pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20346 · v1 · pith:MXSUMCGJnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🪐 quant-ph

Forced Gap Post-Selection for Quantum LDPC Codes and their Operations

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 07:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords post-selectionquantum LDPC codesbivariate bicycle codesbelief propagationlogical error ratequantum error correctionRelay-BP decoder
0
0 comments X

The pith

A forced-gap post-selection strategy improves logical error rates by over a factor of 4 for quantum LDPC codes using only belief propagation decoding.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a post-selection method for high-rate quantum codes in which a decoder is first run normally on a circuit and then re-run once per logical observable while forced to output the complementary logical outcome. Shots are rejected when the likelihood scores for the baseline and forced-complementary solutions are similar. When benchmarked with the Relay-BP decoder on 72-qubit and 144-qubit bivariate bicycle codes plus associated surgery gadgets, the approach yields more than fourfold lower logical error rates than prior post-selection techniques at the same rejection fraction. The method is lightweight because it requires only repeated belief-propagation passes rather than higher-latency decoders such as BP-OSD.

Core claim

By forcing the decoder to produce a complementary logical solution for each observable after the baseline run and rejecting shots whose likelihood scores for the two solutions are close, logical error rates on the 72-qubit and 144-qubit bivariate bicycle codes and their surgery gadgets fall by more than a factor of four compared with previous post-selection methods, while using only FPGA-friendly belief propagation at the same post-selection rate.

What carries the argument

The forced-gap rejection rule that discards a shot when the decoder likelihood for the baseline solution is comparable to the likelihood obtained when the decoder is forced to return the logically complementary outcome.

If this is right

  • Logical error rates drop by more than a factor of four on the tested 72-qubit and 144-qubit bivariate bicycle codes and surgery gadgets at fixed post-selection rate.
  • The strategy applies across different decoders and to other high-rate quantum LDPC codes.
  • Only repeated belief-propagation decoding passes are required, avoiding the computational cost of BP-OSD.
  • The same improvement is observed for both memory and logical surgery operations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If likelihood calibration holds for other decoders, the method could be combined with existing surface-code or other LDPC constructions to lower overall qubit overhead.
  • The rejection criterion might be generalized to multiple logical observables simultaneously or to analog syndrome data.
  • Hardware implementations could exploit the FPGA-friendly nature of belief propagation to perform the extra decoding rounds with low added latency.

Load-bearing premise

The decoder likelihood scores correctly rank the relative probabilities of logically complementary solutions.

What would settle it

An experiment in which the decoder likelihood scores are deliberately miscalibrated or biased and the logical error rate is then measured with and without the gap-based rejection rule.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20346 by Adam Wills, Isaac Chuang, Theodore J. Yoder.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the Forced Gap post-selection strategy. Phase 1 (blue): the decoder is run on syndrome σ to produce a baseline correction e (0) with logical class L (0) = A·e (0). If the decoder declares erasure the instance is immediately rejected. Phase 2 (amber): for each of the K logical observables (i = 1, . . . , K), a forced run solves the modified problem (H(i) , σ(i) ), where an extra row appended to … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Simulated error rates per round for the idling [[72, 12, 6]] code, and the [[144, 12, 12]] code under post-selection, at physical noise p = 10−3 and 2.5 × 10−3 , respectively. The x-axis shows “Post￾selection rate”, that is, the fraction of shots that are rejected, where a curve is generated by varying the threshold T. Both codes are simulated for 6 and 12 rounds of syndrome extraction, respectively, and t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Logical error rates of various surgery bicycle instructions [Yod+25] subject to post-selection under the forced gap strategy, all at physical noise p = 2.5 × 10−3 . We present the logical error rate for the entire circuit, without normalising by the number of rounds. The number of syndrome extraction rounds that we used in our simulations of each gadget are shown above. These were chosen by optimality of t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a simple and general post-selection strategy for high-rate quantum codes that is transferrable across decoders. After an initial baseline run, the decoder is re-run once per logical observable, and forced in these latter runs to provide a solution where the given observable has the complementary outcome. Shots are rejected that find logically complementary solutions with similar likelihoods compared to the baseline. Using the Relay-BP decoder, we benchmark the strategy on the $72$-qubit and $144$-qubit bivariate bicycle codes, as well as surgery gadgets for the latter. In comparison to previous post-selection strategies, our results offer an improved logical error rate by over a factor of $4$ on the same circuit and physical error rate, and at the same rate of post-selection. Our strategies are also lightweight, relying only on FPGA-friendly belief propagation, whereas the previous best used repeated rounds of a high-latency BP-OSD decoder.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a forced-gap post-selection strategy for quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. After a baseline decoder run, the decoder is re-run with each logical observable forced to its complementary outcome; shots are rejected when the likelihoods of the baseline and forced-complementary solutions are similar. Using the Relay-BP decoder, the strategy is benchmarked on the 72-qubit and 144-qubit bivariate bicycle codes as well as surgery gadgets for the latter, claiming an improvement in logical error rate by more than a factor of 4 relative to prior post-selection methods at identical post-selection rate and physical error rate. The approach is positioned as lightweight and transferable because it relies only on belief propagation rather than repeated BP-OSD rounds.

Significance. If the central empirical claim holds, the work supplies a practical, decoder-agnostic post-selection technique that materially lowers logical error rates for high-rate quantum LDPC codes without increasing post-selection overhead. The explicit use of FPGA-friendly belief propagation (rather than higher-latency BP-OSD) constitutes a concrete implementation advantage. The direct benchmarking on concrete 72- and 144-qubit codes and surgery gadgets supplies reproducible evidence of the performance gain when the decoder likelihoods behave as assumed.

major comments (1)
  1. [Benchmarking results on the 72-qubit and 144-qubit bivariate bicycle codes] Benchmarking results on the 72-qubit and 144-qubit bivariate bicycle codes: the reported factor-of-4 logical-error-rate reduction at fixed post-selection rate depends on Relay-BP likelihood scores being at least monotonically related to the true posterior probabilities of logically complementary error patterns. No calibration diagnostics (likelihood histograms conditioned on actual logical outcome, or direct comparison against BP-OSD or exact enumeration on small instances) are supplied to substantiate this assumption. Systematic bias in the approximate decoder could therefore cause the gap-rejection rule either to discard useful shots or to retain erroneous ones, erasing the claimed improvement.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and benchmarking sections] The abstract and benchmarking sections omit statistical error bars, the total number of shots collected, and any description of decoder calibration procedures. Inclusion of these details would allow readers to assess the statistical significance of the factor-of-4 claim.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the physical error rate and post-selection rate at which each curve is evaluated so that the constant-rate comparison is immediately verifiable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our work. We address the major comment in detail below, providing clarifications and committing to revisions where appropriate to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Benchmarking results on the 72-qubit and 144-qubit bivariate bicycle codes: the reported factor-of-4 logical-error-rate reduction at fixed post-selection rate depends on Relay-BP likelihood scores being at least monotonically related to the true posterior probabilities of logically complementary error patterns. No calibration diagnostics (likelihood histograms conditioned on actual logical outcome, or direct comparison against BP-OSD or exact enumeration on small instances) are supplied to substantiate this assumption. Systematic bias in the approximate decoder could therefore cause the gap-rejection rule either to discard useful shots or to retain erroneous ones, erasing the claimed improvement.

    Authors: We acknowledge the referee's concern regarding the lack of explicit calibration for the Relay-BP likelihood scores. However, we note that the post-selection strategy is designed to exploit relative likelihood differences between the baseline and forced-complementary runs, rather than relying on absolute probability values. This relative approach reduces sensitivity to systematic biases in the decoder's approximations. The empirical results demonstrate consistent improvements across different code sizes and operations, which would be unlikely if the likelihoods were not sufficiently correlated with the true posteriors. To further substantiate this, in the revised manuscript we will include additional diagnostics: specifically, likelihood ratio histograms for cases where the logical outcome is known (e.g., via exact methods on smaller analogs or by injecting known errors), and a comparison of post-selection performance using Relay-BP versus BP-OSD on the 72-qubit code. We believe these additions will confirm the validity of our assumptions while maintaining the lightweight nature of the method. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: strategy and benchmarks are defined independently of results

full rationale

The paper defines the forced-gap post-selection rule directly from baseline and forced-complementary decoder runs, then reports empirical logical error rates from direct benchmarking on 72- and 144-qubit bivariate bicycle codes. No equation or claim reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, no self-citation chain justifies the central performance gain, and the improvement is measured against prior post-selection methods on identical circuits. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The strategy assumes standard quantum error correction noise models and that belief-propagation likelihoods are sufficiently informative; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the post-selection threshold choice.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Belief-propagation decoder likelihoods provide a reliable ranking of logical error probabilities under the physical noise model used.
    Invoked when the gap-based rejection rule is defined and when comparing to baseline runs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5688 in / 1316 out tokens · 34262 ms · 2026-05-21T07:27:40.441805+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Concatenating Algebraic Codes over High-Rate Quantum LDPC Codes

    quant-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Concatenating quantum Reed-Solomon outer codes over the gross code using Galois qudits reaches teraquop regime at 10^{-3} physical noise with lower overhead than prior two-gross-code constructions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 103 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 8 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16408 , year=

    Decision-tree decoders for general quantum LDPC codes , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16408 , year=

  2. [2]

    Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation With Constant Error Rate

    D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or , title =. quant-ph/9906129 , year =

  3. [3]

    Gidney and M

    C. Gidney and M. Newman and P. Brooks and C. Jones , title =. Nature Communications , volume =

  4. [4]

    C. A. Pattison and A. Krishna and J. Preskill , title =. Quantum , volume =

  5. [5]

    David Forney , address =

    G. David Forney , address =. Concatenated codes [by] G. David Forney, Jr. , year =. Concatenated codes , lccn =

  6. [6]

    2025 , eprint=

    Tour de gross: A modular quantum computer based on bivariate bicycle codes , author=. 2025 , eprint=

  7. [7]

    Nature , volume=

    High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory , author=. Nature , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

  8. [8]

    International Symposium on Applied Algebra, Algebraic Algorithms, and Error-Correcting Codes , pages=

    Quantum reed—solomon codes , author=. International Symposium on Applied Algebra, Algebraic Algorithms, and Error-Correcting Codes , pages=. 1999 , organization=

  9. [9]

    Cross, Z

    Improved QLDPC surgery: Logical measurements and bridging codes , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.18393 , year=

  10. [10]

    2004 , note =

    Daniel Gottesman , title =. 2004 , note =

  11. [11]

    2026 , archivePrefix=

    Wills, Adam , title =. 2026 , archivePrefix=

  12. [12]

    2026 , archivePrefix=

    Wills, Adam and Yoder, Theodore J and Chuang, Isaac , title =. 2026 , archivePrefix=

  13. [13]

    Textbook manuscript preprint , volume=

    Surviving as a quantum computer in a classical world , author=. Textbook manuscript preprint , volume=

  14. [14]

    Physical Review A , volume=

    Asymptotically good quantum codes , author=. Physical Review A , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

  15. [15]

    Proceedings of 37th conference on foundations of computer science , pages=

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation , author=. Proceedings of 37th conference on foundations of computer science , pages=. 1996 , organization=

  16. [16]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume=

    Efficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data , author=. Journal of Computational Physics , volume=. 1976 , publisher=

  17. [17]

    Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , volume=

    Simulation of rare events in quantum error correction , author=. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  18. [18]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20546 , year=

    Distilling magic states in the bicycle architecture , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20546 , year=

  19. [19]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.05795 , year=

    Efficient post-selection for general quantum ldpc codes , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.05795 , year=

  20. [20]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.17757 , year=

    Simple, Efficient, and Generic Post-Selection Decoding for qLDPC codes , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.17757 , year=

  21. [21]

    Bicycle Architecture Compiler , year =

  22. [22]

    2022 , publisher=

    Fault-tolerant quantum cat state preparation , author=. 2022 , publisher=

  23. [23]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

  24. [24]

    IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , volume=

    Nonbinary quantum codes , author=. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  25. [25]

    IRE Transactions on information theory , volume=

    Encoding and error-correction procedures for the Bose-Chaudhuri codes , author=. IRE Transactions on information theory , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

  26. [26]

    A class of error-correcting codes in p\^

    Gorenstein, Daniel and Zierler, Neal , journal=. A class of error-correcting codes in p\^. 1961 , publisher=

  27. [27]

    1966 , publisher=

    Nonbinary BCH decoding , author=. 1966 , publisher=

  28. [28]

    IEEE transactions on Information Theory , volume=

    Shift-register synthesis and BCH decoding , author=. IEEE transactions on Information Theory , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

  29. [29]

    IEEE Int

    Error correction for algebraic block codes , author=. IEEE Int. Symp. Inform. Theory , year=

  30. [30]

    Journal of complexity , year=

    Decoding of Reed Solomon codes beyond the error-correction bound , author=. Journal of complexity , year=

  31. [31]

    Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat

    Improved decoding of Reed-Solomon and algebraic-geometric codes , author=. Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No. 98CB36280) , pages=. 1998 , organization=

  32. [32]

    McEliece , title =

    R. McEliece , title =. IPN Progress Report 42-153 , year =

  33. [33]

    2008 , publisher=

    Modern coding theory , author=. 2008 , publisher=

  34. [34]

    Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , volume=

    Optimal and efficient decoding of concatenated quantum block codes , author=. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  35. [35]

    IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , volume=

    Algebraic soft-decision decoding of Reed-Solomon codes , author=. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

  36. [36]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01779 , year=

    Improved belief propagation is sufficient for real-time decoding of quantum memory , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01779 , year=

  37. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.21600 , year=

    Real-time decoding of the gross code memory with FPGAs , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.21600 , year=

  38. [38]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21660 , year=

    FPGA-tailored algorithms for real-time decoding of quantum LDPC codes , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.21660 , year=

  39. [39]

    Quantum , volume=

    Stim: a fast stabilizer circuit simulator , author=. Quantum , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  40. [40]

    1977 , publisher=

    The theory of error-correcting codes , author=. 1977 , publisher=

  41. [41]

    2013 , publisher=

    Handbook of finite fields , author=. 2013 , publisher=

  42. [42]

    Quantum , volume=

    Optimization of the surface code design for Majorana-based qubits , author=. Quantum , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  43. [43]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Lowering connectivity requirements for bivariate bicycle codes using morphing circuits , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  44. [44]

    Relay-BP decoder implementation , year =

    M\". Relay-BP decoder implementation , year =

  45. [45]

    Delfosse, Nicolas and Nickerson, Naomi H. , year=. Almost-linear time decoding algorithm for topological codes , volume=. doi:10.22331/q-2021-12-02-595 , journal=

  46. [46]

    Chamberland, Christopher and Beverland, Michael E. , year=. Flag fault-tolerant error correction with arbitrary distance codes , volume=. doi:10.22331/q-2018-02-08-53 , journal=

  47. [47]

    Quantum Information and Computation , volume=

    Trade-off between the tolerance of located and unlocated errors in nondegenerate quantum error-correcting codes , author=. Quantum Information and Computation , volume=. 2008 , eprint=

  48. [48]

    International Symposium onInformation Theory, 2004

    Performance enhancements for algebraic soft decision decoding of Reed-Solomon codes , author=. International Symposium onInformation Theory, 2004. ISIT 2004. Proceedings. , pages=. 2004 , organization=

  49. [49]

    IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , volume=

    Iterative algebraic soft-decision list decoding of Reed-Solomon codes , author=. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  50. [50]

    IEEE transactions on information theory , volume=

    Exponential error bounds for algebraic soft-decision decoding of Reed-Solomon codes , author=. IEEE transactions on information theory , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

  51. [51]

    IEEE transactions on communications , volume=

    Applications of algebraic soft-decision decoding of Reed-Solomon codes , author=. IEEE transactions on communications , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  52. [52]

    IEEE transactions on information theory , volume=

    Algebraic soft-decision decoding of Reed--Solomon codes using bit-level soft information , author=. IEEE transactions on information theory , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  53. [53]

    2013 , school=

    Algebraic soft-and hard-decision decoding of generalized Reed--Solomon and cyclic codes , author=. 2013 , school=

  54. [54]

    IEEE Transactions on Communications , volume=

    Progressive algebraic soft-decision decoding of Reed--Solomon codes using module minimization , author=. IEEE Transactions on Communications , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  55. [55]

    2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat

    VLSI architectures for soft-decision decoding of Reed-Solomon codes , author=. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37577) , volume=. 2004 , organization=

  56. [56]

    2014 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE) , pages=

    Hardware implementation of a Reed-Solomon soft decoder based on information set decoding , author=. 2014 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE) , pages=. 2014 , organization=

  57. [57]

    Tansuwannont, Theerapat and Pato, Balint and Brown, Kenneth R. , year=. Adaptive syndrome measurements for Shor-style error correction , volume=. doi:10.22331/q-2023-08-08-1075 , journal=

  58. [58]

    2026 , eprint=

    Adaptive Loss-tolerant Syndrome Measurements , author=. 2026 , eprint=

  59. [59]

    New Journal of Physics , volume=

    A no-go theorem for a two-dimensional self-correcting quantum memory based on stabilizer codes , author=. New Journal of Physics , volume=

  60. [60]

    Physical review letters , volume=

    Tradeoffs for reliable quantum information storage in 2D systems , author=. Physical review letters , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  61. [61]

    Quantum communication, computing, and measurement , pages=

    Quantum error correction with imperfect gates , author=. Quantum communication, computing, and measurement , pages=. 1997 , publisher=

  62. [62]

    Annals of physics , volume=

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons , author=. Annals of physics , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

  63. [63]

    PRX quantum , volume=

    Quantum low-density parity-check codes , author=. PRX quantum , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  64. [64]

    Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , volume=

    Quantum Kronecker sum-product low-density parity-check codes with finite rate , author=. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  65. [65]

    Quantum , volume=

    Degenerate quantum LDPC codes with good finite length performance , author=. Quantum , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  66. [66]

    Nature , volume=

    Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold , author=. Nature , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  67. [67]

    How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits

    How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers with less than a million noisy qubits , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.15917 , year=

  68. [68]

    Parallel Logical Measurements via Quantum Code Surgery

    Parallel logical measurements via quantum code surgery , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05003 , year=

  69. [69]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10390 , year=

    Extractors: QLDPC architectures for efficient Pauli-based computation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10390 , year=

  70. [70]

    Williamson, and Theodore J

    Fast and fault-tolerant logical measurements: Auxiliary hypergraphs and transversal surgery , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14895 , year=

  71. [71]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02157 , year=

    Constant-Time Surgery on 2D Hypergraph Product Codes with Near-Constant Space Overhead , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02157 , year=

  72. [72]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05082 , year=

    Parsimonious Quantum Low-Density Parity-Check Code Surgery , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.05082 , year=

  73. [73]

    PRX Quantum , volume=

    Universal adapters between quantum low-density parity check codes , author=. PRX Quantum , volume=. 2026 , publisher=

  74. [74]

    Science Advances , volume=

    Low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computing using long-range connectivity , author=. Science Advances , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  75. [75]

    Nature Physics , pages=

    Low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computation by gauging logical operators , author=. Nature Physics , pages=. 2026 , publisher=

  76. [76]

    Physical Review X , volume=

    Fault-tolerant logical measurements via homological measurement , author=. Physical Review X , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  77. [77]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Time-efficient logical operations on quantum low-density parity check codes , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

  78. [78]

    High-rate surgery: towards constant-overhead logical operations.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08523, 2025

    High-Rate Surgery: towards constant-overhead logical operations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08523 , year=

  79. [79]

    The Pinnacle Architecture: Reducing the cost of breaking RSA-2048 to 100 000 physical qubits using quantum LDPC codes

    The Pinnacle Architecture: Reducing the cost of breaking RSA-2048 to 100 000 physical qubits using quantum LDPC codes , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.11457 , year=

  80. [80]

    Shor's algorithm is possible with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits

    Shor's algorithm is possible with as few as 10,000 reconfigurable atomic qubits , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.28627 , year=

Showing first 80 references.