Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.03208 v8 pith:VV3CIZIN submitted 2024-11-05 econ.EM

Randomly Assigned First Differences?

classification econ.EM
keywords deltaregressiontreatmentcorrelatedeffectevolutionresearchersacemoglu
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider a first-difference regression of an outcome evolution $\Delta Y$ on a treatment evolution $\Delta D$. If the treatment effect changes over time, the regression residual is a function of the period-one treatment $D_{1}$. Then, researchers should test if $\Delta D$ and $D_{1}$ are correlated: if they are, the regression may suffer from an omitted variable bias. To solve it, researchers may control for $E(\Delta D|D_{1})$. We revisit Acemoglu et al (2016), who study the effect of imports from China on US employment. $\Delta D$ and $D_{1}$ are correlated. $\Delta D$'s coefficient is less negative when controlling for $E(\Delta D|D_{1})$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.