pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20703 · v1 · pith:TIZ4WC3Enew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🪐 quant-ph

Strongly-coupled non-Markovian waveguide QED with input-output HEOM

Neill Lambert , Yi-Te Huang , Yueh-Nan Chen , Paul Menczel , Franco Nori This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 05:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords waveguide QEDnon-Markovian dynamicsinput-output HEOMstrongly coupledbound photonsnonlinear dispersionVan Hove singularitiesqubit-waveguide coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

The input-output HEOM method accurately captures non-Markovianity in strongly coupled waveguide QED from non-local coupling and nonlinear dispersion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the input-output hierarchical equations of motion to a single qubit in a one-dimensional waveguide without using perturbative or Markovian approximations. It shows that this approach handles non-Markovian effects from two sources. Spatially non-local coupling shapes the steady-state bound photons, which are released when the qubit energy is quenched. Nonlinear dispersion, as in a cavity array with point coupling, produces persistent oscillations tied to Van Hove singularities in the spectral density.

Core claim

The io-HEOM method accurately captures non-Markovianity in waveguide QED from two distinct origins: spatially non-local coupling between the qubit and the waveguide, and non-linear dispersion in the waveguide modes.

What carries the argument

Input-output hierarchical equations of motion (io-HEOM), which extend standard HEOM to treat input-output relations and non-Markovian dynamics in waveguide QED.

If this is right

  • The form of the coupling function controls the population and properties of steady-state bound photons.
  • Quenching the qubit energy releases the bound photons into the waveguide.
  • Nonlinear dispersion produces persistent oscillations linked to Van Hove singularities in the spectral density.
  • The method remains accurate in strongly coupled regimes beyond standard approximations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach may generalize to multi-qubit systems to reveal collective non-Markovian effects in waveguides.
  • Bound-photon dynamics could inform designs for quantum memories that store photons via strong coupling.
  • Validation against exact methods in solvable limits would test convergence for broader spectral densities.

Load-bearing premise

The io-HEOM remains numerically stable and converges to the correct dynamics for strongly coupled regimes and the specific spectral densities and coupling functions in the examples.

What would settle it

A mismatch between io-HEOM predictions and exact solutions for bound photon numbers in a non-local coupling case, or failure to reproduce oscillations in a nonlinear-dispersion cavity array, would falsify the accuracy claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20703 by Franco Nori, Neill Lambert, Paul Menczel, Yi-Te Huang, Yueh-Nan Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In this work we study two examples of non [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Dynamics and steady state in Example 1, an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: We demonstrate how a quench of the qubit frequency can lead to emission of photons out of the (virtual) bound [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dynamics and steady state for Example 2, a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Correlation Function Fitting for Example 3, a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dynamics and steady state for Example 3, a qubit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of modeling a single qubit in contact with a one-dimensional waveguide beyond the standard perturbative and Markovian approximations. Using the recently developed input-output hierarchical equations of motion (io-HEOM), we investigate multiple examples of such waveguides, characterized by different spectral densities. Our examples highlight that the io-HEOM method can accurately capture non-Markovianity in waveguide QED from two distinct origins. The first source of non-Markovianity is spatially non-local coupling between the qubit and the waveguide. By examining two examples with non-local coupling, we show how the coupling function affects the steady-state bound photons, and demonstrate the release of these photons when the qubit energy is quenched. The second source of non-Markovianity is non-linear dispersion. We illustrate this scenario using the example of a cavity array with point-like coupling, where the non-linear dispersion leads to persistent oscillations due to Van Hove singularities in the spectral density.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies the input-output hierarchical equations of motion (io-HEOM) to a single qubit coupled to a one-dimensional waveguide beyond perturbative and Markovian limits. It presents numerical examples illustrating non-Markovian effects from two sources: spatially non-local coupling (affecting steady-state bound-photon profiles and quench dynamics) and nonlinear dispersion (producing persistent oscillations tied to Van Hove singularities in a cavity-array model).

Significance. If the reported dynamics are accurate, the work supplies a concrete demonstration that io-HEOM can treat strong-coupling non-Markovian waveguide QED arising from both non-local interactions and structured spectral densities. The explicit examples of bound photons, quench release, and Van Hove-induced oscillations constitute reproducible illustrations that could be useful for quantum-optics modeling.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that io-HEOM 'can accurately capture' the non-Markovian effects is load-bearing for the central claim yet is not accompanied by quantitative error metrics, convergence tests, or comparisons against exact solutions for the chosen spectral densities and coupling strengths.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Numerical examples] The specific functional forms and parameter values of the spectral densities and coupling functions used in each example should be stated explicitly (ideally in a table or appendix) to enable direct reproduction.
  2. [Methods] A brief statement of the numerical tolerances or truncation levels employed in the io-HEOM hierarchy would clarify the reported convergence behavior.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting an important point about supporting the central claim. We address the major comment below and are prepared to revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that io-HEOM 'can accurately capture' the non-Markovian effects is load-bearing for the central claim yet is not accompanied by quantitative error metrics, convergence tests, or comparisons against exact solutions for the chosen spectral densities and coupling strengths.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's phrasing would be strengthened by explicit quantitative support. The io-HEOM approach is constructed to converge to the exact dynamics as the hierarchy depth increases, and the manuscript already presents results for multiple spectral densities and coupling regimes. In the revised version we will add (i) convergence tests with respect to hierarchy truncation level, including quantitative error estimates between successive tiers, and (ii) direct comparisons against known limiting cases (weak-coupling Markovian dynamics and, where analytically tractable, exact solutions for linear dispersion). We will also revise the abstract to qualify the accuracy statement in light of these new benchmarks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper applies the input-output HEOM method to independent examples defined by external spectral densities and coupling functions. Numerical demonstrations of non-Markovian effects from spatially non-local coupling (steady-state bound photons and quench release) and from nonlinear dispersion (persistent oscillations tied to Van Hove singularities) are shown directly via simulation outputs. No derivation step reduces a claimed prediction or result to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; the central claims rest on explicit, externally specified inputs and reported convergence behavior rather than tautological re-expression of those inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability and accuracy of the io-HEOM method in the strongly coupled non-Markovian regime and on the representativeness of the chosen spectral densities and coupling functions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The io-HEOM method remains valid and numerically tractable for strongly-coupled non-Markovian waveguide QED.
    Invoked when the paper states that the method can accurately capture the dynamics in the examined examples.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5704 in / 1239 out tokens · 41492 ms · 2026-05-21T05:22:12.408383+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We consider the problem of modeling a single qubit in contact with a one-dimensional waveguide beyond the standard perturbative and Markovian approximations. Using the recently developed input-output hierarchical equations of motion (io-HEOM)...

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    engineered

    + Ω X j a† jaj +g c X j a† jaj+1 +a † j+1aj .(34) whereΩisthefrequencyofthecavities, andg c thecavity- cavity coupling. The qubit-waveguide coupling is point- like, since the qubit only couples to the zeroth cavity with coupling strengthg0. This model has the dispersion relation ¯ω(p) = Ω + 2gc cos(p),(35) wherep∈[−π, π), and the constant coupling functio...

    work page 2074

  2. [2]

    A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    P.Forn-Díaz, L.Lamata, E.Rico, J.Kono,andE.Solano, Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 25005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    De Liberato, Virtual photons in the ground state of a dissipative system, Nat

    S. De Liberato, Virtual photons in the ground state of a dissipative system, Nat. Commun.8, 1465 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Stassi, A

    R. Stassi, A. Ridolfo, O. Di Stefano, M. J. Hartmann, and S. Savasta, Spontaneous conversion from virtual to real photons in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 243601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Cirio, S

    M. Cirio, S. De Liberato, N. Lambert, and F. Nori, Ground state electroluminescence, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 12 113601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Cirio, N

    M. Cirio, N. Shammah, N. Lambert, S. De Liberato, and F. Nori, Multielectron ground state electroluminescence, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 190403 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Kuzmin, N

    R. Kuzmin, N. Mehta, N. Grabon, R. Mencia, and V. E. Manucharyan, Superstrong coupling in circuit quantum electrodynamics, npj Quantum Information5, 20 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Yoshihara, T

    F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S.Saito,andK.Semba,Superconductingqubit–oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nature Physics13, 44 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    A. F. Kockum, G. Johansson, and F. Nori, Decoherence- free interaction between giant atoms in waveguide quan- tum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 140404 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Kannan, M

    B. Kannan, M. J. Ruckriegel, D. L. Campbell, A. Frisk Kockum, J. Braumüller, D. K. Kim, M. Kjaer- gaard, P. Krantz, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski, A. Vep- säläinen, R. Winik, J. L. Yoder, F. Nori, T. P. Or- lando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Waveguide quantum electrodynamics with superconducting artificial giant atoms, Nature583, 775 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Messinger, B

    A. Messinger, B. G. Taketani, and F. K. Wilhelm, Left-handed superlattice metamaterials for circuit QED, Phys. Rev. A99, 032325 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Wiegand, B

    E. Wiegand, B. Rousseaux, and G. Johansson, Trans- mon in a semi-infinite high-impedance transmission line: Appearance of cavity modes and rabi oscillations, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023003 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Niemczyk, F

    T. Niemczyk, F. Deppe, H. Huebl, E. Menzel, F. Hocke, M. Schwarz, J. Garcia-Ripoll, D. Zueco, T. Hümmer, E. Solano,et al., Circuit quantum electrodynamics in the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys.6, 772 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    M. V. Gustafsson, T. Aref, A. F. Kockum, M. K. Ekström, G. Johansson, and P. Delsing, Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom, Science346, 207 (2014)

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    Magazzù, P

    L. Magazzù, P. Forn-Díaz, R. Belyansky, J.-L. Orgiazzi, M. A. Yurtalan, M. R. Otto, A. Lupascu, C. M. Wilson, and M. Grifoni, Probing the strongly driven spin-boson model in a superconducting quantum circuit, Nat. Com- mun.9, 1403 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Puertas Martínez, S

    J. Puertas Martínez, S. Léger, N. Gheeraert, R. Dasson- neville, L. Planat, F. Foroughi, Y. Krupko, O. Buisson, C. Naud, W. Hasch-Guichard, S. Florens, I. Snyman, and N. Roch, A tunable Josephson platform to explore many- body quantum optics in circuit-QED, npj Quantum In- formation5, 19 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Teixidó-Bonfill, X

    A. Teixidó-Bonfill, X. Dai, A. Lupascu, and E. Martín- Martínez, Towards an experimental implementation of entanglement harvesting in superconducting circuits: ef- fectofdetectorgapvariationonentanglementharvesting, arXiv:2505.01516 [quant-ph] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Dong, P.-B

    X.-L. Dong, P.-B. Li, Z. Gong, and F. Nori, Waveguide QED with dissipative light-matter couplings, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L012036 (2025)

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    L. Zhou, Z. R. Gong, Y.-X. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Controllable scattering of a single photon inside a one- dimensional resonator waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 100501 (2008)

    work page 2008

  21. [21]

    Holzinger, R

    R. Holzinger, R. Gutiérrez-Jáuregui, T. Hönigl-Decrinis, G. Kirchmair, A. Asenjo-Garcia, and H. Ritsch, Control of localized single- and many-body dark states in waveg- uide QED, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 253601 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Bychek, C

    A. Bychek, C. Hotter, D. Plankensteiner, and H. Ritsch, Superradiant lasing in inhomogeneously broadened en- sembles with spatially varying coupling, Open Res. Eur. 1, 73 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Peropadre, D

    B. Peropadre, D. Zueco, D. Porras, and J. J. García- Ripoll, Nonequilibrium and nonperturbative dynamics of ultrastrong coupling in open lines, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 243602 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Sánchez-Burillo, D

    E. Sánchez-Burillo, D. Zueco, L. Martín-Moreno, and J. J. García-Ripoll, Dynamical signatures of bound states in waveguide QED, Phys. Rev. A96, 023831 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Sánchez-Burillo, L

    E. Sánchez-Burillo, L. Martín-Moreno, J. J. García- Ripoll, and D. Zueco, Single photons by quenching the vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 013601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    Terradas-Briansó, L

    S. Terradas-Briansó, L. Martín-Moreno, and D. Zueco, Waveguide QED in the dipole gauge, Phys. Rev. A109, 033715 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    De Bernardis, P

    D. De Bernardis, P. Pilar, T. Jaako, S. De Liberato, and P. Rabl, Breakdown of gauge invariance in ultrastrong- coupling cavity QED, Phys. Rev. A98, 053819 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Arranz Regidor, G

    S. Arranz Regidor, G. Crowder, H. Carmichael, and S. Hughes, Modeling quantum light-matter interactions in waveguide QED with retardation, nonlinear inter- actions, and a time-delayed feedback: Matrix product states versus a space-discretized waveguide model, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 023030 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Sánchez Muñoz, F

    C. Sánchez Muñoz, F. Nori, and S. De Liberato, Resolu- tion of superluminal signalling in non-perturbative cav- ity quantum electrodynamics, Nature Communications 9, 1924 (2018)

    work page 1924

  30. [30]

    F. Tay, A. Mojibpour, S. Sanders, S. Liang, H. Xu, G. C. Gardner, A. Baydin, M. J. Manfra, A. Alabas- tri, D. Hagenmüller, and J. Kono, Multimode ultrastrong coupling in three-dimensional photonic-crystal cavities, Nature Communications16, 3603 (2025)

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Tanimura, Nonperturbative expansion method for a quantum system coupled to a harmonic-oscillator bath, Phys

    Y. Tanimura, Nonperturbative expansion method for a quantum system coupled to a harmonic-oscillator bath, Phys. Rev. A41, 6676 (1990)

    work page 1990

  32. [32]

    Tanimura, Stochastic Liouville, Langevin, Fokker- Planck, and master equation approaches to quantum dis- sipative systems, J

    Y. Tanimura, Stochastic Liouville, Langevin, Fokker- Planck, and master equation approaches to quantum dis- sipative systems, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.75, 082001 (2006)

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    Tanimura and R

    Y. Tanimura and R. Kubo, Time evolution of a quan- tum system in contact with a nearly Gaussian-Markoffian noise bath, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.58, 101 (1989)

    work page 1989

  34. [34]

    Tanimura, Numerically “exact” approach to open quantum dynamics: The hierarchical equations of mo- tion (HEOM), J

    Y. Tanimura, Numerically “exact” approach to open quantum dynamics: The hierarchical equations of mo- tion (HEOM), J. Chem. Phys.153, 020901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Lambert, T

    N. Lambert, T. Raheja, S. Cross, P. Menczel, S. Ahmed, A. Pitchford, D.Burgarth, and F. Nori,QuTiP-BoFiN: A Bosonic and Fermionic numerical hierarchical-equations- of-motion library with applications in light-harvesting, quantum control, and single-molecule electronics, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 013181 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Cirio, P

    M. Cirio, P. Liang, and N. Lambert, Input-output hier- archical equations of motion, Phys. Rev. A112, 012211 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Zhang, P.-Y

    W.-M. Zhang, P.-Y. Lo, H.-N. Xiong, M. W.-Y. Tu, and F. Nori, General non-Markovian dynamics of open quan- tum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 170402 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    de Vega and D

    I. de Vega and D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 015001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  39. [39]

    D.A.Lidar,Lecturenotesonthetheoryofopenquantum systems, arXiv:1902.00967 (2019). 13

    work page arXiv 1902

  40. [40]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory Of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    work page 2002

  41. [41]

    Lambert, S

    N. Lambert, S. Ahmed, M. Cirio, and F. Nori, Mod- elling the ultra-strongly coupled spin-boson model with unphysical modes, Nat. Commun.10, 3721 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Terradas-Briansó, C

    S. Terradas-Briansó, C. A. González-Gutiérrez, F. Nori, L. Martín-Moreno, and D. Zueco, Ultrastrong waveguide QED with giant atoms, Phys. Rev. A106, 063717 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    S. Lin, X. Zhao, and Y. Xia, Giant atoms coupled to a waveguide: Continuous coupling and multiple excita- tions, Phys. Rev. A113, 033705 (2026)

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    Mirhosseini, E

    M. Mirhosseini, E. Kim, V. S. Ferreira, M. Kalaee, A. Sipahigil, A. J. Keller, and O. Painter, Superconduct- ing metamaterials for waveguide quantum electrodynam- ics, Nature Communications9, 3706 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Scigliuzzo, G

    M. Scigliuzzo, G. Calajò, F. Ciccarello, D. Perez Lozano, A.Bengtsson, P.Scarlino, A.Wallraff, D.Chang, P.Dels- ing, and S. Gasparinetti, Controlling atom-photon bound statesinanarrayofJosephson-junctionresonators,Phys. Rev. X12, 031036 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Z.-H. Chen, Y. Wang, X. Zheng, R.-X. Xu, and Y. Yan, Universal time-domain Prony fitting decomposition for optimized hierarchical quantum master equations, The Journal of Chemical Physics156, 221102 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Derevianko, G

    N. Derevianko, G. Plonka, and M. Petz, From ESPRIT to ESPIRA: estimation of signal parameters by iterative rational approximation, IMA Journal of Numerical Anal- ysis43, 789 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Schaubert, Application of Prony’s method to time- domain reflectometer data and equivalent circuit synthe- sis, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation27, 180 (1979)

    D. Schaubert, Application of Prony’s method to time- domain reflectometer data and equivalent circuit synthe- sis, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation27, 180 (1979)

    work page 1979

  49. [49]

    https://github.com/nwlambert/io-heom-waveguide-qed

    work page

  50. [50]

    Liang, N

    P. Liang, N. Lambert, S. Luo, L. Guo, and M. Cirio, A purified input-output pseudomode model for struc- tured open quantum systems, arXiv:2412.04264 [quant- ph] (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    L. Zhou, H. Dong, Y.-X. Liu, C. P. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum supercavity with atomic mirrors, Phys. Rev. A 78, 063827 (2008)

    work page 2008

  52. [52]

    Crowder, L

    G. Crowder, L. Ramunno, and S. Hughes, Quantum trajectory theory and simulations of nonlinear spectra and multiphoton effects in waveguide-QED systems with a time-delayed coherent feedback, Phys. Rev. A106, 013714 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    I.-C. Hoi, A. F. Kockum, L. Tornberg, A. Pourkabirian, G. Johansson, P. Delsing, and C. M. Wilson, Probing the quantum vacuum with an artificial atom in front of a mirror, Nature Physics11, 1045 (2015)

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    J. Jin, X. Zheng, and Y. Yan, Exact dynamics of dissi- pative electronic systems and quantum transport: Hier- archical equations of motion approach, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 234703 (2008)

    work page 2008

  55. [55]

    Kato and Y

    A. Kato and Y. Tanimura, Quantum heat current un- der non-perturbative and non-markovian conditions: Ap- plications to heat machines, The Journal of Chemical Physics145, 224105 (2016)

    work page 2016

  56. [56]

    A. H. Kiilerich and K. Mølmer, Input-output theory with quantum pulses, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 123604 (2019)

    work page 2019

  57. [57]

    Gheeraert, X

    N. Gheeraert, X. H. H. Zhang, T. Sépulcre, S. Bera, N.Roch, H.U.Baranger,andS.Florens,Particleproduc- tion in ultrastrong-coupling waveguide qed, Phys. Rev. A 98, 043816 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    Gribben, A

    D. Gribben, A. Strathearn, G. E. Fux, P. Kirton, and B. W. Lovett, Using the Environment to Understand non-Markovian Open Quantum Systems, Quantum6, 847 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    M. Yu, W. T. Strunz, and S. Nimmrichter, Non- markovian dynamics of the giant atom beyond the rotating-wave approximation, arXiv:2601.03383 [quant- ph] (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    Silbey and R

    R. Silbey and R. A. Harris, Variational calculation of the dynamics of a two level system interacting with a bath, J. Chem. Phys.80, 2615 (1984)

    work page 1984

  61. [61]

    S.DeLiberato, D.Gerace, I.Carusotto,andC.Ciuti,Ex- tracavity quantum vacuum radiation from a single qubit, Phys. Rev. A80, 053810 (2009)

    work page 2009

  62. [62]

    A. A. Anappara, S. De Liberato, A. Tredicucci, C. Ciuti, G. Biasiol, L. Sorba, and F. Beltram, Signatures of the ultrastrong light-matter coupling regime, Phys. Rev. B 79, 201303 (2009)

    work page 2009

  63. [63]

    P. D. Nation, J. R. Johansson, M. P. Blencowe, and F. Nori, Colloquium: Stimulating uncertainty: Amplify- ing the quantum vacuum with superconducting circuits, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  64. [64]

    De Liberato, Virtual photons in the ground state of a dissipative system, Nature Communications8, 1465 (2017)

    S. De Liberato, Virtual photons in the ground state of a dissipative system, Nature Communications8, 1465 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    Günter, A

    G. Günter, A. A. Anappara, J. Hees, A. Sell, G. Bia- siol, L. Sorba, S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, A. Tredicucci, A. Leitenstorfer, and R. Huber, Sub-cycle switch-on of ultrastrong light–matter interaction, Naturea458, 178 (2009)

    work page 2009

  66. [66]

    Cirio, K

    M. Cirio, K. Debnath, N. Lambert, and F. Nori, Am- plified optomechanical transduction of virtual radiation pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 053601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  67. [67]

    Lolli, A

    J. Lolli, A. Baksic, D. Nagy, V. E. Manucharyan, and C. Ciuti, Ancillary qubit spectroscopy of vacua in cavity and circuit quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 183601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    Janzen, X

    N. Janzen, X. Dai, S. Ren, J. Shi, and A. Lupascu, Tun- able coupler for mediating interactions between a two- level system and a waveguide from a decoupled state to the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033155 (2023)

    work page 2023

  69. [69]

    Lin, P.-C

    J.-D. Lin, P.-C. Kuo, N. Lambert, A. Miranowicz, F.Nori,andY.-N.Chen,Non-markovianquantumexcep- tional points, Nature Communications16, 1289 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Ikeda and G

    T. Ikeda and G. D. Scholes, Generalization of the hier- archical equations of motion theory for efficient calcula- tions with arbitrary correlation functions, The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 204101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  71. [71]

    M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, Dephasing-assisted trans- port: quantum networks and biomolecules, New Journal of Physics10, 113019 (2008)

    work page 2008

  72. [72]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.183, 1760 (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    J. R. Johansson, P. D. Nation, and F. Nori, QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems, Comput. Phys. Commun.184, 1234 (2013)

    work page 2013

  74. [74]

    Lambert, E

    N. Lambert, E. Giguére, P. Menczel, B. Li, P. Hopf, G. Suárez, M. Gali, J. Lishman, R. Gadhvi, R. Agar- wal, A. Galicia, N. Shammah, P. Nation, J. Johansson, S. Ahmed, S. Cross, A. Pitchford, and F. Nori, QuTiP 5: The Quantum Toolbox in Python, Physics Reports 14 1153, 1 (2026)

    work page 2026

  75. [75]

    Reznik, A

    B. Reznik, A. Retzker, and J. Silman, Violating Bell’s inequalities in vacuum, Phys. Rev. A71, 042104 (2005)

    work page 2005

  76. [76]

    Pozas-Kerstjens and E

    A. Pozas-Kerstjens and E. Martín-Martínez, Harvesting correlations from the quantum vacuum, Phys. Rev. D92, 064042 (2015)

    work page 2015