REVIEW
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Randomly Assigned First Differences?
read the original abstract
We consider a first-difference regression of an outcome evolution $\Delta Y$ on a treatment evolution $\Delta D$. If the treatment effect changes over time, the regression residual is a function of the period-one treatment $D_{1}$. Then, researchers should test if $\Delta D$ and $D_{1}$ are correlated: if they are, the regression may suffer from an omitted variable bias. To solve it, researchers may control for $E(\Delta D|D_{1})$. We revisit Acemoglu et al (2016), who study the effect of imports from China on US employment. $\Delta D$ and $D_{1}$ are correlated. $\Delta D$'s coefficient is less negative when controlling for $E(\Delta D|D_{1})$.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.