pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18367 · v1 · pith:UK2XFQOTnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 🪐 quant-ph

Zeno-Assisted Quantum Heat Engines

Selma Memi\'c , Rafael Wagner , Susana F. Huelga , Martin B. Plenio This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 11:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum Zeno dynamicsquantum heat engineOtto cycleshortcut to adiabaticityquantum frictionquantum lubricationfinite-time thermodynamicsquantum thermodynamics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Coupling a quantum heat engine to a frequently monitored auxiliary system confines its evolution to a Zeno subspace that acts as a shortcut to adiabaticity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a lubrication protocol that uses quantum Zeno dynamics to reduce losses in finite-time quantum heat engines. An auxiliary lubricant is coupled to the working medium and monitored at high frequency, projecting the joint state onto a subspace whose effective dynamics match the population-preserving evolution needed for an Otto cycle. This approach recovers the ideal Otto efficiency even when the work strokes occur at finite duration instead of in the slow, quasistatic limit. A sympathetic reader cares because the method offers a concrete, measurement-based route to counteract quantum friction without requiring perfect external control fields.

Core claim

By coupling the working medium to an auxiliary lubricant and frequently monitoring the lubricant, the joint evolution is confined to a Zeno subspace that yields an effective shortcut to adiabaticity during the work strokes of a quantum Otto cycle. In the ideal Zeno limit this protocol reproduces the transitionless dynamics that preserve populations in the instantaneous energy basis, thereby recovering the Otto efficiency at finite stroke duration while the analysis also accounts for implementation-dependent costs such as switching, driving, monitoring, and imperfect thermalization.

What carries the argument

Quantum Zeno dynamics induced by frequent monitoring of the auxiliary lubricant, which projects the joint system onto a subspace whose reduced dynamics replicate transitionless driving.

If this is right

  • Finite-duration work strokes can achieve the same efficiency as the quasistatic Otto cycle when the Zeno condition holds.
  • Net gains in power and efficiency depend on subtracting the thermodynamic costs of coupling, monitoring, and imperfect thermalization.
  • Quantum Zeno dynamics supplies a measurement-based alternative to other lubrication strategies for suppressing quantum friction.
  • The same confinement technique can be applied to study the interplay of strong coupling, measurement, and control in other quantum thermodynamic processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The protocol could be tested in superconducting circuits or trapped-ion systems by engineering controllable auxiliary degrees of freedom whose monitoring rate can be tuned.
  • Similar Zeno-subspace engineering might extend to other cycles such as Carnot or Stirling, or to quantum refrigerators.
  • The trade-off between monitoring frequency and introduced decoherence sets a practical upper bound on achievable power that could be quantified in open-system simulations.
  • Connections to measurement-induced phase transitions or Zeno-protected subspaces in many-body systems suggest broader uses in quantum information processing.

Load-bearing premise

The auxiliary lubricant can be coupled and monitored frequently enough to keep the joint evolution strictly inside the desired Zeno subspace without dominant back-action or decoherence.

What would settle it

An experiment that increases monitoring frequency toward the Zeno limit yet fails to observe the engine efficiency approaching the quasistatic Otto value, or that detects decoherence rates large enough to eject the state from the protected subspace.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.18367 by Martin B. Plenio, Rafael Wagner, Selma Memi\'c, Susana F. Huelga.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: summarizes the four strokes considered here. 1. Device specification and preparation We take the total Hilbert space of the engine (cf. Eq. (1)) to be HQHE = O k Fk ⊗ C 2 ⊗ O k Fk so that the working medium is a single qubit HS = C2 , and each bath is modeled as an infinite-dimensional bosonic thermal reservoir HBhot = HBcold = N k Fk, where Fk is the bosonic Fock space associated with mode k. The initial … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: We consider a drive H(t) which generates the evolution t 7→ U(t) given by U(tf , ti) = T  exp  −i Z tf ti ds H(s)  . (56) Now, we let ti ≡ t(1), tf ≡ t(n) and divide the evolution so that tf − ti = Pn k=1 δt(k) where δt(k) = t(k+1) − t(k) ∼ (tf − ti)/n. We alternate between short unitary pulses U(t(k+1), t(k)) and dichotomic measurements M. If we assume that we start within the Pℓ subspace HPℓ , s.t. ρ… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Finite-time quantum heat engines (QHEs) typically extract less work than their quasistatic counterparts because fast driving generates coherences and non-adiabatic transitions during the work strokes, a phenomenon commonly referred to as quantum friction. Quantum lubrication denotes a broad class of strategies that use auxiliary systems or controls to mitigate this loss. In this work, we introduce a lubrication protocol based on the quantum Zeno dynamics (QZD). By coupling the working medium to an auxiliary lubricant system and frequently monitoring the lubricant, we confine the joint evolution to a Zeno subspace and obtain an effective shortcut to adiabaticity during the work strokes of a QHE running an Otto cycle. In the ideal Zeno limit, the protocol reproduces the transitionless dynamics required to preserve populations in the instantaneous energy basis and recover the Otto efficiency at finite stroke duration. We also analyze several implementation-dependent thermodynamic costs, including switching, driving, monitoring, and imperfect thermalization, in order to assess how these costs constrain the practical gains in efficiency and power. Our results identify QZD as a conceptually distinct route to quantum lubrication and highlight quantum heat engines as a useful setting in which to study the interplay between strong coupling, measurement, and quantum thermodynamic control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a quantum lubrication protocol for finite-time Otto-cycle quantum heat engines. An auxiliary lubricant system is coupled to the working medium and subjected to frequent projective monitoring; in the ideal Zeno limit the joint dynamics is confined to a subspace whose effective Hamiltonian reproduces the transitionless (counterdiabatic) evolution that preserves populations in the instantaneous energy eigenbasis of the working medium, thereby recovering the quasistatic Otto efficiency at finite stroke duration. Implementation costs arising from switching, driving, monitoring, and imperfect thermalization are analyzed qualitatively to assess net gains in efficiency and power.

Significance. If the central claim is rigorously established, the work supplies a conceptually distinct route to quantum lubrication that exploits measurement-induced Zeno dynamics rather than coherent control fields. It furnishes a concrete setting in which to examine the thermodynamic interplay between strong coupling, frequent monitoring, and shortcut-to-adiabaticity protocols, and identifies concrete experimental signatures that could be tested in platforms where auxiliary-system readout is available.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and protocol description] The central claim that the ideal Zeno limit exactly reproduces transitionless dynamics (abstract and protocol section) rests on the unstated assumption that the lubricant–working-medium interaction Hamiltonian commutes with the instantaneous Zeno projectors in such a way that the intra-subspace effective Hamiltonian contains precisely the required counterdiabatic term and no residual leakage channels. An explicit derivation of the projected Hamiltonian and verification of this commutativity condition is needed; without it the population-preservation result does not follow automatically from standard Zeno-subspace projection.
  2. [Implementation costs analysis] The analysis of monitoring-induced back-action and decoherence (implementation-costs section) remains qualitative. A quantitative bound or scaling relation showing that the auxiliary-system coupling strength and monitoring rate can be chosen so that the Zeno confinement time remains shorter than the relevant decoherence timescales would be required to substantiate the claim that the protocol remains advantageous once realistic noise is included.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the units and the value of the monitoring frequency used in each panel.
  2. [Notation and definitions] The notation for the joint Hamiltonian and the Zeno projector should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional redefinition of symbols in later sections reduces readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We have carefully considered each major comment and provide detailed responses below, along with indications of the changes we will make in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and protocol description] The central claim that the ideal Zeno limit exactly reproduces transitionless dynamics (abstract and protocol section) rests on the unstated assumption that the lubricant–working-medium interaction Hamiltonian commutes with the instantaneous Zeno projectors in such a way that the intra-subspace effective Hamiltonian contains precisely the required counterdiabatic term and no residual leakage channels. An explicit derivation of the projected Hamiltonian and verification of this commutativity condition is needed; without it the population-preservation result does not follow automatically from standard Zeno-subspace projection.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The manuscript's protocol section outlines the Zeno dynamics but does not provide a fully explicit derivation of the projected Hamiltonian. We agree that verifying the commutativity condition is essential for rigor. In the revised version, we will include a detailed derivation showing that the interaction Hamiltonian commutes appropriately with the Zeno projectors, leading to an effective Hamiltonian that exactly matches the transitionless (counterdiabatic) driving without residual leakage terms in the ideal limit. This will confirm the population preservation result. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Implementation costs analysis] The analysis of monitoring-induced back-action and decoherence (implementation-costs section) remains qualitative. A quantitative bound or scaling relation showing that the auxiliary-system coupling strength and monitoring rate can be chosen so that the Zeno confinement time remains shorter than the relevant decoherence timescales would be required to substantiate the claim that the protocol remains advantageous once realistic noise is included.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the analysis of monitoring-induced back-action and decoherence in the implementation-costs section is qualitative. To address this, we will incorporate a quantitative scaling relation in the revised manuscript. We will derive a bound demonstrating that the auxiliary-system coupling strength and monitoring rate can be selected such that the Zeno confinement timescale is shorter than the decoherence timescales, thereby supporting the claim of net advantage under realistic conditions. This will involve estimating the relevant parameters and showing the existence of a favorable regime. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation applies standard quantum Zeno dynamics to Otto cycle without reducing to self-definition or fitted inputs.

full rationale

The central result follows from taking the monitoring frequency to infinity in the joint Hamiltonian, which by the known Zeno theorem projects the evolution onto the desired subspace whose effective generator is the adiabatic plus counterdiabatic term. This limit is an external mathematical fact, not constructed from the target efficiency or population preservation. The paper cites the standard QZD literature rather than its own prior work for the projection property, and the thermodynamic costs are analyzed separately with explicit expressions. No step equates a prediction to a fitted parameter or renames an input as a derived output.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The protocol rests on standard quantum mechanics and the quantum Zeno effect; no new free parameters are introduced beyond conventional rates for coupling and monitoring. The lubricant system is an auxiliary construct whose independent evidence would come from experimental realization.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Frequent projective measurements on the auxiliary system project the joint evolution onto a Zeno subspace that suppresses non-adiabatic transitions.
    Invoked in the description of the lubrication protocol and the ideal Zeno limit.
  • domain assumption The working medium follows an Otto cycle with two isochoric thermalization strokes and two work strokes.
    Standard setup for the quantum heat engine under study.
invented entities (1)
  • Auxiliary lubricant system no independent evidence
    purpose: To be coupled to the working medium and monitored to enforce the Zeno subspace.
    New auxiliary degree of freedom introduced to implement the lubrication protocol.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5749 in / 1417 out tokens · 29332 ms · 2026-05-20T11:28:17.964510+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

154 extracted references · 154 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Strong coupling To start, we consider lubricating the device solely via the strong-coupling drive provided byH tot(t). In this case, the evolution is fully unitary, and our revised notion of work becomes ∆W (s.c.) tot = +⟨H tot(t1)⟩ρSL(t1) − ⟨Htot(t0)⟩ρSL(t0) +⟨H tot(t3)⟩ρSL(t3) − ⟨Htot(t2)⟩ρSL(t2), (118) where ρSL(t0) = (p0|0⟩⟨0|+p 1|1⟩⟨1|)⊗ |+⟩⟨+|(119) ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    (5) is no longer sufficient by itself because the work stroke is interrupted by measurements and the outcome of those measurements is stochastic

    Zeno drive For the Zeno-driven protocol, Eq. (5) is no longer sufficient by itself because the work stroke is interrupted by measurements and the outcome of those measurements is stochastic. A more appropriate description is trajectory based: between two consecutive measurements the joint system evolves unitarily, while each measurement updates the state ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    6 (a)-(c), are significant, thus motivating the frequent monitoring of the lubricant

    Coupling and decoupling of the lubricant In this subsection, we show that the coupling and decoupling costs associated with lubricating the QHE according to the strong-coupling alone, such as the one considered in Fig. 6 (a)-(c), are significant, thus motivating the frequent monitoring of the lubricant. We start by noticing that, in the limitΓ→ ∞the final...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Frequent monitoring A substantial literature has been devoted to understanding the energetic requirements of implementing quantum measurements [74, 86, 112–115]. From that perspective, ideal projective measurements are often treated as limiting operations whose exact implementation would require unbounded resources, because preparing pure states needed fo...

    work page

  5. [5]

    In the previous subsection we accounted for entropy production associated with the measuring device following Ref

    Entropy production Beyond the explicit energetic changes associated with measurement and strong coupling, the protocol also produces entropy through the irreversible removal of correlations between the working medium and the lubricant. In the previous subsection we accounted for entropy production associated with the measuring device following Ref. [74]. ...

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    L. M. Cangemi, C. Bhadra, and A. Levy, Quantum engines and refrigerators, Physics Reports Quantum engines and refrigerators,1087, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    H. E. D. Scovil and E. O. Schulz-DuBois, Three-Level Masers as Heat Engines, Phys. Rev. Lett.2, 262 (1959)

    work page 1959

  8. [8]

    S.DeffnerandS.Campbell,Quantum Thermodynamics: An introduction to the thermodynamics of quantum information(Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Kosloff, A quantum mechanical open system as a model of a heat engine, J

    R. Kosloff, A quantum mechanical open system as a model of a heat engine, J. Chem. Phys.80, 1625 (1984)

    work page 1984

  10. [10]

    Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General12, L103 (1979)

    R. Alicki, The quantum open system as a model of the heat engine, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General12, L103 (1979)

    work page 1979

  11. [11]

    Introduction to Quantum Thermodynamics: History and Prospects

    R. Alicki and R. Kosloff, Introduction to Quantum Thermodynamics: History and Prospects (2018), arXiv:1801.08314 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  12. [12]

    M. A. Aamir, P. Jamet Suria, J. A. Marín Guzmán, C. Castillo-Moreno, J. M. Epstein, N. Yunger Halpern, and S. Gasparinetti, Thermally driven quantum refrigerator autonomously resets a superconducting qubit, Nat. Phys.21, 318 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Auffèves, Quantum Technologies Need a Quantum Energy Initiative, PRX Quantum3, 020101 (2022)

    A. Auffèves, Quantum Technologies Need a Quantum Energy Initiative, PRX Quantum3, 020101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Pusz and S

    W. Pusz and S. L. Woronowicz, Passive states and KMS states for general quantum systems, Communications in Mathematical Physics58, 273 (1978)

    work page 1978

  15. [15]

    Talkner, E

    P. Talkner, E. Lutz, and P. Hänggi, Fluctuation theorems: Work is not an observable, Phys. Rev. E75, 050102 (2007)

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    Bäumer, M

    E. Bäumer, M. Lostaglio, M. Perarnau-Llobet, and R. Sampaio, Fluctuating work in coherent quantum systems: Proposals and limitations, inThermodynamics in the Quantum Regime(Springer International Publishing, 2018) p. 275–300

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Roßnagel, O

    J. Roßnagel, O. Abah, F. Schmidt-Kaler, K. Singer, and E. Lutz, Nanoscale Heat Engine Beyond the Carnot Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 030602 (2014)

    work page 2014

  18. [18]

    N. H. Ying Ng, M. P. Woods, and S. Wehner, Surpassing the Carnot efficiency by extracting imperfect work, New Journal of Physics19, 113005 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    M. P. Woods, N. H. Y. Ng, and S. Wehner, The maximum efficiency of nano heat engines depends on more than temperature, Quantum3, 177 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Lostaglio, Certifying Quantum Signatures in Thermodynamics and Metrology via Contextuality of Quantum Linear Response, Phys

    M. Lostaglio, Certifying Quantum Signatures in Thermodynamics and Metrology via Contextuality of Quantum Linear Response, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 230603 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Lostaglio, Quantum Fluctuation Theorems, Contextuality, and Work Quasiprobabilities, Phys

    M. Lostaglio, Quantum Fluctuation Theorems, Contextuality, and Work Quasiprobabilities, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 040602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    N. E. Comar, D. Cius, L. F. Santos, R. Wagner, and B. Amaral, Contextuality in Anomalous Heat Flow, PRX Quantum6, 030359 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Kosloff and A

    R. Kosloff and A. Levy, Quantum Heat Engines and Refrigerators: Continuous Devices, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry65, 365 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Kosloff and Y

    R. Kosloff and Y. Rezek, The Quantum Harmonic Otto Cycle, Entropy19, 136 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Kosloff and T

    R. Kosloff and T. Feldmann, Discrete four-stroke quantum heat engine exploring the origin of friction, Phys. Rev. E65, 055102 (2002)

    work page 2002

  26. [26]

    Feldmann and R

    T. Feldmann and R. Kosloff, Quantum lubrication: Suppression of friction in a first-principles four-stroke heat engine, Phys. Rev. E73, 025107 (2006)

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Feldmann, E

    T. Feldmann, E. Geva, R. Kosloff, and P. Salamon, Heat enginesinfinitetimegovernedbymasterequations,Am. J. Phys.64, 485 (1996)

    work page 1996

  28. [28]

    Feldmann and R

    T. Feldmann and R. Kosloff, Quantum four-stroke heat engine: Thermodynamic observables in a model with intrinsic friction, Phys. Rev. E68, 016101 (2003)

    work page 2003

  29. [29]

    F. L. Curzon and B. Ahlborn, Efficiency of a Carnot engine at maximum power output, American Journal of Physics43, 22–24 (1975)

    work page 1975

  30. [30]

    Van den Broeck, Thermodynamic Efficiency at Maximum Power, Phys

    C. Van den Broeck, Thermodynamic Efficiency at Maximum Power, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 190602 (2005)

    work page 2005

  31. [31]

    Schmiedl and U

    T. Schmiedl and U. Seifert, Efficiency at maximum power: An analytically solvable model for stochastic heat engines, EPL (Europhysics Letters)81, 20003 (2007)

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    Esposito, R

    M. Esposito, R. Kawai, K. Lindenberg, and C. Van den Broeck, Efficiency at maximum power of low-dissipation carnot engines, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 150603 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    Kato, On the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan5, 435–439 (1950)

    T. Kato, On the adiabatic theorem of quantum mechanics, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan5, 435–439 (1950)

    work page 1950

  34. [34]

    Wang and M

    Z.-Y. Wang and M. B. Plenio, Necessary and sufficient condition for quantum adiabatic evolution by unitary control fields, Phys. Rev. A93, 052107 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Albash and D

    T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Adiabatic quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    M. V. Berry, Transitionless quantum driving, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical42, 365303 (2009)

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    D. J. Griffiths,Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005)

    work page 2005

  38. [38]

    Rezek, Reflections on Friction in Quantum Mechanics, Entropy12, 1885 (2010)

    Y. Rezek, Reflections on Friction in Quantum Mechanics, Entropy12, 1885 (2010)

    work page 2010

  39. [39]

    del Campo, A

    A. del Campo, A. Chenu, S. Deng, and H. Wu, Friction-free quantum machines, inThermodynamics in the Quantum Regime: Fundamental Aspects and New Directions, edited by F. Binder, L. A. Correa, C. Gogolin, J. Anders, and G. Adesso (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018) pp. 127–148

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Weber, S

    R. Weber, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, The Thermodynamic Costs of Pure Dephasing in Quantum Heat Engines: Quasistatic Efficiency at Finite Power (2023), arXiv:2312.05375 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    P. A. Camati, J. F. G. Santos, and R. M. Serra, Coherence effects in the performance of the quantum Otto heat engine, Phys. Rev. A99, 062103 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Rezek, P

    Y. Rezek, P. Salamon, K. H. Hoffmann, and R. Kosloff, The quantum refrigerator: The quest for absolute zero, 30 EPL (Europhysics Letters)85, 30008 (2009)

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    del Campo, Shortcuts to Adiabaticity by Counterdiabatic Driving, Phys

    A. del Campo, Shortcuts to Adiabaticity by Counterdiabatic Driving, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 100502 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Alipour, A

    S. Alipour, A. Chenu, A. T. Rezakhani, and A. d. Campo, Shortcuts to Adiabaticity in Driven Open Quantum Systems: Balanced Gain and Loss and Non- Markovian Evolution, Quantum4, 336 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Takahashi and A

    K. Takahashi and A. del Campo, Shortcuts to Adiabaticity in Krylov Space, Phys. Rev. X14, 011032 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Guéry-Odelin, A

    D. Guéry-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Torrontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, and J. G. Muga, Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 045001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    A.delCampo, J.Goold,andM.Paternostro,Morebang for your buck: Super-adiabatic quantum engines, Sci Rep4, 6208 (2014)

    work page 2014

  48. [48]

    M. Beau, J. Jaramillo, and A. Del Campo, Scaling- Up Quantum Heat Engines Efficiently via Shortcuts to Adiabaticity, Entropy18, 168 (2016)

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    W. Hou, W. Yao, X. Zhao, K. Rehan, Y. Li, Y. Li, E. Lutz, Y. Lin, and J. Du, Combining energy efficiency and quantum advantage in cyclic machines, Nature Communications16, 5318 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    Shende, M

    K. Shende, M. Kandpal, Arvind, and K. Dorai, Experimental investigation of a quantum otto heat engine with shortcuts to adiabaticity implemented using counter-adiabatic driving, Phys. Rev. E107, 064127 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    S. Deng, A. Chenu, P. Diao, F. Li, S. Yu, I. Coulamy, A. del Campo, and H. Wu, Superadiabatic quantum friction suppression in finite-time thermodynamics, Science Advances4, eaar5909 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    B.MisraandE.C.G.Sudarshan,TheZeno’sparadoxin quantum theory, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.)18, 756 (1977)

    work page 1977

  53. [53]

    Greenfield, A

    S. Greenfield, A. Kamal, J. Dressel, and E. Levenson- Falk, A unified picture for quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects (2025), arXiv:2506.12679 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Facchi and S

    P. Facchi and S. Pascazio, Quantum Zeno dynamics: mathematical and physical aspects, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 493001 (2008)

    work page 2008

  55. [55]

    von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, 2nd ed., Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol

    J. von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, 2nd ed., Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 38 (Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1932) pp. IX, 262, originally published as Volume 38 of Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, in 1932

    work page 1932

  56. [56]

    Facchi and S

    P. Facchi and S. Pascazio, Quantum Zeno Subspaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 080401 (2002)

    work page 2002

  57. [57]

    Facchi, V

    P. Facchi, V. Gorini, G. Marmo, S. Pascazio, and E.Sudarshan,QuantumZenodynamics,PhysicsLetters A275, 12–19 (2000)

    work page 2000

  58. [58]

    Hacohen-Gourgy, L

    S. Hacohen-Gourgy, L. P. García-Pintos, L. S. Martin, J. Dressel, and I. Siddiqi, Incoherent Qubit Control Using the Quantum Zeno Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 020505 (2018)

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    N. Erez, Y. Aharonov, B. Reznik, and L. Vaidman, Correcting quantum errors with the Zeno effect, Phys. Rev. A69, 062315 (2004)

    work page 2004

  60. [60]

    Cramer, N

    J. Cramer, N. Kalb, M. A. Rol, B. Hensen, M. S. Blok, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, R. Hanson, and T. H. Taminiau, Repeated quantum error correction on a continuously encoded qubit by real-time feedback, Nat Commun7, 11526 (2016)

    work page 2016

  61. [61]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, S. J. Evered, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, G. Baranes, A. Gu, T. Manovitz, M. Xu, M. Kalinowski, S. Majidy, C. Kokail, N. Maskara, E. C. Trapp, L. M. Stewart, S. Hollerith, H. Zhou, M. J. Gullans, S. F. Yelin, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, M. Cain, and M. D. Lukin, A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architecture for universal quantum co...

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    G. A. Paz-Silva, A. T. Rezakhani, J. M. Dominy, and D. A. Lidar, Zeno Effect for Quantum Computation and Control, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 080501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  63. [63]

    Berwald, N

    J. Berwald, N. Chancellor, and R. Dridi, Grover Speedup from Many Forms of the Zeno Effect, Quantum 8, 1532 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Berwald, N

    J. Berwald, N. Chancellor, and R. Dridi, Zeno-effect computation: Opportunities and challenges, Phys. Rev. A111, 042623 (2025)

    work page 2025

  65. [65]

    Zhang, A

    Y. Zhang, A. Sarlette, P. Lewalle, T. Karmakar, and K. B. Whaley, Optimal schedule of multi-channel quantum Zeno dragging with application to solving the k-SAT problem (2025), arXiv:2507.16128 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Lewalle, L

    P. Lewalle, L. S. Martin, E. Flurin, S. Zhang, E. Blumenthal, S. Hacohen-Gourgy, D. Burgarth, and K. B. Whaley, A Multi-Qubit Quantum Gate Using the Zeno Effect, Quantum7, 1100 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [67]

    Hacohen-Gourgy and L

    S. Hacohen-Gourgy and L. S. Martin, Continuous measurements for control of superconducting quantum circuits, Advances in Physics: X5, 1813626 (2020)

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    K. R. Dizaji, A. Haqq, A. B. Magann, and C. Arenz, Hamiltonian simulation in Zeno subspaces (2024), arXiv:2405.13589 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Lewalle, Y

    P. Lewalle, Y. Zhang, and K. B. Whaley, Optimal Zeno Dragging for Quantum Control: A Shortcut to Zeno with Action-Based Scheduling Optimization, PRX Quantum5, 020366 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Burgarth, P

    D. Burgarth, P. Facchi, H. Nakazato, S. Pascazio, and K. Yuasa, Generalized Adiabatic Theorem and Strong- Coupling Limits, Quantum3, 152 (2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Burgarth, P

    D. Burgarth, P. Facchi, G. Gramegna, and K. Yuasa, One bound to rule them all: from Adiabatic to Zeno, Quantum6, 737 (2022)

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    L. S. Schulman, Continuous and pulsed observations in the quantum Zeno effect, Phys. Rev. A57, 1509 (1998)

    work page 1998

  73. [73]

    Facchi, H

    P. Facchi, H. Nakazato, and S. Pascazio, From the Quantum Zeno to the Inverse Quantum Zeno Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 2699 (2001)

    work page 2001

  74. [74]

    Facchi and M

    P. Facchi and M. Ligabò, Quantum Zeno effect and dynamics, Journal of Mathematical Physics51, 022103 (2010)

    work page 2010

  75. [75]

    O. A. D. Molitor and G. T. Landi, Stroboscopic two- stroke quantum heat engines, Phys. Rev. A102, 042217 (2020)

    work page 2020

  76. [76]

    Zheng, S

    Y. Zheng, S. Campbell, G. De Chiara, and D. Poletti, Cost of counterdiabatic driving and work output, Phys. Rev. A94, 042132 (2016)

    work page 2016

  77. [77]

    Rivas and S

    A. Rivas and S. F. Huelga,Open Quantum Systems: An Introduction(Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012)

    work page 2012

  78. [78]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The Theory of Open Quantum Systems(Oxford University PressOxford, 2002)

    work page 2002

  79. [79]

    Fundamental energy cost for quantum measurement

    K. Abdelkhalek, Y. Nakata, and D. Reeb, Fundamental energy cost for quantum measurement (2018), 31 arXiv:1609.06981 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    G. T. Landi and M. Paternostro, Irreversible entropy production: From classical to quantum, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035008 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.