pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.10786 · v1 · pith:T7MBAEHXnew · submitted 2019-06-25 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY· math.OC

Optimized energy utilization in small and large commercial loads and residential areas

Hayder O. Alwan , Hamidreza Sadeghian , Sherif Abdelwahed This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 15:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SYmath.OC
keywords demand side managementsmart gridresidential schedulingcommercial loadsvoltage deviationpower lossrenewable generationappliance optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

DSM framework lets households schedule appliances by day-ahead prices and simulates resulting network effects at commercial buses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a demand side management framework for smart grids that covers residential households equipped with renewable generation plus interruptible and uninterruptible appliances, alongside a separate high-load commercial bus. Households individually shift appliance use to minimize energy cost according to forecasted day-ahead electricity prices. A simulation model then evaluates the aggregate effects of these schedules on distribution network quantities such as voltage deviation, real power loss, reverse power flows, and voltage rise, with the most visible problems appearing at the commercial load bus.

Core claim

A DSM framework processes many controllable loads of different types across two service areas; each household optimizes appliance timing using day-ahead price forecasts, while a commercial-area bus demonstrates the network-level consequences of large aggregated loads. The simulation quantifies impacts on voltage profile, power loss, and operating conditions including reverse flows and voltage rise, which are readily observed at the commercial bus.

What carries the argument

The integrated simulation model that couples per-household price-based scheduling of interruptible and uninterruptible loads with distribution-network load-flow calculations to measure DSM performance.

If this is right

  • Household cost optimization occurs through timing of interruptible and uninterruptible appliances.
  • Voltage deviation and real power loss change measurably when DSM is applied across the two areas.
  • Reverse power flows and voltage rise appear at the commercial load bus under high renewable penetration.
  • The same model scales to demonstrate DSM behavior with a large number of appliances.
  • Renewable generation at households interacts with the commercial-bus load profile in the simulated network.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Accurate day-ahead prices could reduce the need for real-time centralized coordination in mixed residential-commercial feeders.
  • Extending the model to include stochastic forecast errors would test robustness of the observed voltage and loss results.
  • Similar scheduling logic might be applied to industrial loads to check whether commercial-bus problems generalize.
  • The framework implicitly assumes no direct appliance-to-appliance communication, which could be relaxed in future extensions.

Load-bearing premise

Day-ahead electricity price forecasts remain accurate enough for each household to achieve its cost minimum through independent scheduling without real-time coordination or unexpected load interactions.

What would settle it

Re-run the simulation replacing day-ahead price forecasts with actual real-time price series and check whether household cost savings and the reported network impacts (voltage rise, reverse flows) at the commercial bus remain quantitatively similar.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.10786 by Hamidreza Sadeghian, Hayder O. Alwan, Sherif Abdelwahed.

Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Fig.8. A and B Represnts DSM Results for commercial at Different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In smart grid, the demand side management (DSM) techniques need to be designed to process a large number of controllable loads of several types. In this paper, we proposed a framework to study the demand side management in smart grid which contains a variety of loads in two service areas, one with multiple residential households, and one bus with commercial customers. Specifically, each household may have renewable generation as well as interruptible and uninterruptible appliances to make individual scheduling to optimize the electric energy cost by making the best time of the electricity usage according to the day ahead forecast of electricity prices. A high load bus represents a commercial area employed to demonstrate the impact of high load at any bus on voltage profile, power loss, and load flow condition, and to show the performance of the proposed DSM for large number of appliance. Using the developed simulation model, we examine the performance of the proposed DSM and study their impact on the distribution network operation and renewable generation, overall voltage deviation, real power loss, and possible problems such as reverse power flows, voltage rise have examined and compared, these problems can easily be seen at the commercial load bus.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a DSM framework for smart grids consisting of multiple residential households (each with renewables plus interruptible and uninterruptible appliances) that individually schedule loads to minimize energy cost using day-ahead price forecasts, together with a high-load commercial bus. A simulation model is used to evaluate the resulting effects on distribution-network quantities including overall voltage deviation, real power loss, reverse power flows, and voltage rise, with particular attention to problems visible at the commercial bus.

Significance. If the simulation model, scheduling algorithm, and network impacts were shown to be reproducible and robust, the work would address a practically relevant question about coordinating residential DSM with commercial loads and renewables. The explicit comparison of residential versus commercial bus behavior and the focus on reverse-flow and voltage-rise issues are potentially useful for distribution-system operators. No machine-checked proofs, open code, or parameter-free derivations are described.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / model description] Abstract and § (model description): the central claim that individual household scheduling using day-ahead price forecasts produces the reported reductions in voltage deviation, power loss, and reverse flows rests on an unexamined assumption of forecast accuracy. No Monte Carlo trials, noise injection, or sensitivity analysis on forecast error is reported; any shift in appliance start times would directly alter the aggregate load profile and the network metrics at both residential and commercial buses.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no equations, pseudocode, or objective function are supplied for the scheduling of interruptible versus uninterruptible appliances, nor is the optimization method (MILP, heuristic, etc.) or any constraint set stated. Without these, the cost-optimization step cannot be verified or reproduced, undermining the link between DSM and the claimed network benefits.
  3. [Abstract / simulation section] Abstract / simulation section: the load-flow method, network topology, line parameters, and validation (against benchmark feeders or measured data) are not described. Consequently it is impossible to assess whether the reported voltage-deviation and loss figures are artifacts of the particular test system or generalizable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains a grammatical error in the final sentence (“have examined and compared, these problems can easily be seen…”).
  2. [Throughout] Notation for appliance types and price-forecast variables is introduced without a nomenclature table or consistent symbols across the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to improve clarity, reproducibility, and robustness of the results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / model description] Abstract and § (model description): the central claim that individual household scheduling using day-ahead price forecasts produces the reported reductions in voltage deviation, power loss, and reverse flows rests on an unexamined assumption of forecast accuracy. No Monte Carlo trials, noise injection, or sensitivity analysis on forecast error is reported; any shift in appliance start times would directly alter the aggregate load profile and the network metrics at both residential and commercial buses.

    Authors: We agree that the impact of forecast errors was not examined. The current simulations assume perfect day-ahead forecasts. In the revised manuscript we will add a Monte Carlo sensitivity study that injects realistic price-forecast noise and reports the resulting variation in voltage deviation, losses, and reverse flows at both residential and commercial buses. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no equations, pseudocode, or objective function are supplied for the scheduling of interruptible versus uninterruptible appliances, nor is the optimization method (MILP, heuristic, etc.) or any constraint set stated. Without these, the cost-optimization step cannot be verified or reproduced, undermining the link between DSM and the claimed network benefits.

    Authors: The manuscript currently presents only a high-level description of the scheduling step. We will expand both the abstract and the model-description section to include the objective function, the distinction between interruptible and uninterruptible appliance constraints, the optimization method employed, and pseudocode for the overall procedure. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract / simulation section] Abstract / simulation section: the load-flow method, network topology, line parameters, and validation (against benchmark feeders or measured data) are not described. Consequently it is impossible to assess whether the reported voltage-deviation and loss figures are artifacts of the particular test system or generalizable.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the simulation setup is insufficiently documented. The revised manuscript will specify the load-flow solver, the exact network topology and line parameters, and any validation performed against standard test feeders. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: simulation framework with no equations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper proposes a DSM scheduling framework for residential and commercial loads using day-ahead price forecasts and evaluates it via simulation on network metrics. No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citations appear in the provided text or abstract. The central claims rest on direct simulation outputs rather than any reduction to inputs by construction. This is the common case of a self-contained empirical/simulation study with no mathematical circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5741 in / 1094 out tokens · 42535 ms · 2026-05-25T15:55:53.512395+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

12 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [2]

    Optimized household demand management with local solar PV generation

    Elyas, Seyyed Hamid, Hamidreza Sad eghian, Hayder O. Alwan, and Zhifang Wang. "Optimized household demand management with local solar PV generation." In 2017 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), pp. 1 -

    work page 2017

  2. [3]

    Appliance Commitment for Household Load Scheduling

    P. Du and N. Lu “Appliance Commitment for Household Load Scheduling” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol.2, no.2, June 2011

    work page 2011

  3. [4]

    Dispatch of Direct load control using dynamic programming

    Yuan-Yih Hsu, “Dispatch of Direct load control using dynamic programming” IEEE Translon power system, Vol.6, pp.1056-1061, 1991. PV Utilization Efficiency Penalty Price 𝜋𝑝 = [¢/kWh] Residential Area Penalty Price 𝜋𝑝 = [¢/kWh] Commercial Area 0 5 10 20 98% 0 2 3 5 96% 68.3% 100% 62.5% 100% 58.4% 100% %100 DSM 50%DSM %25 DSM DSM with PV 136.5 153.6 172.5 DS...

    work page 1991

  4. [5]

    Load Restoration Methodology Considering Renewable Energies and Combined Heat and Power Systems

    Alwan, Hayder O., and Noor M. Farhan. "Load Restoration Methodology Considering Renewable Energies and Combined Heat and Power Systems." arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01789 (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [6]

    Muslu, “Economic Dispatch with environmental Considerations: Tradeoff curves and emission reduction rates, “Elect

    M. Muslu, “Economic Dispatch with environmental Considerations: Tradeoff curves and emission reduction rates, “Elect. Power Syst. Res. , 2004

    work page 2004

  6. [7]

    Integrating genetic algorithms, tabu search, and simu lated annealing for the unit commitment problem

    A. H. Mantawy, Y. L. Abdel -Magid ; S. Z. Selim “Integrating genetic algorithms, tabu search, and simu lated annealing for the unit commitment problem ”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems , Vol.14, no. 3, 1999

    work page 1999

  7. [8]

    Development of agriculture demand side management project,

    M.V. Krishna Rao and C.Radhakrishna, “Development of agriculture demand side management project,” IEEE Trans. On power Syst. vol. 6,, 1991

    work page 1991

  8. [9]

    Demand side management of industrial electricity consumption: Promotion the use of renewable energy through real -time pricing,

    C. PaddyFinn, “Demand side management of industrial electricity consumption: Promotion the use of renewable energy through real -time pricing,” Appl. Energy, vol 113, pp.11-21, Jan. 2014

    work page 2014

  9. [10]

    Decentralized Demand Side Management Optimization for Residential and Commercial Load

    Alwan, Hayder O., Hamidreza Sadeghian, and Zhifang Wang. "Decentralized Demand Side Management Optimization for Residential and Commercial Load." In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT), pp. 0712-0717. IEEE, 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [11]

    Energy Management Optimization and Voltage Evaluation for Residential and Commercial Areas

    Alwan, Hayder O., Hamidreza Sadeghian, and Sherif Abdelwahed. "Energy Management Optimization and Voltage Evaluation for Residential and Commercial Areas." Energies 12, no. 9 (2019): 1811

    work page 2019

  11. [12]

    Detection of Static Air-Gap Eccentricity in Three Phase Induction Motor by Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)

    Alwan, Hayder E., and Qais S. Al-Sabbagh. "Detection of Static Air-Gap Eccentricity in Three Phase Induction Motor by Using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)." Journal of Engineering 15, no. 4 (2009): 4176-4192

    work page 2009

  12. [13]

    R., and M

    Sadeghian, H. R., and M. M. Ardehali. "A novel approach for optimal economic dispatch scheduling of integrated combined heat and power systems for maximum economic profit and minimum environmental emissions based on Benders decomposition." Energy 102 (2016): 10-23

    work page 2016