pith. sign in

arxiv: 1812.03372 · v3 · pith:P2V7TQ4Ynew · submitted 2018-12-08 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

What is the Effect of Importance Weighting in Deep Learning?

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords effectweightingimportancedeeplearningnetworkswhiledatasets
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Importance-weighted risk minimization is a key ingredient in many machine learning algorithms for causal inference, domain adaptation, class imbalance, and off-policy reinforcement learning. While the effect of importance weighting is well-characterized for low-capacity misspecified models, little is known about how it impacts over-parameterized, deep neural networks. This work is inspired by recent theoretical results showing that on (linearly) separable data, deep linear networks optimized by SGD learn weight-agnostic solutions, prompting us to ask, for realistic deep networks, for which many practical datasets are separable, what is the effect of importance weighting? We present the surprising finding that while importance weighting impacts models early in training, its effect diminishes over successive epochs. Moreover, while L2 regularization and batch normalization (but not dropout), restore some of the impact of importance weighting, they express the effect via (seemingly) the wrong abstraction: why should practitioners tweak the L2 regularization, and by how much, to produce the correct weighting effect? Our experiments confirm these findings across a range of architectures and datasets.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Cumulative Meta-Learning from Active Learning Queries for Robustness to Spurious Correlations

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    CAML meta-learns a progressively refined inductive bias from active-learning queries to improve robustness to spurious correlations, reporting accuracy gains on minority groups across several benchmarks.