, A

P. Ambichl, A. Brandstötter, J. Böhm, M. Kühmayer, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Focusing inside disordered media with the generalized Wigner-Smith operator, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 033903 (2017)

work page 2017

[13] [13]

Horodynski, M

M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, A. Brandstötter, K. Pich- ler, Y. V. Fyodorov, U. Kuhl, and S. Rotter, Optimal wave fields for micromanipulation in complex scattering environments, Nat. Photon.14, 149 (2020)

work page 2020

[14] [14]

Bouchet, S

D. Bouchet, S. Rotter, and A. P. Mosk, Maximum infor- mation states for coherent scattering measurements, Nat. Phys.17, 564 (2021)

work page 2021

[15] [15]

M. W. Matthès, Y. Bromberg, J. de Rosny, and S. M. Popoff, Learning and avoiding disorder in multimode fibers, Phys. Rev. X11, 021060 (2021)

work page 2021

[16] [16]

del Hougne, K

P. del Hougne, K. B. Yeo, P. Besnier, and M. Davy, Coherent wave control in complex media with arbitrary wavefronts, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 193903 (2021)

work page 2021

[17] [17]

Horodynski, M

M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, C. Ferise, S. Rotter, and M. Davy, Anti-reflection structure for perfect transmis- sion through complex media, Nature607, 281 (2022)

work page 2022

[18] [18]

Hüpfl, N

J. Hüpfl, N. Bachelard, M. Kaczvinszki, M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rotter, Optimal cooling of multiple levitated particles through far-field wavefront shaping, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 083203 (2023)

work page 2023

[19] [19]

J. Sol, L. Le Magoarou, and P. del Hougne, Opti- mal blind focusing on perturbation-inducing targets in sub-unitary complex media, Laser Photonics Rev.19, 2400619 (2024)

work page 2024

[20] [20]

U. G. B¯ utait˙ e, C. Sharp, M. Horodynski, G. M. Gibson, M. J. Padgett, S. Rotter, J. M. Taylor, and D. B. Phillips, Photon-efficient optical tweezers via wavefront shaping, Sci. Adv.10, eadi7792 (2024)

work page 2024

[21] [21]

Globosits, J

D. Globosits, J. Hüpfl, and S. Rotter, Pseudounitary Flo- quet scattering matrix for wave-front shaping in time- periodic photonic media, Phys. Rev. A110, 053515 (2024)

work page 2024

[22] [22]

Goïcoechea, J

A. Goïcoechea, J. Hüpfl, S. Rotter, F. Sarrazin, and M. Davy, Detecting and focusing on a nonlinear target in a complex medium, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 183802 (2025)

work page 2025

[23] [23]

Byrnes and M

N. Byrnes and M. R. Foreman, Perturbing scattering res- onances in non-hermitian systems: a generalized Wigner- Smith operator formulation, Newton1, 100194 (2025)

work page 2025

[24] [24]

K. Y. Bliokh, Z. Kuang, and S. Rotter, Dynamic and geometric shifts in wave scattering, Rep. Prog. Phys.88, 107901 (2025)

work page 2025

[25] [25]

Horodynski, T

M. Horodynski, T. Reiter, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rotter, Tractor beams with optimal pulling force using struc- tured waves, Phys. Rev. A108, 023504 (2023)

work page 2023

[26] [26]

Orazbayev, M

B. Orazbayev, M. Malléjac, N. Bachelard, S. Rotter, and R. Fleury, Wave-momentum shaping for moving objects in heterogeneous and dynamic media, Nat. Phys.20, 1441 (2024)

work page 2024

[27] [27]

J. T. Karlsen, P. Augustsson, and H. Bruus, Acoustic force density acting on inhomogeneous fluids in acoustic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 114504 (2016)

work page 2016

[28] [28]

Anghinoni, G

B. Anghinoni, G. Flizikowski, L. Malacarne, M. Parta- nen, S. Bialkowski, and N. Astrath, On the formulations of the electromagnetic stress–energy tensor, Ann. Phys. 443, 169004 (2022)

work page 2022

[29] [29]

Zemanian, An n-port realizability theory based on the theory of distributions, IEEE Trans

A. Zemanian, An n-port realizability theory based on the theory of distributions, IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory10, 265 (1963)

work page 1963

[30] [30]

25, edited by C

R.H.Dicke,Generalmicrowavecircuittheorems,inPrin- ciples of Microwave Circuits,IETElectromagneticWaves Series No. 25, edited by C. G. Montgomery, R. H. Dicke, and E. M. Purcell (IET, 1987) pp. 130–161

work page 1987

[31] [31]

A. A. Barybin, Modal expansions and orthogonal com- plements in the theory of complex media waveguide exci- tation by external sources for isotropic, anisotropic, and bianisotropic media, Prog. Electromagn. Res.19, 241 (1998)

work page 1998

[32] [32]

Hüpfl, N

J. Hüpfl, N. Bachelard, M. Kaczvinszki, M. Horodynski, M. Kühmayer, and S. Rotter, Optimal cooling of multiple levitated particles: Theory of far-field wavefront shaping, Phys. Rev. A107, 023112 (2023)

work page 2023

[33] [33]

This non-generic case is understood in Eq

An exception occurs if the two matrices happen to share the same eigenvector associated with their maxi- mal eigenvalues. This non-generic case is understood in Eq. (23) by observing that what matters is not ultimately the commutation of the two matrices but the vanishing of the expectation value of the commutator

work page

[34] [34]

Miettinen,Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, edited by F

K. Miettinen,Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, edited by F. S. Hillier, International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, Vol. 12 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1999)

work page 1999

[35] [35]

Hausdorff, Der wertvorrat einer bilinearform, Math

F. Hausdorff, Der wertvorrat einer bilinearform, Math. Z.3, 314 (1919)

work page 1919

[36] [36]

M. K. Fan and A. L Tits, On the generalized numerical range, Linear Multilinear Algebra21, 313 (1987)

work page 1987

[37] [37]

Gallay and D

T. Gallay and D. Serre, Numerical measure of a complex matrix, Commun. Pure Appl. Math.65, 287 (2012)

work page 2012

[38] [38]

C. F. Dunkl, P. Gawron, J. A. Holbrook, Z. Puchała, and K. Życzkowski, Numerical shadows: measures and den- sities on the numerical range, Linear Algebra Its Appl. 434, 2042 (2011)

work page 2042

[39] [39]

Campos Venuti and P

L. Campos Venuti and P. Zanardi, Probability density of quantum expectation values, Phys. Lett. A377, 1854 (2013)

work page 2013

[40] [40]

Wang and C

Y. Wang and C. Guo, Probability distribution for coher- ent transport of random waves (2025), arXiv:2511.04602 [physics.optics]

work page arXiv 2025

[41] [41]

About Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation (by E.Schrodinger)

E. Schrödinger, About Heisenberg uncertainty relation (1999), arXiv:quant-ph/9903100 [quant-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[42] [42]

Bhatia and C

R. Bhatia and C. Davis, A better bound on the variance, Am. Math. Mon.107, 353 (2000)

work page 2000

[43] [43]

Huang and D

Y. Huang and D. P. Palomar, Rank-constrained separa- ble semidefinite programming with applications to opti- mal beamforming, IEEE Trans. Signal Process.58, 664 (2010)

work page 2010

[44] [44]

Luo, W.-K

Z.-Q. Luo, W.-K. Ma, A. M.-C. So, Y. Ye, and S. Zhang, Semidefinite relaxation of quadratic optimization prob- lems, IEEE Signal Process. Mag.27, 20 (2010)

work page 2010

[45] [45]

Gurobi Optimization, LLC, Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual (2024)

work page 2024

[46] [46]

Del Campo Fonseca and D

A. Del Campo Fonseca and D. Ahmed, Ultrasound robotics for precision therapy, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 205, 115164 (2024)

work page 2024

[47] [47]

M. A. Ghanem, A. D. Maxwell, Y.-N. Wang, B. W. Cu- nitz, V. A. Khokhlova, O. A. Sapozhnikov, and M. R. Bailey, Noninvasive acoustic manipulation of objects in a living body, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.117, 16848 (2020). 7

work page 2020

[48] [48]

Lo, C.-H

W.-C. Lo, C.-H. Fan, Y.-J. Ho, C.-W. Lin, and C.-K. Yeh, Tornado-inspired acoustic vortex tweezer for trap- ping and manipulating microbubbles, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.118, e2023188118 (2021)

work page 2021

[49] [49]

Del Campo Fonseca, C

A. Del Campo Fonseca, C. Glück, J. Droux, Y. Ferry, C. Frei, S. Wegener, B. Weber, M. El Amki, and D. Ahmed, Ultrasound trapping and navigation of mi- crorobots in the mouse brain vasculature, Nat. Commun. 14, 5889 (2023)

work page 2023

[50] [50]

Y. Yang, Y. Yang, D. Liu, Y. Wang, M. Lu, Q. Zhang, J. Huang, Y. Li, T. Ma, F. Yan, and H. Zheng, In-vivo programmable acoustic manipulation of genetically engi- neered bacteria, Nat. Commun.14, 3297 (2023)

work page 2023

[51] [51]

Medany, L

M. Medany, L. Piglia, L. Achenbach, S. K. Mukkavilli, and D. Ahmed, Model-based reinforcement learning for ultrasound-driven autonomous microrobots, Nat. Mach. Intell.7, 1076 (2025)

work page 2025

[52] [52]

Burstow and A

R. Burstow and A. N. Pouliopoulos, Evaluating the ac- curacy of acoustic holograms for precise spatial targeting within the brain, npj Acoust.1, 24 (2025)

work page 2025

[53] [53]

S. Li, D. Kim, S. Fan, and C. Guo, Joint control of co- herent transmission, reflection, and absorption (2025), arXiv:2511.04788 [physics.optics]

work page arXiv 2025

[54] [54]

Blanchard and E

P. Blanchard and E. Brüning, Inner product spaces and Hilbert spaces, inMathematical Methods in Physics, Progress in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 69 (Birkhäuser, Cham, 2015) pp. 213–225

work page 2015

[55] [55]

Radiation forces and torques in optics and acoustics

I. Toftul, S. Golat, F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. Nori, Y. Kivshar, and K. Y. Bliokh, Radiation forces and torques in optics and acoustics (2025), arXiv:2410.23670 [physics.optics]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[56] [56]

P. L. Marston and J. H. Crichton, Radiation torque on a sphere caused by a circularly-polarized electromagnetic wave, Phys. Rev. A30, 2508 (1984)

work page 1984

[57] [57]

Zhang and P

L. Zhang and P. L. Marston, Angular momentum flux of nonparaxial acoustic vortex beams and torques on ax- isymmetric objects, Phys. Rev. E84, 065601 (2011)

work page 2011

[58] [58]

G.T.Silva, T.P.Lobo,andF.G.Mitri,Radiationtorque produced by an arbitrary acoustic wave, EPL97, 54003 (2012)

work page 2012

[59] [59]

Smagin, I

M. Smagin, I. Toftul, K. Y. Bliokh, and M. Petrov, Acoustic lateral recoil force and stable lift of anisotropic particles, Phys. Rev. Appl.22, 064041 (2024)

work page 2024

[60] [60]

P. C. Chaumet and A. Rahmani, Electromagnetic force and torque on magnetic and negative-index scatterers, Opt. Express17, 2224 (2009)

work page 2009

[61] [61]

Y. E. Lee, K. H. Fung, D. Jin, and N. X. Fang, Optical torque from enhanced scattering by multipolar plasmonic resonance, Nanophotonics3, 343 (2014)

work page 2014

[62] [62]

Nieto-Vesperinas, Optical torque on small bi-isotropic particles, Opt

M. Nieto-Vesperinas, Optical torque on small bi-isotropic particles, Opt. Lett.40, 3021 (2015). End Matter Derivation details and electromagnetic equivalent of Eq.(13)—For a given physical statea, Eq. (8) reads in acoustics P(a)≡− ∫ A (p1av∗ 1a +p∗ 1av1a)·dA=u† aia +i† aua.(26) By extension, it is possible to compose any other physical statea±bora±jb. Usi...

work page 2015