pith. sign in

arxiv: 1810.10917 · v4 · pith:ODDP5UKUnew · submitted 2018-10-25 · 🪐 quant-ph

About Wigner Friend's and Hardy's paradox in a Bohmian approach: a comment of `Quantum theory cannot' consistently describe the use of itself'

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords theoryquantumanalyzebohmiancannotconsistentlydescribeinterpretation
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

This is an analysis of the recently published article `Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself' by D. Frauchiger and R. Renner~\cite{1}. Here I decipher the paradox and analyze it from the point of view of de Broglie-Bohm hidden variable theory (i.e., Bohmian mechanics). I also analyze the problem from the perspective obtained by the Copenhagen interpretation (i.e., the Bohrian interpretation) and show that both views are self consistent and do not lead to any contradiction with a `single-world' description of quantum theory.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A refined Frauchiger--Renner paradox based on strong contextuality

    quant-ph 2024-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The authors derive a GHZ-FR paradox from strong contextuality that avoids post-selection and quantum reasoning by modeled observers, unlike the original FR paradox.