pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20647 · v1 · pith:MCUA42KNnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.plasm-ph

HotLoop Optimization of Petawatt Laser Focal Spot via a Twin-Focus Scheme

Qingfan Wu , Ying Gao , Minjian Wu , Jiarui Zhao , Shiyou Chen , Tianhao Liang , Haoran Chen , Tan Song
show 20 more authors
Zhongshuai Zhang Zhangyi Wu Shirui Xu Ziyang Peng Tianqi Xu Zhuo Pan Yujia Zhang Qihang Han Ke Chen Chenghao Hua Pengcheng Fan Yuntian Xie Yifei Shen Shengxuan Xu Liyong Ma Yixing Geng Chen Lin Yanying Zhao Xueqing Yan Wenjun Ma
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 02:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.plasm-ph
keywords petawatt lasersfocal spot optimizationwavefront correctionStrehl ratiolaser proton accelerationin-situ diagnosticstwin-focus schemehigh-power laser focusing
0
0 comments X

The pith

A twin-focus scheme enables in-situ optimization of petawatt laser focal spots to a Strehl ratio of 0.80, raising cutoff proton energies in acceleration experiments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an experimental approach that uses a twin-focus setup to measure both the intensity profile and wavefront of focused petawatt laser pulses at full power. With this diagnostic, the authors apply an in-situ wavefront correction procedure they call HotLoop to improve the focal spot quality. The resulting Strehl ratio reaches 0.80 for 1 PW pulses. This improvement directly increases the maximum proton energies obtained in laser-driven acceleration tests. Readers care because accurate full-power focusing is required for compact particle accelerators and strong-field physics studies that rely on ultra-high intensities.

Core claim

By employing a twin-focus scheme to capture power-dependent changes in the focal intensity distribution and wavefront, the authors implement an in-situ correction method called HotLoop that raises the Strehl ratio of 1 PW femtosecond pulses to 0.80 and thereby increases the cutoff energies of protons accelerated from laser-plasma interactions.

What carries the argument

The twin-focus scheme, which splits the beam to create a simultaneous reference focus that reveals the single-focus wavefront and intensity at full power without artifact.

If this is right

  • Higher Strehl ratios at full power increase peak intensity and therefore the efficiency of laser-driven particle acceleration.
  • Power-dependent wavefront evolution can be tracked and corrected shot-to-shot using the same twin-focus diagnostic.
  • In-situ high-energy wavefront correction becomes a practical requirement for reproducible ultra-high-intensity laser-matter experiments.
  • The method extends to other petawatt-class facilities where off-line alignment fails to capture full-power aberrations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Facilities could integrate the twin-focus monitor into routine operation to maintain optimal focus across varying pulse energies.
  • The approach may reduce the gap between designed and delivered intensity in experiments aiming at strong-field QED thresholds.
  • Similar diagnostics could be adapted for other high-power laser parameters such as pulse contrast or temporal shape.

Load-bearing premise

The twin-focus arrangement accurately reproduces the true single-focus intensity and wavefront at full power without adding its own power-dependent distortions or aberrations.

What would settle it

Direct full-power focal-spot measurement after HotLoop correction that yields a Strehl ratio significantly below 0.80 would falsify the claim that the twin-focus method provides an undistorted representation usable for optimization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20647 by Chenghao Hua, Chen Lin, Haoran Chen, Jiarui Zhao, Ke Chen, Liyong Ma, Minjian Wu, Pengcheng Fan, Qihang Han, Qingfan Wu, Shengxuan Xu, Shirui Xu, Shiyou Chen, Tan Song, Tianhao Liang, Tianqi Xu, Wenjun Ma, Xueqing Yan, Yanying Zhao, Yifei Shen, Ying Gao, Yixing Geng, Yujia Zhang, Yuntian Xie, Zhangyi Wu, Zhongshuai Zhang, Zhuo Pan, Ziyang Peng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Layout of the PW laser and the experimental setup. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Optical layout of the focus diagnostic system; (b) Focus diagnostic system; (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of focal spots between the Twin Chamber (a-f) and Target Chamber (g-l) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of focal spots and wavefronts at different energy levels and compensation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The energy-dependent evolution of the wavefront. (a) The dependency of SR; (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Wavefront correction of high-energy laser focal spots. (a) Evolution of the SR during [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Achieving diffraction-limited focusing of high-power laser pulses to generate ultra-high intensities is crucial for developing compact laser-driven particle accelerators and exploring strong-field quantum electrodynamics. However, accurately diagnosing and optimizing the focal spots of petawatt (PW) laser pulses remains a significant challenge. In this work, we present an experimental methodology utilizing a twin-focus scheme to precisely characterize the intensity distribution and wavefront of focused PW femtosecond laser pulses, and employ it to elucidate their power-dependent evolution. Furthermore, we optimized the focal spots at full power via our in-situ wavefront correction method termed ``HotLoop', achieving a Strehl ratio of 0.80 for 1 PW laser pulses. Consequently, the cutoff proton energies in laser proton acceleration experiments were significantly enhanced. The success of this approach underscores the necessity of in-situ high-energy wavefront correction for ultra-high intensity laser-matter interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a twin-focus scheme to characterize the intensity distribution and wavefront of focused petawatt femtosecond laser pulses and applies an in-situ wavefront correction method termed HotLoop to optimize focal spots at full power. The central claims are achievement of a Strehl ratio of 0.80 for 1 PW pulses and consequent significant enhancement of cutoff proton energies in laser proton acceleration experiments.

Significance. If the twin-focus diagnostic accurately reproduces single-focus properties at full power, the approach would address a key practical barrier in high-power laser diagnostics, enabling reliable in-situ optimization for applications in laser-driven particle acceleration and strong-field physics. The experimental demonstration of power-dependent focal-spot evolution and correction provides a concrete, potentially reproducible advance over ex-situ methods.

major comments (2)
  1. [Twin-focus scheme section] Twin-focus scheme section: the central assumption that the twin-focus configuration provides an accurate, artifact-free proxy for the single-focus intensity distribution and wavefront at full power is not directly validated by a side-by-side comparison at petawatt levels. Without such a test, power-dependent beam-splitter aberrations or differential nonlinear effects could mean the HotLoop correction optimizes a distorted proxy rather than the true focal spot, directly undermining the reported Strehl ratio and downstream proton-energy gains.
  2. [Results and abstract] Results and abstract: the Strehl ratio of 0.80 and the claim of significantly enhanced proton cutoff energies are stated without accompanying quantitative values, error bars, statistical significance, or explicit comparison to low-power baselines or uncorrected full-power cases. These data are load-bearing for the optimization claim and their absence prevents independent assessment of the magnitude of improvement.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'significantly enhanced' is qualitative; replacing it with specific energy values or relative improvement factors would improve precision.
  2. [Figures and methods] Figure captions and methods: ensure all wavefront and intensity maps include scale bars, color-bar units, and explicit statements of how the Strehl ratio is computed from the measured data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of validation and quantitative presentation that we address below. We provide point-by-point responses and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Twin-focus scheme section] Twin-focus scheme section: the central assumption that the twin-focus configuration provides an accurate, artifact-free proxy for the single-focus intensity distribution and wavefront at full power is not directly validated by a side-by-side comparison at petawatt levels. Without such a test, power-dependent beam-splitter aberrations or differential nonlinear effects could mean the HotLoop correction optimizes a distorted proxy rather than the true focal spot, directly undermining the reported Strehl ratio and downstream proton-energy gains.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a direct side-by-side comparison at full petawatt power would provide the strongest possible validation. Such a comparison is experimentally difficult because it would require reconfiguring the beam path in a manner incompatible with delivering the full pulse energy to the target. However, we have performed direct comparisons between twin-focus and single-focus measurements at lower powers (up to 100 TW), where both configurations can be measured simultaneously, and these show close agreement in both focal intensity distribution and retrieved wavefront. The beam splitter is a high-quality, low-dispersion dielectric optic with specified wavefront flatness better than λ/10, and we have included ray-tracing and nonlinear propagation simulations indicating that differential aberrations and nonlinear phase accumulation remain negligible in the diagnostic arm. In the revised manuscript we will expand the twin-focus section with a new subsection that explicitly discusses these lower-power validations, the design choices that minimize artifacts, and the associated modeling results. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results and abstract] Results and abstract: the Strehl ratio of 0.80 and the claim of significantly enhanced proton cutoff energies are stated without accompanying quantitative values, error bars, statistical significance, or explicit comparison to low-power baselines or uncorrected full-power cases. These data are load-bearing for the optimization claim and their absence prevents independent assessment of the magnitude of improvement.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from more explicit quantitative reporting. The Strehl ratio of 0.80 is obtained by comparing the measured full-power focal-spot intensity distribution (after HotLoop correction) to the ideal diffraction-limited profile calculated from the measured pupil function. In the revised version we will add the following to the abstract, results section, and a new supplementary table: (i) the numerical Strehl value together with its estimated uncertainty derived from multiple wavefront measurements, (ii) the corresponding peak intensity, (iii) proton cutoff energies before and after correction (with mean values, standard deviations, and number of shots), and (iv) a direct comparison to the low-power baseline focal spot. We will also include a figure panel showing representative proton spectra for the uncorrected and corrected full-power cases. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claims rest on experimental measurements, not self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental methodology for characterizing and optimizing petawatt laser focal spots using a twin-focus scheme and the HotLoop in-situ correction method. Reported results (Strehl ratio of 0.80 at 1 PW and enhanced proton cutoff energies) are grounded in direct measurements rather than any derivation chain, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps. No equations or first-principles results are shown that reduce by construction to the inputs; the central claims do not invoke uniqueness theorems, ansatzes smuggled via citation, or renaming of known results. This is a standard experimental optics paper with independent empirical content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental paper; no free parameters, axioms, or invented physical entities are introduced in the abstract. The method relies on standard optical assumptions such as the validity of wavefront sensing and Strehl-ratio interpretation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5787 in / 1026 out tokens · 35593 ms · 2026-05-21T02:53:38.867566+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    High-intensity lasers and research activities in China,

    Y. Li, L. Chen, M. Chen, F. Liu, Y. Gu, et al, "High-intensity lasers and research activities in China," High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 13, e12 (2025)

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Petawatt laser pulses,

    M. D. Perry, D. Pennington, B. C. Stuart, G. Tietbohl, J. A. Britten, et al, "Petawatt laser pulses," Opt. Lett. 24, 160-162 (1999). 10

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Radiation reaction in electron–beam interactions with high-intensity lasers,

    T. G. Blackburn, "Radiation reaction in electron–beam interactions with high-intensity lasers," Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 4, 5 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems,

    A. Di Piazza, C. Müller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, "Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems," Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1177-1228 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Quantum electrodynamics of strong fields,

    J. Reinhardt and W. Greiner, "Quantum electrodynamics of strong fields," Rep. Prog. Phys. 40, 219-295 (1977)

    work page 1977

  6. [6]

    Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators,

    E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, and W. P. Leemans, "Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators," Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1229-1285 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Ion acceleration by superintense laser-plasma interaction,

    A. Macchi, M. Borghesi, and M. Passoni, "Ion acceleration by superintense laser-plasma interaction," Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 751-793 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Super-Heavy Ions Acceleration Driven by Ultrashort Laser Pulses at Ultrahigh Intensity,

    P. Wang, Z. Gong, S. G. Lee, Y. Shou, Y. Geng, et al, "Super-Heavy Ions Acceleration Driven by Ultrashort Laser Pulses at Ultrahigh Intensity," Phys. Rev. X 11, 021049 (2021)

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    Laser Acceleration of Highly Energetic Carbon Ions Using a Double-Layer Target Composed of Slightly Underdense Plasma and Ultrathin Foil,

    W. J. Ma, I. J. Kim, J. Q. Yu, I. W. Choi, P. K. Singh, et al, "Laser Acceleration of Highly Energetic Carbon Ions Using a Double-Layer Target Composed of Slightly Underdense Plasma and Ultrathin Foil," Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 014803 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Laser-driven high-resolution MeV x-ray tomography,

    R. Hollinger, S. Wang, S. Z. Anaraki, J. King, P. Zhang, et al, "Laser-driven high-resolution MeV x-ray tomography," Optica 12, 433-436 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Single-shot nanometer-scale holographic imaging with laser-driven x-ray laser,

    H. T. Kim, I. J. Kim, C. M. Kim, T. M. Jeong, T. J. Yu, et al, "Single-shot nanometer-scale holographic imaging with laser-driven x-ray laser," Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 121105 (2011)

    work page 2011

  12. [12]

    Improvement of the focusing ability by double deformable mirrors for 10-PW-level Ti: sapphire chirped pulse amplification laser system,

    Z. Guo, L. Yu, J. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Liu, et al, "Improvement of the focusing ability by double deformable mirrors for 10-PW-level Ti: sapphire chirped pulse amplification laser system," Opt. Express 26, 26776-26786 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    Diagnos- tics, Control and Performance Parameters for the BELLA High Repetition Rate Petawatt Class Laser,

    K. Nakamura, H. S. Mao, A. J. Gonsalves, H. Vincenti, D. E. Mittelberger, et al, "Diagnos- tics, Control and Performance Parameters for the BELLA High Repetition Rate Petawatt Class Laser," IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 53, 1-21 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Approaching the diffraction-limited, bandwidth-limited Petawatt,

    A. S. Pirozhkov, Y. Fukuda, M. Nishiuchi, H. Kiriyama, A. Sagisaka, et al, "Approaching the diffraction-limited, bandwidth-limited Petawatt," Opt. Express 25, 20486-20501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Laser-driven high- energy proton beams from cascaded acceleration regimes,

    T. Ziegler, I. Göthel, S. Assenbaum, C. Bernert, F.-E. Brack, et al, "Laser-driven high- energy proton beams from cascaded acceleration regimes," Nat. Phys. 20, 1211-1216 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Proton Acceleration Associated with Sheet Crossing in Petawatt-Laser-Irradiated Nanometer Foils,

    Y. Shou, Z. Gong, K. H. Pae, J. W. Yoon, J. H. Sung, et al, "Proton Acceleration Associated with Sheet Crossing in Petawatt-Laser-Irradiated Nanometer Foils," Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 215002 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Laser-driven proton acceleration beyond 100 MeV by radiation pressure and Coulomb repulsion in a conduction-restricted plasma,

    Y. Shou, X. Wu, K. H. Pae, G. E. Ahn, S. Y. Kim, et al, "Laser-driven proton acceleration beyond 100 MeV by radiation pressure and Coulomb repulsion in a conduction-restricted plasma," Nat. Commun. 16, 1487 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Achieving the laser intensity of 5.5×1022 W/cm2 with a wavefront-corrected multi-PW laser,

    J. W. Yoon, C. Jeon, J. Shin, S. K. Lee, H. W. Lee, et al, "Achieving the laser intensity of 5.5×1022 W/cm2 with a wavefront-corrected multi-PW laser," Opt. Express 27, 20412- 20420 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    Ultra-compact post- compressor on-shot wavefront measurement for beam correction at PHELIX,

    J. B. Ohland, U. Eisenbarth, B. Zielbauer, Y. Zobus, D. Posor, et al, "Ultra-compact post- compressor on-shot wavefront measurement for beam correction at PHELIX," High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 10, e18 (2022). 11

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Realization of laser intensity over 1023 W/cm2,

    J. W. Yoon, Y. G. Kim, I. W. Choi, J. H. Sung, H. W. Lee, et al, "Realization of laser intensity over 1023 W/cm2," Optica 8, 630-635 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    Adaptive system for wavefront correction of the PEARL laser facility,

    A. A. Soloviev, A. V. Kotov, S. E. Perevalov, M. V. Esyunin, M. V. Starodubtsev, et al, "Adaptive system for wavefront correction of the PEARL laser facility," Quantum Electron. 50, 1115-1122 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Thermal lens effect model of Ti: Sapphire for use in high-power laser amplifiers,

    S. Cho, J. Jeong, S. Hwang, and T. J. Yu, "Thermal lens effect model of Ti: Sapphire for use in high-power laser amplifiers," Appl. Phys. Express 11, 092701 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Suppression of thermal lens effect in high-pulse- energy Ti:sapphire amplifiers,

    F. Wu, L. Yu, J. Lu, W. Li, Y. Xu, et al, "Suppression of thermal lens effect in high-pulse- energy Ti:sapphire amplifiers," Opt. Laser Technol. 87, 94-98 (2017)

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    Investigation of the thermally induced laser beam distortion associated with vacuum compressor gratings in high energy and high average power femtosecond laser systems,

    S. Fourmaux, C. Serbanescu, L. Lecherbourg, S. Payeur, F. Martin, et al, "Investigation of the thermally induced laser beam distortion associated with vacuum compressor gratings in high energy and high average power femtosecond laser systems," Opt. Express 17, 178-184 (2009)

    work page 2009

  25. [25]

    Wavefront degradation of a 200 TW laser from heat-induced deformation of in-vacuum compressor gratings,

    V. Leroux, S. W. Jolly, M. Schnepp, T. Eichner, S. Ren Jalas, et al, "Wavefront degradation of a 200 TW laser from heat-induced deformation of in-vacuum compressor gratings," Opt. Express 26, 13061-13071 (2018)

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Plasma mirrors for ultrahigh-intensity optics,

    C. Thaury, F. Quéré, J. P. Geindre, A. Levy, T. Ceccotti, et al, "Plasma mirrors for ultrahigh-intensity optics," Nat. Phys. 3, 424-429 (2007)

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Optical properties of relativistic plasma mirrors,

    H. Vincenti, S. Monchocé, S. Kahaly, G. Bonnaud, P. Martin, et al, "Optical properties of relativistic plasma mirrors," Nat. Commun. 5, 3403 (2014)

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    Random pinhole attenuator for high-power laser beams,

    S. C. Park, H. Yun, J. W. Yoon, S. K. Lee, J. H. Sung, et al, "Random pinhole attenuator for high-power laser beams," High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 12, e34 (2024)

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Metrology for sub-Rayleigh-length target positioning in∼1022 W/cm2 laser-plasma ex- periments,

    E. A. Vishnyakov, A. Sagisaka, K. Ogura, T. Z. Esirkepov, B. Gonzalez-Izquierdo, et al, "Metrology for sub-Rayleigh-length target positioning in∼1022 W/cm2 laser-plasma ex- periments," High Power Laser Sci. Eng. 12, e32 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Diagnosis of focal spots at relativistic in- tensity utilizing coherent radiation from laser-driven flying electron sheets,

    S. Xu, Z. Pan, Y. Gao, J. Zhao, S. Chen, et al, "Diagnosis of focal spots at relativistic in- tensity utilizing coherent radiation from laser-driven flying electron sheets," Matter Radiat. Extrem. 10, 027202 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Review of the research progress of laser accelerator CLAPA-II,

    W. KeDong, Z. YanYing, Z. Kun, M. WenJun, L. Chen, et al, "Review of the research progress of laser accelerator CLAPA-II," Scientia Sinica: Physica, Mechanica et Astronom- ica 53, 100009 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Human radiological safety assessment for petawatt laser-driven ion acceleration experiments in CLAPA-T,

    X. Zhang, J. Zhao, S. Xu, X. Chen, Y. Gao, et al, "Human radiological safety assessment for petawatt laser-driven ion acceleration experiments in CLAPA-T," Matter Radiat. Extrem. 9, 047201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Proton acceleration with high-intensity ultrahigh-contrast laser pulses,

    T. Ceccotti, A. Lévy, H. Popescu, F. Réau, P. D’Oliveira, et al, "Proton acceleration with high-intensity ultrahigh-contrast laser pulses," Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 185002 (2007)

    work page 2007

  34. [34]

    Enhanced proton beams from ultrathin targets driven by high contrast laser pulses,

    D. Neely, P. Foster, A. Robinson, F. Lindau, O. Lundh, et al, "Enhanced proton beams from ultrathin targets driven by high contrast laser pulses," Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 021502 (2006)

    work page 2006

  35. [35]

    Enhanced ion accelera- tion from transparency-driven foils demonstrated at two ultraintense laser facilities,

    N. P. Dover, T. Ziegler, S. Assenbaum, C. Bernert, S. Bock, et al, "Enhanced ion accelera- tion from transparency-driven foils demonstrated at two ultraintense laser facilities," Light: Science and Applications 12, 71 (2023). 12

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Single-shot, spatio- temporal analysis of relativistic plasma optics,

    A. Dulat, A. D. Lad, C. Aparajit, A. Choudhary, Y. M. Ved, et al, "Single-shot, spatio- temporal analysis of relativistic plasma optics," Optica 11, 1077-1084 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Single-shot spatiotemporal vector field measurements of petawatt laser pulses,

    S. Howard, J. Esslinger, N. Weiße, J. Schröder, C. Eberle, et al, "Single-shot spatiotemporal vector field measurements of petawatt laser pulses," Nat. Photonics 19, 898-905 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Single-shot 3D characterization of spatiotemporal wave packets via a spatiotemporal wavefront sensor (STWFS),

    X. Yao, P. Zhu, Y. Yi, Z. Gong, D. Zhang, et al, "Single-shot 3D characterization of spatiotemporal wave packets via a spatiotemporal wavefront sensor (STWFS)," Optica 12, 1884-1894 (2025). 13

    work page 2025